Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

Nov 30, 2010 Full story: CBS2 51,248

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Full Story

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#45651 Nov 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Most people don't get married to have a legal contract..
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, they ALL do, since no license is required to simply live together, or even share an entire life together.
For some couples, it's the ONLY reason, but for most, gay or straight, it is simply a useful PART of the process.
Actually, that is an annoying addition that is fulfilled and set aside, rarely to be looked at again. A momentary act that addresses the minor government interest and involvement.

The driving focus is the union of a man and woman committing to live joined as one. A public expression of that vow. A complimentary blend bonded by love and devotion, naturally birthing fruit.

When that fruit is removed from the relationship, government interest ceases or becomes discriminatory.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
unut

Mount Vernon, IL

#45654 Nov 30, 2013
Looks like again the same low life, troll is judging the same numbers again! Thinking people are judging the comments.lol

Judged:

13

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#45656 Nov 30, 2013
justme wrote:
Gay marriage is still a reality and Kimary is just spinning in circles because his fragile little self can't handle it. Poor bastard. He thinks his bigoted opinion should matter and it so clearly doesn't.
Oh honey, you need to be honest. Nothing of this is opinion, it is all realty;

A ss couple will only ever be a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.

Which is why you can ALWAYS see the difference!

Smile.

Judged:

12

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#45657 Nov 30, 2013
justme wrote:
<quoted text>
Says who? Your imaginary friend in the sky?
How do you know He's not there?

Smirk.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Judge

Belleville, IL

#45658 Nov 30, 2013
Wow. You folks are miserable judgmental a-holes.

What folks do in their own homes should be no one else's business. If it doesn't effect you and yours then why care?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#45659 Nov 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Most people don't get married to have a legal contract..
<quoted text>
Actually, that is an annoying addition that is fulfilled and set aside, rarely to be looked at again. A momentary act that addresses the minor government interest and involvement.
The driving focus is the union of a man and woman committing to live joined as one. A public expression of that vow. A complimentary blend bonded by love and devotion, naturally birthing fruit.
When that fruit is removed from the relationship, government interest ceases or becomes discriminatory.
All your contract and fruit talk is completely irrelevant. You've done nothing to stop the progress of SSM and now it's too late.

People get married because they want friends and family to recognize their commitment to each other as a couple. Screw your contract talk, screw reproduction, screw mars and venus.

Ya got nunthin', KiMare. Your opinions about SSM mean nothing.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#45660 Nov 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you know He's not there?
Smirk.
How do you know She's not there?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#45661 Nov 30, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you know She's not there?
Do you really think a she would not control things more?

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#45662 Nov 30, 2013
Judge wrote:
Wow. You folks are miserable judgmental a-holes.
What folks do in their own homes should be no one else's business. If it doesn't effect you and yours then why care?
Wow, that was really idiotic and judgmental!

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Judge

Belleville, IL

#45663 Nov 30, 2013
Right. Because arguing with people for days over an opinion that will not change is very intelligent and efficient.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#45664 Nov 30, 2013
Judge wrote:
Right. Because arguing with people for days over an opinion that will not change is very intelligent and efficient.
I'm not arguing over an opinion.

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#45665 Nov 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Most people don't get married to have a legal contract.
But that's why they get if the get a legally recognized marriage.
KiMare wrote:
Nor do they anticipate a divorce when they make the vow,'until death do we part.'
They may not anticipate a divorce, but MOST of them will get one.
KiMare wrote:
2. "Why require something you need protection to prevent" makes no sense??? Only a blonde gay would be so dumb.
You keep exposing how foreign marriage is to gays, why are you afraid to formalize your own relationships instead of imposing an imposter relationship on marriage???
I'm straight. Only a monster could be as stupid as you are!
Why don't you call your imposter relationship something else, like a "Freak show"?:)

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#45666 Nov 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Most people don't get married to have a legal contract..
<quoted text>
Actually, that is an annoying addition that is fulfilled and set aside, rarely to be looked at again.
BS, it's looked at again by MOST of them. MOST couples divorce.
KiMare wrote:
A momentary act that addresses the minor government interest and involvement.
Ask anybody getting a divorce how "minor" government involvement is.
KiMare wrote:
The driving focus is the union of a man and woman committing to live joined as one. A public expression of that vow.
People can make a public expression of anything, but legal marriage is a legal contract. That's why there is an issue you stupid monster! If it were just a matter of holding ceremonies in someones back yard, there would be problem.
KiMare wrote:
A complimentary blend bonded by love and devotion, naturally birthing fruit.
When that fruit is removed from the relationship, government interest ceases or becomes discriminatory.
Our rights should be determined by our gender genes?
And no matter how many times you bring it up, you don't have to be fertile to marry. That's not part of the marriage contract.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#45667 Nov 30, 2013
Toby Tyler wrote:
SODOMY that's all you people are worried about it's wrong plain and simple.
David, SODOMY is all you are worried about. Most people who engage in it are straight, and as long as all parties are consenting, there is nothing wrong with it.
bigot

Belleville, IL

#45668 Nov 30, 2013
There would be plenty of vet fashionable adopted kids. That itself is a win/win

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45669 Nov 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
What a despicable troll attack by a sissy man. You pick on innocent women?
Pick on? No, not at all pervert cur, I'm only here speaking truth. Smile.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45670 Nov 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The pendulum swings both ways, you'd be wise to be careful.
Smile.
You'd be wise to stand in front of it.
Smile.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45671 Nov 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh honey, you give me way too much power.
What power is it that you imagine you have pervert? LOL!!! What a moron you are.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
That is not my definition of marriage, it is as old as society and cross cultural.
And wow, what power you have! To declare that a relationship that has existed in every single society in human history is now redefined by a piece of paper.
I'm just trying to understand why a ss couple is STILL only ever a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage?
Snicker.
You have to keep trying to understand it, because it's not understandable. It's simply nonsense. But you keep trying idiot.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45672 Nov 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior making ss marriage an oxymoron.
Real marriage has always been and will always be a committed relationship between one man and one woman. Demanding it ain't so doesn't make it so.
It is the only relationship that reproduces naturally, a father and mother raising their children.
It is the only relationship that is the birthing place of every single other type of relationship.
It is the only relationship that reunites two completely unique parts. A complimentary union, instead of a duplicated half.
It is the only relationship that sexually fit together by design. There is no abusive violation of design.
It is the only relationship that restores a male and female to the very original roots of our creation, pre-gender.
It is the only union that blends two different genders bringing perfect balance. A same gender union lacks diversity and is off balance.
All this says nothing about the cultural, historic and religious distinctions that marriage wholly embraces.
It clearly has, needs and deserves a special and unique definition. It is absurd and sacrilegious to equate ss couples.
Pastor Kirschmann, this isn't a church. Baseless repetition doesn't create truth here. Share this with your sheep princess, no one here is buying your bullshyt. Your relationship with your os ugly wife has nothing special and deserves nothing special.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45673 Nov 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you read what you write? A property exchange? A contract? YOu are proof gays don't know shit about marriage.
Of course people can without marriage, but they do within marriage primarily because of children. Something ss couples never have to deal with.
Mating is usually a main reason for marriage. You do know that marriages have been annulled because of the inability to procreate?
I'm both male and female. The male is married, the female is a slut.
Let us all know when procreation is a requirement of marriage ok cur? Until then, you got nothing. You never have. You never will. Smile hon!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Dixmoor Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Use of Taser on man who died not in Midlothian ... (Mar '10) 1 hr 4therecord 122
Crestwood has problems (Jun '08) 4 hr Mike 3
Chicago Ridge fire chief resigns, officials loo... 5 hr Jack says so 23
Exclusive: Cop says political reasons keep hit-... 5 hr Reality Bites 4
Former Hells Angels Leader Sentenced (Nov '06) 5 hr Mike 141
Should the taxpayers of Midlothian pay to repai... 5 hr Mike 44
B.I.P.D. needs leadership now 5 hr Mike 103
Dixmoor Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Dixmoor People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Dixmoor News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Dixmoor

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 3:25 pm PST

NBC Sports 3:25PM
Bears clearly looking to move in another direction
NBC Sports 3:44 PM
Lions preparing for the cold - NBC Sports
Bleacher Report 3:47 PM
Cutler's Benching Too Little, Too Late for Bears
NBC Sports 6:32 PM
Week 16 skill-position injury report — Thursday
NBC Sports 7:47 PM
Golden Tate excited for Jimmy Clausen to get another starting opportunity