Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,407 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

ROTFL

Jonesboro, AR

#30001 Apr 5, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
Okay, I used the wrong word, it should have read, your not or.
Not a typo, not a grammar error, I plainly used the wrong word.
See how easy that was to admit a mistake, I did not have to write a essay or make a federal case explaining myself.
Actually it would take at least a book to explain you, I know there are books written about your type.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30002 Apr 5, 2014
ROTFL wrote:
<quoted text>
# 29984 had nothing to do with the post to which he was referring. You remind us of Kim Jong-un, lots of bravado, no substance. You really need to post on "Topix For Kids" other than your spelling and grammatical errors, you should fit in.
How do you know it was not the post?

Since you seem to know which post, please share that information with me.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30003 Apr 5, 2014
ROTFL wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually it would take at least a book to explain you, I know there are books written about your type
I suspect that would include all books in your case.

You Know they are there.

That is the extent of your knowledge of books.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30004 Apr 5, 2014
ROTFL wrote:
<quoted text>
# 29984 had nothing to do with the post to which he was referring. You remind us of Kim Jong-un, lots of bravado, no substance. You really need to post on "Topix For Kids" other than your spelling and grammatical errors, you should fit in
Well Sir, I do stand corrected, that indeed was the wrong post.

However since my thoughts on that post seem to be of interest to you I will be happy to share them with you.

I did not use sitting in place of setting, I was sitting, I was not "setting" any thing any where. I misspelled the word, call it whatever you want, typo, etc.... I don.t care.

The last part of that post, I understood your metaphorical attempt at humor.

Since you are you interested in my opinion on your post, I must say you really suck at metaphorical humor.

Bottom line - Garbage in, garbage out.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30005 Apr 5, 2014
ROTFL wrote:
<quoted text>
# 29984 had nothing to do with the post to which he was referring. You remind us of Kim Jong-un, lots of bravado, no substance. You really need to post on "Topix For Kids" other than your spelling and grammatical errors, you should fit in.
BTW- the "he" to which you are referring sure has feminine flair in their post, and who is us?
ROTFL

Jonesboro, AR

#30006 Apr 5, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Well Sir, I do stand corrected, that indeed was the wrong post.
However since my thoughts on that post seem to be of interest to you I will be happy to share them with you.
I did not use sitting in place of setting, I was sitting, I was not "setting" any thing any where. I misspelled the word, call it whatever you want, typo, etc.... I don.t care.
The last part of that post, I understood your metaphorical attempt at humor.
Since you are you interested in my opinion on your post, I must say you really suck at metaphorical humor.
Bottom line - Garbage in, garbage out.
Okay, you stand corrected, now if you could stand correctly the world would be a better place. It doesn't really matter if you misspell a word or butcher the language with your grammar, you just don't get it.
Blaggard

Roland, OK

#30007 Apr 5, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell me- what does a typo have to do improper grammar?
As I said before, I am as capable of using of using grammar check as you are, I just don't give a big Rats Ass weather I do or not.
And it is post from people like you that get bent all out of shape about grammar because you can not go toe to toe in political discourse.
Then holler diversion.......... OH yes you are a bright one.
I am sure you meant "whether" not weather, but I am equally sure you didnt even know there was a difference.
Recently you went on with your blather asking for political discourse, calling me inept at it and such, yet, when I engaged you in political discourse giving you a range of topics to choose from, you went silent and ran and hid like the little bitch you are and nobody heard from you (except all your alter egos) for days. Face it you just stir the pot. You will lash out as usual and I look forward to laughing heartily at your response.
speller feller

Conway, AR

#30008 Apr 5, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
"Impossible for you to go toe toe with anyone about politics"
When the opponent refuses to discuss politics it is indeed impossible to engage in political discourse.
Here is the deal, you pick any political topic you would care to discuss.
The rules shall be, all discourse will be on the political subject at hand, any remarks other than subject matter is automatic disqualification by either party.
Now all we are waiting for is to see if you have the balls to put or money where your mouth is!
Been there. Done that.
You can back track and reread them, there are lots!
They pretty much all begin and end the same way...
-You post, and I post a rebuttal.
-You post, and I post a news link proving your information absurd.
-You post something about rolling around on the floor laughing and then rant about the news link is biased and wrong. I post something about it being odd that you are always laying on the ground laughing like an idiot, and although you discredit the reality of news and live in the Twilight Zone, the real world goes on without you.
-You post a spelling error because you've been proven wrong and your sources that you have placed high and lifted up have issued retractions...leaving you with nothing and looking like a fool. I post several ways you have butchered the English language through grammatical errors, spelling errors, incoherent sentences.
-You post some sort of cussing, raving, lunatic rant about how you have proven everyone wrong cause you're bad to the bone, so I am resorting to attacking your grammar and spelling (when you were the one that diverted the political topic to begin with, AND it is in black and white for all to see) and that you don't care if I point out your errors because you're a big, tough guy that could speak correctly if you wanted to (of course, it's always by your own admission that you would have to do this through some sort of 'chek yer gramer hear' site that you are sure anyone that has a grasp of when to use was/were and their/there/they're must use)...but really, by the end of your cussing rant, you're pouting and whining about being personally attacked, and always ignoring your own responsibility. Sometimes, you end with an ALL CAPS "ATTA BOY, BARNEY", and refer to me as 'cupcake'.
-I post some sort of mockery...but really, all I can then think about is cake...so I have to go get a snack...
-You pout and disappear for a while...sometimes all your rowdy friends show up to remind us how fantastic and smart you are...but they usually tuck tail and run, too.
You did try to rejuvenate that whole obamacare success thing...but wisely dropped it.
Really, Barney, a toe-to-toe challenge from you? Well, it's just means you're about to stop, drop, and roll around laughing...and that just not normal behavior for an old guy...and I think I'm going to go do some baking...
Reality Check

Camden, AR

#30009 Apr 5, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Counter point:
Two caveats. First, we know little about RAND’s survey methodology at this time; we’ll have to see the actual study to see the details of what they did. Second, we don’t know how many previously uninsured people signed up for off-exchange coverage, above and beyond the normal rate of churn that this market would traditionally see.
Article above by Forbes
The more insured people that sign up for Obamacare the weaker it makes Obama's argument for Obamacare. He argued that EVERYONE should have healthcare. If only 7.1 million have signed up (not paid) then the more that already had insurance the worse it makes the argument for the bill. As for the RAND methodology, I agree with you and you would do well to remember that you made this point the next time you use a study or survey to make your point on another issue. Maybe you were listening when I told you to NEVER believe a study or survey fullheartedly. I doubt it but one can hope.
Reality Check

Camden, AR

#30010 Apr 5, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Since you mention the Rand report.
Where is your proof Rand even did a legitimate study, several sources reported on it, they must have found it, why can't you?
Why did you not answer the question , "did they say it had been released"
BTW- Right wing think tanks are very much a part of the political landscape today.
I'm glad you are asking these type of questions because you should on every type of study you come across. Exactly what does a study have to go through to be "released"? I really have no clue. Never thought about it actually but since you are making such a big deal about it, you must think it's a very important thing. Is there an actual "study release" building where those who have conducted a study must go in order to get their results out to the world? Maybe there are "study faries" that collect studies that are worthy of release and then magically fly the results around to all the media outlets. Please let me know. The suspense is killing me!

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30011 Apr 5, 2014
Blaggard wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sure you meant "whether" not weather, but I am equally sure you didnt even know there was a difference.
Recently you went on with your blather asking for political discourse, calling me inept at it and such, yet, when I engaged you in political discourse giving you a range of topics to choose from, you went silent and ran and hid like the little bitch you are and nobody heard from you (except all your alter egos) for days. Face it you just stir the pot. You will lash out as usual and I look forward to laughing heartily at your response.
..

Tell you what, just give me the number of the post that give me that range of topics and I will choose one, then we will see if you can debate as well as you whine and make excuses.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30012 Apr 5, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
The more insured people that sign up for Obamacare the weaker it makes Obama's argument for Obamacare. He argued that EVERYONE should have healthcare. If only 7.1 million have signed up (not paid) then the more that already had insurance the worse it makes the argument for the bill. As for the RAND methodology, I agree with you and you would do well to remember that you made this point the next time you use a study or survey to make your point on another issue. Maybe you were listening when I told you to NEVER believe a study or survey fullheartedly. I doubt it but one can hope.
Tell you what, when you learn enough about Obamacare to have a informed conversation it we will pick up here where we left off.

Now I will help you get started by giving you this tid-bit of information.

7.2 million is the amount of people who signed up through the exchange only, there are several million more who bought through the privet market.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30013 Apr 5, 2014
ooops- private

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30014 Apr 5, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm glad you are asking these type of questions because you should on every type of study you come across. Exactly what does a study have to go through to be "released"? I really have no clue. Never thought about it actually but since you are making such a big deal about it, you must think it's a very important thing. Is there an actual "study release" building where those who have conducted a study must go in order to get their results out to the world? Maybe there are "study faries" that collect studies that are worthy of release and then magically fly the results around to all the media outlets. Please let me know. The suspense is killing me!
Seems to me if you figured out the FAIRIES carried the study to the media you can surly figure out you just answered your own question as to whom releases the report.

But then again your like minded posters here think aliens are breeding with sheep and jack-asses, i guess you fit right in with your fairies.

LMFAO, and you hypocrites are constantly riding my ass about speaking figuratively.
speller feller

Conway, AR

#30015 Apr 5, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>..
Tell you what, just give me the number of the post that give me that range of topics and I will choose one, then we will see if you can debate as well as you whine and make excuses.
Tell you what, since you are pulling one of your "show me" diversions, I'd be more than happy to take you up on it. The number of the post is #29874.
Tell you what, I'll give you one better than just the number...I copied and pasted your nonsense AND Blaggard's challenge. Of course, you went silent...well, after you tried in vain to point out a few errors here and there. After failing there, you tucked your tail between your legs and disappeared for several days.
What a true glutton for punishment you are, you stupid, stupid man. This will only prove my above post, and your pathetic games that make you sound like a whimpering baby...please, ask for someone else to bring up past posts that you ignored!!
Let the debates begin...well, after you roll around a bit...

"Sunday Mar 23
BARNEYII wrote: <quoted text>
Tell me something please, would you go to a web site that's intended purpose is to discus grammar to discus politics . Probably not, but you would sure turn to personal condescending comments when you can't your own in political discourse. It appears you have a fan that is inept at political discourse as you."

"Blaggard wrote: <quoted text>
Actually I am quite well versed in political discourse, it just bears pointing out when as other have said you make an ass of yourself while telling everyone else how stupid you are.
As for the political discourse, I saw your back and forth with Mr Jass and I must say you do have your head deep in the sand. I spent about 13 hours in the car today and listened via sattelite radio to CNN FOX NEWS and CNBC. each one of those stations at one point in time today, called the sanctions against Russia "insignificant". Instead of keeping quiet and backing down as you were so sure he would, Putin is ramping up and getting more violent.
I am also dying to know what you think of Bill Clinton saying that Obama's notion of releasing control of ICANN "a really BAD idea" which one of your liberal heroes will you defend? And while we are dealing with foreign policy, what about the so called nuke deal with Iran? Even Democrat Senators and Congressmen are calling Obama out for not doing anything to enforce the agreement. "

Okay, big boy...impress us all...
speller feller

Conway, AR

#30016 Apr 5, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Seems to me if you figured out the FAIRIES carried the study to the media you can surly figure out you just answered your own question as to whom releases the report.
But then again your like minded posters here think aliens are breeding with sheep and jack-asses, i guess you fit right in with your fairies.
LMFAO, and you hypocrites are constantly riding my ass about speaking figuratively.
The point, blockhead, is that you post more polls, studies, and surveys and BADA-BING BADA -BOOM them as 100% fact because you agree with the outcome. Your hypocrisy then comes marching in when anyone else posts poll results that you don't agree with...and you cry foul, and try to make a mockery out of the very same method you just used to 'prove' yourself right with...a POLL!
Barney, please get that laughing under control. You are laughing off body parts. You have rolled around on the ground laughing so much that you surely must be injuring your brain, and it's showing more and more every day!
And,'speaking figuratively', Barney? Come on, now. No one, and I mean NO ONE has ever accused you of something that is beyond your capability!
You don't comprehend literal fact...we would never ever expect you to be able to comprehend anything more than the lies you believe from DC!
guest

United States

#30017 Apr 5, 2014
You got a lot of nerve!!!! Who are you nobody special in my book you talk to yourself way too much on topix. And don't worry about me and mine. You need to be worried about. Yours.:7
Who are you

United States

#30018 Apr 5, 2014
guest wrote:
You got a lot of nerve!!!! Who are you nobody special in my book you talk to yourself way too much on topix. And don't worry about me and mine. You need to be worried about. Yours.:7
How bout me? I've been worried about you and yours. I opened my book, and there was your name. Right under the word special. Would it be okay if I stopped worrying about you'ens?
If you say yes, then I might start talking to myself here on topix! A lot! Too much, maybe!

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#30019 Apr 6, 2014
speller feller wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell you what, since you are pulling one of your "show me" diversions, I'd be more than happy to take you up on it. The number of the post is #29874.
Tell you what, I'll give you one better than just the number...I copied and pasted your nonsense AND Blaggard's challenge. Of course, you went silent...well, after you tried in vain to point out a few errors here and there. After failing there, you tucked your tail between your legs and disappeared for several days.
What a true glutton for punishment you are, you stupid, stupid man. This will only prove my above post, and your pathetic games that make you sound like a whimpering baby...please, ask for someone else to bring up past posts that you ignored!!
Let the debates begin...well, after you roll around a bit...
"Sunday Mar 23
BARNEYII wrote: <quoted text>
Tell me something please, would you go to a web site that's intended purpose is to discus grammar to discus politics . Probably not, but you would sure turn to personal condescending comments when you can't your own in political discourse. It appears you have a fan that is inept at political discourse as you."
"Blaggard wrote: <quoted text>
Actually I am quite well versed in political discourse, it just bears pointing out when as other have said you make an ass of yourself while telling everyone else how stupid you are.
As for the political discourse, I saw your back and forth with Mr Jass and I must say you do have your head deep in the sand. I spent about 13 hours in the car today and listened via sattelite radio to CNN FOX NEWS and CNBC. each one of those stations at one point in time today, called the sanctions against Russia "insignificant". Instead of keeping quiet and backing down as you were so sure he would, Putin is ramping up and getting more violent.
I am also dying to know what you think of Bill Clinton saying that Obama's notion of releasing control of ICANN "a really BAD idea" which one of your liberal heroes will you defend? And while we are dealing with foreign policy, what about the so called nuke deal with Iran? Even Democrat Senators and Congressmen are calling Obama out for not doing anything to enforce the agreement. "
Okay, big boy...impress us all..

.
OMG, this one is to good to lay off of, its late tonight, I will be be sure and get back to ya though, this is going to be fun..........
speller feller

Conway, AR

#30020 Apr 6, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Does eating Crow have any thing to do with the unusual briefness of your post, or is this just a coincidence.
How was all that Crow you just dined on from the entire previous page?
Ironic irony! Isn't it funny?
Don't you just wanna roll around on the floor and laugh until you're missing a body part?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

El Dorado Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Wondering 37 min Abc1234 20
80-room Marriott hotel behind McDonald's northside 10 hr Resident 24
Tonya's Dance School 11 hr Billie 16
Freedom of Speech, Sign Lady 12 hr Abc1234 2
Soccer 14 hr JWN2 1
fat chicks 21 hr Edmonds 14
Pokémon Mon Seriously 9

El Dorado Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

El Dorado Mortgages