created by: Rick | Jun 8, 2010

Arkansas

5,929 votes

Did you vote today?

Click on an option to vote

  • Yes
  • No
  • Other (explain below)
Look

Cherokee Village, AR

#21631 Feb 7, 2013
Blue Statesman wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks, but no thanks, I have had all of you I can stand.
Lol i'll bet you have but your going to get more anyway i'm going to be on you like stink on you know what,iknow my politics,apparently better the you by reading your post but have no fear i will not let you lie like some ppl here will allow you to so,if you post be prepared to back it up and not just your opinion.
Look

Cherokee Village, AR

#21632 Feb 7, 2013
Barnyard wrote:
<quoted text>
It wouldn't be prudent
A dumb answer.
Look

Cherokee Village, AR

#21633 Feb 7, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>Once again, anyone who says what you posted, especially about Bush knowing it was a lie, is either a liar themselves or just completely ignorant. In other words, you "Blue Statesman/BARNEYII are either a liar or a sucker. Today, it's both, you know what you are saying is a lie but you want to believe it to be true because you've been indoctrinated to hate Bush so much that you don't even know why you hate him.
"You can't change facts."
You do it all of the time.
What he hates is the fact that Bush won a war that Democrats wanted him to lose because they are traitors,liers,theives and sorry as bat shat,had Dems not supported saddam more than Bush the war would have been won in half the time many american lives would have been saved and yes
Look

Cherokee Village, AR

#21634 Feb 7, 2013
Blue Statesman wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me get something clear,
Bush's Excuse for going to war was because Saddam had used gas (WMD) in the past?
Or was it because of faulty intelligence at the time he invaded a sovereign state?
He said Saddam had tried to buy yellow cake uranium in his State of the union address, and new it was a lie when he said it.
You are correct sir, "you can't change the facts"
Did Saddam invade kuwait,and did he try 3 more times after Bush sr. threw him out,did he threaten the U.S. you are stupid,a lier and hate the fact that Bush won a war that a Democrat did not have the guts to do,of course you know that Saddam was responsible for murdering a million ppl under his dictatorship,did BUSH do the right thing,of course he did but it kills your soul to hear this "BUT YOU CANT CHANGE THE FACTS".'COME GET YOU SOME MORE THERE'S PLENTY HERE"
Look

Cherokee Village, AR

#21635 Feb 7, 2013
Blue Statesman wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks, but no thanks, I have had all of you I can stand.
You may have all you want but i'll assure you you dont have all you can "stand" because i'm comming after you lieing arse .
Look

Cherokee Village, AR

#21636 Feb 7, 2013
Blue Statesman wrote:
<quoted text>
No I was not changing the facts, I was repeating them.
Now tell me what part of that was a lie, and what do have other than your opinion, to refute what I presented as fact?
Are coming out from under the porch Mutt, or not?
SIMPLE!!were you part of the BUSH intelegence team,no how could you possible say he lied,simple again,you wanted to lie again saying something and making it true just ended,i'm on the seen.
Look

Cherokee Village, AR

#21637 Feb 7, 2013
Blue Statesman wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me get something clear,
Bush's Excuse for going to war was because Saddam had used gas (WMD) in the past?
Or was it because of faulty intelligence at the time he invaded a sovereign state?
He said Saddam had tried to buy yellow cake uranium in his State of the union address, and new it was a lie when he said it.
You are correct sir, "you can't change the facts"
I really could care less why Bush went to war because he had many more reasons to take out Saddam than he needed "think you mr.Bush,think you mr.BUSH"remmber that,i also think G.Bush myself personally. "dont forget,there is more where this came from"
ALilKnowledge

Des Arc, AR

#21639 Feb 7, 2013
&#9834; Raise your hands like you just don't care &#9834;
Barnyard

Jonesboro, AR

#21640 Feb 7, 2013
Look wrote:
<quoted text>A dumb answer.
Obviously dumb to you, but then you are obviously dumb.
Blue Statesman

Ravenden, AR

#21641 Feb 7, 2013
Look wrote:
<quoted text>Lol i'll bet you have but your going to get more anyway i'm going to be on you like stink on you know what,iknow my politics,apparently better the you by reading your post but have no fear i will not let you lie like some ppl here will allow you to so,if you post be prepared to back it up and not just your opinion.
News flash, if you can prove me wrong on what I posted as fact, I will be the first to admit I was wrong.

You prepare to back up your boasting Mr/Ms. politics.
Blue Statesman

Ravenden, AR

#21643 Feb 7, 2013
Look wrote:
<quoted text>I really could care less why Bush went to war because he had many more reasons to take out Saddam than he needed "think you mr.Bush,think you mr.BUSH"remmber that,i also think G.Bush myself personally. "dont forget,there is more where this came from"
We now face Iraq today, and matters could not be worse. Anna Mulrine of the Christian Science Monitor reports "Violence in Iraq from July to October hit its highest level in two years, a discouraging sign one year after the last US military vehicles exited the country and prompts questions about whether the situation on the ground in Iraq jeopardizes America's national security interests." Deaths and injuries to civilians are rising. The government of Nouri al-Maliki, which the U.S. helped to install, is in turmoil.
"The levels of violence there are still extremely high -- and lethal," says Nora Bensahel, senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), who notes that more people are dying in Iraq today than in Afghanistan, where America's war is ongoing.
Ostensibly, Bensahel concludes, "It's clear that the [Iraqi] security forces [are] strong enough to be able to hold together and maintain certain levels of capabilities." Serious questions can be asked of that assessment to the extent Bensahel may be deluding herself. That would appear to be so. From July to October 2012, 854 civilians were killed and 1,640 were wounded. Is that success?
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Iraq-Today-b...
WARRIOR

Washington, DC

#21644 Feb 7, 2013
Blue Statesman wrote:
<quoted text>
We now face Iraq today, and matters could not be worse. Anna Mulrine of the Christian Science Monitor reports "Violence in Iraq from July to October hit its highest level in two years, a discouraging sign one year after the last US military vehicles exited the country and prompts questions about whether the situation on the ground in Iraq jeopardizes America's national security interests." Deaths and injuries to civilians are rising. The government of Nouri al-Maliki, which the U.S. helped to install, is in turmoil.
"The levels of violence there are still extremely high -- and lethal," says Nora Bensahel, senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), who notes that more people are dying in Iraq today than in Afghanistan, where America's war is ongoing.
Ostensibly, Bensahel concludes, "It's clear that the [Iraqi] security forces [are] strong enough to be able to hold together and maintain certain levels of capabilities." Serious questions can be asked of that assessment to the extent Bensahel may be deluding herself. That would appear to be so. From July to October 2012, 854 civilians were killed and 1,640 were wounded. Is that success?
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Iraq-Today-b...
Then why did Obama pullout?
Two sides

Duluth, GA

#21645 Feb 7, 2013
Nope. The next election is a long way off. Talk about a reach!
Blue Statesman

Ravenden, AR

#21646 Feb 7, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Then why did Obama pullout?
Over extended military, money, politics, unjust war to start with,

all the above

for starters.

Blue Statesman

Mountain Home, AR

#21647 Feb 7, 2013
Look wrote:
<quoted text>SIMPLE!!were you part of the BUSH intelegence team,no how could you possible say he lied,simple again,you wanted to lie again saying something and making it true just ended,i'm on the seen.
Congressmen Henry A. Waxman, who approved Bush's war initiative, expessed concern that such a mishap could have occurred.'It is hard to imagine how this situation could have developed,' he stated in a letter to the President.'The two most obvious explanations knowing deception or unfathomable incompetence both have immediate and serious implications.' Waxman added,'These facts raise troubling questions. It appears that at the same time you, Secretary Rumsfeld, and State Department officials were citing Iraq's efforts to obtain uranium from Africa as a crucial part of the case against Iraq, U.S. intelligence officials regarded this very same evidence as unreliable. If true, this is deeply disturbing: it would mean that your Administration asked the U.N. Security Council, the Congress, and the American people to rely on information that your own experts knew was not credible
FACT

Mountain Home, AR

#21648 Feb 7, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>Once again, anyone who says what you posted, especially about Bush knowing it was a lie, is either a liar themselves or just completely ignorant. In other words, you "Blue Statesman/BARNEYII are either a liar or a sucker. Today, it's both, you know what you are saying is a lie but you want to believe it to be true because you've been indoctrinated to hate Bush so much that you don't even know why you hate him.
"You can't change facts."
You do it all of the time.
The yellowcake removed from Iraq - which was not the same yellowcake that President George W. Bush claimed, in a now discredited section of his 2003 State of the Union address, that Saddam was trying to purchase in Africa -

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/07/world/afric...
dont know nothin

Yakima, WA

#21650 Feb 7, 2013
Look wrote:
<quoted text>Helping a car company is not helping you or me and before long you will be driving cars made there not here,its just more jobs out of the U.S. however if any company needs to be put out of business it ours,it will be like you moving to another country we wont have to take goverment money to support them and they are out of Obama care,the hold idea to start with for chrysler,they are not American owned and would like to get rid of labor laws and all of the drunks and pot smokers you we shown on the news.
Letting a major car company like Chrysler would hurt the economy. You do not think that by them shuting down 52,000 imediate jobs would not stun the economy followed by other businesses counting on those incomes as well? Those jobs would have never been created here in the U.S. in the first place, are you people really that dense? China would not buy from Chrysler because of the cost to build and ship the vehicles to their country, hence no jobs to be created. So, Chrysler is now buying a factory and employing Chinese laborers to make Chinese cars for U.S. based Chrysler's profit, get it? We are not going to buy chinese made chryslers, as if it was to high for China to buy and ship then it will be to high for us to buy and ship and defeating the purpose anyways. Chrysler will also continue to make models only available in the U.S. that will help the company with overseas orders. I do not know how you cannot say that this does not help the economy or company. When Chrysler makes more they pay more and that helps everyone.
dont know nothin

Yakima, WA

#21651 Feb 7, 2013
Way wiser than DKN wrote:
<quoted text>For starter you are a socialist. Let's get something straight i'm all for killing terroist but what i'm against is the president to have unlimited power to use drones to kill innocent americans without evidence on U S soil. You don't know this president because the media refuses to do their job. I guess you ok with him killing people like beck, hannity, o'reilly or anyone that speaks out against him. As far as the tea party is concerned you called them racials do you not get their name taxed enough already. They are good hard working people that are sick of the government getting bigger and taking over. You really need to learn what the word radical means. A radical group for example is the black panthers. But i'm betting you are all for them. What about the kkk you for them too. I hope neither. Your a socialist, I'm an american conservtive. For you information most the time i vote republican have voted for democrats. It really depends who is best for the job. most republicans are good people and there is some good democrats, but most are for obama's agenda and that ain't good. I've decided i ain't wasting no more time on you because socialist always think that they are right and won't listen to reason. The only thing i hear coming out of your mouth is criticism. you never agree with anybody. You really ain't worth my time and you are even making barney look smarter. Bye bye have a nice obama controlled life.
In your words what exactly is a socialist to you? What innocent Americans? If you are harboring with Al Qaeda you sir are no American and lose all rights to due process. Do you think the U.S. Government is really just going to go around killing innocent Americans stateside with no evidence? What kind of wacko are you? I called the Tea party radicals not "racials", but please "continue governor". TEA party radicals just that "radicals". Even the conservative base of the Republican party is starting to denounce their names. You are right though I am for neither the panthers or kkk. What is an "American conservative" to you? So you are an Independant? I listen to everyones point of view but only very few are common sense.
Look

Mountain Home, AR

#21652 Feb 8, 2013
dont know nothin wrote:
<quoted text>In your words what exactly is a socialist to you? What innocent Americans? If you are harboring with Al Qaeda you sir are no American and lose all rights to due process. Do you think the U.S. Government is really just going to go around killing innocent Americans stateside with no evidence? What kind of wacko are you? I called the Tea party radicals not "racials", but please "continue governor". TEA party radicals just that "radicals". Even the conservative base of the Republican party is starting to denounce their names. You are right though I am for neither the panthers or kkk. What is an "American conservative" to you? So you are an Independant? I listen to everyones point of view but only very few are common sense.
Al Qaeda!! Al Qaeda are you crazy?Obama has made friends with them,they are his brothers and he will not refer to them as terrorist any more,we were under the impression there was no more Al Qaeda now you say there is?
Hmmm

Little Rock, AR

#21653 Feb 8, 2013
Look wrote:
<quoted text>SIMPLE!!were you part of the BUSH intelegence team,no how could you possible say he lied,simple again,you wanted to lie again saying something and making it true just ended,i'm on the seen.
Quit making yourself look even more stupid than you are.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

El Dorado Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
AR Who do you support for Secretary of State in Ar... (Oct '10) 15 min KatBrownKohl 230
Laura B. Mason arrested for solicitation to com... (Jun '13) 2 hr Duck lover 701
No Hesitation Targets for DHS (Feb '13) 4 hr Grigori 49
AR Who do you support for Lieutenant Governor in A... (Oct '10) 4 hr KatBrownKohl 383
Hot ladies 5 hr John51 4
AR Exit polls: Boozman defeats 2-term incumbent Li... (Nov '10) 6 hr cody 842
AR More than 1,000 dead birds fall from sky in Ark (Jan '11) 11 hr freak on a leash 9,999
•••
•••
El Dorado Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

El Dorado Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••
•••

El Dorado People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

El Dorado News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in El Dorado
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••