my post:<quoted text>
Sorry lady, we'll criticize Bush as long as we want. Eight years of malfeasance and corruption deserve a little scrutiny, don't you think. I mean, you feel free to land on Obama after 9 months, I guess some of us feel after 8 YEARS the Bush admin (and you, by your support) can handle some skinning, don't you think?
Besides, looking at history is a good way of not repeating the mistakes of the past, isn't it?
Plant Lady wrote:
Why is it that when ever someone criticizes #44 the reply justifies it by pointing at #43? Does that somehow make it right?
As you can plainly see I did not state I felt one should not criticize #43. My post addressed the issue of justifying #44's missteps by pointing at #43's , as a child will try attempt to divert the attention.
I certainly do feel we should look at past mistakes to move forward and hopefully not repeat them. But that is an entirely separate issue from what I was addressing.