created by: Rick | Jun 8, 2010

Arkansas

5,829 votes

Did you vote today?

Click on an option to vote

  • Yes
  • No
  • Other (explain below)
Comments
26,961 - 26,980 of 29,112 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago
Supporter

Memphis, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29338
Feb 16, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
So you think Ronald Reagan gain seats in his first term?
OMG, there is just no hope for you.
The U.S. House election, 1982 was an election for the United States House of Representatives held on November 2, 1982, in the middle of President Ronald Reagan's first term, whose popularity was sinking due to economic conditions under the 1982 recession. Therefore, the President's Republican Party lost seats in the House. Unlike most midterm election cycles, the number of seats lost—27 seats to the Democratic Party—was a comparatively large swap. It included most of the seats that had been gained the previous election, cementing the Democratic majority.
Let's face it Barney, you just can't convince these numb nuts that can think for themselves that any of your positions are defensible. They were raised by a bunch of arrogant fools that believe that you are responsible for your own actions and you aren't going to be able to convince them otherwise until you can get the government to take away everything they have ever worked for, then they will see the wisdom of our ways.
guest

Searcy, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29339
Feb 16, 2014
 
Nope
guest

Searcy, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29340
Feb 16, 2014
 
Yes
Redd

Little Rock, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29341
Feb 16, 2014
 
Supporter wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's face it Barney, you just can't convince these numb nuts that can think for themselves that any of your positions are defensible. They were raised by a bunch of arrogant fools that believe that you are responsible for your own actions and you aren't going to be able to convince them otherwise until you can get the government to take away , then they will see the wisdom of our ways.
You forgot something, most of the lazy numb nuts that post on topix are already taking away everything you have ever worked for. Hell half of every berg across the Delta is on some sort of public assistance or BS disability.

Let's face it Jock Supporter, better than a average chance, you are to.
Reality Check

Camden, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29342
Feb 16, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
It is obvious what you were doing, but I still must ask you again, what the Hell does minimum wage have to do with the high unemployment numbers that plagued the early years of this administration .
The numbers you said were the highest in history, kind of like you telling us the CBO released a report saying Obama care kills two million jobs....
and the list is considerably longer of things you have lied about.
So you see sometimes what you happen to think is a personal attack because I pointing out where you lied.
Well, that's just a reality check Ole Buddy.
I'm not doing anything but trying to tell you that I was referring to the minimum wage as another failed liberal ideology and since you opened the unemployment door to minimum wage I obliged you. Any other meaning than that was concocted by your liberal ideology.
Redd

Little Rock, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29343
Feb 16, 2014
 
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not doing anything but trying to tell you that I was referring to the minimum wage as another failed liberal ideology and since you opened the unemployment door to minimum wage I obliged you. Any other meaning than that was concocted by your liberal ideology.
Funny thing about the minimum wage, back when the minimum stood at a buck and a quarter an hour that wage had twice the purchasing power of today's minimum.

Wonder why?
Supporter

Jonesboro, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29344
Feb 16, 2014
 
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny thing about the minimum wage, back when the minimum stood at a buck and a quarter an hour that wage had twice the purchasing power of today's minimum.
Wonder why?
You don't know? You and Barney.
Reality Check

Camden, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29345
Feb 16, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny thing about the minimum wage, back when the minimum stood at a buck and a quarter an hour that wage had twice the purchasing power of today's minimum.
Wonder why?
That's a totally separate argument and you know it. I don't think a liberal would want to have that argument as we are experiencing the devaluation of the dollar under Barack Obama's spending and printing spree.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29346
Feb 16, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Redd wrote:
<quoted text>Funny thing about the minimum wage, back when the minimum stood at a buck and a quarter an hour that wage had twice the purchasing power of today's minimum.

Wonder why?
UH-OH. This should be good
Reality Check

Camden, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29347
Feb 16, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
So you think Ronald Reagan gain seats in his first term?
OMG, there is just no hope for you.
The U.S. House election, 1982 was an election for the United States House of Representatives held on November 2, 1982, in the middle of President Ronald Reagan's first term, whose popularity was sinking due to economic conditions under the 1982 recession. Therefore, the President's Republican Party lost seats in the House. Unlike most midterm election cycles, the number of seats lost—27 seats to the Democratic Party—was a comparatively large swap. It included most of the seats that had been gained the previous election, cementing the Democratic majority.
Take a deep breath and read it again. If Ronald Reagan gained seats in his first mid-term election I would have included him with GW and FDR. Now you can regroup and continue proving liberalism is a failure.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29348
Feb 16, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not doing anything but trying to tell you that I was referring to the minimum wage as another failed liberal ideology and since you opened the unemployment door to minimum wage I obliged you. Any other meaning than that was concocted by your liberal ideology.
Again, I know what you were trying to say, I understand your excuse for why you said it,

and one more time, it still does NOT have a F*CKING thing to do with the original subject.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29349
Feb 16, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Take a deep breath and read it again. If Ronald Reagan gained seats in his first mid-term election I would have included him with GW and FDR. Now you can regroup and continue proving liberalism is a failure

.
Oh I see you put a period behind Reagan, that is why I asked, I thought even you caught the part where said Reagan lost seats in the mid term.

You made it obvious in one of your prior rants today, that you did not see me credit the cause for Reagan's high UE numbers to the same reason Obama got his.......... they inherited them.

It appeared to go over your head as well as what I meant when Reagan had a Democrat Majority to work with and the Dems. got the Tea Party.

So you see, a Republican president did work with Tip O'neil (D) and they got things done.

President Obama got self proclaimed obstructionist, and this is what we got today.
Redd

Little Rock, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29350
Feb 16, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a totally separate argument and you know it. I don't think a liberal would want to have that argument as we are experiencing the devaluation of the dollar under Barack Obama's spending and printing spree.
We have been experiencing a slow devaluation of the dollar and the gradual destruction of the middle class for years..a great deal due to Republican legislative give-aways to the rich 1%ers who own them lock, stock and barrel..

Lucky for them, there are many just like you...always ready to defend their actions primarily because they see themselves financially, intellectually, and morally separated from the rest of us Commie rabble.

Maybe you'll live to see your error.....I certainly hope so, it will be short-lived though and won't matter by then, given our utter disregard for the future.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29351
Feb 16, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a totally separate argument and you know it. I don't think a liberal would want to have that argument as we are experiencing the devaluation of the dollar under Barack Obama's spending and printing spree.
LMFAO, yep just as lame as I expected.

I predict a reality check in your near future........
Redd

Little Rock, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29352
Feb 16, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Take a deep breath and read it again. If Ronald Reagan gained seats in his first mid-term election I would have included him with GW and FDR. Now you can regroup and continue proving liberalism is a failure.
Lord Reagan spent us into the beginnings of where Mission Accomplished took Obama.

The greatest Republican Administrations were headed by Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, and Dwight David Eisenhower. They understood humanity, the working class and it's need to be defended.

To mention Reagan in the same breath as Washington is blasphemy.

BTW, you exist today as a free thinking American strictly because of liberalism and it's beginnings in Seventeenth Century England. To deny this is to reject legitimate History.

So deny away.
Reality Check

Camden, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29353
Feb 16, 2014
 
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, I know what you were trying to say, I understand your excuse for why you said it,
and one more time, it still does NOT have a F*CKING thing to do with the original subject.
Ok, I get it. You don't want to go down that road because you know it's an argument you can't win. You know it's an intentional lie by your party designed to make the uninformed dependent and poor and your ok with that. Hey, if your going to be a progressive liberal, then at least wear it proudly. Even if it's a lie.
Reality Check

Camden, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29354
Feb 16, 2014
 
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
Lord Reagan spent us into the beginnings of where Mission Accomplished took Obama.
The greatest Republican Administrations were headed by Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, and Dwight David Eisenhower. They understood humanity, the working class and it's need to be defended.
To mention Reagan in the same breath as Washington is blasphemy.
BTW, you exist today as a free thinking American strictly because of liberalism and it's beginnings in Seventeenth Century England. To deny this is to reject legitimate History.
So deny away.
Obama's spending makes Reagan and all other presidents look as if they were saving. GW Bush not George Washington. Liberalism is anything but free for all but a VERY few. Any ideology that allows certain citizens to live off of the fruits of other's labor without contributing at all only serves as a mechanism to control the uninformed by empty promises and control those who won't buy into empty promises by taxation. Liberalism is the most devious form of oppression this world has ever seen.
Human

White Hall, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29355
Feb 16, 2014
 
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>Lord Reagan spent us into the beginnings of where Mission Accomplished took Obama.

The greatest Republican Administrations were headed by Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, and Dwight David Eisenhower. They understood humanity, the working class and it's need to be defended.

To mention Reagan in the same breath as Washington is blasphemy.

BTW, you exist today as a free thinking American strictly because of liberalism and it's beginnings in Seventeenth Century England. To deny this is to reject legitimate History.

So deny away.
If it weren't for Reagan, we'd be speaking Russian by now.
If any of you young f#<%s knew any real history, other than that liberal crap that's being taught in schools the last 20 years, you would know that Communism, Socialism, Progressivism, "Liberalism", whatever you want to call it, is bad for pretty much everyone involved, unless you are the one in power. Communist powers have killed more of their own people, than were killed during WW2, on all sides.
Rag on Reagan if you want, it's your right. But he's the reason you're not doing your bitching in Russian.
Reality Check

Camden, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29356
Feb 16, 2014
 
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
We have been experiencing a slow devaluation of the dollar and the gradual destruction of the middle class for years..a great deal due to Republican legislative give-aways to the rich 1%ers who own them lock, stock and barrel..
Lucky for them, there are many just like you...always ready to defend their actions primarily because they see themselves financially, intellectually, and morally separated from the rest of us Commie rabble.
Maybe you'll live to see your error.....I certainly hope so, it will be short-lived though and won't matter by then, given our utter disregard for the future.
The income gap between the rich and poor has greatly widened under Obama. The 1% have gotten filthy rich under Obama and the poor have gotten poorer. Here's something for your argument. Be sure to look at the chart.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/201...
Reality Check

Camden, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29357
Feb 16, 2014
 
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
LMFAO, yep just as lame as I expected.
I predict a reality check in your near future........
I hand reality checks out to you on a regular basis so one for you in the near future is almost a sure bet.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

6 Users are viewing the El Dorado Forum right now

Search the El Dorado Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
AR Arkansas Hunting Rights Amendment (Oct '10) 27 min I am woman 3,835
AR More than 1,000 dead birds fall from sky in Ark (Jan '11) 1 hr cooker 9,800
telishia giles-ainsworth 3 hr greenbean68 1
Why can't the Chicago police control the blacks... 3 hr Jerry 3
trash drunk chicken shit 4 hr tryncirath 1
AR Exit polls: Boozman defeats 2-term incumbent Li... (Nov '10) 4 hr midnight oil 829
jobs 4 hr The Real Duck 12
Municipal Auditorium- El Dorado 4 hr The Real Duck 35
Eldorado , Entire city needs to be cleaned up,! 7 hr Grigori 21
•••
•••
•••
El Dorado Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

El Dorado Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

El Dorado People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

El Dorado News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in El Dorado
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••