Familiar with the (old) article. Here is a quote from near the end;
" But because no one has been able to observe the evolution of homosexuality first hand we can only theorize as to how it happened."
In other words, a theory that is not accepted in any measurable way by evolutionary scientists.
A theory is not proof for the cause of homosexuality.<quoted text>
In other words, you are a clueless dumbass. Who says it's not accepted? You are HARDLY an evolutionary scientist. Hell, you are barely literate.
Pointing out same sex sexual behavior in animals does nothing to explain why it is present among humans. Which is what the sentence I quoted notes.
For that reason, evolutionary scientists don't even give the THEORY any credence.