Breakout by Ward

Posted in the Eureka Forum

Comments (Page 9)

Showing posts 161 - 180 of253
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Rob

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#162
Apr 23, 2013
 
Who cares wrote:
<quoted text>
At this point Rosenfeld, who the eff cares? I mean really. You got a deal because the city council got together and approved a deal where everyone wins and that includes you. You were excused from the big portion of the NID, the city has the bridge in place and paid in full. The city has some additional parkland for the future. You were going to pay more because you had more vehicles using the bridge than anyone else involved. You may think it was unfair because it was you. Doris supplied you with information from closed sessions and she was still patently unable to do anything for you except cash your campiagn contribution checks. Be happy that everyone involved won. Move on you childish, snobbish SOB.
Actually bill moron everyone lost except the city attorney and I just think that lying and cheating by public officials is not good and those officials should be held accountable. There is something wrong when city officials march into court and lie under oath. You as a public official yourself think that's ok apparently.

If they wanted a giant bridge for their own reasons and part of my property for their own reasons, which they did all along, they should have been honest about it and I would have gone along and made a deal in 2004.
Bill moritz sr

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#163
Apr 23, 2013
 
Who cares wrote:
<quoted text>
At this point Rosenfeld, who the eff cares? I mean really. You got a deal because the city council got together and approved a deal where everyone wins and that includes you. You were excused from the big portion of the NID, the city has the bridge in place and paid in full. The city has some additional parkland for the future. You were going to pay more because you had more vehicles using the bridge than anyone else involved. You may think it was unfair because it was you. Doris supplied you with information from closed sessions and she was still patently unable to do anything for you except cash your campiagn contribution checks. Be happy that everyone involved won. Move on you childish, snobbish SOB.
My son thinks its ok for taxpayers to get soaked and for government officials to lie cheat and steal and fix elections so he is moving to a country which truly values good government
Letusnamenames

Vienna, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Very mature. Just shows why the other side wasn't elected. They need to learn to act their age.
Rob

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165
Apr 23, 2013
 
Letusnamenames wrote:
Very mature. Just shows why the other side wasn't elected. They need to learn to act their age.
Uh huh but the comments insulting me are ok?

Do you ever have anything of substance to add?
Troll Hunter

Arnold, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166
Apr 23, 2013
 
Letusnamenames wrote:
Very mature. Just shows why the other side wasn't elected. They need to learn to act their age.
What does lying, cheating and stealing have to do with the election? You can only call that to people's attention if you win? You are nothing more than an internet troll. The ugly little creature under the bridge asking for proof and not accepting it when presented.
Anold Granny

Arnold, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

More name calling. Still no proof!
Letusnamenames

Vienna, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Exactly. I find that went they start throwing out things like this then generally there is never any proof. Until they post proof I will continue to believe that.

They also like to say "do your own footwork". I guess they want me to try to find the proof for them when I think they already know it doesn't exist. It's all a deflection game with them.
Troll Hunter

Arnold, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Plenty of proof, you are just failing to acknowledge it.
Rob Rosenfeld

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170
Apr 23, 2013
 
Letusnamenames wrote:
Exactly. I find that went they start throwing out things like this then generally there is never any proof. Until they post proof I will continue to believe that.
They also like to say "do your own footwork". I guess they want me to try to find the proof for them when I think they already know it doesn't exist. It's all a deflection game with them.
What proof do you need? Missey and Mullins were not on the ballot in the election you keep referring to- do you acknowledge that? Sweeney himself had authored a legal memo which made clear there was no authority to remove Missey from the ballot- the only difference between the case in the memo and the Missey situation was that the memo applied to friends of Sweeney. Mullins' sewer bill allegedly arrived at City Hall after the deadline- the envelope had a smudged out postmark date. Oh, and Mullins and Missey happened to be running against allies of Sweeney. Thats proof of rottenness in Arnold to anyone with any sense.

As far as the forgery, perjury, etc in my case- yes all that has been well established and no one familiar with the case will argue that Ruby massey's signature on the NID petition was valid. Im not going to marshall all kinds of documentation just for some lamebrain on a website who won't identify him/herself. There should be a City sponsored investigation into this fiasco and I will provide all information for that.
Letusnamenames

Vienna, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#171
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Troll Hunter wrote:
Plenty of proof, you are just failing to acknowledge it.
Nope. No links posted. No proof. Post the links, the ones directly related to Arnold.

You can keep screaming that line, but everyone sees you are ting and that no proof has been posted.
Troll Hunter

Arnold, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172
Apr 23, 2013
 
The documentation was posted for Mullins, Missey and Sweeney's memo.
Letusnamenames

Vienna, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rob Rosenfeld wrote:
<quoted text>
What proof do you need? Missey and Mullins were not on the ballot in the election you keep referring to- do you acknowledge that? Sweeney himself had authored a legal memo which made clear there was no authority to remove Missey from the ballot- the only difference between the case in the memo and the Missey situation was that the memo applied to friends of Sweeney. Mullins' sewer bill allegedly arrived at City Hall after the deadline- the envelope had a smudged out postmark date. Oh, and Mullins and Missey happened to be running against allies of Sweeney. Thats proof of rottenness in Arnold to anyone with any sense.
As far as the forgery, perjury, etc in my case- yes all that has been well established and no one familiar with the case will argue that Ruby massey's signature on the NID petition was valid. Im not going to marshall all kinds of documentation just for some lamebrain on a website who won't identify him/herself. There should be a City sponsored investigation into this fiasco and I will provide all information for that.
I got it...no proof. Even if I did give you my identity I have a good feeling that you wouldn't supply the proof because if you had it and wanted to let all of the citizens know about it the. You would have found a way to post it instead of playing these games. And everyone always says that if there is an investigation line. Truth is, seems like an investigation is never requested or materializes.
Rob Rosenfeld

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
I got it...no proof. Even if I did give you my identity I have a good feeling that you wouldn't supply the proof because if you had it and wanted to let all of the citizens know about it the. You would have found a way to post it instead of playing these games. And everyone always says that if there is an investigation line. Truth is, seems like an investigation is never requested or materializes.
Youre right you got me. I made up this elaborate story about a forgery in order to..... Oh, wait let me think of a reason I would have done that....

And that business about Missey and Mullins- lets just keep ignoring that
Proof

Arnold, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175
Apr 23, 2013
 
Arnold Granny

Arnold, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Oh my! Forgery,perjury, secret memos,smudged post marks,one conspiracy after another. I think you might be watching too many spy movies
Lettucenamenames

Vienna, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#177
Apr 23, 2013
 
Rob, some people argue just for the attention. Don't get sucked In. Don't feel the trolls and they will go away.
Rob Rosenfeld

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178
Apr 23, 2013
 
Arnold Granny wrote:
Oh my! Forgery,perjury, secret memos,smudged post marks,one conspiracy after another. I think you might be watching too many spy movies
Ahhh- so the proof is presented and the subject is changed. Exactly as predicted
Proof

Arnold, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179
Apr 23, 2013
 
Ruby Massey's signature was forged. Only two people testified under oath and are the ones who committed perjury along with the person who attested to the validity of the signatures.
No conspiracy claimed, just truths revealed, no secret memos, Mr. Sweeney's memo was posted along with along with the envelope of Mr. mullins
Proof

Arnold, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180
Apr 23, 2013
 
Lettucenamenames wrote:
Rob, some people argue just for the attention. Don't get sucked In. Don't feel the trolls and they will go away.
Unfortunately the trolls do not go away. They just keep changing the subject when they're obviously proven wrong. The truth is going to burn all of the corrupt government officials of Arnold, past and present in their public and private capacities.
Letusnamenames

Vienna, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Now that we have some proof we have something to work with. Now see, was that too hard. If you weren't playing games and posted it a week ago we wouldn't have these problems.

Which page is the forgery, page 1 (my suspect) or pages 2 and 3? Who allegedly forged the signature?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 161 - 180 of253
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Eureka Discussions

Search the Eureka Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
MO Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Missouri ... (Oct '10) 1 hr RNC Rightwing NUT Cases 95,007
How many churches does Arnold need? 14 hr Naomi 14
Should Arnold Secede from Jefferson County 14 hr Yes 2
MO Missouri Proposition B: The Puppy Mill Bill (Oct '10) 16 hr layback 6,894
Fox C6 Board of Education : Discussion 18 hr Suzy Q 100
The Art of White Trash Finances 20 hr Driver 5
Ridgecrest Scandal 22 hr Doris Borgelt 50
•••

Flood Warning for St Louis County was issued at July 10 at 9:50PM CDT

•••
•••
•••
•••

Eureka Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Eureka People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Eureka News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Eureka
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••