Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,271 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

hutaer

Pittsburgh, PA

#24861 May 9, 2013
youtube.com/watch...
Yes I voted today already
rudhira xivrecnib

Benton, AR

#24862 May 9, 2013
Lisa wrote:
The EVIL that Lives in the Hearts of some men!
http://news.yahoo.com/dems-gop-fails-show-sca...

Much Ado About Nothing.
The Truth

Stuttgart, AR

#24863 May 9, 2013
Why don't you ignorant morons let this thread die and start a new one, stupid idiots.
rudhira xivrecnib

Benton, AR

#24864 May 9, 2013
Lisa wrote:
<quoted text>The EVIL that Lives in the Hearts of some men! It sickens me to know of the EVIL that for over FOUR years Lives only to Destroy America and so many walk around with Blinders on!! That EVIL is Barack Hussein Obama!!!
John Stossel syndrome?

Legitimate question, what's your take on John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt?...Always wondered about that guy, kinda creepy if you ask me..
rudhira xivrecnib

Benton, AR

#24865 May 9, 2013
The Truth wrote:
Why don't you ignorant morons let this thread die and start a new one, stupid idiots.
Did you enjoy Memphis in May?
rudhira xivrecnib

Little Rock, AR

#24867 May 10, 2013
Global warming my butt, them liberals are at it again. It's plain to everyone with a brain that that CO2 stuff comes from all those Alien rockets and those Beaners butts.

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/carbon-dioxi...
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#24869 May 10, 2013
rudhira xivrecnib wrote:
Global warming my butt, them liberals are at it again. It's plain to everyone with a brain that that CO2 stuff comes from all those Alien rockets and those Beaners butts.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/carbon-dioxi...
Has anyone noticed how cool (no pun intended) the global warming debate has gotten? Since we are almost 10 years into a cooling cycle, I suspect what happened in the late 1970's will repeat. For decades, scientists had argued that humans were the cause of global cooling. Around 1980, the earth entered into a warming cycle and it wasn't long before the same scientists that argued that global cooling was a global epidemic turned right around and began arguing that global warming was the new threat. Of course we all know that Al Gore perfected inserting a capitalistic element into the argument and has become filthy rich because of it. I don't believe a word of those global warming scientist since I know they will be the same scientists that jump on the global cooling bandwagon here in a couple of years or so.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#24870 May 11, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Has anyone noticed how cool (no pun intended) the global warming debate has gotten? Since we are almost 10 years into a cooling cycle, I suspect what happened in the late 1970's will repeat. For decades, scientists had argued that humans were the cause of global cooling. Around 1980, the earth entered into a warming cycle and it wasn't long before the same scientists that argued that global cooling was a global epidemic turned right around and began arguing that global warming was the new threat. Of course we all know that Al Gore perfected inserting a capitalistic element into the argument and has become filthy rich because of it. I don't believe a word of those global warming scientist since I know they will be the same scientists that jump on the global cooling bandwagon here in a couple of years or so.
I have not "noticed" that.

I suspect notice would be the key word.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/ear...
rudhira xivrecnib

Little Rock, AR

#24871 May 11, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Has anyone noticed how cool (no pun intended) the global warming debate has gotten? Since we are almost 10 years into a cooling cycle, I suspect what happened in the late 1970's will repeat. For decades, scientists had argued that humans were the cause of global cooling. Around 1980, the earth entered into a warming cycle and it wasn't long before the same scientists that argued that global cooling was a global epidemic turned right around and began arguing that global warming was the new threat. Of course we all know that Al Gore perfected inserting a capitalistic element into the argument and has become filthy rich because of it. I don't believe a word of those global warming scientist since I know they will be the same scientists that jump on the global cooling bandwagon here in a couple of years or so.
Here it is, Co2 is a greenhouse gas, greenhouse gas destroys O-zone, O-zone protects Earth from most incoming UV radiation from the sun while protecting life from DNA-damaging radiation, UV radiation increases earth's surface land temps, more so it's oceans, radiation alters lifeforms. Sea levels rise, desertification increases, worldwide fresh water supplies diminish as Arctic ice disappears.

Solution, cut carbon emissions or deny it exist. Mankind being what it is, denial is of course, the winner....for now.
Kevin

Mountain Home, AR

#24872 May 11, 2013
Vote for waht?
ann

Euless, TX

#24873 May 11, 2013
No
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#24874 May 11, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I have not "noticed" that.
I suspect notice would be the key word.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/ear...

Or this.

http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/news.php
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#24875 May 11, 2013
rudhira xivrecnib wrote:
<quoted text>
Here it is, Co2 is a greenhouse gas, greenhouse gas destroys O-zone, O-zone protects Earth from most incoming UV radiation from the sun while protecting life from DNA-damaging radiation, UV radiation increases earth's surface land temps, more so it's oceans, radiation alters lifeforms. Sea levels rise, desertification increases, worldwide fresh water supplies diminish as Arctic ice disappears.
Solution, cut carbon emissions or deny it exist. Mankind being what it is, denial is of course, the winner....for now.
The problem is, that no ACTUAL data exist that proves this. As a matter of fact the "greenhouse effect" that is supposed to be the culprit in "global warming" So if greenhouse gasses are still being emitted then the ozone should still be disappearing and temps should still be rising but alas the earth is currently cooling. Sorry to break it to you but your believing a lie or better yet a political agenda.
good one

Ashburn, VA

#24876 May 12, 2013
It really is a good one

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#24877 May 12, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is, that no ACTUAL data exist that proves this. As a matter of fact the "greenhouse effect" that is supposed to be the culprit in "global warming" So if greenhouse gasses are still being emitted then the ozone should still be disappearing and temps should still be rising but alas the earth is currently cooling. Sorry to break it to you but your believing a lie or better yet a political agenda.
You can also believe chain e-mails and the talking head attention whores or you could look a little deeper.
..........

"I have a better idea to get at the heart of scientific acceptance of climate change: see how many scientific articles in peer-reviewed journals contradict it. Oh look at that, virtually none. Well, I'm sure if we survey scientists, we'll find a huge number of climate specialists who disagree! Wait, no, it turns out about 97% agree with AGW, and as for scientists in general the number is above 80%(I wonder if you would get numbers that high when asking non-physicists about Dark Matter). But I'm sure nationally and internationally recognized bodies of scientists would show more doubt, since we know global warming is wrong, right? Oh wait, looks like there isn't a single significant body of scientists anymore which claims AGW might not be happening.
At what point do you think the vast majority of experts might be more reliable than a handful of skeptics, many with questionable neutrality and closes monetary or ideological ties to industries and front-groups who feel threatened by the specter of climate change regulations? At what point does the certainty become enough to convince you that we should take action? Don't we have a responsibility to base policy on the best available science?"
rudhira xivrecnib

Little Rock, AR

#24878 May 12, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is, that no ACTUAL data exist that proves this. As a matter of fact the "greenhouse effect" that is supposed to be the culprit in "global warming" So if greenhouse gasses are still being emitted then the ozone should still be disappearing and temps should still be rising but alas the earth is currently cooling. Sorry to break it to you but your believing a lie or better yet a political agenda.
And apparently you must be reading some voodoo science put out by a conglomerate of industry minded scientist and paid political lackeys whose sole purpose is to confuse a mostly uninformed public not cognizant to the reality that surrounds them..

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energ...

http://www.edf.org/climate/how-we-know-the-ea...

http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/08/world/world-cli...

BTW the O-zone is being deminished.

If there's a lair in the house I'm sure you believe him explicitly.

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/Wor...
Forrest

Ash Flat, AR

#24879 May 12, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is, that no ACTUAL data exist that proves this. As a matter of fact the "greenhouse effect" that is supposed to be the culprit in "global warming" So if greenhouse gasses are still being emitted then the ozone should still be disappearing and temps should still be rising but alas the earth is currently cooling. Sorry to break it to you but your believing a lie or better yet a political agenda.

I'm not to smart , but it seems if the majority of climate science guys says it is true, then you are the one following a political agenda by denying their life's work is true.

Unless maybe you are one of those climate science guys that is in the minority on global warming opinion, spending your Sunday here on Topix.
Reality Check

Little Rock, AR

#24880 May 12, 2013
Forrest wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not to smart , but it seems if the majority of climate science guys says it is true, then you are the one following a political agenda by denying their life's work is true.
Unless maybe you are one of those climate science guys that is in the minority on global warming opinion, spending your Sunday here on Topix.
If you think that scientists and their research results don't follow those who want specific results and their money your kidding yourself.
Forrest

Cherokee Village, AR

#24881 May 12, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
If you think that scientists and their research results don't follow those who want specific results and their money your kidding yourself.
Of course they do, its highly probable that type make up the majority of the dissenting opinions among their peers.


Is just straight forward man, but spin it any way that makes you happy.
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#24882 May 12, 2013
Forrest wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course they do, its highly probable that type make up the majority of the dissenting opinions among their peers.
Is just straight forward man, but spin it any way that makes you happy.
Right. An investor who wants to prove that greenhouse gasses are eating the ozone and is willing to put up millions of dollars to prove it will give the money to a group of scientists who's preliminary findings show that the results will likely be contradictory to what the investor wants. You do realize that any study can show any results depending on what is controlled for and what isn't? Knowing that, you still think the data is "straight forward"? Really?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

El Dorado Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Hey Cops, Robin Barber On the Warrant List 12 min dude 8
Anarchist dance clubs? 22 min Sorry 5
How Does UC Jail Get By With Putting Females on... 27 min beenthere 3
Regions Bank Employees Very Rude and Uninformative 2 hr ummm 23
Ladies public service announcement 3 hr wastingmytime 10
Laura B. Mason arrested for solicitation to com... (Jun '13) 6 hr nosey 950
Your Time Is Coming, Missing Crazy Woman 6 hr Henry 12
More from around the web

El Dorado People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

El Dorado Mortgages