Letusnamenames

United States

#21 Feb 14, 2013
Despite my repeated requests her and her camp have not posted one shred of proof of her allegations. Instead they call me names, attack me personally an tell me I don't know what I'm asking for.
Ha Ha

Arnold, MO

#22 Feb 14, 2013
Who has attacked you, who are you this week? Who cares? Blah, blah, blah, it's all about you whining about being picked on. Yes, it is the den of inequity, the pit of vipers, the leeches of society building their castles with the fruits of your labor.
Bwahaha

Arnold, MO

#23 Feb 14, 2013
You want entirely too many soap operas.
Bwahaha

Arnold, MO

#24 Feb 14, 2013
Well, you watch them AND you want them.
JC Penknife

United States

#25 Feb 14, 2013
We've already been through this. The MCHR told Susie Boone her complaint was outside of their jurisdiction. Shockey's complaint is a carbon copy of hers, so it is also not in their purview, and Shockey knows it. This is nothing but a PR stunt. Shockey has has not been given an adverse employment action and is not part of a protected class. This is the equivalent of me sending my tax return to the Department of Agriculture. http://www.labor.mo.gov/mohumanrights/File_Co...
Bwahaha

Arnold, MO

#26 Feb 14, 2013
Ahem, Ahem.

"The [Missouri Human Rights] Act also makes it unlawful to retaliate against an individual for filing a complaint of discrimination, testifying or assisting in an investigation, or proceeding under the Act."

Key points: "retaliate," "assisting in an investigation."

http://labor.mo.gov/mohumanrights/Discriminat...

But you just go on ahead and keep thinkin' you know what's what just 'cause you've got the loudest mouth. ;)
Nyu uh uh

Arnold, MO

#27 Feb 14, 2013
The retaliation must be connected to some discriminatory act. There have been no acts of discrimination, hence no retaliation. No extra paydays for employees trying for additional bonus checks. All politically motivated, so obvious.
Read and Weep

Arnold, MO

#28 Feb 14, 2013
Put the whole statement on here: The Missouri Human Rights Act (the Act) prohibits discrimination in housing, employment, and places of public accommodations based on race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, disability, age (in employment only), and familial status (in housing only). The Act also makes it unlawful to retaliate against an individual for filing a complaint of discrimination, testifying or assisting in an investigation, or proceeding under the Act.
unbelievable

Florissant, MO

#29 Feb 14, 2013
Okay Mr JCPENKNIFE Explain to me if you know so much. Why would Doris and Sandy miss a council meeting BUT attend a Union meeting if they are on the up and up. If you are on a council then you should attend!!!!!!!!!! BUT of course they choose not to, ummmmmmmmmm why is that? You and I both know why!!!
Read and Weep

Arnold, MO

#30 Feb 14, 2013
Regular council meetings are on Thursdays, not on Mondays. Get over it. You don't know why and neither does anyone who is not Doris or Sandy.
Clueless

Arnold, MO

#31 Feb 15, 2013
JC Penknife wrote:
We've already been through this. The MCHR told Susie Boone her complaint was outside of their jurisdiction. Shockey's complaint is a carbon copy of hers, so it is also not in their purview, and Shockey knows it. This is nothing but a PR stunt. Shockey has has not been given an adverse employment action and is not part of a protected class. This is the equivalent of me sending my tax return to the Department of Agriculture. http://www.labor.mo.gov/mohumanrights/File_Co...
Boyer you really do not have a clue. Why don't you go to the council meeting and shout it out?
Clueless

Arnold, MO

#32 Feb 15, 2013
Read and Weep wrote:
Regular council meetings are on Thursdays, not on Mondays. Get over it. You don't know why and neither does anyone who is not Doris or Sandy.
jcpencildik is one of Doris' closest supporters and she is one of his. He knows. He was also holding the ladder for her that night. Then again maybe he wasn't?
Letusnamenames

United States

#33 Feb 15, 2013
At least Sweeney knows not to release information on pending litigation of personnel matters. Seems like a current council member posted something they should violating the privacy and sunshine laws. Way to abuse your position.
Really

Arnold, MO

#35 Feb 15, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
At least Sweeney knows not to release information on pending litigation of personnel matters. Seems like a current council member posted something they should violating the privacy and sunshine laws. Way to abuse your position.
I guess you don't read the Leader? Sweeney has been all over it making quotes and convicting Ken Moss.
Letusnamenames

United States

#36 Feb 15, 2013
Doris seems to think she has the right to send this information all over. How shameful. I wonder what the plaintiff thinks of her for publicizing this on her behalf?
CC Sybil

Saint Louis, MO

#37 Feb 15, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
Doris seems to think she has the right to send this information all over. How shameful. I wonder what the plaintiff thinks of her for publicizing this on her behalf?
I am pretty sure she has no issue and is glad the truth is getting out. She probably finds it incredibly hypocritical of Shockey to, after having a complaint which has been substantiated by the MCHR against him, file a complaint with the MCHR himself against 2 Council Members in a poison pill attempt to prevent his firing.

So while there is ample and overwhelming cause, he will say he was fired because of "retaliation" for his complaint rather than for the 7 figures in settlement or damages paid out as a result of what his actions are going to cost us.
Bulletin

Arnold, MO

#38 Feb 15, 2013
LUNN aka CC:\
What part of public domain do you not understand? She does have the right and the obligation to send this information far and wide. Sunshine is the best disinfectant. Hopefully the people of Arnold will see that the absolute power of Sweeney and Company has corrupted absolutely the government of the City of Arnold. Shout it from the rooftops and share it with many.
Letusnamenames

United States

#39 Feb 15, 2013
Again, I'm not CC, but you all don't have any regard for the truth as shown by what Doris did to be Mayor. By the way, nice email.(insert sarcasm here).

What Doris did was shameful. It is pending litigation. It should have been kept private until the lawsuit was decided or settled. Doris doing this and dragging their names through the mud is no better than what she is accusing them of doing. Anybody running for Mayor should be more respectful. All Doris ever displays is disrespect.
Bulletin

Arnold, MO

#40 Feb 15, 2013
Hey CC, go take a long walk off of a short pier. No one cares what you think, say or do. If you don't think people know who you are, you are being less than honest with yourself.
Letusnamenames

United States

#41 Feb 15, 2013
I think that you are making a fool of yourself for trying to accuse me of being someone that I am not. But that's up to you. Just shows why you shouldn't be Mayor, Doris. Yet another false accusation from the false accusation queen.

Think maybe you have cried conspiracy so many times that you really can't tell what is a conspiracy and what isn't. The word delusional comes to mind. That's why nobody is paying attention to you or your band of misfits anymore.

Maybe you should choose to attend the council meeting and represent he citizens that elected you instead of trying to campaign next time.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Eureka Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Fox C6 Board of Education : Discussion (Jun '14) 1 hr Matt Hay 893
Why does a town the size of Byrnesmill need a m... Thu cedar hill 13
Seckman Elementary parents...our problems are s... Thu what next 8
fox athletics Dec 14 Warrior12 8
Abundance of Fat Slobs Dec 14 Twinkie 2
Missouri KKK Leader: Ferguson Protests Are Boos... Dec 14 neveratfault 26
Know Missouri Law Regarding Cameras Before You ... Dec 13 Mary 25
Eureka Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Eureka People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Eureka News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Eureka

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:25 pm PST

NBC Sports 4:25PM
Will St. Louis' defense shut down Eli Manning?
Bleacher Report 4:54 PM
Previewing Giants vs. Rams
Bleacher Report 8:44 PM
Complete Week 16 Preview for New York
Bleacher Report 4:32 AM
Chiefs' Week 16 Preview vs. Steelers
Bleacher Report10:58 AM
Polamalu (Knee) Likely to Sit Sunday