Didn't bother to read the article.KiMare wrote:
Here is some non-faith science for you! Afraid?
Do you understand the implications of epi-marker discovery?
"Different kinds of epi-marks safeguard different sex-specific characteristics; some protect the genitals, others protect sexual identity, and this study suggests others keep safe sexual partner preference.
When these epi-marks are passed between generations from fathers to daughters or mothers to sons, they have the potential to result in reverse effects. The outcome is feminization of characteristics in sons or masculinization of some characteristics in daughters, occasionally affecting sexual preference."
First they will identify different epi-markers. Next they will be able to correct markers mistakenly left. Literally shape not just gender, but the masculization or feminization of either gender!
The whole issue of homosexuality will be rendered mute!
Did you notice how mute you were to the essence of my post?
Perfect proof of a blonde ho.
:-) <quoted text>
You still are mute on the article.
I nailed that one, didn't I???
You could try again, not that I expect anything other than a blonde ho response.
SMIRK, SMILE AND BAZINGA!!!
Notice you don't know the difference between "mute" and "moot".
But you have been mute on this question:
Should you have been aborted?