Liberate women! Put Mitt Romney in a ...

Liberate women! Put Mitt Romney in a binder!

Posted in the Farmington Forum

First Prev
of 13
Next Last

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#1 Oct 19, 2012
:o
factologist

Huntsville, AL

#2 Oct 19, 2012
LucindaW wrote:
:o
President Mitt will take women out of the BINDER and put'em into a BIND.
Soup line

Pine Knot, KY

#3 Oct 19, 2012
factologist wrote:
<quoted text>President Mitt will take women out of the BINDER and put'em into a BIND.
Obama has women in a bind, More women are living in poverty under Obama then anytime in history.
factologist

Huntsville, AL

#4 Oct 19, 2012
Soup line wrote:
<quoted text>Obama has women in a bind, More women are living in poverty under Obama then anytime in history.
Yeah, and you can thank the Bush economy for that. You know, the same as Romney wants to take us back to. Low pay and pregnant, that's the Romney plan for women.
Buut

Muscle Shoals, AL

#5 Oct 19, 2012
factologist wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah, and you can thank the Bush economy for that. You know, the same as Romney wants to take us back to. Low pay and pregnant, that's the Romney plan for women.
...but Bush isn't running for office! It has been 8 years since Bush ran for the Presidency.....let it go....
factologist

Huntsville, AL

#6 Oct 19, 2012
Buut wrote:
<quoted text>
...but Bush isn't running for office! It has been 8 years since Bush ran for the Presidency.....let it go....
NEVER! And, as long as I am alive, neither will my grandchildren. Hopefully, it will be in Middle and High School history books so it will be passed on from generation to generation. We should never forget what caused The Great Depression or The Great Recession nor the role the respective presidential administrations had in them. We should never allow another administration to throw our economy under the bus the way Hoover and Bush did. NEVER! We voters need to recognize that pig and not allow it to gain office. And that includes Mitt Romney.
So you damn betcha', I won't forget. I know what that pig looks like and Romney fits the description.
VoteObama

Santa Fe, NM

#7 Oct 19, 2012
Buut wrote:
<quoted text>
...but Bush isn't running for office! It has been 8 years since Bush ran for the Presidency.....let it go....
No, but his clone is. Vote Obama because it is not only the RIGHT choice, it is the MORAL choice.

“leaning left”

Since: Mar 09

local

#8 Oct 19, 2012
Buut wrote:
<quoted text>
...but Bush isn't running for office! It has been 8 years since Bush ran for the Presidency.....let it go....
Why don't you tell the loved ones of the 4488 dead, killed in the Bush/Cheney War and the countless wounded to let it go?

An illegal invasion of Iraq based on faulty intel {lies}.

The CBO estimated that of the $2.4 trillion long-term price tag for the war, about $1.9 trillion of that would be spent on Iraq, or $6,300 per U.S. citizen. The primary drivers of the debt predate Barack Obama. The post-9/11 wars and security build-up, the Bush tax cuts, and the 2001 and 2008 recessions simply began before Obama became president. You can blame him for extending the Bush tax cuts till 2012, or for the stimulus (though the stimulus would never have happened without the 2008 financial crisis), Bush and his cronies are to blame. I will never let it go....
hahah

Muscle Shoals, AL

#9 Oct 20, 2012
YOUR left-leanning radicals are JUST TOO SILLY AND HILARIOIUS to take even for BUILDING a nation than TEARING IT DOWN>

Just your admision to BLAMING BUSH, BLAMING BUSH......tells lots of people the NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY is full of wackos and lunnies, nut-jobs.

MY only greatest concern is for the ROMNEY WHITE HOUSE TO TAKE SHAPE in 2013 - what the radical whack-jobs and main-stream media elites will be planning and doing to continue tearing down the Government and tearing down this down.

GOD BE WITH ROMNEY as he is going need it and certainly the REST of America will be praying for him - that is the 37% percent MINUS YOU 10% ELTISTS scum-bags that poison the well for ALL OF US!

If living is the US is so bad in 2013, move to EUROPE -they could use YOUR help there!!!!!!

“leaning left”

Since: Mar 09

local

#10 Oct 20, 2012
hahah wrote:
YOUR left-leanning radicals are JUST TOO SILLY AND HILARIOIUS to take even for BUILDING a nation than TEARING IT DOWN>
Just your admision to BLAMING BUSH, BLAMING BUSH......tells lots of people the NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY is full of wackos and lunnies, nut-jobs.
MY only greatest concern is for the ROMNEY WHITE HOUSE TO TAKE SHAPE in 2013 - what the radical whack-jobs and main-stream media elites will be planning and doing to continue tearing down the Government and tearing down this down.
GOD BE WITH ROMNEY as he is going need it and certainly the REST of America will be praying for him - that is the 37% percent MINUS YOU 10% ELTISTS scum-bags that poison the well for ALL OF US!
If living is the US is so bad in 2013, move to EUROPE -they could use YOUR help there!!!!!!
You are an uneducated, ignorant, asinine fool. You can't spell or put a coherent sentence together. You and your ilk scare the Hell out of me.

I really don't think God has a dog in this race, and praying for Romney makes you sound as truly stupid as you are.

If being a bit smarter than you makes me an elitist then I will wear that moniker proudly.

Spin as you will, Bush is responsible. Facts man facts.....
lolol

Albuquerque, NM

#11 Oct 21, 2012
VoteObama wrote:
<quoted text>
No, but his clone is. Vote Obama because it is not only the RIGHT choice, it is the MORAL choice.
.
snort .. obama moral .. lololol good one

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#12 Oct 21, 2012
hahah wrote:
YOUR left-leanning radicals are JUST TOO SILLY AND HILARIOIUS to take even for BUILDING a nation than TEARING IT DOWN>
Just your admision to BLAMING BUSH, BLAMING BUSH......tells lots of people the NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY is full of wackos and lunnies, nut-jobs.
MY only greatest concern is for the ROMNEY WHITE HOUSE TO TAKE SHAPE in 2013 - what the radical whack-jobs and main-stream media elites will be planning and doing to continue tearing down the Government and tearing down this down.
GOD BE WITH ROMNEY as he is going need it and certainly the REST of America will be praying for him - that is the 37% percent MINUS YOU 10% ELTISTS scum-bags that poison the well for ALL OF US!
If living is the US is so bad in 2013, move to EUROPE -they could use YOUR help there!!!!!!
Pay no attention to the lying man behind the curtain....look at his record. Mitt Romney's main justification for running for president is his experience with Bain Capital, not his record as governor of Massachusetts and here's why...

State spending rose by 22% on Romney's watch, nearly double the rate of inflation.

During his tenure, the state ranked 47th among the 50 states in job creation.

Job growth was at 0.9 percent, far behind the national average of over 5 percent. Massachusetts lost 14% of its manufacturing jobs.

State employment grew twice as fast as the private sector under Mitt's guidance.

Unlike his grandiose claims as a presidential candidate, as govenor, he couldn't reduce Massachusetts' multi-billion dollar budget deficit without NEW revenue. He increased corporate taxes and state fees by $750 million a year, outstripping his tax cuts.

Paradoxically, the Romney campaign blames the recession on President Obama, but when pressed about Romney's less than stellar preformance as governor says, "Romney deserves some slack because the economy was really bad when he came into office." LOL
De ja v

Muscle Shoals, AL

#13 Oct 21, 2012
Wrathbone wrote:
<quoted text>
Pay no attention to the lying man behind the curtain....look at his record. Mitt Romney's main justification for running for president is his experience with Bain Capital, not his record as governor of Massachusetts and here's why...
State spending rose by 22% on Romney's watch, nearly double the rate of inflation.
During his tenure, the state ranked 47th among the 50 states in job creation.
Job growth was at 0.9 percent, far behind the national average of over 5 percent. Massachusetts lost 14% of its manufacturing jobs.
State employment grew twice as fast as the private sector under Mitt's guidance.
Unlike his grandiose claims as a presidential candidate, as govenor, he couldn't reduce Massachusetts' multi-billion dollar budget deficit without NEW revenue. He increased corporate taxes and state fees by $750 million a year, outstripping his tax cuts.
Paradoxically, the Romney campaign blames the recession on President Obama, but when pressed about Romney's less than stellar preformance as governor says, "Romney deserves some slack because the economy was really bad when he came into office." LOL
hmmm, what qualifed -0- coming into office and what qualifies him even now?....because he's black?

you may as wil replace Romney with Obama to the US:

Romney's less than stellar preformance as governor says, "Romney deserves some slack because the economy was really bad when he came into office."

If your accusations to Romney are relevant to Romney than SHOULD the identical events under Obama be just as applicable?

LOL! This what I have to blink and shack my head to in reading what you wacko-left-wing nut jobs (NO DISRESPECT TO True Liberal Democrats).
teabagging imbeciles

Santa Fe, NM

#14 Oct 21, 2012
De ja v wrote:
<quoted text>
hmmm, what qualifed -0- coming into office and what qualifies him even now?....because he's black?
you may as wil replace Romney with Obama to the US:
Romney's less than stellar preformance as governor says, "Romney deserves some slack because the economy was really bad when he came into office."
If your accusations to Romney are relevant to Romney than SHOULD the identical events under Obama be just as applicable?
LOL! This what I have to blink and shack my head to in reading what you wacko-left-wing nut jobs (NO DISRESPECT TO True Liberal Democrats).
Are you just naturally stupid or do you have to work at it?

Romney couldn't hold a candle to Obama's accomplishments since he took office, and this despite the recession.

Obama's tenures as an Illinois senator and a Congressional senator...not to mention his level of education, intelligence and HONESTY, more than qualifies him for the office of President. Romney, on the other hand, has nothing to offer the American people but lies, obfuscation and a legacy of repugnant business practices associated with Bain Capital.
factologist

Huntsville, AL

#15 Oct 21, 2012
teabagging imbeciles wrote:
<quoted text>
Romney,... has nothing to offer the American people but lies, obfuscation and a legacy of repugnant business practices associated with Bain Capital.
Now don't take me wrong for saying this, but a Romney supporter will say a similar thing about Obama. This fact begs the question, "in the eyes of the voters, is either candidate capable of handling the job"? And what does "handle" mean anyway. The fact is that neither candidate can fix the stalemate of the congress. Obama's obstacle being the House and Romney's, the Senate. This means neither Obama nor Romney will be able to get through their programs. Either man means four more years of gridlock. Either man means four more years of a divided nation. This means neither man can "handle" the job. IMO!
De ja v

Muscle Shoals, AL

#16 Oct 21, 2012
teabagging imbeciles wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you just naturally stupid or do you have to work at it?
Romney couldn't hold a candle to Obama's accomplishments since he took office, and this despite the recession.
Obama's tenures as an Illinois senator and a Congressional senator...not to mention his level of education, intelligence and HONESTY, more than qualifies him for the office of President. Romney, on the other hand, has nothing to offer the American people but lies, obfuscation and a legacy of repugnant business practices associated with Bain Capital.
HOW do you make this 'stuff' up> Do you do this standing on top of you head? It must suck to YOU in Sante Fe! Come join us and the rest of the world......
De ja v

Muscle Shoals, AL

#17 Oct 21, 2012
factologist wrote:
<quoted text>Now don't take me wrong for saying this, but a Romney supporter will say a similar thing about Obama. This fact begs the question, "in the eyes of the voters, is either candidate capable of handling the job"? And what does "handle" mean anyway. The fact is that neither candidate can fix the stalemate of the congress. Obama's obstacle being the House and Romney's, the Senate. This means neither Obama nor Romney will be able to get through their programs. Either man means four more years of gridlock. Either man means four more years of a divided nation. This means neither man can "handle" the job. IMO!
which is WHY the popular vote will be won by one, and the electoral college will be won by the other!

Year 2000 all over again but this time with consequences....remember the LA riots - after the OJ Simpson verdict?

I apologize for being a pessimist but after 4 years of 'racism''counter'racism', this country is about to explode.

“leaning left”

Since: Mar 09

local

#18 Oct 21, 2012
De ja v wrote:
<quoted text>
which is WHY the popular vote will be won by one, and the electoral college will be won by the other!
Year 2000 all over again but this time with consequences....remember the LA riots - after the OJ Simpson verdict?
I apologize for being a pessimist but after 4 years of 'racism''counter'racism', this country is about to explode.
Are you implying there were not consequences resulting from the stolen 2000 election? Just think maybe the Gore administration would have seen the warning signs and prevented 9/11. Consequently we would not have invaded Iraq and not be bogged down in Afghanistan...Countless lives saved. Countless injuries prevented. Think about the trillions of dollars poured down the rat hole.

Elections always have consequences. We will never recover from the damage done by Baby Bush. To put Romney in office will undo any progress we have [albeit slow] gained. The economy is slowly recovering and if there was any co-operation from congress we could be further along on the road to recovery. It is imperative
that Obama is re-elected. The middle class has to have a fair shake. Romney is incapable of relating to average working people.
factologist

Huntsville, AL

#19 Oct 21, 2012
De ja v wrote:
<quoted text>
which is WHY the popular vote will be won by one, and the electoral college will be won by the other!
It's certainly possible.
Year 2000 all over again but this time with consequences....remember the LA riots - after the OJ Simpson verdict?
Spoken like an insecure White Man.
I apologize for being a pessimist but after 4 years of 'racism''counter'racism', this country is about to explode.
You should apologize for being a damn racist. It's crap like you espouse that is the cause of some of the division we have in this country.
teabagging imbeciles

Santa Fe, NM

#20 Oct 21, 2012
De ja v wrote:
<quoted text>
HOW do you make this 'stuff' up> Do you do this standing on top of you head? It must suck to YOU in Sante Fe! Come join us and the rest of the world......
Nah..nothing that gymnastic. I do what modern technology has made available to all of us through the auspices of a PC...I do the research. When are you going to start?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 13
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Farmington Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Man accused of throwing ax at couple and their ... 18 hr aztec1 3
Aztec looks to revitalize the historic downtown Nov 5 Hmmmm 1
News City scores 50 out of 100 for LGBTQ friendly po... Nov 4 123ABC 1
Cody Foutz (Feb '07) Nov 3 Do dodo 17
Are you're teens drinking lean?? Oct 27 three blocks 1
News Bus service begins Monday from Dulce to Farmington Oct 26 Wes 1
News Man stabbed in Wal-Mart parking lot (May '10) Oct '17 Hazel96 79

Farmington Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Farmington Mortgages