As You See It: Nov. 10, 2009

[Keeth]

Mr. Ken Sovey: nice letter there. I'm glad to see a voice of reason on the right. While you're lecturing the left, you might want to lecture such noted shrill and intolerant local right wingers as DH here and a certain Mr. Emberson. Hypocrisy is calling out the other side while ignoring the same behavior on your side.

[pat]

On the one hand, Ken Sovey calls people on the left hypocritical and neurotic and on the other hand, chastises people on the left for not being open to the opinions of others. Classic tactic of conservatives.

As for Krauthamer himself, we need to get rid of all these right wing cold war era warhawks who are doing nothing for the country and would like nothing but more war.

[Soquel by the Creek]

Eating wrote:

Wow...defending Charles Krauthammer? Good job.
There have never been two men who's physical appearance has been more effected by the evil that oozes our of their thoughts than Charles Krauthammer and the Pope.
Look at either of them and you will see evil, evil that has completely taken over a physical body.

I agree that Charles Krauthammer is one ugly, scary-looking dude, way up there on Henry Waxman scale. So by your logic then, Sarah Palin must be an angel of truth and goodness, right?

[Keeth]

Soquel by the Creek wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree that Charles Krauthammer is one ugly, scary-looking dude, way up there on Henry Waxman scale. So by your logic then, Sarah Palin must be an angel of truth and goodness, right?

God said the Devil would be attractive. CK is merely her succubus.

[Eating]

Soquel by the Creek wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree that Charles Krauthammer is one ugly, scary-looking dude, way up there on Henry Waxman scale. So by your logic then, Sarah Palin must be an angel of truth and goodness, right?

I'm not so much saying he's "ugly" or "unappealing", I'm saying he actually looks like evil completely inhabits his soul. Along with the Pope.