Editorial: No martyrs in Huntsville

Editorial: No martyrs in Huntsville

There are 2 comments on the Dallas Morning News story from Apr 3, 2013, titled Editorial: No martyrs in Huntsville. In it, Dallas Morning News reports that:

It's a welcome surprise when the justice system gives deference to the political system on the sensitive subject of capital punishment.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Dallas Morning News.

Dudley Sharp

Houston, TX

#2 Apr 8, 2013
DA Watkins Precedent:

File a bunch of bills on capital punishment and we will stop all executions during the session, just in case one might pass. Do it every session!

Oh my.

Heck, suspend all traffic tickets and fines next time a proposed change comes to those laws - just for the session, though, just in case one might pass.

If the DMN were not so, blindly, anti death penalty, they might realize what an idiotic precedent this is.

DMN has had no difficulty in overcoming the obstacle of reason in prior death penalty considerations, so here were are.

Embrace it.

NOTE: Did anyone at DMN look at the voter registration and drivers license data for Dallas in 1998 and 2002 to see what percentage of jurors might have been black, based upon those called to jury duty and those who actually showed up?

You know, some reporter stuff?
Dudley Sharp

Houston, TX

#3 Apr 9, 2013
How cynical is SB 1270 - Texas Racial Justice Act?

Let's look at these two provisions under SB 1270. Art. 53.02. PROOF OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION; PROCEDURE.

(1) statistical evidence derived from the county where the defendant was sentenced to death, including evidence that death sentences were sought or imposed more frequently as punishment for
capital offenses against persons of one race than as punishment for capital offenses against persons of another race; or

(f) If the court finds that race was a significant factor in a decision to seek or impose the sentence of death at the time the death sentence was sought or imposed, the court shall order that a death sentence not be sought, or that the death sentence imposed by the judgment be vacated and the defendant resentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

A look:

As to (1), frequency is a measure of occurrence, not a measure of disproportionality, discrimination or measurable bias.

For example, if 10 death sentences are sought and imposed for both black and white murderers, the frequency of death sentences for each race is equal. Equal frequency can be, totally, disproportionate.

If whites had committed 100 death penalty eligible murders, yet only 10 death sentences were sought and imposed, and blacks had committed 12 "identical" (2) death penalty eligible murders, yet 10 death sentences were sought and imposed, there would be equal frequency, but striking disproportionality.

For those truly looking for discrimination, it doesn't matter how frequently, how often or how rarely the death penalty is sought or imposed for murderers of different races/ethnicities, it only matters if it is significantly, measurably disproportionately sought or imposed based upon discrimination.

In any jurisdiction, if death sentences are sought or imposed 10 times for whites and 7 times for blacks or 10 times for blacks and 7 times for whites, the frequency is 30% less or 43% more and - voila - a claim of "more frequently" will be made and discrimination will be pronounced, even if death sentences are sought and imposed proportionately to any race/ethnicity involvement in capital murders and there is zero discrimination.

The RJA, intentionally, allows cases to be challenged and overturned based upon a definition of "discrimination" which has nothing to do with discrimination.

Even if the bill made some real effort at wording that was honest and meaningful, we all know that every case is different and therefore batches of cases will never have statistical exactitude as the bill's author's know. Therefore it is just an anti death penalty bill and nothing more. No surprise.

======

(f) is so, blatantly, cynical it seems stupid to even point it out. To state the obvious, the authors of the bill are stating that racial discrimination is OK within LWOP, just not within the death penalty. I am surprised that was not written into the bill. Oh, yeah, it was.

The RJA makes a mockery of justice and is a direct insult to those who truly wish to end racism and discrimination.

The RJA is a big, unnecessary dishonest mess.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

DeSoto Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Election Who do you support for State Board of Education... (Oct '10) 11 hr Fartman 904
Lancaster, TX is great city to live in! Jul 2 Breezy 1
Election Who do you support for State Board of Education... (Oct '10) Jul 1 Farters 742
Glenn Heights Water Bills- (Apr '07) Jul 1 Guest 23
Lancaster Tx Mayor and City Manager are THUGS (Nov '12) Jun 21 satisfied citizen 20
Lancaster pronounciation Jun 16 divadiva 5
Why do people talk about Lancaster like it's gh... (May '09) Jun 15 satisfied citizen 72
More from around the web

DeSoto People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

DeSoto Mortgages