Who still takes global warming seriously?

Full story: Farmington Daily Times

Despite the recent discovery of the e-mails that resulted in "Climate Gate" and the fact this has been one of the coldest and harshest winters in many years, Gov.
Comments
30,141 - 30,160 of 30,825 Comments Last updated Jun 9, 2013
2 manygoats

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31424
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Consensus......ever heard of it?

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31425
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

They only object to the scientific science fiction cut and paste useless babble the sux repeats over and again.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31426
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

PHD wrote:
They only object to the scientific science fiction cut and paste useless babble the sux repeats over and again.
another vote of a peanut to the wingnut who says an official NASA website is just ... "science fiction".

LOL.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31427
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

2 manygoats wrote:
Consensus......ever heard of it?
http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus
Thanks so much! Never saw that one. Will be using it.

Tina Anne has been saying my OTHER 2 official NASA websites talking about global warming weren't the only ones out there...

by which she meant there HAD to be other official NASA websites that were saying global warming was a hoax...

ha ha, but of course she could never meet my challenge to actually produce them.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31428
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

tina's game is to fool people into thinking that even NASA is confused about climate change. The same with "fake facts" except with solar scientists or geologists are having fights with each other. Etcetera.

As once tina said they have their posts "specialized" in deliverance. ph'd is wild card at large hoping to be paid even if it involves being nice to tina, she figures.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31429
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

2

I'm a global warming supervillain, I produce new and stronger greenhouse gases for entertainment, emit greenhouse gas as a fact of life and enjoy using and producing energy and fuel.

Life is good, don't fear drought; CO2 is the answer. The more CO2 in the air, the less water plants need. Life is beautiful.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31430
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

SpaceBlues wrote:
tina's game is to fool people into thinking that even NASA is confused about climate change. The same with "fake facts" except with solar scientists or geologists are having fights with each other. Etcetera.
Can't remember if you saw our exchange.

She actually came back with 4 citations to Roy Spencers new paper...

If she had an ounce of honesty she would have been horrified when I proved that paper was rebutted by actual NASA climatologists and Roy Spencer's editor {to a Satellite publication by RSS} resigned in shame.

She ignored it and blithely continued as if she had found me a NASA citation.

She is not only a liar, but a liar of the highest degree.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31431
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Brian_G wrote:
I'm a global warming supervillain, I produce new and stronger greenhouse gases for entertainment, emit greenhouse gas as a fact of life and enjoy using and producing energy and fuel.
Life is good, don't fear drought; CO2 is the answer. The more CO2 in the air, the less water plants need. Life is beautiful.
Well that's a proven lie.

The greenhouse effect in the atmosphere does not work like a real greenhouse.

And in the atmosphere, warmer temperatures will evaporate the moisture in the ground and MORE water is needed.

In a green house, the moisture is self contained, so won't go anywhere.
2 manygoats

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31432
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Brian_G wrote:
I'm a global warming supervillain, I produce new and stronger greenhouse gases for entertainment, emit greenhouse gas as a fact of life and enjoy using and producing energy and fuel.
Life is good, don't fear drought; CO2 is the answer. The more CO2 in the air, the less water plants need. Life is beautiful.
Ignorance is bliss..........
http://climate.nasa.gov/key_indicators#co2
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31433
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
another vote of a peanut to the wingnut who says an official NASA website is just ... "science fiction".
LOL.
More words of wisdom from the scientific science fiction wallop10 AKA walloped again and again. If the NASA website isn't scientific science fiction than explain why they use terms like could be, prediction, forecast, opinion and many more fashionable buzz words. Another you really don't know vote for you.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31434
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
Can't remember if you saw our exchange.
She actually came back with 4 citations to Roy Spencers new paper...
If she had an ounce of honesty she would have been horrified when I proved that paper was rebutted by actual NASA climatologists and Roy Spencer's editor {to a Satellite publication by RSS} resigned in shame.
She ignored it and blithely continued as if she had found me a NASA citation.
She is not only a liar, but a liar of the highest degree.
Yes, I remember the sequence and it was similar to her previous posts before you joined the forum. She repeats the same with new embelishments like "it was 2008 when AGW was disproven" contradicting previous claim of 2007 or 2009.

Her neurons must be twisted with so many lies.
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31435
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Brian_G wrote:
I'm a global warming supervillain, I produce new and stronger greenhouse gases for entertainment, emit greenhouse gas as a fact of life and enjoy using and producing energy and fuel.
Life is good, don't fear drought; CO2 is the answer. The more CO2 in the air, the less water plants need. Life is beautiful.
"I produce new and stronger greenhouse gases for entertainment"-sitting around putting a fart show isn't entertainment to most people.

"don't fear drought"-you must not have any or you've never gardened or farmed.

"The more CO2 in the air, the less water plants need."-dis-proven a number of times.

"Life is beautiful." Yes, it is, but how would you know? You're too busy polluting.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31436
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

1

Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well that's a proven lie.
The greenhouse effect in the atmosphere does not work like a real greenhouse.
And in the atmosphere, warmer temperatures will evaporate the moisture in the ground and MORE water is needed.
In a green house, the moisture is self contained, so won't go anywhere.
So where does the water go when it evaporates? Most if not all of your post is proven scientific science fiction. Well look at that you are one and the same as you call others out there expressing their opinion. Are you sure youíre not posting from that third world dictatorship country?

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31437
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
RealScience in particular is well known as the #1 climatology website. They have the top climatolotists participating there, plus I have seen top skeptic interacting too.
Per Wikipedia:
Skeptical Science has become a well-known resource for people seeking to understand or debate climate change, and has been praised for its straightforwardness.[11] Marine biologist Ove Hoegh-Guldberg has described it as "the most prominent knowledge-based website dealing with climate change in the world",[12] and The Washington Post has praised it as the "most prominent and detailed" website to counter arguments by global warming skeptics.[13] In September 2011, the site won the 2011 Eureka Prize from the Australian Museum in the category of Advancement of Climate Change Knowledge.[14]
So no surprises the Queen of lying right wing sites would have none of this.
<quoted text>
If that were true, NASA wouldn't have been on record officially as supporting global warming under the Bush administration.
Caught you lying again, didn't I.
<quoted text>
No. All the websites that have NASA on them and show their official logo on the topic of global warming are strongly in favor of global warming.
Which means you told a BIG lie when you claimed recently:
TINA ANNE: The fact that you still believe in AGW after all this time really is a peek into your mind. After all, AGW stopped being a theory in 2008.
<quoted text>
You took that out of context. The running off, meant you didn't honestly respond to that.
Yes, you have now responded -- but you did it with MORE lies about it.
I challenged you to find me a site with an official NASA logo that took your position.
and all you can do is try and smoke up the room with your lies.
Realscience and Skepticalscience are well known for being loaded with propaganda and not science. And as far as awards, many works of fiction win awards. The real judge is what they produce and what they have produced is propaganda, pure and simple. The reason you find yourself defending them and the NASA web sites is that the limited amount of source material available to you means that you cannot find other sources to rely on. That you have to resort to claiming I am lying instead of finding additional proof to back up your claims.

OF course you have little choice. That so many of the places you once could rely on have now changed thier stance and are now disagree with man being the primary motivator on climate change or have been discredited.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31438
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

gcaveman1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, honey, you try so hard, but your spelling alone makes you seem like an ignoramus that no one should pay attention to.
Then there's your lack of logic and your endless lies; but that's for another post.
So you are trying to say that I am like you. That like you that I have nothing but lies and lack logic.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31439
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

2

SpaceBlues wrote:
tina's game is to fool people into thinking that even NASA is confused about climate change. The same with "fake facts" except with solar scientists or geologists are having fights with each other. Etcetera.
As once tina said they have their posts "specialized" in deliverance. ph'd is wild card at large hoping to be paid even if it involves being nice to tina, she figures.
Actually it is to just point out how many actual researcher disagree with the party line, that some of what is posted is nothing more than spin.

But I will hold on to the links to those sites. After all, in a couple of decades from now when NASA is claiming that man is the cause of a global ice age I will haul them out to beat someone just like you with as proof. Just as I love to haul out the fact that NAS once supported the claim that man was going to cause an ice age back in the seventies.

I find history is full of tools for handling people like you.
Seriously

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31440
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

2 manygoats wrote:
<quoted text>
Ignorance is bliss..........
http://climate.nasa.gov/key_indicators#co2
Seriously
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31441
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

1

There you have again the wallop10 get walloped again and again.
Seriously

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31442
Feb 5, 2013
 
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31443
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Do tell all.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

5 Users are viewing the Farmington Forum right now

Search the Farmington Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Employees screwed by CCEA 7 hr CCSD Bad Teachers 8
Skandera: CCSD School District Canít Split (Jun '12) 11 hr Ewa NEA Krackpot 35
Debate: Immigrants & K-12 - Farmington, NM (Dec '11) Tue Skeeter 37
The most spectacular UFO sighting in U.S. histo... (May '10) Jul 21 Investigator 8
DWI victims relive painful memories to prevent ... (Dec '08) Jul 21 Patty 17
Barack Obama COUNTDOWN Clock 1000 days left & c... Jul 20 Round and round where it 148
City attorneys challenge claims of discriminati... Jul 20 XandO 5
•••
•••
•••
•••

Farmington Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Farmington People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Farmington News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Farmington
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••