Yo Barack!!

[Themis]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20091104/pl_...

[harvey]

I'm still laughing about the vote in Virginia and New Jersey....the voters spoke....up your's obama...he went all out in support of those two dem governors and the voters gave him the bird. Doesn't that tell you how fed up people are with him and his bullshit??? But the liberals will deny as they always do.....too stupid to get the message.

[Bob Oppenheimer]

looks like the morons all stayed home this election day.... except in erie where morons rule.

[JOY]

harvey wrote:

I'm still laughing about the vote in Virginia and New Jersey....the voters spoke....up your's obama...he went all out in support of those two dem governors and the voters gave him the bird. Doesn't that tell you how fed up people are with him and his bullshit??? But the liberals will deny as they always do.....too stupid to get the message.

It's no reflection on Obama whatsoever. Both were very unpopular in their home states. Dream on all you want.

[BuckshotJones]

Voters did not stay home in Va. The turnout was comparable to 2008. The difference is people have had a chance to see Obama in power and obviously don't like what they see. Independents went sharply to Republicans. If this happens again next year Democrats are toast.

[harvey]

BuckshotJones wrote:

Voters did not stay home in Va. The turnout was comparable to 2008. The difference is people have had a chance to see Obama in power and obviously don't like what they see. Independents went sharply to Republicans. If this happens again next year Democrats are toast.

You are right but as I predicted, JOY still doesn't get it....fog/coma/brainwashing... .she's a die hard dumbocrat.

[Hyde]

Exposing the Hyde Amendment Lies

Look at these misleading quotes:
“It is black letter law that not one dime of federal tax money can be used to fund any abortion.... I'm just telling you factually right now that the Hyde amendment is the law of the land." - Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO)

“There are no federal tax dollars that will fund abortion under the bill. The Hyde Amendment…..already bars federal funding for abortion. It still exists. It will not change. There is nothing in the bill that will change that." - Rep. Ron Klein (D-FL)

"I do not believe there will be a change in the Hyde amendment." - Sen. Arlin Specter (D-PA)

The truth: the Capps language explicitly permits the two things forbidden in the Hyde Amendment -- federal government funding for abortion and funding for plans that cover abortion.

So much for continuing longstanding federal policy on federal funding of abortions!

Watch both video’s that explains the truth: NOTE...the second one picks up where the first one leaves off
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup...

[lostinny23]

Washington (CNN)-- The push to overhaul health care received a major boost Thursday as the American Medical Association and AARP endorsed legislation drafted by top House Democrats.
The AARP, the nation's largest organization of older Americans, is a nonpartisan group that advocates for people 50 and older. The AMA, historically an opponent of health care reform, is considered one the nation's most influential doctors' advocacy groups.
"I want to thank both organizations again for their support, and I urge Congress to listen to AARP, listen to the AMA and pass this reform for hundreds of millions of Americans who will benefit from it," President Obama said at the White House.
The backing of those two groups comes as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, oversees final changes to the $1.1 trillion health care bill. The measure likely will come to a final vote Saturday.
Read the House health care bill (PDF)
A 42-page manager's amendment on the health care legislation posted Tuesday night made mostly technical changes in the nearly 2,000-page bill compiled from three Democratic proposals passed by three House committees.
By making the changes public Tuesday, House Democratic leaders could open floor debate on the bill Friday, while fulfilling their pledge to allow 72 hours of review before bringing the measure to the full chamber.
Video: What to do if insurer refuses claim
RELATED TOPICS
Health Care Reform
U.S. House of Representatives
Nancy Pelosi
Republican Party
Medicare
Pelosi insisted Thursday she will have the 218 votes necessary to pass the bill. Meanwhile, President Obama is set to huddle Friday with congressional Democrats on Capitol Hill to review the legislation.
In a statement, AARP CEO Barry Rand said, "We started this debate more than two years ago with the twin goals of making coverage affordable to our younger members and protecting Medicare for seniors.
"We can say with confidence that [the House bill] meets those goals with improved benefits for people in Medicare and needed health insurance market reforms to help ensure every American can purchase affordable health coverage."
The AMA's president, Dr. J. James Rohack, told reporters Thursday that the legislation is "not a perfect representation of our views" but is close enough to warrant his group's support and keep the reform process moving forward.
Rohack said the bill needs to be accompanied by legislation reversing scheduled Medicare reimbursement payment reductions to physicians.
Responding to the AMA endorsement, Obama said the doctors' group is "supporting reform because [its members have] seen firsthand what's broken about our health care system," Obama said.
"They would not be supporting it if they really believed that it would lead to government bureaucrats making decisions that are best left to doctors."

[gman]

Bob Oppenheimer wrote:

looks like the morons all stayed home this election day.... except in erie where morons rule.

No...the morons showed up on election day....you saw the results right?

[Dallas]

JOY wrote:

<quoted text>
It's no reflection on Obama whatsoever. Both were very unpopular in their home states. Dream on all you want.

Here, Joy....this might help.

http://www.mahalo.com/kool-aid-coupons

[citi]

Dallas wrote:

<quoted text>
Here, Joy....this might help.
http://www.mahalo.com/kool-aid-coupons

LMAO! D! Great response!

How ARE you?

:) citi

[Dallas]

citi wrote:

<quoted text>
LMAO! D! Great response!
How ARE you?
:) citi

Doing well....just been incredibly busy. Missed you guys so thought I'd pop in.

[citi]

Dallas wrote:

<quoted text>
Doing well....just been incredibly busy. Missed you guys so thought I'd pop in.

Well we sure have missed you too! A pleasure to read, as always D!

:) citi

[CRANK]

JOY wrote:

<quoted text>
It's no reflection on Obama whatsoever. Both were very unpopular in their home states. Dream on all you want.

Funny how if a republican lost under Bush it was a referendum on Bush, but when two democratic governors lose under Oh-Bam-Me (the black Nixon) it is no reflection on Oh-Bam-Me whatsoever. What the Oh-Bam-Me supporters can't come to grips with, is that conservatives are not treating Oh-Bam-Me (the black Nixon) nearly as badly as the liberals treated Bush. It seems that can't taken even a portion of what they dished out for eight years for ten months. Speaks volumes about strength.

[gman]

CRANK wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny how if a republican lost under Bush it was a referendum on Bush, but when two democratic governors lose under Oh-Bam-Me (the black Nixon) it is no reflection on Oh-Bam-Me whatsoever. What the Oh-Bam-Me supporters can't come to grips with, is that conservatives are not treating Oh-Bam-Me (the black Nixon) nearly as badly as the liberals treated Bush. It seems that can't taken even a portion of what they dished out for eight years for ten months. Speaks volumes about strength.

Only a person of ignorance would disrespect our president by calling him "limbaugh like" names. you lose all credibility.

[CRANK]

gman wrote:

<quoted text>
Only a person of ignorance would disrespect our president by calling him "limbaugh like" names. you lose all credibility.

But it was okay to call Bush names for eight years? Perhaps you ought to rethink credibility, and what it actually means. This country is so divided, half of the country has no credibility with the other half. That includes you.

[in the no]

Hyde wrote:

Exposing the Hyde Amendment Lies
Look at these misleading quotes:
“It is black letter law that not one dime of federal tax money can be used to fund any abortion.... I'm just telling you factually right now that the Hyde amendment is the law of the land." - Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO)
“There are no federal tax dollars that will fund abortion under the bill. The Hyde Amendment…..already bars federal funding for abortion. It still exists. It will not change. There is nothing in the bill that will change that." - Rep. Ron Klein (D-FL)
"I do not believe there will be a change in the Hyde amendment." - Sen. Arlin Specter (D-PA)
The truth: the Capps language explicitly permits the two things forbidden in the Hyde Amendment -- federal government funding for abortion and funding for plans that cover abortion.
So much for continuing longstanding federal policy on federal funding of abortions!
Watch both video’s that explains the truth: NOTE...the second one picks up where the first one leaves off
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup...

Sounds just like good old Specter: "I do not "believe" there will be a change in the Hyde amendment." As usual, his way of saying "I am effin clueless I am just here to collect a paycheck."

[gman]

CRANK wrote:

<quoted text>
But it was okay to call Bush names for eight years? Perhaps you ought to rethink credibility, and what it actually means. This country is so divided, half of the country has no credibility with the other half. That includes you.

No. It wasn't ok to call him names either. I can honestly say that I have shown respect to our president whether I agreed with his point of view. I have credibility but those who have to resort to name calling...lose it all.

[JOY]

CRANK wrote:

<quoted text>
But it was okay to call Bush names for eight years? Perhaps you ought to rethink credibility, and what it actually means. This country is so divided, half of the country has no credibility with the other half. That includes you.

Bush had the ENTIRE country behind him after 9/11. He Blew It Big Time by diverting into Iraq for those nonexistant WMD's. He got what he earned and deserved after that. You pick on Obama for no other reason than he is a Democratic President and Black to boot...which REALLY pisses off the Repugnicans.

[danm]

gman wrote:

<quoted text>
No. It wasn't ok to call him names either. I can honestly say that I have shown respect to our president whether I agreed with his point of view. I have credibility but those who have to resort to name calling...lose it all.

Like the ones that are called "teabaggers", "racists" "terrorists" when they disagree with the current administration and what those on capital hill are trying to do..do those who resort to name calling lose any credibility?