388th District Court

Full story: El Paso Times 35
Experience: Judge of the 388th District Court since 2001. Former 65th District Court associate judge and lawyer in private practice. Read more
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Maria Teresa Block

El Paso, TX

#1 Feb 17, 2008
Ms. Marlene Gonzalez age is 53 and she is the best Candidate for the 388th District Court, the Constitutional Rights and the due process of law is being violated in this court. It's time for a change, elect Judge Marlene Gonzalez.
WhereIsMarlene

El Paso, TX

#2 Feb 17, 2008
Maria Teresa Block wrote:
Ms. Marlene Gonzalez age is 53 and she is the best Candidate for the 388th District Court, the Constitutional Rights and the due process of law is being violated in this court. It's time for a change, elect Judge Marlene Gonzalez.
Marlene gonzalez can barely speak English.

Is she an American citizen?

For sure she is not Mexican.

She never shows up to the forums or radio talk shows.

What is she afraid of?

Does she exist?
A Voter

El Paso, TX

#3 Feb 17, 2008
anyone who has been in Judge Patricia Macias court knows that this woman is crazed and power hungry and it is time for her to leave.

Macias like the majority of presiding Judges rules in favor of attorneys who contribute or kiss her behind. Any family law case brought by attorneys that she does not like do not stand a chance in custody cases. Point in fact she gave full custody to then presiding Judge Luis Aguilar against their mother Captain Sylvia Aguilar. This woman is so hateful that her campaign and thrust to make herself a presiding Judge over several smaller courts feeds into her ego.

Many Judges like Alfredo Chavez, Robert Anchondo and Sam Medrano have followed her lead in power hungry momentum by creating sub courts that they all create.

I will vote for ANYONE other than Patricia Macias if we have allowed the mentality of this woman to dominate the family court for so many years, I know its time for a change.

Doris Sipes addressed this issue in trying to impeach her from her court for her behavior and favortism, the only family law Judge that had the balls to do anything while everyone else grins and bears it.
A Voter

El Paso, TX

#4 Feb 17, 2008
correction

"the only family law ATTORNEY"
YikesSipes

AOL

#5 Feb 17, 2008
A Voter wrote:
anyone who has been in Judge Patricia Macias court knows that this woman is crazed and power hungry and it is time for her to leave.
Macias like the majority of presiding Judges rules in favor of attorneys who contribute or kiss her behind. Any family law case brought by attorneys that she does not like do not stand a chance in custody cases. Point in fact she gave full custody to then presiding Judge Luis Aguilar against their mother Captain Sylvia Aguilar. This woman is so hateful that her campaign and thrust to make herself a presiding Judge over several smaller courts feeds into her ego.
Many Judges like Alfredo Chavez, Robert Anchondo and Sam Medrano have followed her lead in power hungry momentum by creating sub courts that they all create.
I will vote for ANYONE other than Patricia Macias if we have allowed the mentality of this woman to dominate the family court for so many years, I know its time for a change.
Doris Sipes addressed this issue in trying to impeach her from her court for her behavior and favortism, the only family law Judge that had the balls to do anything while everyone else grins and bears it.
So why is Doris Sipes showing up in court defending perverts? Is Doris a family pervert law attorney?
A Voter

El Paso, TX

#6 Feb 17, 2008
YikesSipes wrote:
<quoted text>
So why is Doris Sipes showing up in court defending perverts? Is Doris a family pervert law attorney?
other than the fact that Regina Arditti stated that she was doing Doris Sipes a favor, then after she lost the case stated that she represented him because Doris did not have a Federal License, ultimately, Doris never represented the Perve. How could she? Doris is a family law attorney. Regina on the other hand was in need for publicity. Based on the back lash and her quick backout of the case I think her efforts to make a name for herself made the wrong one?

So when you put two and two together Doris Sipes never represented the Perve. As I mentioned before I give her kudos for having the balls in going toe to toe with Macias and trying to let the public know that Macias behavior and favors to particular attorneys should not be accepted by the community in whole. Thus, challangers, something Macias has not worried about since fighting Cardone for the bench. The only reason she won that election is Cardone is a Republican who ran in a democratic chokehold.
THE SHADOW

Las Cruces, NM

#7 Feb 17, 2008
A Voter wrote:
<quoted text>
other than the fact that Regina Arditti stated that she was doing Doris Sipes a favor, then after she lost the case stated that she represented him because Doris did not have a Federal License, ultimately, Doris never represented the Perve. How could she? Doris is a family law attorney. Regina on the other hand was in need for publicity. Based on the back lash and her quick backout of the case I think her efforts to make a name for herself made the wrong one?
So when you put two and two together Doris Sipes never represented the Perve. As I mentioned before I give her kudos for having the balls in going toe to toe with Macias and trying to let the public know that Macias behavior and favors to particular attorneys should not be accepted by the community in whole. Thus, challangers, something Macias has not worried about since fighting Cardone for the bench. The only reason she won that election is Cardone is a Republican who ran in a democratic chokehold.
REGINA ARDITTI IS A DAM GOOD ATTORNEY WITH MORE INTEGRETY & DOES HER UTMOST TO DEFEND HER CLIENTS NO MATTER THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
pervlawyer

AOL

#8 Feb 17, 2008
THE SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
REGINA ARDITTI IS A DAM GOOD ATTORNEY WITH MORE INTEGRETY & DOES HER UTMOST TO DEFEND HER CLIENTS NO MATTER THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
So why in the midst of an election does Arditti represent a perv involved in the FBI corruption investigation. Not too bright if Arditti wants to sit on a bench.
THE SHADOW

Las Cruces, NM

#9 Feb 17, 2008
AN ATTORNEY DEFENDS CLIENTS FOR A LIVING AND THIS IS STILL THE U.S.A. WARE YOUR INNOSENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY.
THE SHADOW

Las Cruces, NM

#10 Feb 17, 2008
WHY IS IT SOME PEOPLE CANT STICK ON ONE SUBJECT? THIS STARTED OUT ABOUT A CANDIDATE FOR THE 388
pervlawyer

AOL

#11 Feb 17, 2008
Who was the idiot that mentioned arditti in the first place? Its up to arditti if she wants to defend the scum of the earth.
A Voter

El Paso, TX

#12 Feb 17, 2008
THE SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
REGINA ARDITTI IS A DAM GOOD ATTORNEY WITH MORE INTEGRETY & DOES HER UTMOST TO DEFEND HER CLIENTS NO MATTER THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
Whether she is damn good attorney or not doesn't matter anymore. You see nobody really knew who she was until her name and Fernando Parra (perve) hit the news media side by side. Seeing that you are not posting from El Paso, you must not be aware of how the corruption is leaving a bad taste in people's mouths, and now that she defended Parra who is linked to Gilbert Sanchez who is linked to Luther Jones who is linked to...well you got to be here to know that she screwed herself by representing him in the first place.

As to the question of who mentioned Arditti in the first place...well...if you read the entire posts of this thread, you will see that I used Sipes as an example of putting the heat on Macias, then the question came as to Sipes involvment with the Perve Parra, then I explained that Sipes never represented the Perve Parra, ARDITTI said that she was doing it as a favor for Sipes, then she lost the battle and her ignorance in criminal law and this particular Federal case screwed the Perve Parra which in turn caused her to say she was helping Sipes who was not licensed in Federal Court, then I pointed out that Sipes was a Family Attorney who could never of represented Parra in the first place, and Arditti probably did it to gain some publicity, which in turn backfired on her...DUDE, you really need to READ, but since you spelled where...WARE I guess that's just a bit too much for you to follow, thus, my above step by step...jebus...follow the posts this is the last time I do this for you...oh by the way based on your capital type I am betting you are the same nut that defended the Perve in the other threads...just a guess?
A Voter

El Paso, TX

#13 Feb 18, 2008
THE SHADOW wrote:
WHY IS IT SOME PEOPLE CANT STICK ON ONE SUBJECT? THIS STARTED OUT ABOUT A CANDIDATE FOR THE 388
Please see the above post for comprehension?
Ditto

AOL

#14 Feb 18, 2008
A Voter wrote:
<quoted text>
Whether she is damn good attorney or not doesn't matter anymore. You see nobody really knew who she was until her name and Fernando Parra (perve) hit the news media side by side. Seeing that you are not posting from El Paso, you must not be aware of how the corruption is leaving a bad taste in people's mouths, and now that she defended Parra who is linked to Gilbert Sanchez who is linked to Luther Jones who is linked to...well you got to be here to know that she screwed herself by representing him in the first place.
As to the question of who mentioned Arditti in the first place...well...if you read the entire posts of this thread, you will see that I used Sipes as an example of putting the heat on Macias, then the question came as to Sipes involvment with the Perve Parra, then I explained that Sipes never represented the Perve Parra, ARDITTI said that she was doing it as a favor for Sipes, then she lost the battle and her ignorance in criminal law and this particular Federal case screwed the Perve Parra which in turn caused her to say she was helping Sipes who was not licensed in Federal Court, then I pointed out that Sipes was a Family Attorney who could never of represented Parra in the first place, and Arditti probably did it to gain some publicity, which in turn backfired on her...DUDE, you really need to READ, but since you spelled where...WARE I guess that's just a bit too much for you to follow, thus, my above step by step...jebus...follow the posts this is the last time I do this for you...oh by the way based on your capital type I am betting you are the same nut that defended the Perve in the other threads...just a guess?
Ditto!
time for change

El Paso, TX

#15 Feb 20, 2008
There are attorneys out there who are willing to do something about changing this Court and are. I think we all need to talk to our neighbors and folks who have been before Macias and not listen to all the hype that she tries to present. You can check the el paso county web page and see that she hasnt ever tried a family law case or a jury trial or represented a person in a divorce. How can she be qualified to sit on the bench without that experience. She is not supposed to use a couple of psych classes she took twenty years ago to make decisions. She is supposed to follow the law.
That is why Doris spearheaded this effort to remove her and got a bunch of other attorneys behind her including the other candidates.
so obvious

El Paso, TX

#16 Feb 20, 2008
Maria Teresa Block wrote:
Ms. Marlene Gonzalez age is 53 and she is the best Candidate for the 388th District Court, the Constitutional Rights and the due process of law is being violated in this court. It's time for a change, elect Judge Marlene Gonzalez.
Marlene only jumped in after that other attorney Lyda did...
Its so obvious some family member is plugging her...
Also I always questions folks who run for office all the time and lose since it makes you wonder why Marlene wont hack it in the real world...
time for a change

El Paso, TX

#17 Feb 20, 2008
A Voter wrote:
anyone who has been in Judge Patricia Macias court knows that this woman is crazed and power hungry and it is time for her to leave.
Macias like the majority of presiding Judges rules in favor of attorneys who contribute or kiss her behind. Any family law case brought by attorneys that she does not like do not stand a chance in custody cases. Point in fact she gave full custody to then presiding Judge Luis Aguilar against their mother Captain Sylvia Aguilar. This woman is so hateful that her campaign and thrust to make herself a presiding Judge over several smaller courts feeds into her ego.
Many Judges like Alfredo Chavez, Robert Anchondo and Sam Medrano have followed her lead in power hungry momentum by creating sub courts that they all create.
I will vote for ANYONE other than Patricia Macias if we have allowed the mentality of this woman to dominate the family court for so many years, I know its time for a change.
Doris Sipes addressed this issue in trying to impeach her from her court for her behavior and favortism, the only family law Judge that had the balls to do anything while everyone else grins and bears it.
Amen to that... Power has corrupted Macias. Look at who her supporters are - folks who have made over 100K year in awarded attorneys fees in her Court.
check out the other candidates websites...they are good.

Since: Feb 08

United States

#18 Feb 22, 2008
Macias- Simply crazy

Gonzalez- Vindictive Crazy- Unforgiving(Imagen all the lawyers she hates and wont forget

Ness-Garcia- Liar/ Crazy- willing to change her name to run for office

I would rather keep the simply crazy woman but teach her a lesson: Continue with that crazy behavior and we will send you packing the next four around. Patricia get to work and stop with all your stupid ideas. Do your job and get that docket rolling! Oh, dont forget to treat your staff better so that they dont leave to the 383rd or 346th or 34th and so on......
Macias Rules

AOL

#19 Mar 3, 2008
As someone who has had an opportunity to observe Judge Macias since she was in the 65th and now in the 388th, I have first-hand knowledge of how she runs her court and she is demanding. She demands accountability, punctuality, respect for opposing litigants, and most of all she demands that the focus of the custody cases in her court and the Associate court focus on the child(ren)'s best interest(s). If an attorney doesn't want her there, it's because she's probably called them on the carpet for being late, asking for a continuance because they aren't prepared after their client's taken time off of work to show up to court, or simply because they don't want to be held accountable. Judge Macias has very high standards for those in her court and for her staff but no higher than she has for herself. This in not my opinion - This is fact and "that's all I have to say about that".
Twit

El Paso, TX

#20 Mar 3, 2008
Macias Rules wrote:
As someone who has had an opportunity to observe Judge Macias since she was in the 65th and now in the 388th, I have first-hand knowledge of how she runs her court and she is demanding. She demands accountability, punctuality, respect for opposing litigants, and most of all she demands that the focus of the custody cases in her court and the Associate court focus on the child(ren)'s best interest(s). If an attorney doesn't want her there, it's because she's probably called them on the carpet for being late, asking for a continuance because they aren't prepared after their client's taken time off of work to show up to court, or simply because they don't want to be held accountable. Judge Macias has very high standards for those in her court and for her staff but no higher than she has for herself. This in not my opinion - This is fact and "that's all I have to say about that".
another Twit??? Please the flyer that Lydia Garcia sent out was on point. This lady is far from cordial or professional. It is always personal with her and she measures your representation by how far your lips are up her backside. 98% of the practicing Family Law attorneys have the same thing to say about this woman. She is a monster and because she lacks the knowledge of what family law and its reprecussions stand for and she could care less how the children involved are affected.

AS for her staff she is unable to keep the same set of people because of her demeaning and arrogant attitude towards them and the fact that she believes that she carries a clue? She is rude pretentious and a poor excuse of a Judge who has control over families and its problems.

Now that is all I have to say. If those who know her can get out and make sure everyone knows what they know I can guarantee you that it will be enough people to unseat this terror called a Judge of the Family Court.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

El Paso Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Ted Cruz has nothing to offer the country 9 hr No soup 1
Eastside Regional Park 9 hr MachoPanzonEastS ... 11
Poll Should Petro be Banned from this Forum? (Aug '12) 15 hr suave 2,255
News El Paso residents to be charged water franchise... 16 hr huey goins 9
65 Americans missing in Mexico. (Feb '08) 16 hr harrytorta 52
i hate el paso (Nov '11) 18 hr huey goins 257
News Longtime GOP Texas Gov. Perry wins another term (Nov '10) Thu Farter 23,099
El Paso Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

El Paso People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]