Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,407 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

dont know nothin

Benton City, WA

#19235 Dec 11, 2012
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
Excuse me..Fox News can and does.
lol touche good sir
dont know nothin

Benton City, WA

#19236 Dec 11, 2012
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
It sounds good and all but why would those who used to go to the emergency room for everything including the common cold stop simply because we have Obamacare? From what I have seen in the attitudes of the tenants in my rental property, there will be more abuse and not less.
lol because they'll actualy have healthcare and can afford to go to the doctor instead of the emergency room where they have to take you.. and will clear up some of the mess ....
Questioner

Jonesboro, AR

#19237 Dec 12, 2012
dont know nothin wrote:
<quoted text>lol because they'll actualy have healthcare and can afford to go to the doctor instead of the emergency room where they have to take you.. and will clear up some of the mess ....
If Obamacare has copays like most insurance does, they will still go to the emergency room, if it is a totally free ride and I am paying for it, they might go to a doctor. I know it has been pointed out before but I wanted to compliment you on the appropriateness of your moniker.
just1more

Liberty, MO

#19238 Dec 12, 2012
Regan's quote on taxing the wealthy
"We’re going to close the unproductive tax loopholes that allow some of the truly wealthy to avoid paying their fair share. In theory, some of those loopholes were understandable, but in practice they sometimes made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing, while a bus driver was paying ten percent of his salary, and that’s crazy.[...] Do you think the millionaire ought to pay more in taxes than the bus driver or less?
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
"Taxing the wealthy and big bussiness has never ever worked. They just lay off people"
I bet Ronald Regan would disagree with that statement.
In August 1982, the unemployment rate hit 10.1 percent, while mortgage rates hovered near their all-time high at 15 percent. Reagan's tax cuts had had a year to stimulate the economy, but they had not done so.
So Republicans in Congress and some members of his own administration convinced Reagan to agree to a $98.3 billion tax increase, the largest peacetime increase in history.
n Aug. 17, 1982, while a House-Senate conference committee was working out final details with White House support, and it became clear that the tax bill would become law, the Dow Jones industrial average responded with its single biggest one-day leap ever—a 4.9 percent gain, the equivalent of a 600 point gain today.(The actual gain was 38.81 points, pushing the Dow Jones above the 800 mark to 831.24. And it marked the beginning of the bull market.
Reagan signed the tax increase on Sept. 3, 1982. A few months later the economy roared to life as well.
guest

United States

#19239 Dec 12, 2012
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
Excuse me..Fox News can and does.
Only if you watch the highly edited versions posted on Media Matters and other oppressive liberal hate sites.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#19240 Dec 12, 2012
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
It sounds good and all but why would those who used to go to the emergency room for everything including the common cold stop simply because we have Obamacare? From what I have seen in the attitudes of the tenants in my rental property, there will be more abuse and not less..
One reason- Now they have insurance, they are not forced to sit in ER rooms for hours on end waiting for care.

IN OTHER WORDS, THEY WILL HAVE A CHOICE WHERE THEY CAN GET CARE'''''

It will not stop it, there will always be a segment of the population that will take,(what they determine to be) the path of least resistance.

If the tennants YOU CHOOSE to rent to fall into that catagory, then one could conclude that you are enableing them.

I presune that GOV. rent check, you get, helps ease those pangs, does it not?

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#19241 Dec 12, 2012
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
I have to admit Barney, after going round and round with "don't know nothin", I have a greater appreciation in debating you. Now don't get the big head.
Sorry, considering the source , you need not worry about me finding any self adoration in that comment.
guest

United States

#19242 Dec 12, 2012
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, considering the source , you need not worry about me finding any self adoration in that comment.
No, you do it all in your own comments.
still the same

Mountain Home, AR

#19243 Dec 12, 2012
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, considering the source , you need not worry about me finding any self adoration in that comment.
Yep , you are still the same complete and total wacko you always were!

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#19244 Dec 12, 2012
Questioner wrote:
<quoted text>
If Obamacare has copays like most insurance does, they will still go to the emergency room, if it is a totally free ride and I am paying for it, they might go to a doctor. I know it has been pointed out before but I wanted to compliment you on the appropriateness of your moniker.
The moniker is used with satire, obviously.

I have to agree with you, I find his moniker well suited for a forum where people like you who think that the,

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act commonly called "Obamacare" is a insurance policy.

FYI
"Obamacare" Is a United States federal statute, it has no
co-pays.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#19245 Dec 12, 2012
guest wrote:
<quoted text>No, you do it all in your own comments.
No, not "all", I get copious amounts from the comments of you and others who are trying so hard to deal with your frustrations.






Questioner

Jonesboro, AR

#19246 Dec 12, 2012
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
The moniker is used with satire, obviously.
I have to agree with you, I find his moniker well suited for a forum where people like you who think that the,
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act commonly called "Obamacare" is a insurance policy.
FYI
"Obamacare" Is a United States federal statute, it has no
co-pays.
Then it will be terribly abused, another step in making the population unaccountable for their actions. I do believe your side is going to win, until the country is bankrupt, but then that has never bothered a liberal. You would be right about the satire issue if the name didn't fit, but since it does, it is just appropriate.
Redd

United States

#19247 Dec 12, 2012
guest wrote:
<quoted text>Only if you watch the highly edited versions posted on Media Matters and other oppressive liberal hate sites.
Or only if one is unable to differentiate between what is presented by both sides in order to reach a reasonable conclusion.
Redd

United States

#19248 Dec 12, 2012
Questioner wrote:
<quoted text>
Then it will be terribly abused, another step in making the population unaccountable for their actions. I do believe your side is going to win, until the country is bankrupt, but then that has never bothered a liberal. You would be right about the satire issue if the name didn't fit, but since it does, it is just appropriate.
You might want to take a look at just which Administrations preceded the downturns in our Nation's history....and which ones were left to clean up the mess they inherited.

But I hope y'all stick to your "principles" and "moral high-ground", that will ensure that the very people your Party denigrates will continue to vote your leadership out of office.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#19249 Dec 12, 2012
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
Or only if one is unable to differentiate between what is presented by both sides in order to reach a reasonable conclusion.

Fox News Placing the oppressed in the position of oppressor.

Naw, they would not do that..........would they?
Redd

United States

#19250 Dec 12, 2012
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Fox News Placing the oppressed in the position of oppressor.
Naw, they would not do that..........would they?
All part of Rupert Murdoch's agenda, show a little tail on the tube to draw in the rubes, exaggerate the current political situation to reflect a religious bias by the other side, throw in the possibility of gun control and diminished hunting rights, pit the rubes against the other rubes, the races against one another, the poor as subhuman.

Been used throughout history.. with the necessary adjustments to reflect the times.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#19252 Dec 12, 2012
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
All part of Rupert Murdoch's agenda, show a little tail on the tube to draw in the rubes, exaggerate the current political situation to reflect a religious bias by the other side, throw in the possibility of gun control and diminished hunting rights, pit the rubes against the other rubes, the races against one another, the poor as subhuman.
Been used throughout history.. with the necessary adjustments to reflect the times.
Yes Sir, and still the same ages' old motavation.

The love of money..........

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#19253 Dec 12, 2012
motivation.
Redd

United States

#19256 Dec 12, 2012
You're certainly a master wordsmith...of the comic book variety. Entertain me some more with your uncanny wit and wisdom.
Redd

United States

#19257 Dec 12, 2012

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

El Dorado Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Crackhead beauty queens 1 hr Prorate 1
Photographers 2 hr Issac 3
Hotshots struggling 8 hr EldoMasterBlaster 42
Whats the deal with Wendy Morgan? (Mar '14) Wed Dannyboy 58
Hillary 4 Prison Wed To Fud 48
Cute nice guy Wed Wife 20
Fact or fiction? Rascals and elm st bakery clos... Wed common sense 27

El Dorado Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

El Dorado Mortgages