Arnold Police Respond to Sign Fiasco ...

Arnold Police Respond to Sign Fiasco at Polling Place

There are 91 comments on the arnold.patch.com story from Apr 2, 2013, titled Arnold Police Respond to Sign Fiasco at Polling Place. In it, arnold.patch.com reports that:

A disturbance broke out around 6:30 p.m. between a group of teens holding signs opposing Mayoral Candidate Doris Borgelt and the candidate herself.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at arnold.patch.com.

Huh

Arnold, MO

#44 Apr 8, 2013
Sounds like someone has a personal problem.
Ha Ha

Arnold, MO

#45 Apr 8, 2013
Look CC and LUNN aka Sybil is talking to herself again. The voices in her head are confusing her.
Letusnamenames

United States

#46 Apr 9, 2013
Again, I'm not CC, but you can't accept that. I actually feel pity for you. It must be hard losing an election and feeling rejected
Letusnamenames

United States

#47 Apr 9, 2013
Still waiting for the proof of your allegation of electoral fraud, HERE in Jefferson County.
Letusnamenames

United States

#49 Apr 9, 2013
Still waiting for that proof. Looks like you're trying to deflect again. Did you go look at the ballots yet?
Ha Ha

Arnold, MO

#50 Apr 9, 2013
Did you? Why don't you call the election office CC, Lunn aka Sybil? Ask them if YOU can look at the ballots! Give Wes a holla, sure he'd love to hear from you.
Letusnamenames

United States

#51 Apr 10, 2013
Again, not CC.

And I'm not the one making accusations of election fraud. If you're going to make accusations of election tampering them you should do your due diligence and go review the ballots before making such accusations. It looks like the false accusation of election tampering was just debunked since those making it are refusing to go review the ballots. This is the equivalent of crying wolf when no wolf was there. This just proves that the voters got it right by not electing Doris or her cronies.
Hop on This

Arnold, MO

#52 Apr 10, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
Again, not CC.
And I'm not the one making accusations of election fraud. If you're going to make accusations of election tampering them you should do your due diligence and go review the ballots before making such accusations. It looks like the false accusation of election tampering was just debunked since those making it are refusing to go review the ballots. This is the equivalent of crying wolf when no wolf was there. This just proves that the voters got it right by not electing Doris or her cronies.
Everybody knows who you are, it is no secret. You cannot help revealing yourself with every post. This proves nothing but the fact that you are desperately driven to reveal your mundane life and seek excitement living vicariously through others. How do you diagnose that CC? What do they call that affliction? It's a small wonder you can continue to collect an income, being on here all the time. Tsk, tsk.
Letusnamenames

United States

#53 Apr 10, 2013
Like I said. I'm not CC. And you constantly making the false accusation doesn't change fact.

Now quit trying to deflect with knowingly false accusations. Did you go down an look at the ballots to see if there was election tampering? I doubt you will because you already know the allegation is false. Your track record is t looking to good now, is it?
Hop on This

Arnold, MO

#54 Apr 10, 2013
Funny, who do you think I am? How or why would I look at ballots? I doubt anyone can just walk in and look at them. Most likely they would not be available to anyone if you did go there. Why don't you check on that CC? You are always sounding like a snot nosed, bratty little kid whining prove it! So why don't you? It's surprising your parents allowed you to get past the age of 5 without sending you to a children's home as annoying as you are, of course getting you out of the house and into school must have been a relief for them.
Letusnamenames

United States

#55 Apr 10, 2013
Again, I'm not CC. I'm surprised you graduated high school with how much you dream things up and sling false allegations. The teachers probably just passed you to get you out of their class. Pass the problem through to the next teacher sort of thing.

You wonder why Doris and her cronies didn't get elected? Let me give you a little thing called a clue. They keep making allegations and have not presented the proof. When asked they post items from out of town and out of state that have nothing to do with Arnold. People want to see the proof from, guess where....ARNOLD! The voters saw through all the crap that was being spewed and chose the one that wasn't in the papers constantly and making the city look like a laughing stock. A candidate doesn't help their case when having a cronie posting videos on YouTube calling it the Arnold City Council Circus, especially the one titles "The Real War On Women" (the one where Amato confronted Doris about her allegations politely and asked for proof of her allegations).

BTW, how much time does a candidate have to remove their political campaign signs before they are in violation of the law/ordinance or does one exist?
Hop on This

Arnold, MO

#56 Apr 10, 2013
The people making this town a laughing stock have been around many, many years. They are firmly entrenched and cannot accept that their kingdom is about to fall. Doris may have lost the election, due to the good old boys muddying the waters with false claims of lawsuits, but she will wind up in the Mayor's seat. Between Chet Pleban, the guy from Channel 2 and the other investigative reporters all of the corrupt cronies will be exposed. Just wait for Amato to turn on Counts again, this will only be more of a circus until the corrupt cronies are all gone.
Letusnamenames

United States

#57 Apr 10, 2013
Blah, blah, blah....same rhetoric, different day. We've been hearing the same thing from Doris and her cronies for years and yet nothing ever happens. Oh, yeah, their empire is about to fall....been hearing that one from them for years, too, yet nothing has been done.

This is the type of crap people are tired of. Maybe if Doris and her cohorts actually had that little thing called proof for all of those allegations then something would happen. Until then I'm going to wait for Counts, Sweeney and Shockey to file a lawsuit for their names falsely getting dragged through the mud. What did you say that was called, libel?
Letusnamenames

United States

#58 Apr 10, 2013
Oh, and how do you think she will wind up in the Mayor's seat? They would have to have a special election and I think the people would vote for the person running against her even if they were an unknown because of how Doris has acted in the papers.
Jim

United States

#59 Apr 10, 2013
Maybe Doris should move out of arnold if she has so many problems with everyone. It should be easy to find something to lease in a different town.
Letusnamenames

United States

#60 Apr 10, 2013
Jim, if a person has problems with many people like you suggest, wouldn't that tend to indicate where the real problem may lie if you catch my drift?
Clive

Arnold, MO

#61 Apr 10, 2013
Why are people calling Shirley Venable "CC"?

Everyone knows Shirley is Letusnamenames.

Same agenda. Different name.
Clive

Arnold, MO

#62 Apr 10, 2013
Sheesh wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not sure if anyone told you, but Mayor Counts was overwhelmingly elected to another term. Did you (and your fellow brain addled cohorts) ever consider that maybe YOU are the ones who are out of touch with reality?
Just wondering.
Overwhelmingly, according to who? All 2000 voters of the Baptist Church?

*sprinkles self with Holy Water*
Letusnamenames

United States

#63 Apr 11, 2013
Maybe you need to go to Church because the last time I checked the Baltist religion doesn't use Holy Water like Catholics.

And my name isn't Shirley.
Sheesh

Arnold, MO

#64 Apr 11, 2013
Clive wrote:
<quoted text>
Overwhelmingly, according to who? All 2000 voters of the Baptist Church?
*sprinkles self with Holy Water*
Nope. According to objective observation. Let's take a peek at the precinct percentages, shall we?

New Hope UMC: Counts 68.75%, Borgelt 31.25%
Immaculate Conception: Counts 72.01%, Borgelt 26.49%
Fox C-6 Service Center: Counts 62.46%, Borgelt 37.54%
Arnold Rec Center: Counts 69.57%, Borgelt 29.69%
Absentee: Counts 67.91%, Borgelt 30.70%

Total: Counts 68.37%, Borgelt 30.96%.

http://www.jeffcomo.org/uploads/County%20Cler...

Pages 69 & 70.

Not once did Borgelt break 40% despite the fact she campaigned harder and dirtier than Counts had to...That's pretty decisive. The voters spoke loudly and clearly, people. Time to face the reckoning and realize we don't want your kind of governing 'round hurrr.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Eureka Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Fox C6 Board of Education : Discussion (Jun '14) 19 hr Eileen 1,472
News Which Fireworks Stand Has the Best Deals/Prices? (Jun '09) Jun 28 Go 4th 23
Know Missouri Law Regarding Cameras Before You ... (Sep '14) Jun 28 Truth 200
Who Are You Voting For Trump or Clinton Jun 28 Elderly Clintons 21
Illegal Digging in Missouri (Sep '12) Jun 27 ShesIN The Closet 164
Water Tower Dental Group Jun 25 No More Wisdom 7
Defiance quarry Jun 24 Angry 2

Eureka Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Eureka Mortgages