Pa. Sues To Stop Issuance Of Gay Marr...

Pa. Sues To Stop Issuance Of Gay Marriage Licenses

There are 1086 comments on the CBS Local story from Jul 30, 2013, titled Pa. Sues To Stop Issuance Of Gay Marriage Licenses. In it, CBS Local reports that:

State officials in Pennsylvania are asking a court to stop a rogue county from issuing marriage licenses to gay couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS Local.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#856 Aug 16, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
True, turns out straight men will rape anyone when they get horny enough.
12,000 women sexually assaulted v 14,000 men.
Of course since there are only 200,000 women compared to 1.2 million men in the military, that means:
16% of women are sexually assaulted.
1% of men are sexually assaulted.
So women are STILL 16 times more likely to be sexually assaulted by their male counterparts.
Btw, 98% of the rapists are straight men of course; no big surprise there.
You are so full of it. I'm amazed you can hold that much being reamed and all...

Sexual assault reports went up 40% after the repeal of DADT. The only thing that meant was that gays had opportunity. Nothing changed for straights except risk.

Moreover, if you read the article, most men don't tell what the gay Sargent ordered up. Besides, straights prefer blonde women when available.

Your 98% is the amount of BS in your posts.

You admitted that genders are segregated. I already showed that heterosexuals are segregated.

Nothing appears to be 'equal' to me...

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#858 Aug 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so full of it. I'm amazed you can hold that much being reamed and all...
Sexual assault reports went up 40% after the repeal of DADT. The only thing that meant was that gays had opportunity. Nothing changed for straights except risk.
Moreover, if you read the article, most men don't tell what the gay Sargent ordered up. Besides, straights prefer blonde women when available.
Your 98% is the amount of BS in your posts.
You admitted that genders are segregated. I already showed that heterosexuals are segregated.
Nothing appears to be 'equal' to me...
Yes, reports of sexual assault went up, because the gay & lesbian service members being assaulted no longer had to worry about outing themselves by reporting it.

And the 98% figure is directly from the military's report, along with the other figures I posted.

Yes, genders are segregated when they are single, regardless of sexual orientation.

Seems pretty equal to me.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#859 Aug 16, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, reports of sexual assault went up, because the gay & lesbian service members being assaulted no longer had to worry about outing themselves by reporting it.
And the 98% figure is directly from the military's report, along with the other figures I posted.
Yes, genders are segregated when they are single, regardless of sexual orientation.
Seems pretty equal to me.
Reference the report.

You are denying the unequal orientation segregation. Everyone can see your zippers down and your brains fell out.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#860 Aug 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Reference the report.
You are denying the unequal orientation segregation. Everyone can see your zippers down and your brains fell out.
www.sapr.mil

What unequal orientation segregation?

Single heterosexuals are segregated by gender.
Single homosexuals are segregated by gender.

Seems pretty equal to me.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#861 Aug 17, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
www.sapr.mil
What unequal orientation segregation?
Single heterosexuals are segregated by gender.
Single homosexuals are segregated by gender.
Seems pretty equal to me.
The site says nothing about the 98%.

I didn't bring up gender segregation, you did.

You are deliberately denying orientation segregation for heterosexuals.

But hey, an army of d/ck and a// isn't something you will jeopardize, right?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#862 Aug 17, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
True, turns out straight men will rape anyone when they get horny enough.
12,000 women sexually assaulted v 14,000 men.
Of course since there are only 200,000 women compared to 1.2 million men in the military, that means:
16% of women are sexually assaulted.
1% of men are sexually assaulted.
So women are STILL 16 times more likely to be sexually assaulted by their male counterparts.
Btw, 98% of the rapists are straight men of course; no big surprise there.
In other words, out of 1.2 million men,

98% of the heterosexuals assaulted 12,000 women,

2% homosexuals(really less than) assaulted 14,000 men.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#863 Aug 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
They can and do. An medical exception is perfectly reasonable.
However, equating a duplicate gendered half, who in all of human history have never procreated even ONCE, is clearly a vastly different relationship.
This isn't rocket science. Even a child knows the difference. Especially when the couple is mom and dad.
Actually, KiMare, that is nothing more than a rationalization. Procreation is neither a prerequisite for, nor a requirement of,legal marriage.

To imply that it exists, applicable only to same sex couples and solely for the purpose of exclusion is insane. Implying as much only supports the notion that you are certifiable.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#864 Aug 17, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, KiMare, that is nothing more than a rationalization. Procreation is neither a prerequisite for, nor a requirement of,legal marriage.
To imply that it exists, applicable only to same sex couples and solely for the purpose of exclusion is insane. Implying as much only supports the notion that you are certifiable.
Actually seeking to disenfranchise children from consideration is insane.

Especially when married couples have to use protection NOT to procreate, and YOU need to use protection just to have abusive intercourse, and NEVER to prevent pregnancy.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#865 Aug 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Actually seeking to disenfranchise children from consideration is insane.
Says the resident lunatic.
KiMare wrote:
Especially when married couples have to use protection NOT to procreate, and YOU need to use protection just to have abusive intercourse, and NEVER to prevent pregnancy.
KiMare, the reality remains that infertile heterosexual couples CAN, in fact, marry; which disproves your thesis.

What is more, same sex couples are able to adopt in the vast majority of jurisdictions, which further proves your rhetoric incorrect.

Do try to keep up. Do you have a valid and relevant argument? At present, it does not appear so.
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#866 Aug 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
They can and do. An medical exception is perfectly reasonable.
However, equating a duplicate gendered half, who in all of human history have never procreated even ONCE, is clearly a vastly different relationship.
This isn't rocket science. Even a child knows the difference. Especially when the couple is mom and dad.
Even a child knows that procreating is not a requirement for marriage.
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#867 Aug 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually seeking to disenfranchise children from consideration is insane.
Especially when married couples have to use protection NOT to procreate, and YOU need to use protection just to have abusive intercourse, and NEVER to prevent pregnancy.
Hmmmm..... what does your Buybull say about people who knowingly spread lies?

I don't need to use a condom to have sex. Are you daft?

You think my grandparents need to use protection? REALLY? You are dumber than I ever thought possible.
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#868 Aug 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
In other words, out of 1.2 million men,
98% of the heterosexuals assaulted 12,000 women,
2% homosexuals(really less than) assaulted 14,000 men.
Oh? Where did you find those statistics, in WND?
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#869 Aug 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The site says nothing about the 98%.
I didn't bring up gender segregation, you did.
DAMN! It's just a few posts up #859! How many different cognitive disabilities do you have?
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#870 Aug 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so full of it. I'm amazed you can hold that much being reamed and all...
Sexual assault reports went up 40% after the repeal of DADT. The only thing that meant was that gays had opportunity.
Liar.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#871 Aug 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The site says nothing about the 98%.
I didn't bring up gender segregation, you did.
You are deliberately denying orientation segregation for heterosexuals.
But hey, an army of d/ck and a// isn't something you will jeopardize, right?
Then you need to look again. It specifically said 98% of all sexual assault offenders were men.

The fact that single gays & straights berth together proves there is no orientation segregation.

Heterosexuals are not segregated from homosexuals.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#872 Aug 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
In other words, out of 1.2 million men,
98% of the heterosexuals assaulted 12,000 women,
2% homosexuals(really less than) assaulted 14,000 men.
Obviously statistics isn't your strong suit; along with many other things.

98% of sexual assault offenders were men; the overwhelming majority of whom identify as straight.

Only 2% of sexual assault offenders were women.

If you had any knowledge of the military or sexual assault, you'd know many straight men sexually assault other men. It's not about sexual attraction, but rather power.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#873 Aug 17, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you need to look again. It specifically said 98% of all sexual assault offenders were men.
The fact that single gays & straights berth together proves there is no orientation segregation.
Heterosexuals are not segregated from homosexuals.
You said 98% were straight. Big difference. Double check your link. It says no such thing.

Homosexuals birth together. Heterosexuals do not. NOT equal.

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#874 Aug 17, 2013
fr KiMare:

>Did you ever read 'The Emperor's New Clothes'?...<

Did you ever hear "Get a life"? You sure need to.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#875 Aug 17, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously statistics isn't your strong suit; along with many other things.
98% of sexual assault offenders were men; the overwhelming majority of whom identify as straight.
Only 2% of sexual assault offenders were women.
If you had any knowledge of the military or sexual assault, you'd know many straight men sexually assault other men. It's not about sexual attraction, but rather power.
I'm going with your changing claims. None of which you have provided proof for.

Now you make the claim that the huge jump in sexual assault at the same time DADT was rescinded is because of straights!

Here are the facts;

-Gays assault the same sex. Heteros assault the opposite.

-GLBT represent 4% of the general population.

-Gays in the military (less than 4%) accounted for 14000 assaults on males.

-Hetero males who make up more than 96% of males, assaulted 12000 women.

Welcome to the new normal. Sad and sick.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#876 Aug 17, 2013
Pattysboi wrote:
fr KiMare:
>Did you ever read 'The Emperor's New Clothes'?...<
Did you ever hear "Get a life"? You sure need to.
You need to get your own relationship. What are you ashamed of?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Elkins Park Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Michelle Grossman - About NBC 10 News Story - W... (Mar '08) 4 hr Mike M 675
News Dawn Timmeney - About NBC 10 News Story - WCAU ... (Feb '08) Sat Mad 13
News Josh Duggar reportedly paid porn star for sex Sat lisa in lancaster 4
Easy Paypal money Aug 28 rbcrews1984 1
Loanshark or street loan needed in or around Ph... (Apr '13) Aug 28 Roc 60
Dindu nuffin Aug 27 Holotta Wytrache 2
News Pregnant CBS3 Meteorologist Shuts Down Body-Sha... Aug 27 Roy 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Elkins Park Mortgages