Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,407 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Reality Check

Camden, AR

#30065 Apr 8, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Does the meaning of the word TOTAL escape you? As in total uninsured.
Not to mention most policies were exchanged not dropped, you have made no mention of that.
What dam difference dose it make on how many were insured prior, when the total amount of uninsured is dropping like a rock.
One of the intended purpose of the ACA, to lower the amount of uninsured.
Proof is in the numbers Buck-O.
LIVE WITH IT-ITS WORKING
Numbers you can't prove. That's reassuring. If people were insured prior to Obamacare then bought an Obamacare approved plan, they are still insured. Since you are popping off about the total number of uninsured decreasing, that number has to be taken away from your total insured of 17.1 million. Then you have to add the 6 million that lost insurance because of Obamacare to the 30 million that were already uninsured before Obamacare to get the total number of people that now have insurance that didn't before. Since you can't prove your numbers or the amount of those that have actually paid you can't sit there and brag that Obamacare is working. Remember, if you haven't paid, your not covered no matter how you try to spin it. From what I see IT'S NOT WORKING. The proof is in the fact that they didn't implement the entire law by giving who knows how many exemptions and delays until after the 2016 elections (I wonder why they picked that time to enact the full law?). It won't ever work but that doesn't mean it will go away. For example, you see on the news from time to time these "parents" that keep their child in a closet for his/her whole life. When the DHS finds the child he/she is malnourished and can't talk. Using your Obamacare logic one could say that since the child is alive, the parents parenting plan is working. Seems kind of insane when you put it that way don't you think?

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30066 Apr 8, 2014
hugh jass wrote:
<quoted text>Creatures of habit..exactly "you cant fix stupid" that was what I said. Dance little puppet dance
Not real good at at thinking are you, look what you just said, the description of repetitiveness fits you just as well as it does me.

One thing is for sure, you can't fix those who refuse to learn.
hugh jass

Fort Smith, AR

#30067 Apr 8, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice excuse, except for one thing, you had stopped prior to that post.
you disappear for days at a time with your tail between your legs claiming to have a life outside topix and even then offer nothing but idiocy in your response, then you run down others for not answering in 2 or 3 minutes? Whats the word Im looking for..oh right...HYPOCRITE.. yes thats the one. It doesnt matter when or what I respond with you come running back for mare like the good little bitch you are. Dance Puppet Dance.
hugh jass

Fort Smith, AR

#30068 Apr 8, 2014
running back for more . See I correct my mistakes.
hugh jass

Fort Smith, AR

#30069 Apr 8, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Not real good at at thinking are you, look what you just said, the description of repetitiveness fits you just as well as it does me.
One thing is for sure, you can't fix those who refuse to learn.
"at at" talk about repetitive

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30070 Apr 8, 2014
hugh jass wrote:
<quoted text>
you disappear for days at a time with your tail between your legs claiming to have a life outside topix and even then offer nothing but idiocy in your response, then you run down others for not answering in 2 or 3 minutes? Whats the word Im looking for..oh right...HYPOCRITE.. yes thats the one. It doesnt matter when or what I respond with you come running back for mare like the good little bitch you are. Dance Puppet Dance.
And you are quite the little dance partner, the though that your penchant to jump on misspelled words is not as obvious to you as it is others.

The thought that "congrats" just may have been done on purpose just to watch you jump on it, I mean I had just ask you this, "what was I wrong about" which you still have failed to answer BTW, only to do again just what I said you were doing, jumping on the obvious.

(underlying meaning) it demonstrates your lack of ability to think

Thanks for the dance, I hope didn't step on your toes to hard.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30071 Apr 8, 2014
hugh jass wrote:
<quoted text>
"at at" talk about repetitive
Sorry, i should put this disclaimer on all my post:

There is a possibility this post contains material that is intended humor for those bright enough to understand it.
hugh jass

Fort Smith, AR

#30072 Apr 8, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
And you are quite the little dance partner, the though that your penchant to jump on misspelled words is not as obvious to you as it is others.
The thought that "congrats" just may have been done on purpose just to watch you jump on it, I mean I had just ask you this, "what was I wrong about" which you still have failed to answer BTW, only to do again just what I said you were doing, jumping on the obvious.
(underlying meaning) it demonstrates your lack of ability to think
Thanks for the dance, I hope didn't step on your toes to hard.
step om MY toes...I think not. It was very predictable for you to claim you spelled that wrong on purpose to try and cover your stupidity. Took you an awful long time to think of that comeback. I figured you must have meant the misspelling because the rest of your post made no sense at all.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30073 Apr 8, 2014
hugh jass wrote:
<quoted text>
you disappear for days at a time with your tail between your legs claiming to have a life outside topix and even then offer nothing but idiocy in your response, then you run down others for not answering in 2 or 3 minutes? Whats the word Im looking for..oh right...HYPOCRITE.. yes thats the one. It doesnt matter when or what I respond with you come running back for mare like the good little bitch you are. Dance Puppet Dance.
In the event you are a different person to whom that rebuttal was issued, you have no dog in this fight, so..........just STFU
hugh jass

Fort Smith, AR

#30074 Apr 8, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, i should put this disclaimer on all my post:
There is a possibility this post contains material that is intended humor for those bright enough to understand it.
Ohhh so your sayin that ewe aint stoopid evn thow ewe says stoopid stuff in evry post. Ew does that alls on porpuse 2 make the res ob us loke bad. That thar mak cents now.
hugh jass

Fort Smith, AR

#30075 Apr 8, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
In the event you are a different person to whom that rebuttal was issued, you have no dog in this fight, so..........just STFU
AWWWWWWWWWW poor little Barney Bitch can dish it but he can take it. Poor poor baby. Predictable and controllable. Checkmate BITCH.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30076 Apr 8, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Numbers you can't prove. That's reassuring. If people were insured prior to Obamacare then bought an Obamacare approved plan, they are still insured. Since you are popping off about the total number of uninsured decreasing, that number has to be taken away from your total insured of 17.1 million. Then you have to add the 6 million that lost insurance because of Obamacare to the 30 million that were already uninsured before Obamacare to get the total number of people that now have insurance that didn't before. Since you can't prove your numbers or the amount of those that have actually paid you can't sit there and brag that Obamacare is working. Remember, if you haven't paid, your not covered no matter how you try to spin it. From what I see IT'S NOT WORKING. The proof is in the fact that they didn't implement the entire law by giving who knows how many exemptions and delays until after the 2016 elections (I wonder why they picked that time to enact the full law?). It won't ever work but that doesn't mean it will go away. For example, you see on the news from time to time these "parents" that keep their child in a closet for his/her whole life. When the DHS finds the child he/she is malnourished and can't talk. Using your Obamacare logic one could say that since the child is alive, the parents parenting plan is working. Seems kind of insane when you put it that way don't you think?
I think you are insane.

6 million people did not lose their insurance, we have been through this before.
ROTFL

Jonesboro, AR

#30077 Apr 8, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
I bet it scares you since you are likely to be on the losing end.
Barney has always been on the losing end and his future doesn't look all that promising. He used to be somewhat entertaining but that has passed him by also. I sometimes think that he is a plant by the GOP just to show us how dumb the liberal cause is but I doubt it, no one is that gullible. It's hard to believe, an adult that can't take care of himself expecting us to take his word on politics, economics, medicine and even morality, no it's not believable.
Reality Check

Little Rock, AR

#30078 Apr 8, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you are insane.
6 million people did not lose their insurance, we have been through this before.
Yes we have and you obviously still side with Harry Reid in calling them liars.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30079 Apr 8, 2014
hugh jass wrote:
<quoted text>
step om MY toes...I think not. It was very predictable for you to claim you spelled that wrong on purpose to try and cover your stupidity. Took you an awful long time to think of that comeback. I figured you must have meant the misspelling because the rest of your post made no sense at all.
"long time" ?

Guess you have not noticed I have been replying to your post in order of which they were posted.

Like I I said, thinking is some thing you have just not quiet figured out yet and you are sadly relying on rinse and repeat phrases parroted from this thread.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30080 Apr 8, 2014
hugh jass wrote:
<quoted text>
AWWWWWWWWWW poor little Barney Bitch can dish it but he can take it. Poor poor baby. Predictable and controllable. Checkmate BITCH.
Nope, that was me giving as good as I Got.

Apparently you didn't like it any more under than moniker than you do any others.

Suck it up punk.
hugh jass

Fort Smith, AR

#30081 Apr 8, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, that was me giving as good as I Got.
Apparently you didn't like it any more under than moniker than you do any others.
Suck it up punk.
Ok so you cry like a baby and say I shouldnt be in your precious conversation on a public forum then tell me to STFU and now you say giving as good as you got? Wow you really believe that dont you?? sad sad sad. And again I own my comments I dont need other pseudonyms to support myself. Not like you do. Face it there are just several others that love umiliating you as much as I do.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30082 Apr 8, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes we have and you obviously still side with Harry Reid in calling them liars.
Careful of what you say, To be frank I did not pay a whole lot of attention to this when it was as its peak, but I sure thought Mr. Reid referred to the T.V. ads complaining about Obama care as lies.

Some how that evolved to "Harry Reid said 6 million people are liars".

Seriously, if it happen any other way than that I be interested in seeing the story.
hugh jass

Fort Smith, AR

#30083 Apr 8, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
"long time" ?
Guess you have not noticed I have been replying to your post in order of which they were posted.
Like I I said, thinking is some thing you have just not quiet figured out yet and you are sadly relying on rinse and repeat phrases parroted from this thread.
I am sure you meant not "quite" figured out yet but I I am equally sure you will say that was intentional too.
Blaggard

Fort Smith, AR

#30084 Apr 8, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, no, I've not forgotten. I have priorities in my life and Topix is not as high on that list as it obviously is on yours. It would behoove you in the future to consider that everyone's situation is not the same as yours before accusing someone of running off.
Just curious why you are letting someone else choose your debate topic.
As I said, I'd be more than happy to address his debate subjects. We will start with:
I did not say anything close to what I was quoted as saying; however, I wish I had because that is exactly what happened - Putin backed down and cooled his heels. It seems as though those "insignificant sanctions" dealt a pretty good blow to the Russian stock market, if I'm not mistaken, about 15%. You can check for yourself. The Russian ruble also took a hit in value. Perhaps that is why Putin called President Obama and said, Can we work this thing out?
What I personally think about President Clinton saying, Releasing ICANN, I've never given it a thought. To assume that Presidents Obama and Clinton either one is my "hero" is a reflection of the ignorance of the one who assumed it.
That brings us to our last subject, "The so-called Iran nuke deal."
Now, I gotta tell you, this one is really, really hard. I'm just really not sure what to say about this one. I'm going out on a limb here and say it would be just damn near impossible to enforce an agreement that has not been reached. The accord is still an ongoing issue at this point. Had they reached an agreement, it was not scheduled to be implemented until May anyway.
Your turn...
Barney,
I wont begin by berating you for taking so long to answer, as the others did. I understand your limitations and the post was filled with big words, that you had to sound out, then look them up to see what they mean and then the dictionary has more big words in the definition that you must again sound out and attempt to define. I understand its a vicious cycle for simpletons such as yourself so I wont attack you for taking so long.
Regarding Russia, the "talks" you are so proud of were an abysmal failure. As of today there are still tens of thousands of Russian troops on the Ukrainian border as reported by the liberal rag http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/07/russ... so there is still no notable changes in the situation. You are so proud Putin called Obama but there was no result! Russias economy has been failing for years, and any crisis will have ramifications with their stock market, just like U.S. crisis have an impact on our stock markets. Bottom line is Putin still has thousands of troops on the Ukraine border, that doesn't look like a person who is worried at all.
Regarding the ICANN. oh wait...you had no input on that besides calling me ignorant... So we can just chalk that up as Barney unwilling to engage in intelligent conversation because he has no defense for his liberal comrade.
Lastly it was so long ago it took me a moment to find the article

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/03/22/se...
It seems clear that even Obamas own party is pointing out his ineptitude in this matter, 23 democrat senators as well as 179 democrat members of the house have called Obama out on his continued failure to come to any kind of a solution. The deal I was referring to was the preliminary deal signed back in November and touted by Kerry and Obama as a significant victory. That deal by the way has also disintegrated under Obama's ineptitude.
So even though your response offered nothing that warranted debate I have taken my "turn" as you call it. I know that you will resort to childishness rather than defending you position intelligently....but heres hoping.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

El Dorado Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Chris N. 1 hr K Marie 6
Local singers 2 hr Whateva 2
Matt Thomas (Apr '10) 3 hr Chris C 24
What happened to . . . 3 hr Not a fan 4
Please explain-- community college decisions 5 hr real Town House ... 50
News Ex-deputy held on child porn charges 5 hr ucso 38
Tonya the inmate 6 hr Mugshot 6
More from around the web

Personal Finance

El Dorado Mortgages