George Bethke

Mount Vernon, MO

#1 Feb 20, 2006
Arkansas citizens
In Arkansas we do not have mandatory sentencing for child sex molesters.
Far too many children have been brutalized by repeat sex predators.
I urge everyone to contact the Gov. and elected officials to enact “Jessica’s Law” in our state.
As of now the legislators do not meet until the year 2007, how long do our children have to wait to be protected?
The Gov. and our elected officials are not calling for a special session to enact and pass a “Jessica’s Law”, I guess the children will have to wait.
George Bethke
Jean Mandera

Calico Rock, AR

#2 Feb 21, 2006
I have contacted our officials and was told they couldn't do anything until 2008!!!

How many children will be in harms way by then???
Troy Galebach

Andover, MN

#3 Feb 21, 2006
I sympathize with each of you. I’ve noticed that there are several states where there seems to be no particular hurry to enact this sort of legislation. For the life of me I don’t understand why.

People who harm children like this are the worst of our species, and really don’t deserve to walk freely among us.

Since I live in a different state, I can’t help you with this issue, but I urge you to get a group together of like minded citizens and see if you can get a groundswell of support for this law.

Regards
Steven

Stuttgart, AR

#4 Feb 21, 2006
I agree with George Bethke, Arkansas desperately needs Jessica's Law. Far too many times child molesters are convicted of sexual crimes against innocent children, only to have lawyers and judges plea down their prison time, sometimes to just probation.We must have mandatory sentencing, maybe then criminals will think twice knowing they face 25 years to life in prison with no parole.
Tammy

Grand Prairie, TX

#5 Jun 10, 2006
I HIGHLY recommend all take a good look at the information posted at www.nojessicaslaw.org in order to be better informed. It's a REAL EYE-OPENER!
Tammy

Grand Prairie, TX

#6 Jun 10, 2006
As well, here is more truth that most of us haven't stopped to consider.(Written by a member of SOhopeful International)

Surviving at the Whim of Madmen
(page 1)

News of a horrific crime, reporters telling the details over and over, mugshots of the suspect on the screen, revelation that the suspect is a registered sex offender. Even though such a crime might occur hundreds of miles away, I panic.

That crime could cost my son any remaining chance of a normal, stable childhood. It could cost me the choice to live peacefully with my husband, the right to live free of the terror that someone will show up on my doorstep intent on murder.

Why? Because in response to horrific crimes, society now lashes out at law-abiding citizens who, in the past, broke the law. Punishes them again by broadcasting their daily whereabouts to the world, driving them into joblessness and homelessness, banning them from walking down a city street or taking shelter in cases of emergencies. And the law thoroughly punishes their families. Spouses must either live under the same dangers, restrictions and privacy invasions, or abandon their marriage. Children lose friends, homes, and the right to be free of mockery and assault and fear.
We don't speak out often. Being legally required to provide personal information to those who wish to kill us tends to stifle public discourse. If a death threat is made, we cannot protect ourselves by staying with relatives or in a hotel for a few days. The law requires we keep the potential killer updated as to where we can be found. And that potential killer would have more rights under the law, even if he murdered us, than we do as people trying to remain in compliance with ever-changing laws.

My husband was convicted decades ago of a sex crime against an adult. He served time, he participated in years of treatment during and after release, he spent additional years under supervision. Then a court, and a panel of mental health experts, deemed he was no longer a danger to anyone. Not medium risk, not low risk. No risk. He set out to do what hundreds of thousands of ex-cons do--build a new life--and he succeeded. We married and had a child. We worked hard, contributed to our community, raised our son, made plans for the future.

Then society demanded a do-over, and contrived to do so through "regulation." So another court decided there was no punishment attached to retroactive registration of sex offenders, nor in the highly publicized dissemination of their whereabouts.

Even though we are no longer subject to criminal supervision, "civil" laws have taken our privacy, our right to live and travel where we choose, and our right to be free of harassment.
Politicians, the media, and the public make it clear to us: We are human garbage. Toxic waste. Unfit to breathe the air. Unworthy of life. Deserving of death at the hands of vigilantes.

Yes, I say "we," even though my husband is the only sex offender in the family. For years, the public, politicians, and certain advocacy groups have gotten away with failing to acknowledge the swath of collateral damage their law-making has inflicted. If a mere third of offenders are married, almost a quarter million spouses are recklessly placed in jeopardy by the laws. If a third live with a parent, almost a quarter million family members are at risk. If a third have a single child, almost a quarter million children are--daily--endangered by public notification and the prevailing, rabidly encouraged public sentiment that any registered offender should be tormented at every opportunity. Our lives are ones of fear.
Tammy

Grand Prairie, TX

#7 Jun 10, 2006
Surviving at the Whim of Madmen
(page 2)

To those who say I knew what I was getting into by marrying a man with a sex crime in his past, consider this: We married five years before the first law that affected us was passed, and nearly ten years before the current crop became law. Ten years ago, no reasonable person would have predicted that, absent any wrongdoing in that time, we'd suddenly be violating the law to live in a home we own, to drive down certain city streets, to take a vacation without notifying law enforcement, to buy or rent a new home or hold a job without updating the public--all because of a decades-old conviction. All these penalties came to pass after our marriage, and after the birth of our child.

There is no way to appeal it. There is no escaping it. No matter what we do--no matter how well or how long we abide by the laws--we lose more and more rights and freedoms every day. And that loss is based upon pure hysteria and statistical manipulation. The testimony of mental health experts is ignored by politicians and the mainstream media. True recidivism rates are under-reported, or are not reported at all. Even victim advocacy groups and prosecuting attorneys are disregarded when they speak against these punishments. And discussing the consequences of the laws is, apparently, taboo in the public forum.

Some will say it would be shameful to repeal laws intended to protect children. I tell you the recklessness with which hundreds of thousands of innocent American citizens have been triumphantly stripped of their privacy, family, and safety is shameful indeed. Politicians and advocates tell us that such "civil" abuse heaped upon sex offenders is worthy if it saves a single child. By default, they name the pain and loss and endangerment inflicted on other children worthy as well. Shameful indeed.

I don't ask that you welcome us with open arms. We ask for something far more simple: to be left alone, just as we were all those years in which we did nothing wrong under the law. However, if you demand that every offender be eternally punished for his or her past, then show the moral courage to hold yourself accountable for the present.

When you demand offenders be pushed out of your community, say out loud, "and their children should be hounded out of their home, too."

When you demand longer and broader notifications, state bravely, "and I want their children to be shamed whenever they leave their home, to live in terror of vigilante violence forever."

When you demand offenders be banned from schools, proclaim as well, "and I want their children to be mocked and beaten by their classmates, to never have a friend."

When you demand the government step in to 'protect the children,' say to the offender's child, "But you I will purposefully endanger. Your family I will destroy, and claim its destruction as my victory."

When you demand an offender be again punished for a decades-old crime, at least have the decency to say you're willing to inflict certain damage on thousands of children in exchange for the many-times disproved promise of better security for yours.

Don't like the way that sounds? Neither do we. But you have the option of turning away, of ignoring it, of justifying it with sound bites. We don't. We live according to the whims of civil madmen every day.
Ilah June 06
www.sohopeful.org
Kelly

Peoria, IL

#8 Jan 22, 2010
i could really care less about you or your children...if your scummy husband hadn't committed a sex crime you wouldn't be in that situation. YOU are the one that put your children in the so called danger you say they are in by having children with a sex offender.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Elizabeth Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Party tonight, lake tomorrow 4 hr John 2
Any jobs for engineers in Mountain Home? (Jul '14) Thu guest 8
Myka arms? Thu John 5
known std carriers Wed bob 27
Debate: Gay Marriage - Mountain Home, AR (Aug '10) Wed Username 203
Looking for inboard Wed Jim 1
Bar Chicks (Oct '14) Wed John 30
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Elizabeth Mortgages