Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,407 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#29349 Feb 16, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Take a deep breath and read it again. If Ronald Reagan gained seats in his first mid-term election I would have included him with GW and FDR. Now you can regroup and continue proving liberalism is a failure

.
Oh I see you put a period behind Reagan, that is why I asked, I thought even you caught the part where said Reagan lost seats in the mid term.

You made it obvious in one of your prior rants today, that you did not see me credit the cause for Reagan's high UE numbers to the same reason Obama got his.......... they inherited them.

It appeared to go over your head as well as what I meant when Reagan had a Democrat Majority to work with and the Dems. got the Tea Party.

So you see, a Republican president did work with Tip O'neil (D) and they got things done.

President Obama got self proclaimed obstructionist, and this is what we got today.
Redd

United States

#29350 Feb 16, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a totally separate argument and you know it. I don't think a liberal would want to have that argument as we are experiencing the devaluation of the dollar under Barack Obama's spending and printing spree.
We have been experiencing a slow devaluation of the dollar and the gradual destruction of the middle class for years..a great deal due to Republican legislative give-aways to the rich 1%ers who own them lock, stock and barrel..

Lucky for them, there are many just like you...always ready to defend their actions primarily because they see themselves financially, intellectually, and morally separated from the rest of us Commie rabble.

Maybe you'll live to see your error.....I certainly hope so, it will be short-lived though and won't matter by then, given our utter disregard for the future.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#29351 Feb 16, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a totally separate argument and you know it. I don't think a liberal would want to have that argument as we are experiencing the devaluation of the dollar under Barack Obama's spending and printing spree.
LMFAO, yep just as lame as I expected.

I predict a reality check in your near future........
Redd

United States

#29352 Feb 16, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Take a deep breath and read it again. If Ronald Reagan gained seats in his first mid-term election I would have included him with GW and FDR. Now you can regroup and continue proving liberalism is a failure.
Lord Reagan spent us into the beginnings of where Mission Accomplished took Obama.

The greatest Republican Administrations were headed by Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, and Dwight David Eisenhower. They understood humanity, the working class and it's need to be defended.

To mention Reagan in the same breath as Washington is blasphemy.

BTW, you exist today as a free thinking American strictly because of liberalism and it's beginnings in Seventeenth Century England. To deny this is to reject legitimate History.

So deny away.
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#29353 Feb 16, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, I know what you were trying to say, I understand your excuse for why you said it,
and one more time, it still does NOT have a F*CKING thing to do with the original subject.
Ok, I get it. You don't want to go down that road because you know it's an argument you can't win. You know it's an intentional lie by your party designed to make the uninformed dependent and poor and your ok with that. Hey, if your going to be a progressive liberal, then at least wear it proudly. Even if it's a lie.
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#29354 Feb 16, 2014
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
Lord Reagan spent us into the beginnings of where Mission Accomplished took Obama.
The greatest Republican Administrations were headed by Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, and Dwight David Eisenhower. They understood humanity, the working class and it's need to be defended.
To mention Reagan in the same breath as Washington is blasphemy.
BTW, you exist today as a free thinking American strictly because of liberalism and it's beginnings in Seventeenth Century England. To deny this is to reject legitimate History.
So deny away.
Obama's spending makes Reagan and all other presidents look as if they were saving. GW Bush not George Washington. Liberalism is anything but free for all but a VERY few. Any ideology that allows certain citizens to live off of the fruits of other's labor without contributing at all only serves as a mechanism to control the uninformed by empty promises and control those who won't buy into empty promises by taxation. Liberalism is the most devious form of oppression this world has ever seen.
Human

Camden, AR

#29355 Feb 16, 2014
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>Lord Reagan spent us into the beginnings of where Mission Accomplished took Obama.

The greatest Republican Administrations were headed by Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, and Dwight David Eisenhower. They understood humanity, the working class and it's need to be defended.

To mention Reagan in the same breath as Washington is blasphemy.

BTW, you exist today as a free thinking American strictly because of liberalism and it's beginnings in Seventeenth Century England. To deny this is to reject legitimate History.

So deny away.
If it weren't for Reagan, we'd be speaking Russian by now.
If any of you young f#<%s knew any real history, other than that liberal crap that's being taught in schools the last 20 years, you would know that Communism, Socialism, Progressivism, "Liberalism", whatever you want to call it, is bad for pretty much everyone involved, unless you are the one in power. Communist powers have killed more of their own people, than were killed during WW2, on all sides.
Rag on Reagan if you want, it's your right. But he's the reason you're not doing your bitching in Russian.
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#29356 Feb 16, 2014
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
We have been experiencing a slow devaluation of the dollar and the gradual destruction of the middle class for years..a great deal due to Republican legislative give-aways to the rich 1%ers who own them lock, stock and barrel..
Lucky for them, there are many just like you...always ready to defend their actions primarily because they see themselves financially, intellectually, and morally separated from the rest of us Commie rabble.
Maybe you'll live to see your error.....I certainly hope so, it will be short-lived though and won't matter by then, given our utter disregard for the future.
The income gap between the rich and poor has greatly widened under Obama. The 1% have gotten filthy rich under Obama and the poor have gotten poorer. Here's something for your argument. Be sure to look at the chart.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/201...
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#29357 Feb 16, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
LMFAO, yep just as lame as I expected.
I predict a reality check in your near future........
I hand reality checks out to you on a regular basis so one for you in the near future is almost a sure bet.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#29358 Feb 16, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, I get it. You don't want to go down that road because you know it's an argument you can't win. You know it's an intentional lie by your party designed to make the uninformed dependent and poor and your ok with that. Hey, if your going to be a progressive liberal, then at least wear it proudly. Even if it's a lie
No you don't get it, if you got it, you would have understood what my thoughts on the matter are several post back.

You do not seem to understand, I care as less about your ignorant ass opinion of mim. wage this time as I did the last fifteen times I have read it today.

You look like a complete Moron repeating Republican propaganda on the matter.

This argument has bee held by far greater minds than yours and world class economist and they have yet to win this argument.

Hate to break this news to you, your chances are not looking to good either.
Redd

Benton, AR

#29360 Feb 17, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama's spending makes Reagan and all other presidents look as if they were saving. GW Bush not George Washington. Liberalism is anything but free for all but a VERY few. Any ideology that allows certain citizens to live off of the fruits of other's labor without contributing at all only serves as a mechanism to control the uninformed by empty promises and control those who won't buy into empty promises by taxation. Liberalism is the most devious form of oppression this world has ever seen.
You're so full of it, you confuse true Liberalism with give away programs for the poor, and in many cases those not deserving such benefit, while completely ignoring current Conservative initiatives aimed at rewarding the well heeled with vast amounts of cash insuring their profitability remains secure. Your Party, and many of it followers, are no better than the money changers outside the Temple. How much should one profit from the sale of a single Widow's Mite..50, 100, 500 percent, all the while professing piety.

The uninformed represent a large plurality of your Parties support, how else could one vote for someone or something that ignores their best interests. One has to give Murdoch and his ilk their due, much like post WWI propaganda in Germany demonizing Jews, your handlers have learned their lessons well. Voelkisch ideology is once again alive and well, with a unique twist of course, just change the names, surroundings and the particulars.

“Frankly my dear...”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#29361 Feb 17, 2014
Redd and Barney...Barney and Redd.
Should be some sort of new comedy, starring themselves, of course.
The description could read something like, "a new comedy about an inept, bumbling, self-proclaimed political guru, Barney, and his alter-ego ' Redd'. Watch as Barney digs himself into a political grave each week with his wrong, but oh-so-funny analysis of government today. Each episode ends with Barney finally falling into the political pit he's been digging, and his alter-ego,'Redd' showing up to save the day...only to end up being pushed over the edge, joining Barney in their political wasteland, by a variety of celebrity guests. Special guests appearing at the end of each episode will be: Nancy Pelosi, Hilary Clinton, and even a special appearence by Barak Obama! Join us for what's sure to be a million laughs!"

Hey, Barney. If raising minimum wage is going to be so beneficial, why stop at $10 an hour?
Why not raise it higher...$20...$30...maybe even $50 an hour!?!
Everyone could be rich, and afford the new unaffordable healthcare act.
Why are you being so oppressive to the working class and setting the wage so low??
Think bigger, Barney!!!$50 an hour, and THEN, everybody in America will be rich!!

“Frankly my dear...”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#29362 Feb 17, 2014
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
You're so full of it, you confuse true Liberalism with give away programs for the poor, and in many cases those not deserving such benefit, while completely ignoring current Conservative initiatives aimed at rewarding the well heeled with vast amounts of cash insuring their profitability remains secure. Your Party, and many of it followers, are no better than the money changers outside the Temple. How much should one profit from the sale of a single Widow's Mite..50, 100, 500 percent, all the while professing piety.
The uninformed represent a large plurality of your Parties support, how else could one vote for someone or something that ignores their best interests. One has to give Murdoch and his ilk their due, much like post WWI propaganda in Germany demonizing Jews, your handlers have learned their lessons well. Voelkisch ideology is once again alive and well, with a unique twist of course, just change the names, surroundings and the particulars.
Ummm,'Redd', the money changers were actually INSIDE the temple, amongst those that had been so blinded that they didn't even see anything wrong with what they were doing...much like you and your old buddy Barney!

It can be compared to how poor old ignorant Barney believed the liberal spin when the COB issued its projection for ObamaCare and its future impact on jobs.
Barney boy, I know how you are such a stickler for facts and demand HONEST sources, so I want you to take a look at this link...

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBREA131...

You want so badly to dispute evidence when you read liberal opinion of news, but poor old 'Redd'...and, ummmmm Barney, right there in the second paragraph, well it basically refutes every argument you have about every single point you try to make.
Here, I'll quote it for you,
"...the CBO said the health law would lead workers, particularly those with lower incomes, to limit their hours to avoid losing federal subsidies that pharmacists provides to help pay for health insurance and other healthcare costs."

Read the rest of the article. It's really a dismal projection. As is every policy Obama is involved in.
Okay, boys...we are ready for your intellectual spin...it should be entertaining, to say the least!!
Reality Check

Little Rock, AR

#29363 Feb 17, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
No you don't get it, if you got it, you would have understood what my thoughts on the matter are several post back.
You do not seem to understand, I care as less about your ignorant ass opinion of mim. wage this time as I did the last fifteen times I have read it today.
You look like a complete Moron repeating Republican propaganda on the matter.
This argument has bee held by far greater minds than yours and world class economist and they have yet to win this argument.
Hate to break this news to you, your chances are not looking to good either.
Why don't you just say you don't want to have that argument? At least you could be honest about it. You never shy away from any debate on any issue. I mention this in a completely different context, you open the door for debate then run from it hiding behind arguments from others. This is one argument among many that simply allow even the most simple minded person to understand that liberalism is no more than a weapon used against the uninformed to make them think they are being fought for when actually they are being fought against by that very weapon. A weapon used to gain power and money. How anyone could be a part of liberalism and sleep well at night is beyond me. How do you people live with yourselves?

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#29364 Feb 17, 2014
scarlett o hara wrote:
<quoted text>
Ummm,'Redd', the money changers were actually INSIDE the temple, amongst those that had been so blinded that they didn't even see anything wrong with what they were doing...much like you and your old buddy Barney!
It can be compared to how poor old ignorant Barney believed the liberal spin when the COB issued its projection for ObamaCare and its future impact on jobs.
Barney boy, I know how you are such a stickler for facts and demand HONEST sources, so I want you to take a look at this link...
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBREA131...
You want so badly to dispute evidence when you read liberal opinion of news, but poor old 'Redd'...and, ummmmm Barney, right there in the second paragraph, well it basically refutes every argument you have about every single point you try to make.
Here, I'll quote it for you,
"...the CBO said the health law would lead workers, particularly those with lower incomes, to limit their hours to avoid losing federal subsidies that pharmacists provides to help pay for health insurance and other healthcare costs."
Read the rest of the article. It's really a dismal projection. As is every policy Obama is involved in.
Okay, boys...we are ready for your intellectual spin...it should be entertaining, to say the least!!
" basically refutes every argument you have about every single point you try to make"

Wow that must have been one Hell of a statement in your mind. so powerful that it encompasses, about every single point I make.

I mean damn,, every single point.

That sure makes you the lucky one, now all you have to do to prove some one wrong , on any single point, is just whip out your quote there, and by God you have them nailed.

Look here, it is getting high time that you learn you just can't go around telling lies and depending on your straw persona to get you out of it.

As I have told you many times, changing names does not help, your still a Space Cadet under any name.

Before you get to cocky over your great find, read what was in that story about your great job killing Obamacare.

"It's not that the businesses are cutting those jobs," said Jason Furman, who chairs the White House Council of Economic Advisers. He said the CBO report showed an impact on labor supply rather than demand for workers from employers"

Now tell me, what makes you think that some people accepting public assistance have not learned how to manipulate the system( cutting back on hours) long before ACH ever seen the light of day.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#29365 Feb 17, 2014
scarlett o hara wrote:
<quoted text>
Ummm,'Redd', the money changers were actually INSIDE the temple, amongst those that had been so blinded that they didn't even see anything wrong with what they were doing...much like you and your old buddy Barney!
It can be compared to how poor old ignorant Barney believed the liberal spin when the COB issued its projection for ObamaCare and its future impact on jobs.
Barney boy, I know how you are such a stickler for facts and demand HONEST sources, so I want you to take a look at this link...
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBREA131...
You want so badly to dispute evidence when you read liberal opinion of news, but poor old 'Redd'...and, ummmmm Barney, right there in the second paragraph, well it basically refutes every argument you have about every single point you try to make.
Here, I'll quote it for you,
"...the CBO said the health law would lead workers, particularly those with lower incomes, to limit their hours to avoid losing federal subsidies that pharmacists provides to help pay for health insurance and other healthcare costs."
Read the rest of the article. It's really a dismal projection. As is every policy Obama is involved in.
Okay, boys...we are ready for your intellectual spin...it should be entertaining, to say the least!!
", to limit their hours to avoid losing federal subsidies that pharmacists provides" "to help pay for health insurance and other healthcare costs."

" that pharmacists provides"

??????????
Reality Check

Little Rock, AR

#29366 Feb 17, 2014
Redd wrote:
<quoted text>
You're so full of it, you confuse true Liberalism with give away programs for the poor, and in many cases those not deserving such benefit, while completely ignoring current Conservative initiatives aimed at rewarding the well heeled with vast amounts of cash insuring their profitability remains secure. Your Party, and many of it followers, are no better than the money changers outside the Temple. How much should one profit from the sale of a single Widow's Mite..50, 100, 500 percent, all the while professing piety.
The uninformed represent a large plurality of your Parties support, how else could one vote for someone or something that ignores their best interests. One has to give Murdoch and his ilk their due, much like post WWI propaganda in Germany demonizing Jews, your handlers have learned their lessons well. Voelkisch ideology is once again alive and well, with a unique twist of course, just change the names, surroundings and the particulars.
I should have said progressive liberalism. Those who practice true liberalism like Rand Paul and John Stossel are people I admire for the most part. It's people like the Democratic left that are the danger. You talk about selling and making a profit. What's wrong with that? If the market bears a certain price for a certain item, why should anyone sell that item for less than that? You do realize that companies have to make profits in order to survive don't you? If my company didn't make a profit then I would not have a house to live in, food to put on my table, or any money to pay my overhead. Companies that sell things have to sell them for more than they pay for them. It's just the way it is. There are only a select few individuals that have the know how or resources to put in the stores and companies that America needs to function and others that don't have the know how or the capital resources to make that happen are the ones that work for those that have the know how and resources. The markets are the ones that determine price. It's also the market that gives those companies the ability to expand and YES that means more profits for those capable of making them. Besides, there is no better profit to be made than by the workers for the companies. Those workers put up no capital and get a paycheck in return. By the time the employer matches SS and Medicare, the employee's profit margin is over 100% on what they are selling which is their skill. Please find me an example where a company makes over 100% profit margin. Don't even worry about it, you can't.
Redd

Benton, AR

#29367 Feb 17, 2014
scarlett o hara wrote:
<quoted text>
Ummm,'Redd', the money changers were actually INSIDE the temple,
Actually, they were in the courtyard surrounding the Temple...with the livestock.
scarlett o hara wrote:
<quoted text>Among those that had been so blinded that they don't even see anything wrong with what they were doing..


Sound familiar?

BTW, Scarlett O'Hara was a self-indulgent air head...fits you well.
Redd

Benton, AR

#29368 Feb 17, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
I should have said progressive liberalism. Those who practice true liberalism like Rand Paul and John Stossel are people I admire for the most part. It's people like the Democratic left that are the danger. You talk about selling and making a profit. What's wrong with that? If the market bears a certain price for a certain item, why should anyone sell that item for less than that? You do realize that companies have to make profits in order to survive don't you? If my company didn't make a profit then I would not have a house to live in, food to put on my table, or any money to pay my overhead. Companies that sell things have to sell them for more than they pay for them. It's just the way it is. There are only a select few individuals that have the know how or resources to put in the stores and companies that America needs to function and others that don't have the know how or the capital resources to make that happen are the ones that work for those that have the know how and resources. The markets are the ones that determine price. It's also the market that gives those companies the ability to expand and YES that means more profits for those capable of making them. Besides, there is no better profit to be made than by the workers for the companies. Those workers put up no capital and get a paycheck in return. By the time the employer matches SS and Medicare, the employee's profit margin is over 100% on what they are selling which is their skill. Please find me an example where a company makes over 100% profit margin. Don't even worry about it, you can't.
My God, what a waste of words. Reminds me of a GEICO commercial.

&li st=PL139A69A037F3A12D&inde x=9

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#29369 Feb 17, 2014
scarlett o hara wrote:
<quoted text>
Ummm,'Redd', the money changers were actually INSIDE the temple, amongst those that had been so blinded that they didn't even see anything wrong with what they were doing...much like you and your old buddy Barney!
It can be compared to how poor old ignorant Barney believed the liberal spin when the COB issued its projection for ObamaCare and its future impact on jobs.
Barney boy, I know how you are such a stickler for facts and demand HONEST sources, so I want you to take a look at this link...
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBREA131...
You want so badly to dispute evidence when you read liberal opinion of news, but poor old 'Redd'...and, ummmmm Barney, right there in the second paragraph, well it basically refutes every argument you have about every single point you try to make.
Here, I'll quote it for you,
"...the CBO said the health law would lead workers, particularly those with lower incomes, to limit their hours to avoid losing federal subsidies that pharmacists provides to help pay for health insurance and other healthcare costs."
Read the rest of the article. It's really a dismal projection. As is every policy Obama is involved in.
Okay, boys...we are ready for your intellectual spin...it should be entertaining, to say the least!!
Would you mind explaining just (exactly) what you meant by "inside the temple" ?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

El Dorado Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ok ladies i got $40. Whats up 4 hr Horny 1
Best Motorcycle Mechanics or Shops (Jul '12) 12 hr carolinagirl1965 19
fat chicks 13 hr tonya a venturella 15
Sex in Eldo (Jul '10) 14 hr Martie 38
knoe news 15 hr dev 6
News The end of school districts (Jan '13) 16 hr appeal 6
Country Club Streets 16 hr Moving On Up 19

El Dorado Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

El Dorado Mortgages