Wind turbine opponents hire lawyer
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Boston.com.
#1 Sep 30, 2011
State officials new in 2006 about human annoyance noise !
Massachusetts officials were well aware of two distinct types of noise from commercial wind turbines in 2006. The types of noise were regulatory and human annoyance as reported in a wind study for Mattapoisett in 2006. The Vestas V 47 was given as an example.
The Massachusetts Technology Collaborative was the state's economic development agency for renewable energy. They were stuck with two Vestas V 82 turbines in a warehouse since 2004 at $3500.00 per month until they were installed in Falmouth with 2009 stimulus funds.The turbines were installed in 2010. The storage fees were a political embarrassment and the installation has 50 Falmouth residents up in arms over noise issues.
Here is the introduction to the MTC report:
Wind Power in Mattapoisett, Marion & Rochester:Siting Considerations for a Met Tower
and Fatal Flaws Analysis for a Wind Turbine
This report was funded by the Massachusetts Renewable Energy Trust’s Community Wind Collaborative on behalf of the towns of Mattapoisett, Marion & Rochester. It was prepared by Sally Wright and Lynn Di Tullio of the Renewable Energy Research Laboratory at the University of Massachusetts.
Noise considerations generally take two forms, state regulatory compliance and nuisance levels at nearby residences:
A. Regulatory compliance: Massachusetts state regulations do not allow a rise of 10 dB or greater above background levels at a property boundary (Massachusetts Air Pollution Control Regulations, Regulation 310 CMR 7.10). This sound level is very unlikely to be a reached incase at the sites we examined.
B. Human annoyance: Aside from Massachusetts regulations, residences must also be taken into consideration. Any eventual turbine would be sited such that it would be inaudible or minimally audible at the nearest residences. At this stage, to check for “fatal flaws,” a rule of thumb can be used: to minimize possible noise impacts,site wind turbines at least three times the blade tip height from residences. Distances from mixed-use areas may be somewhat shorter.
Noise will not be an issue for siting a wind turbine at the ORR High School or the Marion WWTP.
However, noise will be a primary siting constraint for the Brandt Island Road site because much of the parcel is less than 800 feet wide, and there are residences to the western side of the parcel. Consideration of the neighbors will be an important factor in siting a wind turbine on this parcel of town land. Given a specific size and make of turbine, suggested setbacks from residences can be proposed to eliminate or minimize the audibility at the neighbors. This would then inform the exact siting of a turbine. For example, a Vestas V47 on a 50-meter tower has a 241-foot blade-tip, and would need to be sited on
the far eastern side of the parcel, to be three times the blade-tip height (723 feet) from the neighbors on the western edge."
#2 Sep 30, 2011
How did the Town of Falmouth buy two commercial wind turbines built in 2004 with stimulus funds from 2010 ?
How in the world did the Town of Falmouth buy two turbines in 2010 valued at 5.2 million each through the MTC ? The Massachusetts Technology Collaborative bought these two turbines in 2004 and kept them in a warehouse at $3300.00 per month until the politically embarrassing turbines were sold to the Town ofÂ Falmouth through some Beacon Hill backdoor deal with our federal funds in 2010.
How did stimulus funds get used for two turbines that were so old they had NO warranty left on them ? These turbines were sold like a used car !
The federal prosecuters need to probe this whole deal !
> Notice of a Regional Project Waiver of Section 1605 (Buy American) of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) to the Town of Falmouth, MA
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
SUMMARY: The EPA is hereby granting a waiver of the Buy America requirements of ARRA Section 1605 under the authority of Section 1605(b)(2)[manufactured goods are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory quality] to the Town of Falmouth, Massachusetts for the purchase of a foreign manufactured wind turbine to be installed at its existing wastewater treatment facility
Friday, August 8, 2008
MTC puts mothballed wind turbines on auction block
As a result, the two turbines, originally purchased in 2005 for $5.2 million each went on sale last week
Since: Oct 11
#4 Oct 6, 2011
I live near one and it's mo big deal
Add your comments below
|Pillars of Hercules (Jul '14)||Jun 15||anonymous||36|
|A former East Falmouth resident lived in Naples...||Jun 1||KAW||1|
|Windturbineism Falmouth Massachusetts||May '17||James DeVingo||1|
|Mass DEP Faulted Falmouth Torturous Wind Turbi...||Apr '17||Bob DeLeo||1|
|Tae kwon do on Nantucket for kids?||Apr '17||jrsdc||1|
|Rutland, MA, most registered sexual offenders p...||Feb '17||Boston Globe||1|
|Hidden Wind Turbine Documents Could Prove Costl... (Nov '16)||Nov '16||Bob DeLeo||1|
Find what you want!
Search Falmouth Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC