Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,407 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#19258 Dec 12, 2012
Captain Obvious wrote:
<quoted text>UP 78.56%? LOL!
You're STUPID!
If you will notice, that was not the first typo I have ever made, not likely to be the last either.

Just for you, the DOW was up six tenths of 1% on 12-11-2012, and it is +8.41% Year-to-Date.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#19259 Dec 12, 2012
Captain Obvious wrote:
<quoted text>Must be sad that you and those like you want just one type of news or should I say entertainmkent in the likes of those like msnbc! Your type marches lock step in what the democrats tell you, you and those like you are nothing but obama cult following kool aid drinking zombies. You are not smart enough to think for yourself so you have TV do it for you. If you don't like Fox don't watch it retard!
Maybe he read that Fox News lies in another media, maybe he read it in a Republican bias News paper called the,,,,,,,,
are you ready Genius,,,,,,,,,,

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL,

"Today there is a report in the Wall Street Journal that obliterates the dishonest reporting that has been plastered on the airwaves on Fox for weeks".

The significance that this report was published in the Wall Street Journal cannot be understated. The Journal is the kingpin of Rupert Murdoch’s news empire. The fact that it is openly contradicting his other news outlet, Fox News, is a powerful condemnation of the cable network.
dont know nothin

Benton City, WA

#19260 Dec 12, 2012
Questioner wrote:
<quoted text>
If Obamacare has copays like most insurance does, they will still go to the emergency room, if it is a totally free ride and I am paying for it, they might go to a doctor. I know it has been pointed out before but I wanted to compliment you on the appropriateness of your moniker.
um obamacare is a law my good sir so i don't really know what your asking? lol umm if your talking about the healthcare exchanges through private insurance companies set up by either the state or federal government.. then yes they "may" have a copay as most insurance.. because it is the sammmmme insurance lol ... just made more affordable..and people living here in oregon that make around 16,000 or less will be elgible for medicaid... and if someone can afford a 10 dollar copay... and their insurance weather it be medicaid or someone paying 100dollars a month pays the rest then it does not pass on to everyone like someone going to the emergency room with no form of insurance at all .... soooooooo i hope that clears up some things... and i thank you? lol umm so for those of you who do not understand the meaning of my post name .. if you don't know nothin then in all reality you do know something so thanks! lol
Redd

United States

#19261 Dec 12, 2012
Pardon Gordo Barney, he has a weight problem, a light weight one.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#19262 Dec 12, 2012
Redd wrote:
Pardon Gordo Barney, he has a weight problem, a light weight one.
Particular between his ears.
hi

Harrison, AR

#19265 Dec 12, 2012
Yes
guest

United States

#19266 Dec 12, 2012
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
No, not "all", I get copious amounts from the comments of you and others who are trying so hard to deal with your frustrations.
Thanks again for proving my point.
guest

United States

#19267 Dec 12, 2012
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe he read that Fox News lies in another media, maybe he read it in a Republican bias News paper called the,,,,,,,,
are you ready Genius,,,,,,,,,,
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL,
"Today there is a report in the Wall Street Journal that obliterates the dishonest reporting that has been plastered on the airwaves on Fox for weeks".
The significance that this report was published in the Wall Street Journal cannot be understated. The Journal is the kingpin of Rupert Murdoch’s news empire. The fact that it is openly contradicting his other news outlet, Fox News, is a powerful condemnation of the cable network.
http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP /?p=8583

Like I said, you can either watch FOX or listen to lies that liberal hate sites say is on FOX.

You have proven once again that you are both a sucker and a liar.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#19268 Dec 12, 2012
guest wrote:
<quoted text> http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/...
Like I said, you can either watch FOX or listen to lies that liberal hate sites say is on FOX.
You have proven once again that you are both a sucker and a liar.
Read it again D.A, that said it was printed in the WSJ, I did not say it came from The WSJ.
Richard Dickenson

West Helena, AR

#19269 Dec 12, 2012
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Read it again D.A, that said it was printed in the WSJ, I did not say it came from The WSJ.
I wish yall would stop this dumb azz thread!!! Azz Holes!! Read your bibles instead or come to my church at the corner of 5th. and Baldwin!!!!!!
guest

United States

#19270 Dec 12, 2012
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Read it again D.A, that said it was printed in the WSJ, I did not say it came from The WSJ.
The WSJ article didn't say anything about FOX news. Your newscorpse article is the one that is falsely trying to connect the two. It's what liberals have to do since the truth always destroys your argument. Just look at the coverage of the violence at the Michigan state capitol from the main stream outlets who left out all of the violence perpetrated by the union thugs. For every contributor on the network that has said Rice misled the nation, they have had a contributor say she didn't. Wow, imagine that, reporting two sides of the story. It's a method that is completely foreign you and others on the far left. Again, you can either watch what FOX News actually reports or you can believe what liberal hate sites claim is said on the network. Thanks again for proving my point.
tex

United States

#19272 Dec 12, 2012
No

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#19273 Dec 12, 2012
guest wrote:
<quoted text> http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/...
Like I said, you can either watch FOX or listen to lies that liberal hate sites say is on FOX.
You have proven once again that you are both a sucker and a liar.
However if you would care to read that piece in the WSJ he was referring to, you will find it in the December 4, 2012, U.S. version titled,

Bureaucratic Battle Blunted Libya Attack 'Talking Points'

By SIOBHAN GORMAN and ADAM ENTOUS


Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#19274 Dec 12, 2012
guest wrote:
<quoted text>The WSJ article didn't say anything about FOX news. Your newscorpse article is the one that is falsely trying to connect the two. It's what liberals have to do since the truth always destroys your argument. Just look at the coverage of the violence at the Michigan state capitol from the main stream outlets who left out all of the violence perpetrated by the union thugs. For every contributor on the network that has said Rice misled the nation, they have had a contributor say she didn't. Wow, imagine that, reporting two sides of the story. It's a method that is completely foreign you and others on the far left. Again, you can either watch what FOX News actually reports or you can believe what liberal hate sites claim is said on the network. Thanks again for proving my point.
"The WSJ article didn't say anything about FOX news"

At a boy, you got that part correct, neither the article nor I said they did.

Now I will explain to you what it did mean.

The WSJ run a piece that completely discredits what another Murdoch company (Fox News) had been reporting.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#19275 Dec 12, 2012
guest wrote:
<quoted text>The WSJ article didn't say anything about FOX news. Your newscorpse article is the one that is falsely trying to connect the two. It's what liberals have to do since the truth always destroys your argument. Just look at the coverage of the violence at the Michigan state capitol from the main stream outlets who left out all of the violence perpetrated by the union thugs. For every contributor on the network that has said Rice misled the nation, they have had a contributor say she didn't. Wow, imagine that, reporting two sides of the story. It's a method that is completely foreign you and others on the far left. Again, you can either watch what FOX News actually reports or you can believe what liberal hate sites claim is said on the network. Thanks again for proving my point.
"For every contributor on the network that has said Rice misled the nation, they have had a contributor say she didn't. Wow, imagine that, reporting two sides of the story"

What you had was two sides expressing their opinions''''''


WTF has the opinion from either side have to do with facts on the matter?

According to the WSJ, Fox did not let facts stand in their way on reporting on Benghazi.

dont know nothin

Benton City, WA

#19276 Dec 12, 2012
guest wrote:
<quoted text>The WSJ article didn't say anything about FOX news. Your newscorpse article is the one that is falsely trying to connect the two. It's what liberals have to do since the truth always destroys your argument. Just look at the coverage of the violence at the Michigan state capitol from the main stream outlets who left out all of the violence perpetrated by the union thugs. For every contributor on the network that has said Rice misled the nation, they have had a contributor say she didn't. Wow, imagine that, reporting two sides of the story. It's a method that is completely foreign you and others on the far left. Again, you can either watch what FOX News actually reports or you can believe what liberal hate sites claim is said on the network. Thanks again for proving my point.
lol "Media watchdog Media Matters for America has cataloged what it called the ten most "egregious examples" of "distortion" by both Fox News and its TV personalities.[64] Criticism includes several examples of cropping quotes from President Obama, Vice President Biden and Vice President Gore so they appear out of context, using image-manipulation software to edit the appearance of reporters from The New York Times and using footage from other events during a report on the November 5 Tea Party rally in Washington, D.C.; Media Matters said the intention of Fox News was to make it appear as if a larger number of protesters attended the event.[65] The group also called attention to the December 4 edition of Fox and Friends, accusing the program of misleading its viewers with a "questionable graphic" showing the result of a Rasmussen Reports climate-change poll totaling 120 percent.[66]
In November 2009 Fox News anchor Gregg Jarrett told viewers that a Sarah Palin book signing in Grand Rapids, Michigan had a massive turnout, showing footage of Palin with a large crowd. Jarrett stated that the former Republican vice-presidential candidate is "continuing to draw huge crowds while she's promoting her brand-new book", adding that the images being shown were "some of the pictures just coming in to us.... The lines earlier had formed this morning".[67] The video was actually taken from a 2008 McCain-Palin campaign rally. Fox senior vice president for news Michael Clemente issued a statement saying, "This was a production error in which the copy editor changed a script and didn't alert the control room to update the video".[67] Fox offered an on-air apology the following day during the same "Happening Now" segment, expressing regrets for what it described as a "video error" with no intent to mislead.[68] Fox also apologized for fabricated quotes attributed to John Kerry in an article on its website during the 2004 presidential campaign,[69] stating that the piece was a joke which accidentally appeared on the website.[70]"
is this the news you watch? lol the same one that went to court? yah that's a good source of information..and you say violence at michigan state capitol?... yah more like corrupt politicians.. the state voted down a bill that contained the same union busting tactics... now the republican controlled governor and legislature is running through a bill and are going to court for countradicting the state sunshine law... with gerrymandered districts picked by republicans after the census.. a vast majority of the state does not want right to work but that's what their gonna shove through spite the popular vote..i saw people losing rights today and what you saw were union thugs ..what kind of person are you...
Reality Check

United States

#19277 Dec 12, 2012
dont know nothin wrote:
<quoted text>um prove it in factual evidence what you are saying .. it's easy to say somethig.. it'sanother to back it up... nothing you say or have pposted on here has had any factual credability... i have posted links or quotes from my position..there is nothing in the bill that says pre existing conditions will have to pay extra to have health insurance ... NOWHERE.... Discrimination is the prejudicial or distinguishing treatment of an individual based on their actual or perceived membership in a certain group or category, such as their race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, national origin, or religion... so yah i know wat discrimination is i do not need your definition... and if you work for a company and decide not to use their insurance because you can find it cheaper somewhere else then how are they gonna "tax" your check?..anyways ... what you have said is not going to happen so there is actually no argument to be made here... taking what fox and friends and your coworkers tell you is not a good way to recieve information on politics...yah at least or the next year i don't now how long their gonna come to an agreement on the taxes .. i hope it's the standard for at least the next 4 but i'm not the one involved in the negotiations... so i see you also .. even though this is not going to happen ... stated that the companies would pass the fees on.. well guess what blame the company you work for .. if thy can't take a hit after all the money they made before the crash and continued tomake after we bailed some of them out and are continuing to make due to the tax breaks.. they should feel ashamed of themselves for passing these so called taxs onto the employee instead of taking initiative to give alittle and reinvest... but it's not going to happen and as for me healthcare exchange starts in 13 not 14 so i gueesss i get an early start... lol get real and get facts or get out
Not my definition of discrimination. It was wikipedia's. I found a host of sites that reported the $63 tax/fee. The one you probably consider "credible" is The Huffington Post's website. If you go to healthcare.gov you can read the entire bill. Go down to page 226 and read the section REINSURANCE AND RISK ADJUSTMENT. It outlines this tax/fee and says the tax is to be determined. The section tells how people will have to pay for reinsurance which is insurance that is purchased by an insurance company (the "ceding company" or "cedant" or "cedent" under the arrangement) from one or more other insurance companies (the "reinsurer") as a means of risk management, sometimes in practice including tax mitigation and other reasons. Maybe you should rethink the fact that you would be more than happy to have an argument on the content of Obamacare. Or at least don't be so careless in making claims of your knowledge in a given subject which you clearly don't have in this case. I told you before I own the company I work for. Are you really making the argument that if you blame the company you work for that the tax/fee doesn't exist? Your argumet that a company should be able to eat that kind of tax shows how very little you know about business.
Baseball

Atlanta, TX

#19278 Dec 12, 2012
Fox News is the worst example of onesided broadcasting in journalism history! MSNBC goes to the extreme on the other side.
Curmudgeon

Calico Rock, AR

#19279 Dec 12, 2012
George Bush, Queen Elizabeth, and Vladimir Putin all die and go to hell. While there, they spy a red phone and ask what the phone is for.
The devil tells them it is for calling back to Earth.
Putin asks to call Russia and talks for 5 minutes. When he is finished the devil informs him that the cost is a million dollars, so Putin writes him a check.
Next Queen Elizabeth calls England and talks for 30 minutes. When she is finished the devil informs her that the cost is 6 million dollars, so she writes him a check.
Finally George Bush gets his turn and talks for 4 hours. When he is finished the devil informs him that the cost is $5.00.
When Putin hears this he goes ballistic and asks the devil why Bush got to call the USA so cheaply.
The devil smiles and replies, " Since Obama took over, the USA has gone to hell, so it's a local call."
dont know nothin

Benton City, WA

#19280 Dec 13, 2012
Baseball wrote:
Fox News is the worst example of onesided broadcasting in journalism history! MSNBC goes to the extreme on the other side.
lol at least msnbc has not went to court for broadcasting lies!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

El Dorado Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Female Inmate 30 min Not a fan 5
Dorothy's Diner 33 min Happy customer 9
tiffany lees 35 min Curious 3
News Ex-deputy held on child porn charges 1 hr Peekau 40
Union County Jail Inmate Pageant 5 hr well 6
Musicfest (Oct '14) 13 hr justin lewis 10
Local singers Wed FYI 7

El Dorado Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

El Dorado Mortgages