Second Harassment Claim
Letusnamenames

United States

#42 Feb 15, 2013
And one more thing, obviously I'm striking a nerve because you can't keep from accusing me or trying to figure out who I am. You keep accusing me of being someone I am not to detract from the subject at hand which also tells me I'm hitting a nerve.

Why don't you save what credibility you have left and stick to the subject.

Thanks for the email. Those mass emails you send out are really informative and truthful...NOT.
Goodnight

Arnold, MO

#43 Feb 15, 2013
You really should start an exercise regimen, walk, walk, walk. I promise, you will feel better! No nerves struck, just pushing your buttons, that's all. Having a fine time doing it too ;)
Why don't you save your keystrokes? Who is sending emails? Who are they sending them to? Who cares?
Possible

United States

#44 Feb 15, 2013
Is it possible LUNN is old whirly twirly Shirley? I know CC is crazy, but she has found a nut and had lucid moments in the past, albeit few and far between. Shirls on the other hand is a Venable through and through.
Letusnamenames

United States

#45 Feb 16, 2013
And both accusations would be wrong. Too bad you can't figure it out.
Letusnamenames

United States

#46 Feb 16, 2013
And the only nuts in this town is Doris and her crazies. Too bad those men can't think for themselves. She has to have Jcpenknife write articles for her and Hay to spew what he thinks is legalese.
News Flash

Arnold, MO

#47 Feb 16, 2013
LUNN,
Well good morning sunshine! Look in the mirror, you are describing yourself! The only thing you are missing is the nutcracker and pick. I think Doris is perfectly capable of writing anything she pleases. I also think Matt Hay has a mind of his own and JCPenknife seems to make sure he has documentation to back his articles. The truth is coming out, like it or not. This town is corrupt, looks like we all are going to get the chance to find out just how corrupt it really is! Some interesting stuff.
Anonymous

United States

#48 Feb 16, 2013
Come to the meeting this Thursday. Demand answers! See who wants open and honest government and see who'd rather conduct business behind closed doors, out of sight of those they represent. KNOW what's going on in your city and clean out those that do not have honest government and your best interests at heart!
News Flash

Arnold, MO

#49 Feb 16, 2013
Anonymous wrote:
Come to the meeting this Thursday. Demand answers! See who wants open and honest government and see who'd rather conduct business behind closed doors, out of sight of those they represent. KNOW what's going on in your city and clean out those that do not have honest government and your best interests at heart!
Bravo!
Letusnamenames

United States

#50 Feb 16, 2013
Too bad you all have to log on and post to make it look like Doris has supporters.

The truth of the matter is that Doris posted the lawsuit as an act of retaliation against Shockey for filing a claim against her. That proves that Shockey's claims are now TRUE. Don't you know the law? You can't retaliate against someone who has filed a claim against you. You should have figure that out by reading the lawsuit you poste but then you have proven time and time again that reading is a skill you don't have.
Ha Ha

Arnold, MO

#51 Feb 16, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
Too bad you all have to log on and post to make it look like Doris has supporters.
The truth of the matter is that Doris posted the lawsuit as an act of retaliation against Shockey for filing a claim against her. That proves that Shockey's claims are now TRUE. Don't you know the law? You can't retaliate against someone who has filed a claim against you. You should have figure that out by reading the lawsuit you poste but then you have proven time and time again that reading is a skill you don't have.
Oh really? Do you know this to be a fact? Just what would be considered an act of employment retaliation in a court of law? What would posting an actual lawsuit have to do with that?
Thicker

Arnold, MO

#52 Feb 16, 2013
The plot thickens+++

K Moss has filed suit against R Counts, R Shockey, R Sweeney, and S Boone.

What'sup?
Letusnamenames

United States

#53 Feb 16, 2013
The lawsuit was posted with intent to retaliate and defame the individual that file the complaint against Doris. It was posted out of malice as evidenced by the post in the other thread.
Letusnamenames

United States

#54 Feb 16, 2013
You've been caught in your actions.
Ha Ha

Arnold, MO

#55 Feb 16, 2013
So you can determine not only who posted it, but what their intent was at the time? We should just call you the great Krespin. How is posting a fact that is a public record, malice?
Lettucenamenames

Arnold, MO

#56 Feb 16, 2013
Ha Ha wrote:
So you can determine not only who posted it, but what their intent was at the time?
Yes. I conferred with the voices in my head, I mean with my colleagues and we used our top secret IP powers to determine who did it, why, and what they had for lunch. Big pastrami fan are you...?
Chris Columbus

United States

#57 Feb 16, 2013
Thicker wrote:
The plot thickens+++
K Moss has filed suit against R Counts, R Shockey, R Sweeney, and S Boone.
What'sup?
The discovery in this one should be pay per view.
Letusnamenames

United States

#58 Feb 16, 2013
It was posted with malice. Get it straight. If Shockey didn't file the complaint then this would never have been posts. The other posts surrounding it are threatening to the GOB for Shockey filing the complaint with a "so there" attitude. I think you would lose in a court of law if sued for retaliation and harassment.
Ha Ha

Arnold, MO

#59 Feb 16, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
It was posted with malice. Get it straight. If Shockey didn't file the complaint then this would never have been posts. The other posts surrounding it are threatening to the GOB for Shockey filing the complaint with a "so there" attitude. I think you would lose in a court of law if sued for retaliation and harassment.
In your opinion, and it has been determined that your opinion doesn't count! I think it would have come out no matter what, because it is the Mayor's responsibility to see that these things are taken care of properly, this one just seemed to be swept under the rug. Heck, I don't even thing the city council was aware that the Chief was named in the suit. As for your thoughts, well you can think all you want, if you care to sue Ha Ha, you go right ahead, get your subpoena powers fired up and go for it.
Letusnamenames

United States

#60 Feb 16, 2013
Ha ha yourself. I'm not the one that wil be sueing you. You should reread the post and see if you can comprehend it better. It's called reading for content.
Good Night

Arnold, MO

#61 Feb 16, 2013
I don't have to reread anything. In other words what you think isn't worth repeating so I don't know why you insist on doing it. What if you get sued in a court of law? Bet you would lose, no matter what it was for because you just seem like one of those people who doesn't possess common sense and can't manage a logical thought pattern.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Eureka Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Illegal Digging in Missouri (Sep '12) 44 min BloeMe 55
bogus ticket 1 hr The Truth 10
crazy Stephanie Barron Mon yourbff 1
my ray of light Mon what 2
What's the Deal With Jefferson College Continui... Sun Heed Red Flags 2
Know Missouri Law Regarding Cameras Before You ... (Sep '14) Sun StirringUpCrap 77
John Roland Sat Housesprings 4
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Eureka Mortgages