Father's book courts trouble

Father's book courts trouble

There are 2 comments on the Boston Herald story from Mar 24, 2006, titled Father's book courts trouble. In it, Boston Herald reports that:

A judge who figures prominently in a Methuen father's new book about losing custody of his child issued an order yesterday on whether sales of Kevin Thompson's tell-all should be banned.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Boston Herald.

Susan lLeukhardt

Ramona, CA

#1 Mar 29, 2006
Please tell Kevin I support him and his efforts to expose the family court system . It is the same here in California. My eyes were opened to the blatant abuse of fathers' Constitutional rights in America when I sat in Riverside, Ca. family court and heard the judge keep repeating "Let's see what we can do for mom", never once mentioning what should be done for the child or for the loving involved dad, or for the family for that matter. I believe the family court system is a farce and a means to an end to keep judges, attorneys, evaluators etc. making big money. They don't really care about the child. Keep up the good work Kevin Thompson! Susan Leukhardt, a concerned grandparent in California
ASHISH SHARMA MD

Shrewsbury, MA

#2 Mar 29, 2006
Kevin has done agreat service ,by bringing to the fore front ,as to what goes on in the probate courts,specially in massachussettes.The DSS,( DEPT of social services) and judges gang up against the father's and there exists no rule of law.Every thing is done under the mysteroius phrase" best interest of the child"and totem pole evidence, rules,and decesions are made.I had 6 51A, filed against me( as a physican I know what that means),investigated,and I was made to be a child abuser, etc without even been notified of the investigations or the findings and no oppurtunity to rebutt the accusations.Infact my complain against the probate judge was being heard by the commission for judical conduct at the same time he was taking away the custody of my 4 year old.( he was aware of the complaint).unless a presumtion in favour of joint custody( child needs both parent's) is made , there is no incentive for parent's to behave as the court's encourage a " winner takes all", mentality (which is usually the mothers.)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Essex Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Massachusetts Constables Office Nov 11 JKM 1
Veteran's Day Charity Event on November 10th Nov 6 wingmanmagazine 1
Salem commons in need of renovations Aug '17 Park patron 1
Hallmark Job Opportunity in Rowley Jun '17 VictorOrians 1
Essex County Criminal Mugshots and Arrests Records (Sep '16) Sep '16 Daniel 2
News Urban gangs seen moving into suburbs (Jun '06) Jun '16 Go Blue Forever 29
News Rock-climbing gardener' is new principal in Lev... (Jul '14) Oct '14 kurtcooksalot16 2

Essex Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Essex Mortgages