Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Bruno]

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
No one is trying to force their view on others.
For that you'd need to take a daughter, hobby car and a favorite pet feline hostage.
LOL!!
Everyone here is free to believe what they want moron.
If you don't feel good about gays marrying then right on. You're entitled to your opinion.
But to me and others it's akin to you not wanting to have round BF Goodrich tires so there you go.

You are not only a liar but a bigoted one. You are a troll and you have been pro gay all along becaus you are gay. STFU

[Bruno]

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
Right on.
A reincarnated KKK cross burning moron!
Why not go after real whackjobs other than like those of the 'Joker' you brought back from your memories as a five year old?
http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/15/...

Right on. Another gay activist response. LMAO

[The Great Sly_Clyde]

Bruno wrote:

Now is the time to flood Obramas desk with your demands. He just made the announcement to all illegals under the age of 30 that he will sign any and all documentation to legalize them so they can continue going to universities so they can take jobs away from U.S. citizens that are being laidoff because of the budget crises. These new citizens will get a free $50K + education to work for half the salary of those being laid off. I'm sure he will do the same for the gay community because he wants to continue to be the dumb president that he is. He is doing this not because he is in favor of the idea, but only because he want to be the big stinky cheese

Dear penguin boy what are the requirements that the young illegals must meet?

[The Great Sly_Clyde]

Bruno wrote:

<quoted text>
You are not only a liar but a bigoted one. You are a troll and you have been pro gay all along becaus you are gay. STFU

Have you had sexual relations with Dan?

[Bruno]

Prof Marvel wrote:

I'm Baaaaaaack ...!

Welome back ...

[The Great Sly_Clyde]

Bruno wrote:

<quoted text>
Right on. Another gay activist response. LMAO

Right on. Another fundie activist response

[Bruno]

Nytebreid wrote:

<quoted text>
"Force", Ricardo, is when someone puts a gun to your head and demands that YOU marry a man. That has never been a goal of those advocating the recognition of same sex marriage.
Let's say that the courts overturn the ridiculous bans... "Adam" and "Steve" then move into your neighborhood... you can tell all your friends, relatives and other neighbors "As far as I'm concerned, they're not married." Freedom of speech allows for this.
Your denial, however, will not affect Adam or Steve. Neither would their marriage or their proximity to you have any affect on the relationships you are currently a part of.
Please, tell us - what do you believe is being "forced" onto you?

STOP being so freeking stupid ....

[RiccardoFire]

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
No one is trying to force their view on others.
For that you'd need to take a daughter, hobby car and a favorite pet feline hostage.
LOL!!
Everyone here is free to believe what they want moron.
If you don't feel good about gays marrying then right on. You're entitled to your opinion.
But to me and others it's akin to you not wanting to have round BF Goodrich tires so there you go.

If it is okay for my opinion, then why am I insulted and called names for it? moron. Personally I don't use Goodrich tires, do gays get a discount?

[RiccardoFire]

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

<quoted text>Dan came to the realization after reading posts from people just like you, that gay people deserve the same rights as straight people. In other words he found that bigotry is wrong. Atta boy Dan.

So is being a bigot only wrong for this issue, is it okay to be a bigot to Christians and others? Understand the term you are using jack.

[RiccardoFire]

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
It changed my mind.
I too thought gay marriage out there. It was not until diving into the TOPIX nonsense did I realize my personal ban against gay marriage was wrong.

I suggest you keep reading topix nonsense since your decisions are based on it. Nonsense.

[RiccardoFire]

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
Just my opinion but I think TOPIX is your only social connection.

You just got done writing that topix is where you develop your decisions and it changes your thinking. LOL!!!

[RiccardoFire]

Bill Of Rights wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry but it isn't rocket science Faux Christian bigot boy! Any and all laws that us straights are covered by under "Equal protection" Gays as full Americans should also be covered by all the same laws equally! This would include the right to marry if it is indeed one of "OUR" covered rights under The,"Equal protection" clause of the 14th amendment! See how simple that was? Never mind,most likely like the joke about the ceiling,it's over your head! By the way,why are you still here,I thought it's all been covered? LOL

Your hatred of people that are not in favor of gays married is noted. Once again. You might want to study the term : bigot. Equal protection can be secured without granting a “right to marry. income tax deductions, the ability to file joint taxes, the ability to receive a spouse’s
inheritance upon death, family visitation rights, the right to hospital visitation and the next-of-kin
right to make medical decisions during an emergency....You should have that with 2 gays, doesn't mean it has to be marriage.

[RiccardoFire]

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

<quoted text>Right on. Another fundie activist response

Being intolerant of any differing creed, belief or opinion = Bigot

[The Pink Buffalo]

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
I love little boys.

Come again?

[Prof Marvel]

I'd be a liar if I said I wasn't impressed with what you fellows have been up to since my departure. Namely, how you convinced POTUS homosexuality is safe, normal, and as wholesome as mom's apple pie.

That was no mean feat.

But ...

If you think that advances the ball, think again. The question of the right and goodness of homosexuality is not determined by the stature of the gullible people you con, it's determined by the right and goodness of the thing itself and we have ample evidence male to male sex kills --450,000 bodies in fact.

You people have a short memory.

This is the identical debate that was going on 40 years ago about gay bathhouses -- the exact one.

[Mrs Edith Bunker]

Bruno wrote:

<quoted text>
Another typical gay activist response. No matter how much you mumble on, you are still and always will be second class don't ever forget that.

Now Archie, that was mean. Don't you remember what Maude told you about one man's goose being another man's gander?

[Archie]

Mrs Edith Bunker wrote:

<quoted text>
Now Archie, that was mean. Don't you remember what Maude told you about one man's goose being another man's gander?

Yes, but you never said the gander would lead me to be more likely I smoke meth and die in a few years, maybe the church was wrong about divorce after all, you're killin me.

[Prof Marvel]

Obama operated from ignorance. It's the same ignorance that led 450,000 young men to an early grave.

Obama never heard of Fire Island, he never heard of the Greenwich Village docks, he has no idea who Randy Shitz is, doesn't know Guy Rotello from Adam, thinks the CDC gave male-to-male sex a clean bill of health because you people promote this lie, believes Lady's Gaga's "Born this Way"; thinks male-to-male sex is safe when a condom is used.

I could go on and on detailing the half-truths, misrepresentations, and outright lies the LGBT community has conned Obama, America, and the World with, but you know what they are.

You know the fact that blood banks don't allow gay males to donate blood is a question of public health NOT equality.

You know if you ever needed a blood transfusion the last person you'd want to have donate the blood is another gay male.

You know this.

Even if Obama doesn't.

In fact, that's a good question to all you heteros out there who support gay "equality."

Why don't you support gay equality at the blood banks?

Why aren't you demanding they be permitted to donate blood like everybody else?

Why aren't you foaming at the mouth at that Unconstitutional violation?

Could it be because you're homophobic....?

No?

What do you call it?

[Archie]

I call it dat dare is being normal my friend! Dats what I call dat!

[pizzahater]

ome people are gay,get over it!(They've got thaty planted over all london big red buses at the moment)and its true!what is it to you if your neighbour or work collueges gay,its not affecting your life.(Feel so bad as I'm being anrisocial at my uncles wedding,but who can resist their blackberry or topix)