Channel 4 Report Big Pay Day
billy

Hillsboro, MO

#121 Jun 12, 2013
Thus funny that every one cares
Fed Up Taxpayer

Walnut, CA

#122 Jun 12, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they didn't. It was out there for them all along.
Out where? If anyone on the council knew the truth, it wasn't acknowledged at the meeting when one council member questioned the lawsuit and why it was kept under wraps when the Boone fiasco and investigation findings were made public even before the council received that info. That council member had been lied to about what the Ott case was about and questioned why. In public. So it wasn't out there. The administration hid it for as long as it possibly could. They treated it 180 degrees different than the Boone issue. Probably because they knew the Boone issue was a lie and the Ott case was true.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#123 Jun 12, 2013
Fed Up Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>Out where? If anyone on the council knew the truth, it wasn't acknowledged at the meeting when one council member questioned the lawsuit and why it was kept under wraps when the Boone fiasco and investigation findings were made public even before the council received that info. That council member had been lied to about what the Ott case was about and questioned why. In public. So it wasn't out there. The administration hid it for as long as it possibly could. They treated it 180 degrees different than the Boone issue. Probably because they knew the Boone issue was a lie and the Ott case was true.
The council member knew there was a personnel issue and admitted to being informed about the issue. At that point the member did NO research or they would have found the lawsuit back then. I blame the council person.
Seeking logic

Arnold, MO

#124 Jun 12, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
The council member knew there was a personnel issue and admitted to being informed about the issue. At that point the member did NO research or they would have found the lawsuit back then. I blame the council person.
I think it is all your fault! You seem to know what everyone knew, when they knew it and what they should have done, so why the heck didn't YOU speak up?

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#125 Jun 13, 2013
Seeking logic wrote:
<quoted text>I think it is all your fault! You seem to know what everyone knew, when they knew it and what they should have done, so why the heck didn't YOU speak up?
Just going off of what that official has stated on here. You should go back and read if you didn't already have it removed.

Too bad the person can't remember what they posted or said. Their words are being used against them. Ever think that if they didn't lie that this wouldn't happen?
What

Arnold, MO

#126 Jun 13, 2013
You must be speaking of yourself, you are the one with the wild fantasies and tales to tell. Others back their statements up with documentation, unlike you who just spews whatever comes to your addled brain. You are a joke.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#127 Jun 13, 2013
What wrote:
You must be speaking of yourself, you are the one with the wild fantasies and tales to tell. Others back their statements up with documentation, unlike you who just spews whatever comes to your addled brain. You are a joke.
What documentation do you have that he was threatened? You have NONE. Post your documentation. All of Arnold's citizens are waiting.
please

Imperial, MO

#128 Jun 13, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
What documentation do you have that he was threatened? You have NONE. Post your documentation. All of Arnold's citizens are waiting.
Not all, just you.....speak for yourself. Now bring the proof in your picture. You won't, you know why because you can't. You are not who you say you are.....

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#130 Jun 13, 2013
please wrote:
<quoted text>Not all, just you.....speak for yourself. Now bring the proof in your picture. You won't, you know why because you can't. You are not who you say you are.....
I will post the picture as soon as you go to that other chat board you said you were going to start up.
Concerned Citizen

France

#131 Jun 13, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
What documentation do you have that he was threatened? You have NONE. Post your documentation. All of Arnold's citizens are waiting.
"I told him (Moss) that he might want to consider resigning because he's a young guy with a business, and this isn't going to look good," Counts told Patch.

http://arnold.patch.com/groups/politics-and-e...

Sounds pretty much like blackmail to me. And in my book, that's a threat.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#133 Jun 13, 2013
Concerned Citizen wrote:
<quoted text>"I told him (Moss) that he might want to consider resigning because he's a young guy with a business, and this isn't going to look good," Counts told Patch.

http://arnold.patch.com/groups/politics-and-e...

Sounds pretty much like blackmail to me. And in my book, that's a threat.
Sounds like someone presenting options to me. Not a threat. A threat would be along the lines of "You resign or we will make sure you never do business in this town again."

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#135 Jun 13, 2013
remember when wrote:
<quoted text>Maybe he did say that and is lying in the paper while they were publicly convicting him before a trial or an investigation. The mayor and lawyer.
Nice law suit moss has!

You wanna debate that impeachment talk before investigation now ? Wouldn't that be illegal?
The point is you do t know what was said or how it was said in that meeting because YOU WERE NOT THERE.
Cannot Fix Stupid

Arnold, MO

#136 Jun 13, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
The point is you do t know what was said or how it was said in that meeting because YOU WERE NOT THERE.
The only point you have is the one on top of your head! You're the village idiot and someone needs to put your face on a card and pass it around with one of those little hats with the bells on it.
You were not there either! There are people who were, and the minutes were released. The Mayor threatened Mr. Moss, his family and his business in the papers. No denying that! The city attorney made many "official" statements to the papers also. They hung themselves, not unlike the guy who's family got $950,000 on Chief Shockey's watch. Add that to the $450,000 Ott got, the $55,000 Boone got, the $75,000 Unrein got, the $30,000 Ozark Park Properties got, his total giveaway via MIRMA is up around 1.5 million, the Mayor and city attorney get to take an equal share of the credit for giving that money away too. I wonder how much more he is going to try to drain from them with the help of Sweeney?
Fed Up Taxpayer

Romania

#138 Jun 14, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
The point is you do t know what was said or how it was said in that meeting because YOU WERE NOT THERE.
By that same standard, neither were you. So how in the world would you have a reason to think it wasn't true?

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#139 Jun 14, 2013
Fed Up Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>By that same standard, neither were you. So how in the world would you have a reason to think it wasn't true?
By the same token you think it is true. NOBODY knows what the exact truth is except the ones that met and until there is a polygraph nobody will know what the truth is.
please

Imperial, MO

#140 Jun 14, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
I will post the picture as soon as you go to that other chat board you said you were going to start up.
I'm 100 percent positive that you can not find anywhere that I said I was starting a new chat board. Put your money where your mouth is. Now again doc I ask where is the picture you promised Ms. Honest doc....bahahahaha

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#141 Jun 14, 2013
please wrote:
<quoted text>I'm 100 percent positive that you can not find anywhere that I said I was starting a new chat board. Put your money where your mouth is. Now again doc I ask where is the picture you promised Ms. Honest doc....bahahahaha
You don't get it because your an arse.

And yes, it was you who said you were starting a new chat board.
Idiot Alert

Arnold, MO

#142 Jun 15, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't get it because your an arse.
And yes, it was you who said you were starting a new chat board.
Bang the drum slowly.....maybe it will lull you back to sleep and you won't be tormented by all of those voices in your head, Sybil. CC, LUNN or whatever you are calling yourself today.
Good Morning To You

Arnold, MO

#143 Jun 15, 2013
Now, could we put this back on topic or must we continue to suffer through little miss looney's personal BS?
Let's get back on track and discuss this:
The truth is the Officer Ott filed a SEXUAL DISCRIMININATION complaint with the Arnold Police department and she and her lawyers have walked away with $450,000! The officer involved in the complaint is still working with the APD as an arms instructor and his superior officer the Chief is still collecting $140,000+ per year to run not only the police department, but even more employees! This is unacceptable.
Heather

Arnold, MO

#144 Jun 19, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
I have better things to do with my time than to go digging through things hoping to find something
And yet, you were in this topix quickly pointing fingers of blame at who you thought was the messenger. And when told you were wrong, you didn't apologize, merely changed the point of your constant harangue against Doris.

Hello! The subject is the big payout of $450,000 and how Arnold is stuck yet again, with another big payout -- and one of those directly involved, was promoted rather than punished.

I am beginning to think you're paid to show up on every topix about Arnold and disrupt the thread, misdirect it, attack Doris, and so forth.

You could not be doing it for nothing.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Eureka Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Fox C6 Board of Education : Discussion (Jun '14) 9 hr ruby 1,470
News Which Fireworks Stand Has the Best Deals/Prices? (Jun '09) 13 hr Go 4th 23
Know Missouri Law Regarding Cameras Before You ... (Sep '14) 22 hr Truth 200
Who Are You Voting For Trump or Clinton 22 hr Elderly Clintons 21
Illegal Digging in Missouri (Sep '12) Mon ShesIN The Closet 164
Water Tower Dental Group Jun 25 No More Wisdom 7
Defiance quarry Jun 24 Angry 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Eureka Mortgages