US school shooting revives gun debate

Dec 14, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Yahoo!

Relatives of those killed in past mass shootings reacted with outrage to Friday's news of another massacre at an elementary school in Connecticut.

Comments
2,141 - 2,160 of 2,340 Comments Last updated Mar 31, 2013

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2300 Feb 17, 2013
Respect71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Scuff it off know nothing. Come back when you understand the policies put in place by Reagan.
I'm the one who had to walk you through them.

I understand his polices caused the highest unemployment, a deep recession, and that he tripled the national debt.

His policy of importing cocaine was illegal then and still illegal today.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2301 Feb 17, 2013
Respect71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Your pointless is???
Goodness, boy, even you should be able to look at a PICTURE and know what a bell curve is?

What year did you drop out?

2 plus 2 equals 4?
The Infantile left Winged

Chico, CA

#2302 Feb 17, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
A zygote isn't a child.
What a shame the wingnuts didn't show any care for the human babies that are here right now.
Translation:
Liberalism? It is a serious, pathological lying and very dangerous mental disorder!
just another guy

Belleville, IL

#2303 Feb 17, 2013
The Infantile left Winged wrote:
<quoted text>
Translation:
Liberalism? It is a serious, pathological lying and very dangerous mental disorder!
Alternate translation:

The ends justify the means for us. There is no justification forr what those who believe in the Constitution do.
just another guy

Belleville, IL

#2304 Feb 17, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The whiny lunatic right don't have a pair among them.
Laughable. You loons are deathly afraid of us being armed.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Happy to see Colorado requiring background check and ban massacre magazines.
Maybe assault weapons sales, we see.
The loons want to ban magazines, yet they are begging the manufacturers to keep producing them in Colo.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2305 Feb 17, 2013
just another guy wrote:
Alternate translation:
The ends justify the means for us.
Yea, explains why the NRA fights so hard to stop background checks and to put assault weapons into the hands of anyone who wants them.

Universal background checks: Colorado... next up!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2306 Feb 17, 2013
just another guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Laughable. You loons are deathly afraid of us being armed.
.
The women of America are the ones who should be deathly afraid of people like you being armed.

P*ies with a gun... instead of a backbone.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2307 Feb 17, 2013
just another guy wrote:
The loons want to ban magazines, yet they are begging the manufacturers to keep producing them in Colo.
The only loons that are begging manufacturers to produce massacre magazines are the loons who insist massacre magazines are used by... "sportsmen"... for hunting.
just another guy

Denver, CO

#2308 Feb 17, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The only loons that are begging manufacturers to produce massacre magazines are the loons who insist massacre magazines are used by... "sportsmen"... for hunting.
From the Denver Post

"On Friday in initial debate over the bill, state Rep. Joe Salazar, D-Thorton, still offered an amendment that clarifies manufacturers could still sell high-capacity magazines to out-of-state vendors that range from the U.S. military to law enforcement.

“I want it to be clear that manufacturers can still do business here in Colorado,” Salazar said.

Republicans contested the amendment, calling it an “oops amendment,” and argued that it’s unfair that a company can produce the device, but can’t sell it in Colorado."
just another guy

United States

#2309 Feb 17, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The women of America are the ones who should be deathly afraid of people like you being armed.
P*ies with a gun... instead of a backbone.
The women of America are not afraid of people being armed. In fact 60% of new CCW permits are being issued to women. They aren't buying into your bullshit.
The Infantile left Winged

Chico, CA

#2310 Feb 17, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, explains why the NRA fights so hard to stop background checks and to put assault weapons into the hands of anyone who wants them.
Universal background checks: Colorado... next up!
You liberal lemming dope!
The NRA is NOT fighting hard to stop background checks, They are questioning those who get chosen to do, and how background checks are performed! They / we don't want any liberal lemming idiots like you doing them with your biased ignorance!!!

And liar... you have any links to back up your stupid claim?

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#2311 Feb 17, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>The only loons that are begging manufacturers to produce massacre magazines are the loons who insist massacre magazines are used by... "sportsmen"... for hunting.
And only scared little boys are trying to get government to take away Americans rights.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#2312 Feb 17, 2013
The Infantile left Winged wrote:
<quoted text>
You liberal lemming dope!
The NRA is NOT fighting hard to stop background checks, They are questioning those who get chosen to do, and how background checks are performed! They / we don't want any liberal lemming idiots like you doing them with your biased ignorance!!!
And liar... you have any links to back up your stupid claim?
The National Rifle Association’s executive vice president continued to oppose background checks for all gun purchases despite polls indicating that most NRA members don’t share his position.

The NRA’s Wayne LaPierre said on “Fox News Sunday” that background checks for all gun purchases would lead to a national registry of gun owners. Critics say such a registry could lead to taxes on guns or to confiscation.

Poor teabagger.

Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#2313 Feb 17, 2013
Respect71 wrote:
<quoted text>
And only scared little boys are trying to get government to take away Americans rights.
The same "scared" little boys didn't have crap to say when the "Patriot" Act was passed.

In fact, teabaggers embraced it.
The Infantile left Winged

Chico, CA

#2314 Feb 17, 2013
Wall Street Government wrote:
<quoted text>
The National Rifle Association’s executive vice president continued to oppose background checks for all gun purchases despite polls indicating that most NRA members don’t share his position.
The NRA’s Wayne LaPierre said on “Fox News Sunday” that background checks for all gun purchases would lead to a national registry of gun owners. Critics say such a registry could lead to taxes on guns or to confiscation.
Poor teabagger.
You dense dope!!! You just don't get it???
That supports EXACTLY what I posted, you liberal lemming moron!

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#2315 Feb 17, 2013
Wall Street Government wrote:
<quoted text>The same "scared" little boys didn't have crap to say when the "Patriot" Act was passed.

In fact, teabaggers embraced it.
Lol.
The Infantile left Winged

Chico, CA

#2316 Feb 17, 2013
Wall Street Government wrote:
<quoted text>
The same "scared" little boys didn't have crap to say when the "Patriot" Act was passed.
In fact, teabaggers embraced it.
And neither did you oblamerbot lemmings when he extended it, did you??? YOU IDIOTS!!!
==========
Obama signs Patriot Act extensions
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/...

But what? That's different for some stupid liberal reason???
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#2317 Feb 17, 2013
The Infantile left Winged wrote:
<quoted text>
You dense dope!!! You just don't get it???
That supports EXACTLY what I posted, you liberal lemming moron!
The National Rifle Association’s executive vice president continued to oppose background checks for all gun purchases.

What a dumshit.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#2318 Feb 17, 2013
The Infantile left Winged wrote:
<quoted text>
And neither did you oblamerbot lemmings when he extended it, did you??? YOU IDIOTS!!!
==========
Obama signs Patriot Act extensions
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/...
But what? That's different for some stupid liberal reason???
He only extended 3 provisions of it, and he didn't create it.

It would take congress to repeal it.

Teabaggers wouldn't do that.

No it's NOT different but it just proves, teabaggers blame democrats for policies they implemented.

Then WHINE about it.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2319 Feb 17, 2013
just another guy wrote:
<quoted text>
From the Denver Post
"On Friday in initial debate over the bill, state Rep. Joe Salazar, D-Thorton, still offered an amendment that clarifies manufacturers could still sell high-capacity magazines to out-of-state vendors
You're thinking that I care? Or that it matters?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Elizabeth Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 2 hr Terra Firma 3,009
Relocating advice 3 hr Jjdenver3 10
You rule the planet. How do you save the human... (Dec '12) 16 hr Respect71 1,301
Morgan Ingram was not murdered nor stalked. (Nov '12) Thu curious 37
annette marion tortures w/cpms yvette handfield... Thu ANNETTE MARION KI... 1
Play the "end of the word" game (Jul '11) Thu Hannah V 4,211
Ban the user above you game (Oct '11) Thu joanNYadoptees 2,787
•••
•••
•••

Elizabeth Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Elizabeth People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Elizabeth News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Elizabeth
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••