A look at Lot 4's future

A look at Lot 4's future

There are 6 comments on the Estes Park Trail-Gazette story from Oct 17, 2013, titled A look at Lot 4's future. In it, Estes Park Trail-Gazette reports that:

Estes Park trustees took a closer look at the proposed Anschutz Wellness Center at the Stanley during a special Tuesday night study session.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Estes Park Trail-Gazette.

Read between the lines

Estes Park, CO

#1 Oct 17, 2013
Cullen or villain or however you pronounce it swings the big rod, especially now that the tourists are nowhere in sight. He wants to be the town's savior. I'm sure in two years the entire town will be renamed Stanley Park or Cullenitis or whatever. Power to the LBGT!!

Longmont, CO

#2 Oct 18, 2013
Don't do it Estes! Your emotions are being played... Estes doesn't need a wellness center or any kind of monstrosity to draw tourists...it's the small mountain town charm and heart of the village that keep us coming back. Roads will be repaired, tourists will still come, but if you say yes to this proposal, there will be no turning back and the regret will run deep. Don't Aspen-ize Estes Park!!

Denver, CO

#3 Oct 18, 2013
Wrong time, wrong place. 150-200 more cars per day in a area that is already over populated is not the answer. It will diminish the Stanley Hotel view. Plans to close the road in front of the hotel from Steamer Drive and replace with a bike path is ridiculous. Do a traffic study and see how many cars use this road daily. We already have 3 wellness centers in town. How will this effect their business? Granted they can not stay over night or eat a salad dinner there. This will not help our local restaurants either. If John wants to invest in Estes, go out to Elkhorn and develop the West end of the city.
Gay bashing and

Arvada, CO

#4 Oct 20, 2013
no more tourists. We don't need them, right? You guys should all run for Town board. There's an election in April.
who is them

United States

#5 Oct 21, 2013
and why is Denver so sure of what liddle ole estes needs, oh i get it you are in estes but use a denver internet service provider because it is cheaper so even though you pretend to have money you just look for the best bargain and hurt your own community or else you live in denver and are poor and so have to have a smaller town to look down on to make yourself feel important and justify the space you take up and the carbon monoxide you generate
Owen K

Lincoln, NE

#6 Nov 12, 2013
Estes Park voters, do not fall for this. Keep your town free of more traffic and even more congestion. Maintain the natural environment and do not allow money to dictate.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Drake Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Longmont couple plead guilty in neglect of disa... Apr 4 Maciltrot Witkus 2
News After emotional hearing, bill to decriminalize ... Mar '18 yidfellas v USA 1
karl niemann and joshua wilkes march april 2014... (Oct '15) Mar '18 harrison ford 2
Rattlesnakes Mar '18 CarolynLovesTheCo... 1
News Platte River Power Authority, Longmont and Love... Feb '18 Solarman 1
News Estes Park trustee candidate's comments on fore... (Mar '14) Aug '17 Alejandrojoaquin110 21
D l bleik reaper (Feb '17) Feb '17 Brandy trujillo 2

Drake Jobs

Personal Finance

Drake Mortgages