Your logic is as twisted as your history.<quoted text>
Good point. The British bandits, along with their French poodles, declared war against tiny Germany, ostensibly to protect the sovereignty of Poland, despite the fact that Poland was actively using the Versailles invented Polish corridor to interfere with tiny Germany's intercourse with her eastern territories.
That action, more than any other, effectively destroyed the British Empire, if not, eventually, the Christianized White race. The outcome of the European invasion was that the Soviet "Liberals" took control of Poland, along with most of central and eastern Europe.
After the bandits had convinced their "Liberal" American pals to invade and to subjugate the historic homeland of the White race - Europa - high paid agenda driven Government judges interpreted our Republican friends' infamous 14th Amendment to mean the Africans could "marry" White people.
Precedence has been established. If the Africans can "marry" White people, why shouldn't two persons of the same SEX be permitted to "marry" one another as well? Of course, the racists keep arguing that there is a difference.
To establish equal rights, you first must establish that the issues are equal.
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior. Even science recognizes that fruitless mating signifies a defect.
The differences only continue from there.
Ss couples will only ever be a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered HALF of marriage.