Mayoral election
Letusnamenames

United States

#74 Mar 8, 2013
Doris seems to have found a lot of people that don't agree with her lately. I've run into many ex-supporters she has turned on.

That post proves that she will not represent all citizens equally. She should not be Mayor.
Dr Phil

Garden City, MI

#75 Mar 8, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
Doris seems to have found a lot of people that don't agree with her lately. I've run into many ex-supporters she has turned on.
That post proves that she will not represent all citizens equally. She should not be Mayor.
Actually, I hope she represents the unintelligent citizens who claim to have medical degrees and talk about prescribing medications that someone with their certification cannot by law prescribe (Psychologists cannot write any scripts, not just DEA controlled ones), less than other citizens who are not psychotic and walking Encyclopedic examples of the DSM-IV disorders. In fact, I hope she does not represent delusional citizens at all, and tells them to pound sand.
If you are writing prescriptions as you state, please let me know where your clinic is, as I am ethically required to report you to the board.
Baaaaloney

Arnold, MO

#76 Mar 8, 2013
You can be perfectly nice to Doris and still have her go off half cocked. Don't try to say she is fair or reasonable. That is a crock! I have seen her treat people so badly when I know for a fact they have never done anything to her!!!
Honesty Best Policy

Arnold, MO

#77 Mar 8, 2013
Baaaaloney wrote:
You can be perfectly nice to Doris and still have her go off half cocked. Don't try to say she is fair or reasonable. That is a crock! I have seen her treat people so badly when I know for a fact they have never done anything to her!!!
Odds are you have never spent time with her. You have never worked with her. All you can do is bash her. You can only attack her character you cannot argue issues. When all you can do is call someone names it says nothing for your abilities.
Baaaaloney

Arnold, MO

#78 Mar 9, 2013
Honesty Best Policy wrote:
<quoted text>
Odds are you have never spent time with her. You have never worked with her. All you can do is bash her. You can only attack her character you cannot argue issues. When all you can do is call someone names it says nothing for your abilities.
Wrong on both counts.
Baaaaloney

Arnold, MO

#79 Mar 9, 2013
Actually it is kind of true I've never worked with her because she never works, just goes around being an obstacle to those who are.
Think About It

Arnold, MO

#80 Mar 9, 2013
Well, one thing is for sure. She is definitely not one of the good old boys and won't do their bidding, that is the biggest plus there is. The definition of crazy is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. The good old boys keep getting voted in and they step all over the people to get to their friends, cronies and corporations that they all owe. That's why we are in the mess we are in.
I like Arnold

Florissant, MO

#81 Mar 9, 2013
Think About It wrote:
Well, one thing is for sure. She is definitely not one of the good old boys and won't do their bidding, that is the biggest plus there is. The definition of crazy is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. The good old boys keep getting voted in and they step all over the people to get to their friends, cronies and corporations that they all owe. That's why we are in the mess we are in.
The only 'mess we are in' is the result of Moss, Kornacki, Borgelt, and Hohmeier. The 'good old boys', as you so kindly refer to them, have added shopping centers, strengthened the police department, kept the AB Can plant, balanced the Budget, remodeled Public Works, replaced snow removal equipment, crack-sealed all four wards of the City. Doris, Moss, and Kornacki do nothing put play Monday morning quarterback. It's not difficult to sit back and criticize; leadership is thinking ahead and accomplishing things that are good for the City and it's residents.
Illegitimi non carborundu

Arnold, MO

#83 Mar 9, 2013
Imagine electing a mayor that doesn't own any property, so she could care less about taxpayer property values --- like the time she supported a proposed semi-trailer storage lot on Telegraph at Arnold Tenbrook and she fought against the residents in that neighborhood who feared the effects on their property values.

Imagine electing a mayor that can't hold a job, so she retaliates against her opposition by calling their employer to fabricate some story in hopes you lose your job --- like she recently did to Fox teacher Mike Evans and to others in the past.

Imagine electing a mayor that that tries avoiding paying any taxes to the city she wants to oversee --- but wants to determine how to spend the taxes you pay to the city.

Imagine electing a mayor that seeks to trash reputations of so many residents --- but is such a lowlife she refused to pay off the minor financial pledge she made to the high school band boosters.

Down with Borgelt!
remember when

United States

#84 Mar 9, 2013
I like Arnold wrote:
<quoted text>
The only 'mess we are in' is the result of Moss, Kornacki, Borgelt, and Hohmeier. The 'good old boys', as you so kindly refer to them, have added shopping centers, strengthened the police department, kept the AB Can plant, balanced the Budget, remodeled Public Works, replaced snow removal equipment, crack-sealed all four wards of the City. Doris, Moss, and Kornacki do nothing put play Monday morning quarterback. It's not difficult to sit back and criticize; leadership is thinking ahead and accomplishing things that are good for the City and it's residents.
So your reasoning is... as long as some good things are being done for all to see, the back room dealings and corruption should be allowed. Gosh I think the mafia and hitler thought the same thing.

Nah, I don't think so... Not gonna go along with it!
remember when

United States

#85 Mar 9, 2013
Illegitimi non carborundu wrote:
Imagine electing a mayor that doesn't own any property, so she could care less about taxpayer property values --- like the time she supported a proposed semi-trailer storage lot on Telegraph at Arnold Tenbrook and she fought against the residents in that neighborhood who feared the effects on their property values.
Imagine electing a mayor that can't hold a job, so she retaliates against her opposition by calling their employer to fabricate some story in hopes you lose your job --- like she recently did to Fox teacher Mike Evans and to others in the past.
Imagine electing a mayor that that tries avoiding paying any taxes to the city she wants to oversee --- but wants to determine how to spend the taxes you pay to the city.
Imagine electing a mayor that seeks to trash reputations of so many residents --- but is such a lowlife she refused to pay off the minor financial pledge she made to the high school band boosters.
Down with Borgelt!
So you think I should go along with the disturbing corruption provided in the moss lawsuit against what I feel are the most corrupt three (counts, Peewee, boss hog.) in arnold ?
Nope, forgheeta bout it ! They need to go !

I would rather have a blunt honest person anyday as a weaseling LIAR !
Illegitimi non carborundu

Arnold, MO

#86 Mar 9, 2013
remember when wrote:
<quoted text>
So you think I should go along with the disturbing corruption provided in the moss lawsuit against what I feel are the most corrupt three (counts, Peewee, boss hog.) in arnold ?
Nope, forgheeta bout it ! They need to go !
I would rather have a blunt honest person anyday as a weaseling LIAR !
There happen to be 2 sides to every story. Don't be so foolish to take the BS in Moss' pleading as fact.

Like you, everyone wants honesty from elected officials. I haven't not detected much honesty from candidate Borgelt.
remember when

United States

#87 Mar 9, 2013
Illegitimi non carborundu wrote:
<quoted text>
There happen to be 2 sides to every story. Don't be so foolish to take the BS in Moss' pleading as fact.
Like you, everyone wants honesty from elected officials. I haven't not detected much honesty from candidate Borgelt.
Oh please, I am far from foolish

Did they or did they not take him in back room and demand he resign ? Or his business , family and reputation would be ruined ? Please explain
oh pahleeeze

Arnold, MO

#88 Mar 9, 2013
Did she (Doris) or did she not fall off a ladder?
Man Up

Florissant, MO

#89 Mar 9, 2013
remember when wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh please, I am far from foolish
Did they or did they not take him in back room and demand he resign ? Or his business , family and reputation would be ruined ? Please explain
That's his story. Not necessarily a true story or the whole story, just a partial out-of-context story.
Why is it that he now feels that everyone is picking on poor Ken. He's never done ANYTHING wrong. Suddenly one day out of a clear blue sky, everyone decided to conspire against him. Maybe responsibility for one's actions needs to play a part in this. Maybe it's time to look into the mirror and do a little introspection. Or not. Maybe just keep going down the same path of self-denial.
Doris Borgelt

Arnold, MO

#90 Mar 10, 2013
Well, maybe because it is all of a sudden. No one can deny the fact that Susie Boone was given $55,000, a five year contract and no communication with the council for the remainder of her time here because someone told her Ken Moss allegedly called her a bad name all within five months. Ken Moss was dragged through the papers. On the other hand an officer who according to court papers allegedly had another officer sexually harass her, offer to get rid of her husband, reported incidents and was forced to work with the offending officer,was demoted, disciplined and fired and is still in court since 2010. You saw no weekly statements in the paper from the Mayor or the city attorney with Shockey's name being dragged through them. Doesn't sound quite right, does it?
Maybe someone, a certain councilman who is leaving town for a few years and right now thinks he has nothing to lose, ought to take his head out of the sand and realize that asking Mr. Moss to leave the room while the rest of the council was being told to get rid of him, was wrong. The Mayor, the city administrator and the city attorney taking Mr. Moss into a separate room and triple teaming him by himself without the rest of the council as witnesses to get him to resign was wrong. Threatening the reputation of his family, his business and him if he did not resign was wrong. The Mayor demanding nothing less than impeachment was wrong. The constant barrage of nastiness from the Mayor,city attorney and three of the male council members directed at the five other council members when the vote doesn't go according to their plan is nothing short of criminal and has got to stop!
Doris Borgelt

Arnold, MO

#91 Mar 10, 2013
Illegitimi non carborundu wrote:
Imagine electing a mayor that doesn't own any property, so she could care less about taxpayer property values --- like the time she supported a proposed semi-trailer storage lot on Telegraph at Arnold Tenbrook and she fought against the residents in that neighborhood who feared the effects on their property values.
Imagine electing a mayor that can't hold a job, so she retaliates against her opposition by calling their employer to fabricate some story in hopes you lose your job --- like she recently did to Fox teacher Mike Evans and to others in the past.
Imagine electing a mayor that that tries avoiding paying any taxes to the city she wants to oversee --- but wants to determine how to spend the taxes you pay to the city.
Imagine electing a mayor that seeks to trash reputations of so many residents --- but is such a lowlife she refused to pay off the minor financial pledge she made to the high school band boosters.
Down with Borgelt!
Although I do most definitely own property in Arnold, there are many people who live within the City of Arnold who rent their homes, apartments or trailer pads, those persons are rightfully allowed to vote and run for office. Why would you seek to downgrade those who do not own property? What I fought for was a business who followed the procedures they were given by city staff, that was expanding, asking for no tax abatements or tax subsidies to do so, investing a million of it's own money to bring approximately 20 more jobs and sales tax revenue to the City of Arnold, while vastly improving that corner!

Not that it is any of your business, but I have been successfully self-employed for over 10 years. Prior to that I was gainfully employed 7 years in one industry and eight years in another. Hardly would that qualify as being unable to hold a job.
No fabrication was necessary, Mr. Evans produced all the materials that were forwarded to the district for review.

How do I avoid paying taxes? I pay personal property taxes, real estate taxes, sales taxes, utility taxes, storm water taxes!
The same as any other resident of the city.

I do not seek to trash reputations of residents, please cite specific examples. I have no idea what minor financial pledge is being referred to and have sent an inquiry to the band director. This does involve a child who is a minor so be careful!

Whatever!
Letusnamenames

United States

#92 Mar 10, 2013
Explain the post on your Facebook page publically humiliating and tahing the reputation of Mike Evans, a RESIDENT. That would have classified as purposely trashing the reputation of a resident, especially accusing him of having "some sort of mental instability" in that post and telling others to get Sunshine Requests to find out how many time the police have been to his house and you even provided the street he lived on.
Resume

Florissant, MO

#93 Mar 10, 2013
What is your résumé, Doris?
In addition to the jobs, what are your education and experience?
Just Asking

Arnold, MO

#94 Mar 10, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
Explain the post on your Facebook page publically humiliating and tahing the reputation of Mike Evans, a RESIDENT. That would have classified as purposely trashing the reputation of a resident, especially accusing him of having "some sort of mental instability" in that post and telling others to get Sunshine Requests to find out how many time the police have been to his house and you even provided the street he lived on.
So what? Nothing illegal, all true, what's the problem? What do they always say, don't start nothing and there won't be nothing?
See if you can find anything that is untrue in the following statement. I took it directly from her facebook page.
Dear Facebook Friends,
Mike Evans was sounding quite a bit on the deranged side last Thursday evening. I had two former officers express their concern over his actions. My family was also concerned and said of everybody there, he was the only one that caused them concern for my safety and they cautioned that I be careful and be on guard when he is around. His actions make it appear that he is suffering from some kind of mentally instability. I know there were a couple of domestic disturbances at his home due to problems with roommates. It seems he has a revolving door there. Renting out bedrooms and his basement. I don't know if boarding homes are legal in Arnold and have my hands full campaigning right now. Anyway, what I would like to request is that someone make a Sunshine request as to how many times the police have been called to his address in Windcrest and what those calls were for.
It seems recently he has been causing problems for members of the Arnold Historical Society. I don't know about you, but harassing the elderly is not what I consider the right thing to do! I do know that although he was elected as their president he was not allowed to be a signatory on their bank accounts or documents due to having 10 months left on his probation for a DWI/assault charge and the notice of filing for bankruptcy that was published in the local legal paper The Countian. Please be alert and I appreciate any help I can get.
Thanks,
Doris

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Eureka Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Don Robinson State Park In Cedar Hill 16 hr Jefco Resident 1
Survey for a school project (is evolution real) Thu His Story 4
child molesters in Pacific (Oct '10) Feb 19 4real 9
Lacey (Apr '14) Feb 19 OnlyGodCanJudgeMe 22
J.m marschuetz (Aug '16) Aug '16 Anonymous 1
Holiday Inn Six Flags (Aug '10) Feb '16 scared 10
News Iowa Nat. Guard helping provide fresh drinking ... (Jan '16) Jan '16 OCS waste of time 1

Eureka Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Eureka Mortgages