created by: Rick | Jun 8, 2010

Arkansas

5,711 votes

Did you vote today?

Click on an option to vote

  • Yes
  • No
  • Other (explain below)

Comments (Page 1,154)

Showing posts 23,061 - 23,080 of27,915
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
rudhira xivrecnib

Sherwood, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24867
May 10, 2013
 
Global warming my butt, them liberals are at it again. It's plain to everyone with a brain that that CO2 stuff comes from all those Alien rockets and those Beaners butts.

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/carbon-dioxi...
Reality Check

Camden, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24869
May 10, 2013
 
rudhira xivrecnib wrote:
Global warming my butt, them liberals are at it again. It's plain to everyone with a brain that that CO2 stuff comes from all those Alien rockets and those Beaners butts.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/carbon-dioxi...
Has anyone noticed how cool (no pun intended) the global warming debate has gotten? Since we are almost 10 years into a cooling cycle, I suspect what happened in the late 1970's will repeat. For decades, scientists had argued that humans were the cause of global cooling. Around 1980, the earth entered into a warming cycle and it wasn't long before the same scientists that argued that global cooling was a global epidemic turned right around and began arguing that global warming was the new threat. Of course we all know that Al Gore perfected inserting a capitalistic element into the argument and has become filthy rich because of it. I don't believe a word of those global warming scientist since I know they will be the same scientists that jump on the global cooling bandwagon here in a couple of years or so.

Since: Dec 10

Washington DC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24870
May 11, 2013
 
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Has anyone noticed how cool (no pun intended) the global warming debate has gotten? Since we are almost 10 years into a cooling cycle, I suspect what happened in the late 1970's will repeat. For decades, scientists had argued that humans were the cause of global cooling. Around 1980, the earth entered into a warming cycle and it wasn't long before the same scientists that argued that global cooling was a global epidemic turned right around and began arguing that global warming was the new threat. Of course we all know that Al Gore perfected inserting a capitalistic element into the argument and has become filthy rich because of it. I don't believe a word of those global warming scientist since I know they will be the same scientists that jump on the global cooling bandwagon here in a couple of years or so.
I have not "noticed" that.

I suspect notice would be the key word.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/ear...
rudhira xivrecnib

Sherwood, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24871
May 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Has anyone noticed how cool (no pun intended) the global warming debate has gotten? Since we are almost 10 years into a cooling cycle, I suspect what happened in the late 1970's will repeat. For decades, scientists had argued that humans were the cause of global cooling. Around 1980, the earth entered into a warming cycle and it wasn't long before the same scientists that argued that global cooling was a global epidemic turned right around and began arguing that global warming was the new threat. Of course we all know that Al Gore perfected inserting a capitalistic element into the argument and has become filthy rich because of it. I don't believe a word of those global warming scientist since I know they will be the same scientists that jump on the global cooling bandwagon here in a couple of years or so.
Here it is, Co2 is a greenhouse gas, greenhouse gas destroys O-zone, O-zone protects Earth from most incoming UV radiation from the sun while protecting life from DNA-damaging radiation, UV radiation increases earth's surface land temps, more so it's oceans, radiation alters lifeforms. Sea levels rise, desertification increases, worldwide fresh water supplies diminish as Arctic ice disappears.

Solution, cut carbon emissions or deny it exist. Mankind being what it is, denial is of course, the winner....for now.
Kevin

Calico Rock, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24872
May 11, 2013
 
Vote for waht?
ann

Dallas, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24873
May 11, 2013
 
No
Reality Check

Camden, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24874
May 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I have not "noticed" that.
I suspect notice would be the key word.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/ear...

Or this.

http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/news.php
Reality Check

Camden, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24875
May 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

rudhira xivrecnib wrote:
<quoted text>
Here it is, Co2 is a greenhouse gas, greenhouse gas destroys O-zone, O-zone protects Earth from most incoming UV radiation from the sun while protecting life from DNA-damaging radiation, UV radiation increases earth's surface land temps, more so it's oceans, radiation alters lifeforms. Sea levels rise, desertification increases, worldwide fresh water supplies diminish as Arctic ice disappears.
Solution, cut carbon emissions or deny it exist. Mankind being what it is, denial is of course, the winner....for now.
The problem is, that no ACTUAL data exist that proves this. As a matter of fact the "greenhouse effect" that is supposed to be the culprit in "global warming" So if greenhouse gasses are still being emitted then the ozone should still be disappearing and temps should still be rising but alas the earth is currently cooling. Sorry to break it to you but your believing a lie or better yet a political agenda.
good one

Ashburn, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24876
May 12, 2013
 
It really is a good one

Since: Dec 10

Washington DC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24877
May 12, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

1

Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is, that no ACTUAL data exist that proves this. As a matter of fact the "greenhouse effect" that is supposed to be the culprit in "global warming" So if greenhouse gasses are still being emitted then the ozone should still be disappearing and temps should still be rising but alas the earth is currently cooling. Sorry to break it to you but your believing a lie or better yet a political agenda.
You can also believe chain e-mails and the talking head attention whores or you could look a little deeper.
..........

"I have a better idea to get at the heart of scientific acceptance of climate change: see how many scientific articles in peer-reviewed journals contradict it. Oh look at that, virtually none. Well, I'm sure if we survey scientists, we'll find a huge number of climate specialists who disagree! Wait, no, it turns out about 97% agree with AGW, and as for scientists in general the number is above 80%(I wonder if you would get numbers that high when asking non-physicists about Dark Matter). But I'm sure nationally and internationally recognized bodies of scientists would show more doubt, since we know global warming is wrong, right? Oh wait, looks like there isn't a single significant body of scientists anymore which claims AGW might not be happening.
At what point do you think the vast majority of experts might be more reliable than a handful of skeptics, many with questionable neutrality and closes monetary or ideological ties to industries and front-groups who feel threatened by the specter of climate change regulations? At what point does the certainty become enough to convince you that we should take action? Don't we have a responsibility to base policy on the best available science?"
rudhira xivrecnib

Sherwood, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24878
May 12, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is, that no ACTUAL data exist that proves this. As a matter of fact the "greenhouse effect" that is supposed to be the culprit in "global warming" So if greenhouse gasses are still being emitted then the ozone should still be disappearing and temps should still be rising but alas the earth is currently cooling. Sorry to break it to you but your believing a lie or better yet a political agenda.
And apparently you must be reading some voodoo science put out by a conglomerate of industry minded scientist and paid political lackeys whose sole purpose is to confuse a mostly uninformed public not cognizant to the reality that surrounds them..

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energ...

http://www.edf.org/climate/how-we-know-the-ea...

http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/08/world/world-cli...

BTW the O-zone is being deminished.

If there's a lair in the house I'm sure you believe him explicitly.

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/Wor...
Forrest

Ash Flat, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24879
May 12, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is, that no ACTUAL data exist that proves this. As a matter of fact the "greenhouse effect" that is supposed to be the culprit in "global warming" So if greenhouse gasses are still being emitted then the ozone should still be disappearing and temps should still be rising but alas the earth is currently cooling. Sorry to break it to you but your believing a lie or better yet a political agenda.

I'm not to smart , but it seems if the majority of climate science guys says it is true, then you are the one following a political agenda by denying their life's work is true.

Unless maybe you are one of those climate science guys that is in the minority on global warming opinion, spending your Sunday here on Topix.
Reality Check

White Hall, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24880
May 12, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Forrest wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not to smart , but it seems if the majority of climate science guys says it is true, then you are the one following a political agenda by denying their life's work is true.
Unless maybe you are one of those climate science guys that is in the minority on global warming opinion, spending your Sunday here on Topix.
If you think that scientists and their research results don't follow those who want specific results and their money your kidding yourself.
Forrest

Pocahontas, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24881
May 12, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
If you think that scientists and their research results don't follow those who want specific results and their money your kidding yourself.
Of course they do, its highly probable that type make up the majority of the dissenting opinions among their peers.


Is just straight forward man, but spin it any way that makes you happy.
Reality Check

Camden, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24882
May 12, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Forrest wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course they do, its highly probable that type make up the majority of the dissenting opinions among their peers.
Is just straight forward man, but spin it any way that makes you happy.
Right. An investor who wants to prove that greenhouse gasses are eating the ozone and is willing to put up millions of dollars to prove it will give the money to a group of scientists who's preliminary findings show that the results will likely be contradictory to what the investor wants. You do realize that any study can show any results depending on what is controlled for and what isn't? Knowing that, you still think the data is "straight forward"? Really?
rudhira xivrecnib

Sherwood, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24883
May 12, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Right. An investor who wants to prove that greenhouse gasses are eating the ozone and is willing to put up millions of dollars to prove it will give the money to a group of scientists who's preliminary findings show that the results will likely be contradictory to what the investor wants. You do realize that any study can show any results depending on what is controlled for and what isn't? Knowing that, you still think the data is "straight forward"? Really?
Don't confuse actual science with politics and the greed politics spawn. If you think that science is driven by a bunch of money grubbers with no consciousness of furthering mankind's quest for knowledge, then you truly don't understand scientific research at all.

Every great scientific discovery was challenged by those incapable of understanding the possibilities surrounding those discoveries. If listened to, those detractors would still have us believe the Earth was flat and one could buy their way into Heaven.
rudhira xivrecnib

Sherwood, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24884
May 12, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
You do realize that any study can show any results depending on what is controlled for and what isn't?
Then prove to me the Earth is flat.
Forrest

Pocahontas, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24886
May 12, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Right. An investor who wants to prove that greenhouse gasses are eating the ozone and is willing to put up millions of dollars to prove it will give the money to a group of scientists who's preliminary findings show that the results will likely be contradictory to what the investor wants. You do realize that any study can show any results depending on what is controlled for and what isn't? Knowing that, you still think the data is "straight forward"? Really?
I sure do.
WARRIOR

Washington, DC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24887
May 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Global warming is a hoax just like global cooling of the 70's was. Liberalism is a disease..

Since: Dec 10

Washington DC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24888
May 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

WARRIOR wrote:
Global warming is a hoax just like global cooling of the 70's was. Liberalism is a disease..
Ignorance is fatal, regardless of your political preference.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 23,061 - 23,080 of27,915
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

10 Users are viewing the El Dorado Forum right now

Search the El Dorado Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Alewine auction 1 hr John stud 9
Back to kampung days? Parents let kid pee openl... 1 hr wangtang 4
Glenn mechanical 2 hr mechanical man 7
Dixie Modica (Jan '12) 4 hr Urge Overkill 13
Brittany Vinson 6 hr IMAFAG 7
hoover huh? 11 hr Hotel California 9
Grigori cant post anymore 11 hr Hwy 82 6
•••

Flood Warning for Union County was issued at April 22 at 8:48PM CDT

•••
•••
•••
•••

El Dorado Jobs

•••
•••
•••

El Dorado People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••