Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,407 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

barney is a racist

Conway, AR

#26769 Sep 10, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Cupcake any time you would like to march forward and provide a source that backs your opinion.........Bring it.
I need not 'bring' anything. Your very words prove it. With every post, you expose yourself, thus proving your own 'plain folk' philosophy.
You are the source that backs my opinion...you are just to stupid to realize it.
barney is a racist

Conway, AR

#26770 Sep 10, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
LMFAO, "sanctimonious", oh the irony.
I Hit that nerve pretty hard I see.
Actually, the only thing you did was to avoid giving us insight into all the good charitable work you must be involved in since you are so concerned for these causes and continue to pass your judgment on anyone that differs from you with the same old accusations you've been brainwashed to say...over, and over, and over, and over again.
You only impress yourself. Seriously...only yourself.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#26771 Sep 10, 2013
barney is a racist wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, the only thing you did was to avoid giving us insight into all the good charitable work you must be involved in since you are so concerned for these causes and continue to pass your judgment on anyone that differs from you with the same old accusations you've been brainwashed to say...over, and over, and over, and over again.
You only impress yourself. Seriously...only yourself.
Keep on phishing!

And in the mean time I will be the largest Donner in history to the, St.Jude Children Hospital.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#26772 Sep 10, 2013
AP-40 minutes ago

MOSCOW (AP)— Syria says it has accepted Russia's proposal to place its chemical weapons under international control for subsequent dismantling.

Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem said Tuesday after meeting with Russian parliament speaker that his government quickly agreed to the Russian initiative to "derail the U.S. aggression

Hummmmmmmmmmm, looks like President Obama is well on the way to making the world a safer place and did not fire one shot, or drop one bomb.

Obviously Syria and Russia both know President Obama could have lobed a few missiles at Syria had he chosen to do so.

Unfortunately there are many in the U.S., including the media that has yet to realize that the request to Congress is Political theater.

Syria and Russia are showing signs of doing the right thing, Republican are red faced, privately asking themselves and one another, why did we not see that coming!!!!!!!

You should not under estimate what a skilled politician President Obama is. He beat the Clinton political machine to win the nomination.

That speaks volumes!

WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#26773 Sep 10, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no idea .
"the growth rate today is higher than George W Bush's avg. "

Yet you can't post the numbers Boy Barney. NOBODY and I mean NOBODY makes shyt up better than you do!
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#26774 Sep 10, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
AP-40 minutes ago
MOSCOW (AP)— Syria says it has accepted Russia's proposal to place its chemical weapons under international control for subsequent dismantling.
Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem said Tuesday after meeting with Russian parliament speaker that his government quickly agreed to the Russian initiative to "derail the U.S. aggression
Hummmmmmmmmmm, looks like President Obama is well on the way to making the world a safer place and did not fire one shot, or drop one bomb.
Obviously Syria and Russia both know President Obama could have lobed a few missiles at Syria had he chosen to do so.
Unfortunately there are many in the U.S., including the media that has yet to realize that the request to Congress is Political theater.
Syria and Russia are showing signs of doing the right thing, Republican are red faced, privately asking themselves and one another, why did we not see that coming!!!!!!!
You should not under estimate what a skilled politician President Obama is. He beat the Clinton political machine to win the nomination.
That speaks volumes!
LMFAO! Your stupidity speaks volumes about YOUR mental state!
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#26775 Sep 10, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no idea who controlled Congress during all those growth years under those Democrat administrations, tell you what, for the sake of argument, lets say it was a Republican control congress.
Now tell me something, we have a Republican majority House and a minority leader in the Senate that calls himself the, "GUARDIAN OF GRIDLOCK". With More Than 400 Filibusters Since 2007that pretty much says control don't you think?
How do you explain those, in your words, "pathetic numbers",
Today
Obamas numbers are so great today why don't you post those numbers?
Nobody said our growth rate was great, I said it is growing, the growth rate today is higher than George W Bush's avg. when he left office. When president Obama leaves office we will then know what the avg. for his terms.
When I posted "second-quarter (of this year) economic growth had been revised upward to an annualized rate of 2.5 percent" that you think is "pathetic". You see, that was and I
QUOTE , "Obamas numbers are so great today why don't you post those numbers"
I have never seen a clearer case of anyone not knowing what the Hell they were talking about than what you posted above..........GOOD JOB .
Now that is truly pathetic.
LMAO! PATHETIC response as usual. You LIBTARDS had the house, the senate and the Presidency for two years and all you did was cram big tax health care down the American peoples throats and now it is coming back to haunt you. LOL! LIBTARDS poison everything they touch.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#26776 Sep 10, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO! PATHETIC response as usual. You LIBTARDS had the house, the senate and the Presidency for two years and all you did was cram big tax health care down the American peoples throats and now it is coming back to haunt you. LOL! LIBTARDS poison everything they touch.
Sounds like your getting your information about ACA from a Harris poll and the Chamber of Commerce..........

The Pinocchio Test

Maybe the Chamber of Commerce got exactly what it paid for in this poll.

But in their zeal to bolster Republican talking points, the Chamber and Harris Interactive offered a misleading picture of what the poll said — and the nature of the poll itself. They should offer apologies to the Republicans who so quickly took the bait — and conduct a thorough review of how such polls are presented in the future.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-chec...
Reality Check

Little Rock, AR

#26777 Sep 10, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush had two damn wars that he did not add to his debt, but President Obama did, you just happen to forget that?
Can't forget what you don't know can you?
Well genius, then how did the evil, rich contractors like Haliburton get paid? They wouldn't go over there for free. How did the millitary families survive on nothing for all those years? How did companies like Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics survive giving all those weapons away? They aren't free you know. If you look at it like that then Bush's way is the way to go. Everybody donates their goods and labor so we don't add a dime to the debt. You know the American people were on the hook for that war just like we are on the hook for all of Obama's debt which dwarfs Bush's debt in only half the time. The argument that somehow the debt ended up on Obama's term is just stupid. None of those contractors or millitary families would have waited that long to get paid. You can't win that argument under any circumstances. I blame Bush for the debt he incurred during his term which ended in January 2009 and I blame Obama for causing the debt to become much worse under his leadership and he shoulders ALL responsibility. The reality is that the only way to reduce what we owed was to spend far less than we took in but Obama has a spending problem that he wasn't willing to put off so things went and continue to go into the tank. The American people and American companies have reacted to Obama's policies in a predictable fashion. We have reigned in what we spend in order to protect ourselves so the econonmy shrinks, halts, or barely inches forward. There is simply no way around it, our country is a country driven by consumers Conditions need to be favorable to the businesses that supply those consumers in order for us to thrive. If you try to tax those companies more, prices will increase to the point where consumers can't afford them and the economy slows. If you spend as much as Obama, then increased taxes have to be passed to the consumers as well because we have spent so much that the rich simply can't afford it. So Obama is made to be a liar even if he didn't intend it to be, which I'm not at all convinced is the case.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#26778 Sep 10, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO! PATHETIC response as usual. You LIBTARDS had the house, the senate and the Presidency for two years and all you did was cram big tax health care down the American peoples throats and now it is coming back to haunt you. LOL! LIBTARDS poison everything they touch.
Really, what two years exactly are you referring to?

While you are at it, give us the names of those 60 Senators who gave the Democrats a super majority, for two years.

I will give you a clue big boy, it did not happen, Ted Kennedy died, and was replaced with a Republican.

After that, the super majority was gone.......

Not to mention Sen. Alan “Al” Franken was sworn in months later after he won the election, you see young man , once again you have no idea of what you are talking about.

Reality Check

Little Rock, AR

#26779 Sep 10, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
AP-40 minutes ago
MOSCOW (AP)— Syria says it has accepted Russia's proposal to place its chemical weapons under international control for subsequent dismantling.
Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem said Tuesday after meeting with Russian parliament speaker that his government quickly agreed to the Russian initiative to "derail the U.S. aggression
Hummmmmmmmmmm, looks like President Obama is well on the way to making the world a safer place and did not fire one shot, or drop one bomb.
Obviously Syria and Russia both know President Obama could have lobed a few missiles at Syria had he chosen to do so.
Unfortunately there are many in the U.S., including the media that has yet to realize that the request to Congress is Political theater.
Syria and Russia are showing signs of doing the right thing, Republican are red faced, privately asking themselves and one another, why did we not see that coming!!!!!!!
You should not under estimate what a skilled politician President Obama is. He beat the Clinton political machine to win the nomination.
That speaks volumes!
While Putin is known for his dislike of terrorist (which I respect him for), to think that he is willing to help the United States is a dream. Let's not forget that Russia is not too far removed from being a Communist nation. They still have favorable relationships with Iran and China for no better reason than to not let America gain another foothold as the world's strongest nation. In other words to keep us down where Obama has led us. We will see just how many chemical weapons show up in Russia as a result of this deal. My guess is that it won't be much. I also wonder what will happen to the facilities where these weapons were made. If they are not distroyed, then how strong is the conviction to eliminate those types of weapons in the Middle East? And it appears as though the big deal Obama made about the women and children who were supposedly gassed to death isn't as big of a deal anymore since the agreement. What happened to Obama's then the world's red line? That puts us back at why Obama made a big deal of the whole Syria thing in the first place. My bet is on a coverup for something else Obama was doing that he didn't want the American people to see. What that is will have to be discovered at a later date. Obama's stance on the situation in Syria cooled down way too fast in relation to the amount of attention and importance that was given to it. Obama is talking about still going to Congress to get authorization for force if the situation arises but I bet he won't even do that now regardless of what he says.
Reality Check

Little Rock, AR

#26780 Sep 10, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
AP-40 minutes ago
MOSCOW (AP)— Syria says it has accepted Russia's proposal to place its chemical weapons under international control for subsequent dismantling.
Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem said Tuesday after meeting with Russian parliament speaker that his government quickly agreed to the Russian initiative to "derail the U.S. aggression
Hummmmmmmmmmm, looks like President Obama is well on the way to making the world a safer place and did not fire one shot, or drop one bomb.
Obviously Syria and Russia both know President Obama could have lobed a few missiles at Syria had he chosen to do so.
Unfortunately there are many in the U.S., including the media that has yet to realize that the request to Congress is Political theater.
Syria and Russia are showing signs of doing the right thing, Republican are red faced, privately asking themselves and one another, why did we not see that coming!!!!!!!
You should not under estimate what a skilled politician President Obama is. He beat the Clinton political machine to win the nomination.
That speaks volumes!
Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem said Tuesday after meeting with Russian parliament speaker that his government quickly “agreed to the Russian initiative.”

Al-Moallem added that Syria did so to “uproot U.S. aggression.”

Uproot U.S. aggression? It's all about kicking America while we are down (after being knocked to the ground because of Obama's policies) and not the women and children. Neither Assad, Russia, and especially not Obama care anything about those people no matter what they say. Sorry to burst your Obama bubble. No I'm not, who am I kidding?
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#26781 Sep 10, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Really, what two years exactly are you referring to?
While you are at it, give us the names of those 60 Senators who gave the Democrats a super majority, for two years.
I will give you a clue big boy, it did not happen, Ted Kennedy died, and was replaced with a Republican.
After that, the super majority was gone.......
Not to mention Sen. Alan “Al” Franken was sworn in months later after he won the election, you see young man , once again you have no idea of what you are talking about.
Poor pitiful Boy Barney, so confused all the time. There is no denying the democraps had the house the senate and the Presidency for the first two years Odumbo was in office. You truly are an IDIOT!
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#26782 Sep 10, 2013
Odumbo can't lose. The lame stream libtard media will make this idiot look like a hero and genius. They are so invested in the first half black President in U.S. history that they will not let him fail. If only they could do the same for Boy Barney!
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#26783 Sep 10, 2013
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#26784 Sep 10, 2013
‘a weak and indecisive leader’

Those Americans with COMMON SENSE and SMARTS knew this before he was ever elected.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#26785 Sep 10, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Poor pitiful Boy Barney, so confused all the time. There is no denying the democraps had the house the senate and the Presidency for the first two years Odumbo was in office. You truly are an IDIOT!
You obviously know the Dems held the majority in both houses of Congress

Well here is your chance to show us you know how the Senate works.

Name the 60 Senators and what two years are you talking about,

tell us how many filibusters were created by the Republicans during this two years that the democrats held this 60 vote filibuster proof majority.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#26787 Sep 10, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
‘a weak and indecisive leader’
Those Americans with COMMON SENSE and SMARTS knew this before he was ever elected.
Here is a article by a liberal talking head attention whor*, Topix thinks that is a bad word.

http://www.politicususa.com/2013/09/10/michel...

Now tell me , how you can find any value in either opinion except for a good laugh, from either writer.

Reality Check

Little Rock, AR

#26788 Sep 10, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
You obviously know the Dems held the majority in both houses of Congress
Well here is your chance to show us you know how the Senate works.
Name the 60 Senators and what two years are you talking about,
tell us how many filibusters were created by the Republicans during this two years that the democrats held this 60 vote filibuster proof majority.
No matter how you spin it, Obama had a majority in both houses of Congress and should have been able to get what he wanted done. It would take 60 votes to invoke a cloture. If the Senate voted down party lines then it would have never happened in those years so the blame sits squarely on the controlling party's shoulders. The Democrats. Besides there were only 63 successful cloture votes in the Senate. How many times did the Senate vote? I can tell you that it's alot more than 63. All a cloture vote meant to that Senate was that not even Obama's own party agrees with him so quit crying.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#26789 Sep 10, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
No matter how you spin it, Obama had a majority in both houses of Congress and should have been able to get what he wanted done. It would take 60 votes to invoke a cloture. If the Senate voted down party lines then it would have never happened in those years so the blame sits squarely on the controlling party's shoulders. The Democrats. Besides there were only 63 successful cloture votes in the Senate. How many times did the Senate vote? I can tell you that it's alot more than 63. All a cloture vote meant to that Senate was that not even Obama's own party agrees with him so quit crying.
No matter what name you post under you are just as clueless as the other.

It is not a question of whom had the majority, that is clear.

Here is what you obviously do not understand about the Senate cloture rule.

1. It takes 60 votes to pass major legislation.

2.It takes 60 votes to override, a filibuster.


The Democrats held only 56 seats on January 15, 2009.

The most seats Democrats held in the Senate at one time in 2009 was 58 and two Independents who caucused with the Democrats.


Shoots the Hell out of your explanation of the cloture rule.


The Democratic Party theoretically had a 60% filibuster-proof super majority in the Senate for most of the time period between July 7, 2009, when Al Franken (D) won a contested seat, and February 4, 2010, when Scott Brown (R) replaced Ted Kennedy (D).

However, Ted Kennedy's terminal illness kept him out of Washington from March 2009 until his death on August 25.

The Democrats' 60%(potential) super majority ended on September 24 when Kennedy's replacement Scott Brown (R), was seated.


Only tears you see here, are tears of sadness for your ass backward explanation of the cloture rule'


Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

El Dorado Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Isn't it sooo funny Hotshots 16 min JLAW 16
Please explain-- community college decisions 19 min Jeff 7
House Bulders (Mar '13) 20 min Hooah 14
investigation 1 hr Goose 3
Kenny Benson 3 hr Common Sense 10
Liquor Stores 3 hr Common Sense 1
Kevin Jackson 18 hr Dale 6
More from around the web

Personal Finance

El Dorado Mortgages