Matt Patrick Desecration of JFK Postcard With Wind Turbines
Posted in the Falmouth Forum
#1 Mar 7, 2014
Matthew Patrick Wind Turbine Candidate For Massachusetts State Senate Desecration of JFK Postcard
"But there was one holdout. Matthew Patrick, a Democratic state representative from Falmouth, refused to toe the line. Growing up, Patrick had idolized the slain Robert F. Kennedy. But when the Kennedy family opposed the wind-farm proposal, Patrick found a postcard of John F. Kennedy sailing his yacht in Nantucket Sound and sketched in an array of wind turbines on the saltwater horizon."
#2 Mar 10, 2014
Would you vote for a guy whose relatives call him a RAT ???
#3 Mar 10, 2014
Former State Rep Matthew Patrick is a wind turbine advocate
Do the voters of Massachusetts want former Mass State Rep Matt Patrick to go to the Massachusetts Senate ? No No & No
President John F. Kennedy founded the Peace Corps. Former Massachusetts State Rep Matt Patrick was a Peace Corps volunteer in Ghana from 1977 to 1979. Patrick came back to draw wind turbines on a picture of the former murdered president. A slap in the face of the Kennedy family because they opposed the wind turbines. Patrick kept the defaced post card on a wall in his office.
Matt Patrick took $500 from Cape Wind ! What exactly do you get for five hundred bucks ? The former Falmouth representative has turned Falmouth into a third world country. Falmouth is ground zero for poorly sited wind turbines in the United States .Falmouth has major issues of finances and wind turbine sickness.
Falmouth has been suffering because of Matt Patrick and his passion for commercial megawatt wind turbines
Former State Representative Matt Patrick (D) Falmouth voted to kill the bill to limit Former Speaker of the House of Representatives Thomas Finneran (D). Tom Finneran later pleaded guilty to a federal obstruction of justice charge.
Former State Rep Matt Patrick (D) Falmouth made a bad choice backing the convicted former convicted Speaker Tom Finneran. Bill Finneran pleaded guilty in US District Court to providing false testimony in a redistricting lawsuit. Is this someone that you want to represent you ?
How's this one for a hearty mud-Winter guffaw: State Representative Matthew Patrick of Falmouth voted to kill the eight-year term limit on the speaker of the House. Asked his opinion of the view that a vote to further consolidate Speaker Thomas Finneran's power was a bid to protect perks and choice committee assignments, Patrick was quoted by the Bourne Enterprise as responding: "That's insulting. A lot of legislators have a great deal of respect for the speaker...you're free to disagree"
#4 Apr 2, 2014
So what's the big deal? You never stop whining!
#5 Apr 5, 2014
BEWARE OF THE COMMONWEALTH BEARING GIFTS Apr 4, 2014 By TROY CLARKSON
If you went down to Naimesh and Akku Patel’s 7-11 on Main Street and bought a scratch ticket that resulted in winnings of $1.8 million, that would be great, right? What if, after scratching the ticket and expressing jubilation at your good fortune, you learned that there were strings attached to your windfall? What if those strings included inflicting pain and suffering on others? That might change things.
Next week, our Town Meeting Members, who take their position as our local elected legislature very seriously, will contemplate just such an enigma. The town has struck a deal with the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center (MA CEC) for a grant of up to $1.8 million to help mitigate some of the financial impacts of the court-ordered reduction in operational hours for the town’s wind turbines. Actually, the word “grant” is probably a misnomer. The Commonwealth is proposing to provide the town with some much needed funds to replenish its bleeding wind turbine reserve account in exchange for a seat at the decision-making table related to the fate of the turbines. Even the MA CEC’s own boss acknowledged the convolutionof this pending deal, which needs Town Meeting approval to move forward.“It’s somewhat complicated, but I think it represents an effort to strike a balance between helping to mitigate the financial impact the town is incurring on an ongoing basis,” said CEO Alicia Barton. On its face, given that admission of complexity, this deal should not be approved by our local legislators.
When government admits that something is complex, that means that it is downright confusing. The MA CEC’s Board of Directors just voted this bailout plan with strings attached within the last couple of weeks. To turn around and accept a deal that creates long-term obligations and liabilities for our community without a full vetting and public discussion on all of the financial, operational, and community impacts, particularly on an issue as volatile and injurious as this, would be imprudent and unwise. Our Town Meeting is neither.
I read the staff summary from the MA CEC on this convoluted deal, and I came out scratching my head at why the Town would agree to the terms. Pages of legal mumbo-jumbo reveal one very important point: the CEC’s waiver of the default provision, meaning the town’s responsibility to pay all of the money back if the turbines are decommissioned, is only valid if it comes by a court order. In simpler terms, the MA CEC is buying a guarantee that the town will not decommission the turbines on its own as a resolution to the ongoing public health issues. I’m not advocating that as a solution by any means, but taking that off the table in exchange for cash is tantamount to selling out the neighbors who have been impacted and closing the door on any community –based solution.
It is clear that the town is now losing money every year on these purported money-making machines. It is also clear that the town is facing an admittedly uphill battle in its court cases related to this ill-fated project. In fact, the CEC’s own report opines that,“the prospects are at best uncertain for an outcome that the town can manage financially.” It is becoming clear that the town is acting out of desperation and is willing to risk future financial ruin for short-term financial gain. That is never a good idea, and most assuredly is a terrible idea when the tradeoff includes the continued suffering of neighbors and taxpayers. Acceptance of this payoff from the MA CEC is, in its simplest terms, an excuse for the town to further delay a solution to this problem and foist the solution on a future Board. Our own Zoning Board declared these turbines a nuisance. Our Selectmen disagreed and are suing the ZBA. Adding the MA CEC to the table by selling them some decision making authority only muddles an already painfully complex conundrum
Add your comments below
|Falmouth Selectmen Will Not Appeal Turbine Deci...||Jul 11||Bob DeLeo||1|
|Falmouth Wind Turbine Litigation No Longer Slam...||Jul 1||Bob DeLeo||1|
|Megan Amsler Letter : Chair, Falmouth Energy Co...||Jul 1||Bob DeLeo||1|
|Pillars of Hercules (Jul '14)||Jun '17||anonymous||36|
|A former East Falmouth resident lived in Naples...||Jun '17||KAW||1|
|Windturbineism Falmouth Massachusetts||May '17||James DeVingo||1|
|Mass DEP Faulted Falmouth Torturous Wind Turbi...||Apr '17||Bob DeLeo||1|
Find what you want!
Search Falmouth Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC