Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,407 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#23514 Mar 11, 2013
Pocahantas- wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't forget, let Guest add a couple of words, all though
"You have just proven my point"
sounds like the same crap Guest post.
Carry on you seem to be on a roll.
You make no sense like your alter ego Barney!

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#23515 Mar 11, 2013
Wiser than DKN and Barney wrote:
<quoted text>Barney you just floored me is this a sign you actually believe in God. Because i will say again don't joke about jesus coming soon.
No sir, that was a sign that curmudgeon was plagiarizing Dr. Adrian Rogers.

A Televangelist who is dead but his organization is still begging for money.
curmudgeon

Mountain Home, AR

#23516 Mar 11, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
No sir, that was a sign that curmudgeon was plagiarizing Dr. Adrian Rogers.
A Televangelist who is dead but his organization is still begging for money.
that was a copy & paste I plagurized from another thread on topix. I never heard of the rogers dood . anyroad some dead preacher having copyrighted some article doesnt make him owner of the truth & wisdom that is in those few sentences.
curmudgeon

Mountain Home, AR

#23517 Mar 11, 2013
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation ---------- Now tell me how anything in this is incorrect untruthful or does not apply?

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#23518 Mar 11, 2013
Hagatha May wrote:
Possums, I'm sure you are all plum tuckerd out after those many rants and trying to convince yourself and others that you have some education about the electoral process and voting. Bet you all took hours going back and forth to google the words and correct your spelling, too. You all my dears are simply too ignorant to do your research. In masters and doctorate programs you are left on your own to perform your own research. However you must first have undergraduate work and guidance to prepare you. You aparently have had none
I excuse a lot when dealing with your type in Arkansas. It's very common there for possums to think they know more than they do. TaTa for now Lady of Quality
"tuckerd"-tuckered

"google"- Google

" aparently" -apparently

" It's very common there for possums to think they know more than they do"

It would appear so opossum.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#23519 Mar 11, 2013
curmudgeon wrote:
<quoted text> that was a copy & paste I plagurized from another thread on topix. I never heard of the rogers dood . anyroad some dead preacher having copyrighted some article doesnt make him owner of the truth & wisdom that is in those few sentences.
The original Adrian Rogers piece, which was part of a 1984 sermon, and was also included in another work titled "Ten Secrets for a Successful Family" is quoted below:

You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the industrious out of it. You don't multiply wealth by dividing it. Government cannot give anything to anybody that it doesn't first take from somebody else. Whenever somebody receives something without working for it, somebody else has to work for it without receiving. The worst thing that can happen to a nation is for half of the people to get the idea they don't have to work because somebody else will work for them, and the other half to get the idea that it does no good to work because they don't get to enjoy the fruits of their labor.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#23520 Mar 11, 2013
curmudgeon wrote:
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation ---------- Now tell me how anything in this is incorrect untruthful or does not apply?
To a poor elderly person, or one who is disabled, that little monthly check could very well be seen as legislated prosperity.

With such a great wealth divide in this country I dont see any body legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.


Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#23521 Mar 11, 2013
curmudgeon wrote:
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation ---------- Now tell me how anything in this is incorrect untruthful or does not apply?
History certainly tells us how well theories like his were NOT working before 1935. The year Social Security came about.
curmudgeon

Mountain Home, AR

#23522 Mar 11, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
History certainly tells us how well theories like his were NOT working before 1935. The year Social Security came about.
And what we now have is working? we now have more homeless than during the depression, the USa borrows 40 cents of every dollar. the wealthy have taken their buisnesses & money to other places. The takers greatly outnumber the makers. Places like detriot are considered war zones. The city of detroit erected billboards telling folks enter at your own risk! The USA is in decline and its being done on purpose. The UN and New World Order Agenda 21 plan is steadily turing the USA into a third world country. There isnt now or hasnt been in a while any viable political or ballott box choices. Ill never vote again. Social security is a Ponzi scheme. However Im not referring to some eldelery persons pittance ofa monthly goverment check. You envoking the pity of the poor is a lame answer a poor justiciation of robbing the producers. I referring to the exorbant pay & perks the elected officials vote themselves. The wasted money the goverments spend on wars foriegn aid outside of the USA. That money is gone from the US soil robbed from the US citizens and spent to the benifit of folks that are not productive taxpayers on uS soil.
curmudgeon

Mountain Home, AR

#23523 Mar 11, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
The original Adrian Rogers piece, which was part of a 1984 sermon, and was also included in another work titled "Ten Secrets for a Successful Family" is quoted below:
You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the industrious out of it. You don't multiply wealth by dividing it. Government cannot give anything to anybody that it doesn't first take from somebody else. Whenever somebody receives something without working for it, somebody else has to work for it without receiving. The worst thing that can happen to a nation is for half of the people to get the idea they don't have to work because somebody else will work for them, and the other half to get the idea that it does no good to work because they don't get to enjoy the fruits of their labor.
legislate the poor into freedom? the U S Counstition guarntees the freedom of the poor just a equally as the wealthy.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#23524 Mar 11, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
No sir, that was a sign that curmudgeon was plagiarizing Dr. Adrian Rogers.
A Televangelist who is dead but his organization is still begging for money.
Nobody was plagiarizing anything idiot..
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#23525 Mar 11, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
"tuckerd"-tuckered
"google"- Google
" aparently" -apparently
" It's very common there for possums to think they know more than they do"
It would appear so opossum.
Is barney playing the spelling gam again. Do you really want to go there retard?

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#23526 Mar 11, 2013
curmudgeon wrote:
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation ---------- Now tell me how anything in this is incorrect untruthful or does not apply?
I agree with most of this. However a compelling case could be made against point 4. Example- Churm has $12 million. If he divides it and gives Raptor in Michigan $6 million, you now have two wealthy people instead of just one!

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#23527 Mar 11, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>EVERYTHING except BIRDS! Prove me wrong or shut up!
Make me!!!

“Conserve Wildlife Habitat”

Since: Dec 10

SE Michigan

#23528 Mar 11, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
To a poor elderly person, or one who is disabled, that little monthly check could very well be seen as legislated prosperity.
With such a great wealth divide in this country I dont see any body legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
I have never heard anybody say we should help the truly disabled. The point still remains it's not the governments place to steal from some and give to others. If you did that, or if I did that, we would go to prison, no matter how good our intentions.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#23529 Mar 11, 2013
Raptor in Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
Make me!!!
As usual..
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#23530 Mar 11, 2013
Raptor in Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree with most of this. However a compelling case could be made against point 4. Example- Churm has $12 million. If he divides it and gives Raptor in Michigan $6 million, you now have two wealthy people instead of just one!
If raptor got off her ass and worked for it she could be number 4 also!

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#23531 Mar 11, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Is barney playing the spelling gam again. Do you really want to go there retard?
Do you?

"You have a good chance at getting to (heavan) you know what they say God takes care of children and FOOLS"

That may be your only hope.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#23532 Mar 11, 2013
Raptor in Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
I have never heard anybody say we should help the truly disabled. The point still remains it's not the governments place to steal from some and give to others. If you did that, or if I did that, we would go to prison, no matter how good our intentions.
Nice thing about this government , if you don't like it your free to choose most any other country you like.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#23534 Mar 11, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Is barney playing the spelling gam again. Do you really want to go there retard?
WARRIOR how unlike you to drop an upper case letter in a proper noun. A few others do it habitually, very odd for you, or is it?

Just saying.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

El Dorado Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Crackhead beauty queens 1 hr Prorate 1
Photographers 2 hr Issac 3
Hotshots struggling 8 hr EldoMasterBlaster 42
Whats the deal with Wendy Morgan? (Mar '14) Wed Dannyboy 58
Hillary 4 Prison Wed To Fud 48
Cute nice guy Wed Wife 20
Fact or fiction? Rascals and elm st bakery clos... Wed common sense 27

El Dorado Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

El Dorado Mortgages