Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201878 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198423 Jun 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lookout, he's going postal!!!
Over your lies and intentional deceitfulness? Hardly.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198424 Jun 27, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Now being in St. Louis, you might realize why I left the Midwest....Humidity! Don't get stuck in the arch.
New York is going to be miserable this week with the heat and humidity. Living in the SF bay area half the year, when I go to NY and get off the plane it's like running into a wet wall of discomfort.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198425 Jun 27, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>But we are in California, votes don't count.
They most certainly do count, but only on issues that are constitutional.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198427 Jun 27, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks for proving the ruling opens the door for inevitable intolerance towards people of faith who repudiate bigotry.
LOL!!!! That's a good one!!! I love it when fundies try and spin their self created persecution!!! Nothing funnier!!!!

BTW, if you tried employing comprehension, you would realize that my disparaging remark was aimed at the stupid book, not those that believe it in. But don't let facts get in the way of your persecution!!!!!
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>
Now maybe you can focus on slowing down the high rate of std's and mental illness in the gay world, let's see if marriage helps...lol.
Right after you focus on getting the fundamentalist world to pull all their collective heads out of their sanctimonious *ssholes.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198428 Jun 27, 2013
Found on another thread. Amusing.(Please don't shoot the messenger. I didn't say it. Don't go postal on me).

"Any of you wingnuts who want to marry your shotgun, make sure it is unloaded before you consummate your marriage. Or you might be in for a rude surprise.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198429 Jun 27, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
They most certainly do count, but only on issues that are constitutional.
Gotta give credit where it is due. That's a good civil answer without all your usual nonsense and angry ranting.

CA needs to check the constitutionality of ballot measures before they are put on the ballot, not after they receive a winning vote.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198430 Jun 27, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>I think you are worried that polygamy marriage will cause people to say ssm opened the door to what was predicted. Personally I don't care who marries as long as it's fully equal. I think the person with split personalities should be able to marry within, who does it hurt? Should I have capitalized ssm?
And I think you suffer from the same illness as Rizzo. A delusional belief that you think you know other people's stances on issues when in fact they haven't uttered a word one way or the other.

Oh, and just fyi, I don't "worry" about non-existent events. Not the day when hundreds of thousands of people will inexplicably be clambering to have multiple marriages instead of one, or the imaginary second coming, or any of the other bullshyt events you people obsess over. We leave all that worrying to you and the other sheeple.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198432 Jun 27, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
And I think you suffer from the same illness as Rizzo. A delusional belief that you think you know other people's stances on issues when in fact they haven't uttered a word one way or the other.
Oh, and just fyi, I don't "worry" about non-existent events. Not the day when hundreds of thousands of people will inexplicably be clambering to have multiple marriages instead of one, or the imaginary second coming, or any of the other bullshyt events you people obsess over. We leave all that worrying to you and the other sheeple.
You're angry and at least three people have told you so. It's funny when you angrily deny that you are angry!

Good people are being denied marriage. You ridicule them. You are a hypocrite. What harm would their marriage cause you?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198434 Jun 27, 2013
Since when is wanting marriage equality an "illness"? I think this Jonah1 clown is ill.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#198435 Jun 27, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
And I think you suffer from the same illness as Rizzo. A delusional belief that you think you know other people's stances on issues when in fact they haven't uttered a word one way or the other.
Oh, and just fyi, I don't "worry" about non-existent events. Not the day when hundreds of thousands of people will inexplicably be clambering to have multiple marriages instead of one, or the imaginary second coming, or any of the other bullshyt events you people obsess over. We leave all that worrying to you and the other sheeple.
Ok whatever mr atheist priest. What's funny is every chance you want everyone else to believe in the puddle of crud theory. LOL

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#198436 Jun 27, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL!!!! That's a good one!!! I love it when fundies try and spin their self created persecution!!! Nothing funnier!!!!
BTW, if you tried employing comprehension, you would realize that my disparaging remark was aimed at the stupid book, not those that believe it in. But don't let facts get in the way of your persecution!!!!!
<quoted text>
Right after you focus on getting the fundamentalist world to pull all their collective heads out of their sanctimonious *ssholes.
Now that you can marry, take some anger management classes. And please can you stop talking about the rear end? We got the point, well at least you do.
Big D

Saint Louis, MO

#198437 Jun 27, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You elected Obama who nominated arguably the worse attorney general we've ever had.
Transparent my ass.
Twice :)
Big D

Saint Louis, MO

#198438 Jun 27, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Ok whatever mr atheist priest. What's funny is every chance you want everyone else to believe in the puddle of crud theory. LOL
As opposed to the magic tree, talking snake, rib woman, and the zombie guy with 2 dads
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198439 Jun 27, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Twice :)
Tell me about how Obama is the most transparent president in history like he claimed he would be to get elected.
commonpeeps

Monrovia, CA

#198440 Jun 27, 2013
Doesn't change a thing on anyones views. The sexually disoriented now have the go ahead to persue their own sexual perversions. I can hardly wait until they start biotching and moaning (catcher/pitcher , bottom/top) about now having to go through a legal divorce process. No he da man, no he da man. Property settlement etc. Next will be the pedophiles saying they want 'equal' treatment. We all lose on this one.
laughing man

Luton, UK

#198441 Jun 27, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
"So for those of my gay and lesbian brothers and sisters who needed the federal government's emotional approval of their relationship: Congratulations. I just hope all gay and lesbian Americans take a moment to stop and thank Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush for nominating Justices Kennedy and Roberts so the Clinton era of discrimination could come to an end Wednesday."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/06...
Oh yeah, the GOP has always been complicit, but Brucie has to point and laugh anyhow, as if it's gonna bother me. I've seen it all before.
laughing man

Luton, UK

#198442 Jun 27, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
That's one of those I linked to the other day. It's kind of a shame that he's waited this long, I must admit.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#198443 Jun 27, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
We aren't required to spin it pussy. It's been made very clear to you that it isn't an issue of interest. That does not imply or convey approval or disapproval of any type. The majority of people in this sting have made it quite clear to you. We aren't interested in a discussion about polygamy.
But, because you're a complete asshat, you continue to pretend that our lack of interest means more than it does. Because you got nothing else, and quite frankly, because it appears that stirring the kettle in Topix appears to be your only source of interaction with other human beings.
You have stated your point. You believe polygamy deserves respect. Great for you. We have stated our point - we aren't here to discuss polygamy. If we wanted to discuss polygamy, we would find a string and other Topix members that were intentionally seeking to discuss this issue. What we wouldn't do is hijack an existing string about one thing (same-sex marriage) in order to steer it to be about something else (polygamy). That would be rude.
One way to deal with a weed is to cut off its access to nutrients.

Frankie thrives on ANY attention he can get. He doesn't care if it's positive or negative.

As long as you're paying attention to him, he's going to keep yammering on.

Cut him off at the root. Don't feed the troll.

I honestly believe that if we don't respond to him, he'll get bored and move on.
Dorn

Altadena, CA

#198444 Jun 27, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep...we wont be seeing this issue on their platform
Straight Democratic and straight Republican married people can produce homosexual offspring. This not a political issue.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198445 Jun 27, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
That's one of those I linked to the other day. It's kind of a shame that he's waited this long, I must admit.
Yeah, you got to re-submit links many times for these clowns if there's any chance they'll read them. Usually they won't. No need. They already know everything they want to know and don't want any pesky evidence to the contrary.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Desert Hot Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Vagos motorcycle club targeted in Southern Cali... (Mar '06) 19 hr Im mee 4,851
Review: Coachella Valley Collection Service (Nov '14) Fri vimeo 9
Review: Morongo Casino & Resort Fri MORONGO 2
Gay Jay Leno Darpa Cloaked Robbed Wal Mart Edna... Aug 17 Duce 1
News Yucca Valley: Home Depot shoplifter steals powe... (Oct '15) Aug 7 Well Well 2
News Former Officer Dennis Decker Accused of Raping ... (Apr '08) Jun '17 its me daisy 24
News 11 Suspects Arrested In Whitewater Graffiti Sting (May '07) Jun '17 Killer hill syndrome 84

Desert Hot Springs Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Desert Hot Springs Mortgages