Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,082 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#21612 Feb 7, 2013
Blue Statesman wrote:
<quoted text>
One thing I would add to your theory is the one American citizen who died by drone attack was a Terrorist before he got killed and suddenly became a American citizen again after getting blown away.
Would you have knowingly got onto an airplane with that man, before due process?
Might I remind you Bush invaded a whole country without evidence,
he did not get impeached.
I give Obama credit on this one. He killed a pathetic terrorist. I don't care where they are from or how they are killed as long as they are dead. Obama was right on with this.

Iraq violated 17 resolutions. Sadamm used WMD's on his own people when he gassed and killed Kurds. That has never been in dispute. There is your evidence. I know you won't let the facts get in the way of your opinion barney but you can't change the facts!
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#21613 Feb 7, 2013
Blue Statesman wrote:
Let me put it this way, if a Terrorist is going to kill me and others, I bet he would not give me the benefit of a trial before he did.
Way I see it, extend due process to the greatest extent as possible, if immediate danger exist the terrorist should be SOL.
Good post but I say terrorist are not entitled to due process.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#21614 Feb 7, 2013
Blue Statesman wrote:
<quoted text>
One thing I would add to your theory is the one American citizen who died by drone attack was a Terrorist before he got killed and suddenly became a American citizen again after getting blown away.
Would you have knowingly got onto an airplane with that man, before due process?
Might I remind you Bush invaded a whole country without evidence,
he did not get impeached.
I am still waiting on your answers of what is our mission over there and why does Obama still have our children being killed in wars Bush started? He has had 4 years to bring them home. Why hasn't he done it?
Barnyard

Jonesboro, AR

#21615 Feb 7, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>I am still waiting on your answers of what is our mission over there and why does Obama still have our children being killed in wars Bush started? He has had 4 years to bring them home. Why hasn't he done it?
It wouldn't be prudent
Blue Statesman

Ravenden, AR

#21616 Feb 7, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>I give Obama credit on this one. He killed a pathetic terrorist. I don't care where they are from or how they are killed as long as they are dead. Obama was right on with this.
Iraq violated 17 resolutions. Sadamm used WMD's on his own people when he gassed and killed Kurds. That has never been in dispute. There is your evidence. I know you won't let the facts get in the way of your opinion barney but you can't change the facts!
Let me get something clear,
Bush's Excuse for going to war was because Saddam had used gas (WMD) in the past?
Or was it because of faulty intelligence at the time he invaded a sovereign state?
He said Saddam had tried to buy yellow cake uranium in his State of the union address, and new it was a lie when he said it.
You are correct sir, "you can't change the facts"
Blue Statesman

Ravenden, AR

#21617 Feb 7, 2013
Look wrote:
<quoted text>Let me add this,Obama is killing many innocent people with drones,women,children as well as men not all of these pppl killed are terrorist,it would be insane to think that,now you critize Bush for taking out a dictator that had threatened this country many times along with his neighbors and Bush senior had to go throw him out of Kuwait when he was headed for Saudi Arabia's oil fields,now i know it kills you Democrats arse that Bush won a war, that Clinton didn't have the guts to try to win because he was busy up at the white house {i'll let you guess with what} and it kills you to know that a Republican had the guts to go do that "AFTER THE DEMOCRATS VOTED TO GO TO WAR JUST AS THE REPUBLICANS DID" but as soon as the war started the democrats turned against it for political gain as Democrats always do they turned traitors,had they not been traitor to their own country the war would have been over in half the time "HARRY REED THE WAR IS LOST ITS TIME TO BRING THE TROOPS HOME" i'm sure you can remmber that can't you.
Yes I remember, do you remember what the debate was about when he said that?

Let me remind you if you do not ,

Bush wanted a war-funding bill with no strings attached.


Blue Statesman

Ravenden, AR

#21618 Feb 7, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>I am still waiting on your answers of what is our mission over there and why does Obama still have our children being killed in wars Bush started? He has had 4 years to bring them home. Why hasn't he done it?
No you are not waiting on Barney II to answer that for you.

He directed you to the US Gov. mission web page some time back.
Look

Cherokee Village, AR

#21619 Feb 7, 2013
Blue Statesman wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes I remember, do you remember what the debate was about when he said that?
Let me remind you if you do not ,
Bush wanted a war-funding bill with no strings attached.
Yes and the Democrats supported it.
Barnyard

Jonesboro, AR

#21620 Feb 7, 2013
Blue Statesman wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes I remember, do you remember what the debate was about when he said that?
Let me remind you if you do not ,
Bush wanted a war-funding bill with no strings attached.
Kind of like Obama's budget requests?
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#21621 Feb 7, 2013
Blue Statesman wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me get something clear,
Bush's Excuse for going to war was because Saddam had used gas (WMD) in the past?
Or was it because of faulty intelligence at the time he invaded a sovereign state?
He said Saddam had tried to buy yellow cake uranium in his State of the union address, and new it was a lie when he said it.
You are correct sir, "you can't change the facts"
Maybe he used the same intelligence Sadam used when Sadam went into Kuwait, maybe he had intelligence that Sadams Sons had set up rape and torture chambers for innocent women and children. Maybe he had intelligence that Sadam was going to use WMD gas again on innocent women and children. Maybe he had intelligence that Sadam was in the process of a Presidential assassination plot, whatever it may be it is now over! Sadam is dead and I am HAPPY!

So again I ask you Barney why are we still over there? Why does President Obama continue to allow our children to die on foreign soil? What is our mission over there? Why hasn't Obama given the order for our children to come home? He has had FOUR, that is 4 years to bring our children home! You always avoid the TRUTH!
Blue Statesman

Ravenden, AR

#21622 Feb 7, 2013
Look wrote:
<quoted text>If you want more i have "ALL YOU CAN STAND,I KNOW MY POLITICS,FEEL FREE TO COME AND GET ALL YOU WANT I HAVE GOT IT BELIEVE ME"feel free to get you some more.
Thanks, but no thanks, I have had all of you I can stand.
Look

Cherokee Village, AR

#21623 Feb 7, 2013
dont know nothin wrote:
<quoted text>
http://beijing.usembassy-china.org.cn/iprpate...
They do have patent laws and do file patents. They have made slight variations to many American patents and I must agree with you that piracy is a huge problem that will be hard to control in that country. The jobs created by chrysler by selling their vehicles that they build in that country, to that country, will in turn generate revenue for chrysler here in the United States. It is either gain the revenue that way or do not gain revenue at all which would you take? I am not trying to protect Obama from anything, what I say has been said by the CEO of the company and is common sense. Do you know me? I believe I am not on welfare, so I do not know who you are refering too. Makes sense though comming from a Republican, cannot take the truth so has to criticizes what they think is reality.
Helping a car company is not helping you or me and before long you will be driving cars made there not here,its just more jobs out of the U.S. however if any company needs to be put out of business it ours,it will be like you moving to another country we wont have to take goverment money to support them and they are out of Obama care,the hold idea to start with for chrysler,they are not American owned and would like to get rid of labor laws and all of the drunks and pot smokers you we shown on the news.
Blue Statesman

Ravenden, AR

#21624 Feb 7, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Maybe he used the same intelligence Sadam used when Sadam went into Kuwait, maybe he had intelligence that Sadams Sons had set up rape and torture chambers for innocent women and children. Maybe he had intelligence that Sadam was going to use WMD gas again on innocent women and children. Maybe he had intelligence that Sadam was in the process of a Presidential assassination plot, whatever it may be it is now over! Sadam is dead and I am HAPPY!
So again I ask you Barney why are we still over there? Why does President Obama continue to allow our children to die on foreign soil? What is our mission over there? Why hasn't Obama given the order for our children to come home? He has had FOUR, that is 4 years to bring our children home! You always avoid the TRUTH!
Maybe this will bring you up to speed Hot Rod;

The U.S. now has 66,000 troops in Afghanistan, down from a peak of about 100,000 as recently as 2010. The U.S. and its NATO allies agreed in November 2010 that they would withdraw all their combat troops by the end of 2014, but they have yet to decide what future missions will be necessary and how many troops they would require.

At stake is the risk of Afghanistan's collapse and a return to the chaos of the 1990s that enabled the Taliban to seize power and provide a haven for Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida network. Fewer than 100 al-Qaida fighters are believed to remain in Afghanistan, although a larger number are just across the border in Pakistani sanctuaries.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has said he foresees a need for a U.S. counterterrorism force in Afghanistan beyond 2014, plus a contingent to train Afghan forces.

This is the web page of the Cleveland Plain Dealer, well known for its Right Wing editorial board.

http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/201...
Look

Cherokee Village, AR

#21625 Feb 7, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>I am still waiting on your answers of what is our mission over there and why does Obama still have our children being killed in wars Bush started? He has had 4 years to bring them home. Why hasn't he done it?
There is nothing wrong with this war now because there is a Democrat in office it took him 3 years to get out of Iraq,do you ever here on our news how things are going in Iraq now? No they aren't going to report that now but from what i hear it would have been much better for us to keep troops there,the war was won and it was peaceful when he remove the troops,i also think that since we had invested in the infastructure there we shoul have kep troop there next door to all of the countries that will cause us trouble in the future,in fact we are trying to assist other countries at this time with they wars.
guest

Blytheville, AR

#21626 Feb 7, 2013
Blue Statesman wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me get something clear,
Bush's Excuse for going to war was because Saddam had used gas (WMD) in the past?
Or was it because of faulty intelligence at the time he invaded a sovereign state?
He said Saddam had tried to buy yellow cake uranium in his State of the union address, and new it was a lie when he said it.
You are correct sir, "you can't change the facts"
Once again, anyone who says what you posted, especially about Bush knowing it was a lie, is either a liar themselves or just completely ignorant. In other words, you "Blue Statesman/BARNEYII are either a liar or a sucker. Today, it's both, you know what you are saying is a lie but you want to believe it to be true because you've been indoctrinated to hate Bush so much that you don't even know why you hate him.

"You can't change facts."

You do it all of the time.
Blue Statesman

Ravenden, AR

#21627 Feb 7, 2013
Look wrote:
<quoted text>Yes and the Democrats supported it.
Can't argue with that, they did, 80 of them.

Not a majority as your statement seemed to suggest.

The House passed the legislation by splitting it in two pieces to accommodate anti-war Democrats who refused to vote for any more war funding. The first piece, on the war funding, passed 268-155, with support from 188 Republicans and 80 Democrats. The second part, which included the domestic spending increases, was approved with strong backing from both parties, 416-12.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/House-appr...
Blue Statesman

Ravenden, AR

#21628 Feb 7, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>Once again, anyone who says what you posted, especially about Bush knowing it was a lie, is either a liar themselves or just completely ignorant. In other words, you "Blue Statesman/BARNEYII are either a liar or a sucker. Today, it's both, you know what you are saying is a lie but you want to believe it to be true because you've been indoctrinated to hate Bush so much that you don't even know why you hate him.
"You can't change facts."
You do it all of the time.
No I was not changing the facts, I was repeating them.

Now tell me what part of that was a lie, and what do have other than your opinion, to refute what I presented as fact?

Are coming out from under the porch Mutt, or not?


Look

Cherokee Village, AR

#21629 Feb 7, 2013
Blue Statesman wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe this will bring you up to speed Hot Rod;
The U.S. now has 66,000 troops in Afghanistan, down from a peak of about 100,000 as recently as 2010. The U.S. and its NATO allies agreed in November 2010 that they would withdraw all their combat troops by the end of 2014, but they have yet to decide what future missions will be necessary and how many troops they would require.
At stake is the risk of Afghanistan's collapse and a return to the chaos of the 1990s that enabled the Taliban to seize power and provide a haven for Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida network. Fewer than 100 al-Qaida fighters are believed to remain in Afghanistan, although a larger number are just across the border in Pakistani sanctuaries.
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has said he foresees a need for a U.S. counterterrorism force in Afghanistan beyond 2014, plus a contingent to train Afghan forces.
This is the web page of the Cleveland Plain Dealer, well known for its Right Wing editorial board.
http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/201...
Al-qaida!!! Al-qaida you cant possible believe they still exist,i mean i thought O'had talked them into being brothers and never refer to them as terrorist,now O' said in 2008 that he was going to bring them home but now wants to wait untill 2014 isnt that a long time to wait,now you say they are spreading into pakistani,i cant believe they even exists how is this O' claims they are not a force anymore.
Look

Cherokee Village, AR

#21630 Feb 7, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>Once again, anyone who says what you posted, especially about Bush knowing it was a lie, is either a liar themselves or just completely ignorant. In other words, you "Blue Statesman/BARNEYII are either a liar or a sucker. Today, it's both, you know what you are saying is a lie but you want to believe it to be true because you've been indoctrinated to hate Bush so much that you don't even know why you hate him.
"You can't change facts."
You do it all of the time.
No what they hate is that Bush hung sadam and won a war that they hoped he would lose,Democrats are liers and trators remmber "HARRY REEDS STATEMENT THE WAR IS LOST ITS TIME TO BRING THE TROOPS HOME" he was hoping that we would lose the war its just the sorry bastard he is.
Look

Cherokee Village, AR

#21631 Feb 7, 2013
Blue Statesman wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks, but no thanks, I have had all of you I can stand.
Lol i'll bet you have but your going to get more anyway i'm going to be on you like stink on you know what,iknow my politics,apparently better the you by reading your post but have no fear i will not let you lie like some ppl here will allow you to so,if you post be prepared to back it up and not just your opinion.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

El Dorado Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
So Glad this Person has been Dumbed Down a Bit 1 hr Duck lover 105
Crystal Husbands 2 hr CrazyLady 6
New Festival City plan 6 hr Alice 31
richard owens (Sep '12) 6 hr Alton 9
Justin Lewis? 7 hr Well then 18
Marybeth Kelley (pastor) 7 hr Duck lover 23
who 18 hr ohhell 1
El Dorado Dating
Find my Match

El Dorado People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

El Dorado News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in El Dorado

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:00 am PST

Bleacher Report10:00AM
Sunday Night Football Week 12: TV Schedule, Live Stream for Cowboys vs. Giants
NBC Sports10:41 AM
Ten with Tafoya: Tyron Smith
Bleacher Report11:56 AM
Post-Week 12 Fantasy Reaction for Green, Sanu and Dalton
Bleacher Report 1:07 PM
Cowboys vs. Giants: What Are Experts Saying About Dallas?
Bleacher Report 1:19 PM
Live: Follow Cowboys Highlights