Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.com.
#25 Jul 7, 2013
George Deabold, 2013, is still the same low life theif he was in 2007. He took $4,500.00 from parents who were in desperate need of help for their child. He was fired within 1 week of obtaining our son's record because we chose the private school route. He did absolutely nothing for us and refuses to refund the money. He is a manic egomaniac who needs serious help. Has anyone taken out a lawsuit for him or reported him to Civil Service? Please, please, please don't ever, ever ever use this advocate!!! We're saying this to all parents since we know what it's like to be desperate for help for your child. Find someone else. Marilee Shannon is a great choice-an honest and sincere person!! Also attorney Pam Tucker is excellent!!
#27 May 6, 2014
I would love to get in touch with you about this guy - he has now stepped into quite a mess for himself and would love to hear more about what went on with you guys. You can contact me through Facebook
#28 Nov 27, 2015
This fake advocate, George Deabbold is the biggest liar I ever met... this guy does NOT advocate for the best of the child's education. He tricked me with my child's Due Process Hearings. He only cares about getting $$$ from you and or the school district to full up his pocket. George Deabold is certifiably insane. He takes advantage of parents in a desperate situation seeking help to resolve their issues with the school district. And the worst is that if you don't agree with his unprofessional methods to handle the matter with the school, then he bullies you; he call CPS at them, call the child's doctor to speak bad about the parent, don't give you back documents, etc, etc. The level of harassment he does at you is unbelievable! Please, please, stay away from this fake, LIAR that want to be called advocate.
#29 Nov 27, 2015
Hi, I also had a serious issue with this thief. This LIAR fake advocate turned my life into a hell. Would mind telling me if you got in touch with the person who asked you to contact them through Facebook? I'm really interested in following up about this guy. I'd like to denounce him to Civil Service. I'm also a victim of this guy abuses. Please reply. Thnx!
#30 Nov 27, 2015
Parents PLEASE PLEASE be aware of a fake advocate, George Deabold, from Islip NY.
This fake advocate, George Deabbold is the biggest liar I ever met... this guy does NOT advocate for the best of the child's education. He tricked me with my child's Due Process Hearings. He only cares about getting $$$ from you and or the school district to full up his pocket. George Deabold is certifiably insane. He takes advantage of parents in a desperate situation seeking help to resolve their issues with the school district. And the worst is that if you don't agree with his unprofessional methods to handle the matter with the school, then he bullies you; he call CPS at the parents, call the child's doctor to speak bad about the parent, don't give you back documents, etc, etc. The level of harassment he does to bully you, is unbelievable! Please, please, stay away from this fake, LIAR that want to be called advocate.
#31 Nov 27, 2015
If anyone is interested in getting in touch to denounce this person, George Deabold, before Civil Servi ce, please get in touch though FB, rachell Ortiz. Thnx!
#32 Mar 18, 2016
Do advocates have to register with someone or can you just declare yourself an advocate. Do they work alone or in conjunction with an attorney. Do they get paid, if so how? How much do they charge. I may be in need of one for my child and would be very greatful for any input as I am totally new to this issue. Looking at the above posts I am a bit leary about the whole thing and putting names out there. We don't need the finger pointing and grief, things are hard enough. thank you all in advance for any help given.
#33 Apr 18, 2016
I am looking to find anyone that Deabold has represented happy or unhappy, the school districts he has faught against.
#35 Sep 15, 2016
Really Can you trust him? This was 2013, when the house was sold in 2014 he owed much more. http://legis.suffolkcountyny.gov/Resos2013/i1...
Intro. Res. No. 1063-2013 Laid on Table 2/5/2013
Introduced by Presiding Officer, on request of the County Executive
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -2013, AUTHORIZING THE SALE,
PURSUANT TO LOCAL LAW NO. 16-1976, OF REAL
PROPERTY ACQUIRED UNDER SECTION 46 OF THE
SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX ACT GEORGE DEABOLD AND AMY
DEABOLD, HIS WIFE (SCTM NO. 0500-253.00-02.00-080.000)
WHEREAS, the COUNTY OF SUFFOLK acquired the following described parcel:
ALL, that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with any buildings and
improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being in the Town of Islip, County of Suffolk,
and State of New York, described on the Tax Map of the Suffolk County Real Property Tax
Service Agency as District 0500, Section 253.00, Block 02.00, Lot 080.000, and acquired by tax
deed on November 19, 2012, from Angie M. Carpenter, the County Treasurer of Suffolk County,
New York, and recorded on November 20, 2012, in Liber 12711, at Page 428, and otherwise
known and designated by the Town of Islip, as Lots 19 and 20, Block 28, on a certain map
entitled ÃÂMap of Great River Estates, Section OneÃÂ, filed in the Office of the Clerk of Suffolk
County on March 4, 1910 as Map No. 521; and
FURTHER, notwithstanding the above description, it is the intention of this
conveyance to give title only to such property as was acquired by the County of Suffolk by Tax
Deed on November 19, 2012, from Angie M. Carpenter, the County Treasurer of Suffolk County,
New York, and recorded on November 20, 2012 in Liber 12711 at Page 428.
WHEREAS, in accordance with Suffolk County Local Law No. 16-1976, provision
has been made for the sale of such real property acquired by the County through tax sale; and
WHEREAS, GEORGE DEABOLD AND AMY DEABOLD, HIS WIFE have made
application of said above described parcel and GEORGE DEABOLD AND AMY DEABOLD, HIS
WIFE have paid the application fee and will be paying $72,760.89, as payment of taxes,
penalties, interest, recording fees, and any other charges due the County of Suffolk, pursuant to
Local Law, by applicant, through November 30, 2012; now, therefore be it
1st RESOLVED, this Legislature, being the State Environmental Quality Review Act
(SEQRA) Lead Agency, hereby finds and determines that adoption of this law is not an action
within the meaning of the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the regulations adopted
thereto. See 6 N.Y.C.R.R. Section 617.2
partial read Follow link above for complete read
#36 Jan 29, 2017
We hate cuomo
Add your comments below
|Swift Named Principal at Our Lady of Lourdes (Aug '09)||Mon||Bruser||2,739|
|Old friends In Central Islip, Where Are They Now? (Nov '13)||Sun||Walter D||2|
|Moriches Man Charged With Home Improvement Scam (Feb '11)||Aug 19||raphan disbarred||17|
|Alexander: Kudos to all who are making Heartlan...||Aug 18||Vision||5|
|Review: David Sanders Dance Dynamics (Nov '08)||Aug 17||Imamomnow||17|
|Sub teacher accused of stalking student (Jul '07)||Aug 17||Tim Rigney||180|
|Woman in wrong HOV lane on LIE faces charges (Feb '08)||Aug 15||Andrea Vazquez||89|
Find what you want!
Search East Islip Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC