Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,407 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

dont know nothin

Benton City, WA

#21071 Jan 22, 2013
The Cabbit wrote:
Just to make it clear. I am not a Republican or a Democrat. I refuse to be told what to think. I neither swing right or left. I go forward. All i care about is facts and how we can make this great country of ours better.
Cudos to you for your way of thinking; however, make sure that all the facts are present and relevant in your propositions you put forward.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#21072 Jan 22, 2013
dont know nothin wrote:
<quoted text>Cudos to you for your way of thinking; however, make sure that all the facts are present and relevant in your propositions you put forward.
Thanks. I agree. I am an imperfect human. I will make mistakes. I fully expect to be called on them. knowledge is power.
dont know nothin

Benton City, WA

#21073 Jan 22, 2013
The Cabbit wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks. I agree. I am an imperfect human. I will make mistakes. I fully expect to be called on them. knowledge is power.
I completely concur and admit the same flaws.
Guest

Searcy, AR

#21074 Jan 22, 2013
Old Army we are overwhelmed with bullshit!! But that's typical democrats!! Confuse the system!!
Reality Check

Camden, AR

#21075 Jan 22, 2013
dont know nothin wrote:
<quoted text>All that i stated was true and came from a credible source and agency. He has increased the production of natural gas production along with green energy; both will help the U.S. become energy independant. Please do not speculate and fear mongor thoughtless ideas that would not and is not ever going to be true not matter how bad you want or think they will be. You are onlly fear mongoring and throwing out conspiricies instead of looking for the truth. Scientist and researchers all over the planet have determined that the crazy weather we are experiencing and the change in average temperatures is solely due to the increase in greenhouse gasses the biggest of which is OIL and carbon gases not because obama says so. We alone do not have enough oil to sustain our country for decades let alone centuries. Why do you think we imported most of our oil until late? You keep believing all the conspiricies you can come up with and we'll see who's right in the end.
Well, the people in oil I know tell a different story. They are telling me that we have more oil under our feet than we know what to do with. Oil is what they do. They are not some numbers cruncher sitting in an office in some building somewhere giving politicians the answers they need to push their agenda. They are the people in the field drilling the wells. But do with it what you will, you haven't listened to anything sensible that anyone has said so I don't know why you would start now. Your "scientists", know that greenhouse gasses are solely responsible how? Everything in science is a hypothesis even after it's been "proven". Scientist set out to prove the big bang theory decades ago. When they finally scientifically got to the point of the actual explosion, the laws of physics simply fell apart. They wouldn't even hold up under the magnitude of such an explosion it would have taken to create life. So with their whole world gone they went back to the drawing board and started creating "what if" scenarios by changing certain aspects of their formulas. The result was what is now considered by many to be the explination of life and that's parallell universes.
"Regarding parallel universes, string theory might eventually prove their existence in other dimensions, he said. As to the concept of the “multiverse,” our universe could be considered like a bubble, and there could be other bubbles existing in a kind of bubble bath, he explained, and sometimes these bubbles bump into each other resulting in something like the Big Bang. What existed before the Big Bang?“We should find evidence of an ‘umbilical cord’…perhaps connecting our universe to a parallel universe,” he posited. NASA is considering launching LISA, a laser space antenna that could reveal data of our cosmological origins." This is an article about Michio Kaku a theoretical physicist and the science world's "new view" on how we came to existence. I wouldn't trust the science community's views on anything that can't be physically touched or accurately traced back to it's origin through historical data. You obviously buy everything the science community says whole heartedly.
Kenyanblowsstole ntaxes

Amsterdam, Netherlands

#21077 Jan 22, 2013
Obama negotiating to sell F-16s and tanks to Egypt despite lawmakers' objections

They will most likely be used against genuine pro-democracy protesters and/or Israel, but we are not supposed to think about that. "Higher strategic interests" are involved here.

"Military source: US arms deal continuing despite lawmakers' objections," from DPA, January 13:

Egypt's negotiations with the US to acquire F-16 aircraft and M1A1 Abrams tanks are proceeding smoothly, a senior Egyptian military source has said.

The source added that the negotiations are proceeding regardless of statements made by political opponents of US President Barack Obama, in what may have been an oblique reference to calls by US Congressman Vern Buchanan for the suspension of this deal over what he described as the “dictatorship of President Mohamed Morsy.”

He also said that news about fresh military assistance or deals always sparks controversies, which tend to subside when the deals are concluded. He alleged that those Congressmen or officials who oppose supplies of advanced weaponry to the Egyptian army belong to the pro-Israel camp.

He added that demands made by some Congressmen to stop weapon deals with Egypt are motivated by electoral interests, adding, however, that the US administration does not take into account the opinions of voters when it makes assistance deals because such deals are connected to higher strategic interests.

And what might those be, in this case?

Egypt has been getting US$1.3 billion in annual assistance from the US since it signed the peace treaty with Israel in 1979. Since Islamist President Mohamed Morsy assumed power in July 2011, a number of members of US Congress have called for withholding aid to Egypt.
Jethro

Providence, UT

#21078 Jan 22, 2013
Kenyanblowsstolentaxes wrote:
Obama negotiating to sell F-16s and tanks to Egypt despite lawmakers' objections
They will most likely be used against genuine pro-democracy protesters and/or Israel, but we are not supposed to think about that. "Higher strategic interests" are involved here.
"Military source: US arms deal continuing despite lawmakers' objections," from DPA, January 13:
Egypt's negotiations with the US to acquire F-16 aircraft and M1A1 Abrams tanks are proceeding smoothly, a senior Egyptian military source has said.
The source added that the negotiations are proceeding regardless of statements made by political opponents of US President Barack Obama, in what may have been an oblique reference to calls by US Congressman Vern Buchanan for the suspension of this deal over what he described as the “dictatorship of President Mohamed Morsy.”
He also said that news about fresh military assistance or deals always sparks controversies, which tend to subside when the deals are concluded. He alleged that those Congressmen or officials who oppose supplies of advanced weaponry to the Egyptian army belong to the pro-Israel camp.
He added that demands made by some Congressmen to stop weapon deals with Egypt are motivated by electoral interests, adding, however, that the US administration does not take into account the opinions of voters when it makes assistance deals because such deals are connected to higher strategic interests.
And what might those be, in this case?
Egypt has been getting US$1.3 billion in annual assistance from the US since it signed the peace treaty with Israel in 1979. Since Islamist President Mohamed Morsy assumed power in July 2011, a number of members of US Congress have called for withholding aid to Egypt.
Dayum. My taxes just went up again. I got to find a 2nd job cause I sore can't afford a funeral.
Compo

Luton, UK

#21079 Jan 22, 2013
Interesting to see you people bowing to Hitler II.

LT 2013 01 22 -- In his latest unprecedented move in American history, President Obama announced he is converting his campaign apparatus into a permanent in-your-face campaign aimed at furthering Obama’s divisive, radical politics.

The new tax-exempt advocacy group, Organizing for Action, will “play an active role” in “mobilizing around and speaking out in support of important legislation” during Obama’s second term, the president said last week.

In the same vein, in his second inaugural address yesterday, Obama bullied the opposition. Reinforcing his long-running “spread the wealth” theme, the president hectored successful people, declaring that “our country cannot succeed when a shrinking few do very well and a growing many barely make it.”

Obama also seemed to signal in his mercifully brief oration that he’s going to go all-out to make government bigger.

Now, like a Third World caudillo, Obama will be able to pursue his policies from inside government and from outside through his OfA thug army.

OfA is a less violent version of Mussolini’s black shirts and Hitler’s brown shirts, or of the government-supported goon squads that Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez and Cuba’s Castro brothers use to harass and intimidate their domestic opponents. OfA units brought muscle to the recent fight in Wisconsin over that state’s out-of-control government labor unions. OfA has bludgeoned Democrats that Obama deemed insufficiently left-wing, especially red-state congressional Democrats who had been wavering on the issue of Obamacare.

OfA also dabbles in state politics. In 2009 it meddled in a congressional race in New York’s 23rd district, backing winner Democrat Scott Murphy over Republican Dede Scozzafava. It also involved itself in the Virginia gubernatorial contest, championing eventual loser Democrat Creigh Deeds over Republican Bob McDonnell.

OfA will carry on Obama-style community organizing. This anti-capitalist agitation revolves around the nebulous Marxist concept of “social justice.” It’s about making people angry so they push for change. It arti&#64257;cially creates pressure for government spending on whatever happens to be fashionable in leftist circles that day.

Giving OfA nonprofit status institutionalizes the brutal, sometimes violent organizing techniques of Saul Alinsky within America’s partisan political infrastructure.

This has long been Obama’s goal.

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#21080 Jan 22, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>"i did not ever say i did not know when it will end i said it will end in 2014 presumably"
LOL! Now you "presume" it will end. I thought Obama was going to bring our children home. Our children are dying on foreign soil everday for nothing. Obama has blood on his hands. He kills women and children from the sky with his drones, he even killed an American citizen without due process and he ensures our children are killed daily over there. He KILLS Mexicans by allowing weapons to be smuggled across our border which in turn they come back to this country and KILL our children fighting against such a thing. Obama is a KILLING MACHINE pure and simple.
"he even killed an American citizen without due process"
Guess we ARE losing our FREEDOMS after all, aren't we, Warrior?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#21081 Jan 22, 2013
Kenyanblowsstolentaxes wrote:
Obama negotiating to sell F-16s and tanks to Egypt despite lawmakers' objections
They will most likely be used against genuine pro-democracy protesters and/or Israel, but we are not supposed to think about that. "Higher strategic interests" are involved here.
"Military source: US arms deal continuing despite lawmakers' objections," from DPA, January 13:
Egypt's negotiations with the US to acquire F-16 aircraft and M1A1 Abrams tanks are proceeding smoothly, a senior Egyptian military source has said.
The source added that the negotiations are proceeding regardless of statements made by political opponents of US President Barack Obama, in what may have been an oblique reference to calls by US Congressman Vern Buchanan for the suspension of this deal over what he described as the “dictatorship of President Mohamed Morsy.”
He also said that news about fresh military assistance or deals always sparks controversies, which tend to subside when the deals are concluded. He alleged that those Congressmen or officials who oppose supplies of advanced weaponry to the Egyptian army belong to the pro-Israel camp.
He added that demands made by some Congressmen to stop weapon deals with Egypt are motivated by electoral interests, adding, however, that the US administration does not take into account the opinions of voters when it makes assistance deals because such deals are connected to higher strategic interests.
And what might those be, in this case?
Egypt has been getting US$1.3 billion in annual assistance from the US since it signed the peace treaty with Israel in 1979. Since Islamist President Mohamed Morsy assumed power in July 2011, a number of members of US Congress have called for withholding aid to Egypt.
No source. Ok. Lets see hmm... Ah yes. The jihadwatch.com . I see you copy paste very well. I prefer to get my news from a less bias source.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#21082 Jan 22, 2013
Compo wrote:
Interesting to see you people bowing to Hitler II.
LT 2013 01 22 -- In his latest unprecedented move in American history, President Obama announced he is converting his campaign apparatus into a permanent in-your-face campaign aimed at furthering Obama’s divisive, radical politics.
The new tax-exempt advocacy group, Organizing for Action, will “play an active role” in “mobilizing around and speaking out in support of important legislation” during Obama’s second term, the president said last week.
In the same vein, in his second inaugural address yesterday, Obama bullied the opposition. Reinforcing his long-running “spread the wealth” theme, the president hectored successful people, declaring that “our country cannot succeed when a shrinking few do very well and a growing many barely make it.”
Obama also seemed to signal in his mercifully brief oration that he’s going to go all-out to make government bigger.
Now, like a Third World caudillo, Obama will be able to pursue his policies from inside government and from outside through his OfA thug army.
OfA is a less violent version of Mussolini’s black shirts and Hitler’s brown shirts, or of the government-supported goon squads that Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez and Cuba’s Castro brothers use to harass and intimidate their domestic opponents. OfA units brought muscle to the recent fight in Wisconsin over that state’s out-of-control government labor unions. OfA has bludgeoned Democrats that Obama deemed insufficiently left-wing, especially red-state congressional Democrats who had been wavering on the issue of Obamacare.
OfA also dabbles in state politics. In 2009 it meddled in a congressional race in New York’s 23rd district, backing winner Democrat Scott Murphy over Republican Dede Scozzafava. It also involved itself in the Virginia gubernatorial contest, championing eventual loser Democrat Creigh Deeds over Republican Bob McDonnell.
OfA will carry on Obama-style community organizing. This anti-capitalist agitation revolves around the nebulous Marxist concept of “social justice.” It’s about making people angry so they push for change. It arti&#64257;cially creates pressure for government spending on whatever happens to be fashionable in leftist circles that day.
Giving OfA nonprofit status institutionalizes the brutal, sometimes violent organizing techniques of Saul Alinsky within America’s partisan political infrastructure.
This has long been Obama’s goal.
Frontpagemag.org You just plagiarized the most bias magazine blog I've ever read.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#21086 Jan 22, 2013
This copy paste thing had to stop. If you need an example of a good rant look at reality check blog. He/she made a very strong case. I don't fully agree, but it made my gears turn.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#21087 Jan 22, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Allegedly hell. Who said there is no autopsy? You libs just keep pulling it out of your ass!
Read it again.

There is No autopsy evidence showing the agents death being caused by those weapons allegedly found at the crime scene.

If you can provide prove otherwise,

SHOW ME.
guest

United States

#21088 Jan 22, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Read it again.
There is No autopsy evidence showing the agents death being caused by those weapons allegedly found at the crime scene.
If you can provide prove otherwise,
SHOW ME.
What's the difference if Warrior shows you or not, you will just deny it if he did. I see you're hypocrisy continues to grow at an alarming rate...

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#21089 Jan 22, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
What Republican said what I just said? Did I say "all of the increases" or did you add that yourself? For someone who prides themselves on citing sources, you sure don't mind inserting things you need to change the meanings to fit your "counterpoints". The question is, do you believe the "new and improved" post after you have edited it? I think you do.
.

It did not change anything, it added to the proof that debunked your statement.


Being the spineless individual you are and incapable of admitting you are wrong, one could only expect such a juvenile rebuttal.
guest

United States

#21090 Jan 22, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>.
It did not change anything, it added to the proof that debunked your statement.
Being the spineless individual you are and incapable of admitting you are wrong, one could only expect such a juvenile rebuttal.
A truly, truly alarming rate...

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#21091 Jan 22, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>What's the difference if Warrior shows you or not, you will just deny it if he did. I see you're hypocrisy continues to grow at an alarming rate...
Tell you what big boy, you find it, then lets just see what I say.

Let us see how well you predict the future.

What YA say,

or you going to just keep on barking from under the porch like a mutt?


Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#21092 Jan 22, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>What's the difference if Warrior shows you or not, you will just deny it if he did. I see you're hypocrisy continues to grow at an alarming rate...
I see your ignorance continues to grow at an alarming rate.
guest

United States

#21093 Jan 22, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell you what big boy, you find it, then lets just see what I say.
Let us see how well you predict the future.
What YA say,
or you going to just keep on barking from under the porch like a mutt?
It's not that hard to predict what you will post in the future. Just start with a lie and go from there.

If you were so sure that what you were posting was the truth, you'd let your words stand alone instead of hypocritically demanding others to what you'd never do yourself. It's called confidence, something that your nazi-like responses show you have none of. However, you can't because your entire arguments are, at best, based on false premises. Even the lies you plagiarize from your left-wing hate sites.
Reality Check

Camden, AR

#21094 Jan 23, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>.
It did not change anything, it added to the proof that debunked your statement.
Being the spineless individual you are and incapable of admitting you are wrong, one could only expect such a juvenile rebuttal.
You got backed in a corner by your own deception and lies so don't go blaming me. Kinda like Obama still blames Bush. I shouldn't be suprised but somehow since it's you I am suprised. I guess I figured you somehow didn't engage in every liberal gutter tactic but I see I was wrong.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

El Dorado Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
my mom, ain't nothing wrong wit her 2 min chance 8
da da 69 da da 8 min Please 5
Film Festival 1 hr M Givens 21
Anybody ever tried to get custody back from dhs? (Aug '11) 5 hr to darkie 101
your wife 7 hr Dunno 2
Come on out 15 hr Customer 11
Older hanging with younger Sat Jim 13

El Dorado Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

El Dorado Mortgages