Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,407 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

speller feller

Conway, AR

#30021 Apr 6, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
OMG, this one is to good to lay off of, its late tonight, I will be be sure and get back to ya though, this is going to be fun..........
Well, you asked for the post number, and the various topics that Blaggard asked you about. You have laid off of it once before. Was it not TOO good to lay off of then...when you ignored it?
I will be sure to read all the fun you are going to be offering with your insightful response!
Remember, the first time these questions were asked of you, you were gone for days. Sleep on it...that's a good idea. But you hurry back now..ya hear!
Pins and needles, Barney...pins and needles!!
guest

United States

#30022 Apr 6, 2014
I'm gonna pray for you.
hot thing

Sherwood, AR

#30023 Apr 6, 2014
Somebody plz delete this stupid shit
Speller feller

Conway, AR

#30024 Apr 6, 2014
hot thing wrote:
Somebody plz delete this stupid shit
Maybe after we hear from the big man on campus.
Barney is researching all of the topics he is going to expound on because he is a political guru, of sorts!
He promised us a lot of fun, and we couldn't possibly deny him of that good time.
But feel free to never read here again. It is a choice...don't click the link, or do click the link.
You don't like it, you certainly don't have to read it.
Speller feller

Conway, AR

#30025 Apr 6, 2014
guest wrote:
I'm gonna pray for you.
That would be fantastic! Prayer is effective. I have several requests if you want specifics.
ROTFL

Jonesboro, AR

#30026 Apr 6, 2014
Speller feller wrote:
<quoted text>
That would be fantastic! Prayer is effective. I have several requests if you want specifics.
I believe Barney is judging you
Speller feller

Conway, AR

#30027 Apr 6, 2014
ROTFL wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe Barney is judging you
Yes, I believe you are correct. I guess it's good he has these little pictures to make his point.
You know how he struggles with words...

But, he was just so excited last night to have this fun opportunity to go toe to toe in political discourse with Blaggard, I'm sure we are all expecting great things!

It sure is taking him a long time, though. And he was just begging for political discussions from me...or anyone, really. He was just ready to discuss politics.
I hope he is okay...I hope he hasn't fallen down to laugh, and he can't get up, because he said this was going to be fun, and I can't wait'
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#30028 Apr 6, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell you what, when you learn enough about Obamacare to have a informed conversation it we will pick up here where we left off.
Now I will help you get started by giving you this tid-bit of information.
7.2 million is the amount of people who signed up through the exchange only, there are several million more who bought through the privet market.
That's a cop out and you know it. All the data is pointing to the fact that Obamacare is an utter failure. You don't like it so you opt out of the conversation with a lame excuse. That's fine, opting out won't change the fact that Obamacare is crumbling under it's own weight because of lack of funding. Clinging to a hope and a prayer I see. Those that had insurance and are now paying for an Obamacare approved insurance had no choice. They could either pay more for an Obamacare approved policy and have health insurance or they could pay a penalty and have no insurance getting nothing in return. You know the law is bad when you have to punish people for not participating of their own free will. The American people are smart enough to figure out what is good for them and what is bad for them. This law is terrible for our country so there is a penalty attached for those who want to make their own health care choices.
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#30029 Apr 6, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Seems to me if you figured out the FAIRIES carried the study to the media you can surly figure out you just answered your own question as to whom releases the report.
But then again your like minded posters here think aliens are breeding with sheep and jack-asses, i guess you fit right in with your fairies.
LMFAO, and you hypocrites are constantly riding my ass about speaking figuratively.
No figurative speech here. Just a bit of exaggeration to make a point. A point you obviously missed. You on the other hand do speak figuratively in such a manner that one reading you posts can't tell if you are serious or not. Pretty sure it's a credibility thing with you.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30031 Apr 7, 2014
speller feller wrote:
<quoted text>
#29874
Thought you might have forgotten, again...
Oh, no, I've not forgotten. I have priorities in my life and Topix is not as high on that list as it obviously is on yours. It would behoove you in the future to consider that everyone's situation is not the same as yours before accusing someone of running off.

Just curious why you are letting someone else choose your debate topic.

As I said, I'd be more than happy to address his debate subjects. We will start with:

I did not say anything close to what I was quoted as saying; however, I wish I had because that is exactly what happened - Putin backed down and cooled his heels. It seems as though those "insignificant sanctions" dealt a pretty good blow to the Russian stock market, if I'm not mistaken, about 15%. You can check for yourself. The Russian ruble also took a hit in value. Perhaps that is why Putin called President Obama and said, Can we work this thing out?

What I personally think about President Clinton saying, Releasing ICANN, I've never given it a thought. To assume that Presidents Obama and Clinton either one is my "hero" is a reflection of the ignorance of the one who assumed it.

That brings us to our last subject, "The so-called Iran nuke deal."

Now, I gotta tell you, this one is really, really hard. I'm just really not sure what to say about this one. I'm going out on a limb here and say it would be just damn near impossible to enforce an agreement that has not been reached. The accord is still an ongoing issue at this point. Had they reached an agreement, it was not scheduled to be implemented until May anyway.

Your turn...

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30032 Apr 7, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a cop out and you know it. All the data is pointing to the fact that Obamacare is an utter failure. You don't like it so you opt out of the conversation with a lame excuse. That's fine, opting out won't change the fact that Obamacare is crumbling under it's own weight because of lack of funding. Clinging to a hope and a prayer I see. Those that had insurance and are now paying for an Obamacare approved insurance had no choice. They could either pay more for an Obamacare approved policy and have health insurance or they could pay a penalty and have no insurance getting nothing in return. You know the law is bad when you have to punish people for not participating of their own free will. The American people are smart enough to figure out what is good for them and what is bad for them. This law is terrible for our country so there is a penalty attached for those who want to make their own health care choices.
Nope, that was just me telling you to bring facts to the table not what the right wing spin mch. tells you are facts.
ROTFL

Jonesboro, AR

#30033 Apr 7, 2014
I guess you judge yourself so others won't Barney.. Nothing worse than a fry cook with a thesaurus.
Reality Check

Little Rock, AR

#30035 Apr 7, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, that was just me telling you to bring facts to the table not what the right wing spin mch. tells you are facts.

Then, by all means, enlighten me to the facts since you clearly don't believe the info in my post was fact. That must mean you have the "real" payment numbers so lets have them. I mean who would call something spin unless they had hard evidence to prove otherwise. BTW I never said it was fact. You conveniently seem to keep forgetting that or ignoring it all together. Either way, you need to stop doing that.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30036 Apr 7, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Then, by all means, enlighten me to the facts since you clearly don't believe the info in my post was fact. That must mean you have the "real" payment numbers so lets have them. I mean who would call something spin unless they had hard evidence to prove otherwise. BTW I never said it was fact. You conveniently seem to keep forgetting that or ignoring it all together. Either way, you need to stop doing that.
Look at the source of the "info" in your post. A reporter from the Times calls somebody at Rand. Rand person tells the reporter Rand has conducted a survey and this is the results.

So the TIMES blogger runs a editorial opinion on the matter and some right wing sites run with it, except for Forbes which was clear about the whole thing.

As I said, this so called "study, poll, will never be issued, that would result in huge liability issues for Rand.

But Rand did leak its so called results to the media, and the crap rolled on down hill to the Blaze Faithful, MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.

That means I don't have to have anything, to know what you posted was bull-shit.

Again, if you did not think it was fact, WTF, were you posting it for?
ROTFL

Jonesboro, AR

#30037 Apr 7, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Look at the source of the "info" in your post. A reporter from the Times calls somebody at Rand. Rand person tells the reporter Rand has conducted a survey and this is the results.
So the TIMES blogger runs a editorial opinion on the matter and some right wing sites run with it, except for Forbes which was clear about the whole thing.
As I said, this so called "study, poll, will never be issued, that would result in huge liability issues for Rand.
But Rand did leak its so called results to the media, and the crap rolled on down hill to the Blaze Faithful, MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.
That means I don't have to have anything, to know what you posted was bull-shit.
Again, if you did not think it was fact, WTF, were you posting it for?
And the number of people paying that signed up for Obamacare will never be issued, your point?
rupert likes to watch

Mountain Home, AR

#30038 Apr 7, 2014
ROTFL wrote:
I guess you judge yourself so others won't Barney.. Nothing worse than a fry cook with a thesaurus.
es there is! How about a Fry cook with a hard on for goats! That's why Ol Barney won't leave Salem . He has to get some goat nuckie .
hugh jass

Roland, OK

#30039 Apr 7, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, no, I've not forgotten. I have priorities in my life and Topix is not as high on that list as it obviously is on yours. It would behoove you in the future to consider that everyone's situation is not the same as yours before accusing someone of running off.
Just curious why you are letting someone else choose your debate topic.
As I said, I'd be more than happy to address his debate subjects. We will start with:
I did not say anything close to what I was quoted as saying; however, I wish I had because that is exactly what happened - Putin backed down and cooled his heels. It seems as though those "insignificant sanctions" dealt a pretty good blow to the Russian stock market, if I'm not mistaken, about 15%. You can check for yourself. The Russian ruble also took a hit in value. Perhaps that is why Putin called President Obama and said, Can we work this thing out?
What I personally think about President Clinton saying, Releasing ICANN, I've never given it a thought. To assume that Presidents Obama and Clinton either one is my "hero" is a reflection of the ignorance of the one who assumed it.
That brings us to our last subject, "The so-called Iran nuke deal."
Now, I gotta tell you, this one is really, really hard. I'm just really not sure what to say about this one. I'm going out on a limb here and say it would be just damn near impossible to enforce an agreement that has not been reached. The accord is still an ongoing issue at this point. Had they reached an agreement, it was not scheduled to be implemented until May anyway.
Your turn...
You are the one who said you would answer then next day dickhead. Your response is laughable but Im going to sit back and watch ole Blagg spank your ass with "political discourse"
guest

Memphis, TN

#30040 Apr 7, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Look at the source of the "info" in your post. A reporter from the Times calls somebody at Rand. Rand person tells the reporter Rand has conducted a survey and this is the results.
So the TIMES blogger runs a editorial opinion on the matter and some right wing sites run with it, except for Forbes which was clear about the whole thing.
As I said, this so called "study, poll, will never be issued, that would result in huge liability issues for Rand.
But Rand did leak its so called results to the media, and the crap rolled on down hill to the Blaze Faithful, MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.
That means I don't have to have anything, to know what you posted was bull-shit.
Again, if you did not think it was fact, WTF, were you posting it for?
Amazing. You continue to go to such great lengths to prove what an evil hypocrit and liar you are.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30042 Apr 7, 2014
Consider a brief tale of the tape:
* ACA enrollment through exchanges reached 7.1 million, ahead of early estimates.
* If we include Medicaid, coverage has been extended to well over 10 million Americans.
* The ACA is quickly reducing the uninsured rate.
* According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, the ACA is cheaper than expected and its risk-adjustment provisions are on track to turn a profit for taxpayers.
* Thanks in part to the ACA, health care spending has slowed dramatically and health care inflation is at its lowest point in 50 years.
* According to the Department of Commerce, the ACA is also having a positive effect on personal incomes.

http://www.politicususa.com

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30043 Apr 7, 2014
hugh jass wrote:
<quoted text>
You are the one who said you would answer then next day dickhead. Your response is laughable but Im going to sit back and watch ole Blagg spank your ass with "political discourse"
ROF-LMFAO, You will see that just like you seen me posting I would " answer the next day", take a look again at that post.

I will return the favor and repost for you this time..........

Reply ยป|Report Abuse|Judge it !|#30019 Sunday

"OMG, this one is to good to lay off of, its late tonight, I will be be sure and get back to ya though, this is going to be fun........."

That,s right, I, or any one else didn't see it either.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

El Dorado Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Gringos M/C (Jun '14) 5 hr Marty Chandler 66
Topix gay pals reunited (Aug '09) 6 hr Chris Lacy 7
Top 50 Crazy Bit*h*s in Union County 9 hr New 52
Meth bust 21 hr Fyi 5
Scooter Repair Thu Grow a Pair 2
watch out for two girls at medic pharmacy Thu milk man 12
Isn't it sooo funny Hotshots Thu Pine Bluff worker 5
More from around the web

Personal Finance

El Dorado Mortgages