Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

Nov 30, 2010 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: CBS2

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Comments (Page 1,617)

Showing posts 32,321 - 32,340 of48,691
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Jun 11

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37657
Feb 15, 2013
 
mother superior wrote:
You strengthen the beast by feeding it responses.
<quoted text>
My bad.
The sad thing is, I know better, and usually resist.

My fear is that someone who doesn't know better might drop by and think there is merit to the excuses. So every now and then, I feel the need to respond.

I'll also claim the excuse others are feeding it as well, but I know that is a poor one. Even abuse is reinforcement, though I promise my motives were pure. I'll try to do better.
Mojo

Chicago, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37658
Feb 15, 2013
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't have a marriage.
Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
That hardly sounds like Westboro...
Smile.
The Marraige Man has spoke.

Everyone return to your homes.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37659
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

mother superior wrote:
You strengthen the beast by feeding it responses.
<quoted text>
One of the strongest weapons we have is the enemy itself
.
When visitors stop by our chat room and read all the horrible things the snarling GOD people say to us; the visitors quickly become sympathetic to our crusade for better treatment
.
Our approval ratings are approaching an amazing 60% nationwide
.
This message is currently being read by 122 in the Gay Lesbian chat room combined with 269 from the US Politics chat room; so we have a substantial current reader base total of 391 people at this very moment
George

Waterloo, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37660
Feb 15, 2013
 
Why not

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37661
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Not Yet Equal wrote:
<quoted text>
I feel no embarrassment in demonstrating your attempts to justify harming others needlessly through denial of equal treatment under the law, is irrational and based on your personal prejudice.
Nor do I delight in exposing your irrational prejudice. I only bother because the prejudice and discrimination you promote results in real harm to real people.
You still fail to demonstrate any legitimate governmental interest sufficient for denial of the fundamental right of marriage to same gender couples. Clearly, it is you who remains in denial.
Truth is irrational and prejudicial?

You have yet to give a rational rebuttal to my points. Look at your post. Ad homoan attacks without a single specific rebuttal!

Moreover, you give partial quotes that distort the truth of SCOTUS rulings, and refuse to correct them when asked. It is another response that destroys the moral integrity of your position.

The government does have a legitimate interest in protecting the sole and best birthplace of every other human relationship. It has NO legitimate interest in extending those protections selectively to a friendship while discriminating against numerous other types of friendships.

That is the simple truth.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37662
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rainbow Kid wrote:
<quoted text>
One of the strongest weapons we have is the enemy itself
.
When visitors stop by our chat room and read all the horrible things the snarling GOD people say to us; the visitors quickly become sympathetic to our crusade for better treatment
.
Our approval ratings are approaching an amazing 60% nationwide
.
This message is currently being read by 122 in the Gay Lesbian chat room combined with 269 from the US Politics chat room; so we have a substantial current reader base total of 391 people at this very moment
If you
believe denying marriage to a relationship
will prevent love

If you
demand any committed relationship
has to be called marriage

If you
claim rights and benefits can only be acquired
by a imposition on marriage

If you
equate the diversity of two genders
with the redundancy of same genders

If you
desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions
and violate the historic practice of every single culture in history

If you
believe a fundamental change to the building block of society
will have absolutely no affect

If you
think a law can change
the reality of crucial distinctions in relationships

If you
pretend duplicating sexuality
is the same as blending masculinity and femininity

If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent

If you
ignore the design of sexual union
to manipulate a harmful act

If you
violate evolution's law of reproduction
to equate a genetic dead end

If you
risk the healthiest human relationship
to include one of the unhealthiest

If you
parallel the sole birthplace of every other relationship
with one that can reproduce none

If you
dilute all these things
down to just 'a committed relationship of two people'

Then, and only then, can you equate same-sex unions with marriage.
mahz

Troy, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37663
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

No one cares what you think KiMary. You can cry about it all you want ya little bigot, but in a couple days IL will be the 10th state in the union to allow same sex marriage. It won't be long before the other 40 follow. Nothing you can do it about it except die and let the times pass you by. Equality is on the rise everywhere. You can't stop progress.
mahz

Troy, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37664
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Truth is irrational and prejudicial?
You have yet to give a rational rebuttal to my points. Look at your post. Ad homoan attacks without a single specific rebuttal!
Moreover, you give partial quotes that distort the truth of SCOTUS rulings, and refuse to correct them when asked. It is another response that destroys the moral integrity of your position.
The government does have a legitimate interest in protecting the sole and best birthplace of every other human relationship. It has NO legitimate interest in extending those protections selectively to a friendship while discriminating against numerous other types of friendships.
That is the simple truth.
Smile.
When "truth" is a made fantasy world inside the head of some deranged bigot then yes, it does come across as quite irrational and prejudicial. Your "simple truth" is a simple one because it only exists in your simple brain.

Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37666
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Truth is irrational and prejudicial?
You have yet to give a rational rebuttal to my points. Look at your post. Ad homoan attacks without a single specific rebuttal!
Moreover, you give partial quotes that distort the truth of SCOTUS rulings, and refuse to correct them when asked. It is another response that destroys the moral integrity of your position.
The government does have a legitimate interest in protecting the sole and best birthplace of every other human relationship. It has NO legitimate interest in extending those protections selectively to a friendship while discriminating against numerous other types of friendships.
That is the simple truth.
Smile.
mahz wrote:
<quoted text>
When "truth" is a made fantasy world inside the head of some deranged bigot then yes, it does come across as quite irrational and prejudicial. Your "simple truth" is a simple one because it only exists in your simple brain.
Smirk.
Ad homoan troll attack.

Still waiting for a rational rebuttle...

Smile

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37667
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

mahz wrote:
No one cares what you think KiMary. You can cry about it all you want ya little bigot, but in a couple days IL will be the 10th state in the union to allow same sex marriage. It won't be long before the other 40 follow. Nothing you can do it about it except die and let the times pass you by. Equality is on the rise everywhere. You can't stop progress.
I like to think I am poking holes in a fallacy balloon full of fart air.

The blast of air causes a gay twirling, limp wristed hissy fit.

Snicker.

Since: Jun 11

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37668
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

No matter how you choose to conceptualize marriage for yourself, legally it is a fundamental right of the individual. While churches may place any restrictions on their own ceremonies they choose, the government can only restrict fundamental rights when a compelling and legitimate justification can be demonstrated.

While procreation has never been a requirement for marriage, even that irrational excuse for discrimination ignores the fact that gay people can and do reproduce, and are raising children either biologically related or adopted. Denial of equal treatment under the law provides nothing to opposite sex couple families. It only harms same sex couple families needlessly.

Marriage is a fundamental right of the individual. The only eligibility requirement for a fundamental right is being human. Reasonable restrictions include age, ability to demonstrate informed consent, and not being closely related or currently married. Gay people qualify.

Gay people are asking to be treated equally under the laws, in the remaining states that do not yet recognize their marriages, and by the federal government.

Neither tradition nor gender provides a legitimate governmental interest sufficient for denial of this fundamental right.

Since: Jun 11

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37669
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

"But even if Congress believed at the time of DOMA's passage that children had the best chance at success if raised jointly by their biological mothers and fathers, a desire to encourage heterosexual couples to procreate and rear their own children more responsibly would not provide a rational basis for denying federal recognition to same-sex marriages. Such denial does nothing to promote stability in heterosexual parenting. Rather, it "prevents children of same-sex couples from enjoying the immeasurable advantages that flow from the assurance of a stable family structure, when afforded equal recognition under federal law.

Moreover, an interest in encouraging responsible procreation plainly cannot provide a rational basis upon which to exclude same-sex marriages from federal recognition because, as Justice Scalia pointed out, the ability to procreate is not now, nor has it ever been, a precondition to marriage in any state in the country. Indeed, "the sterile and the elderly" have never been denied the right to marry by any of the fifty states. And the federal government has never considered denying recognition to marriage based on an ability or inability to procreate.

Similarly, Congress' asserted interest in defending and nurturing heterosexual marriage is not "grounded in sufficient factual context for this court to ascertain some relation" between it and the classification DOMA effects.

What remains, therefore, is the possibility that Congress sought to deny recognition to same-sex marriages in order to make heterosexual marriage appear more valuable or desirable. But the extent that this was the goal, Congress has achieved it "only by punishing same-sex couples who exercise their rights under state law." And this the Constitution does not permit. "For if the constitutional conception of 'equal protection of the laws' means anything, it must at the very least mean" that the Constitution will not abide such "a bare congressional desire to harm a politically unpopular group."

Neither does the Constitution allow Congress to sustain DOMA by reference to the objective of defending traditional notions of morality. As the Supreme Court made abundantly clear in Lawrence v. Texas and Romer v. Evans, "the fact that the governing majority in a State has traditionally viewed a particular practice as immoral is not a sufficient reason for upholding a law..."
(Gill v OPM)
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37670
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
If you
believe denying marriage to a relationship
will prevent love
If you
demand any committed relationship
has to be called marriage
If you
claim rights and benefits can only be acquired
by a imposition on marriage
If you
equate the diversity of two genders
with the redundancy of same genders
If you
desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions
and violate the historic practice of every single culture in history
If you
believe a fundamental change to the building block of society
will have absolutely no affect
If you
think a law can change
the reality of crucial distinctions in relationships
If you
pretend duplicating sexuality
is the same as blending masculinity and femininity
If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent
If you
ignore the design of sexual union
to manipulate a harmful act
If you
violate evolution's law of reproduction
to equate a genetic dead end
If you
risk the healthiest human relationship
to include one of the unhealthiest
If you
parallel the sole birthplace of every other relationship
with one that can reproduce none
If you
dilute all these things
down to just 'a committed relationship of two people'
Then, and only then, can you equate same-sex unions with marriage.
We've had legal gay marriage in America for 8 years already
http://makeitequal.org/
.
The only thing that has changed in 8 years is an increase in the number of legally married couples
.
The very fact that you didn't know that; is proof that gay marriage has no adverse affect your marriage
Oh My

Kansas City, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37671
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

just pass the stupid law and let the lawmakers get back to the work on issues that effect every man, woman, and child in this bankrupt poor example of a state.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37673
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rainbow Kid wrote:
<quoted text>
We've had legal gay marriage in America for 8 years already
http://makeitequal.org/
.
The only thing that has changed in 8 years is an increase in the number of legally married couples
.
The very fact that you didn't know that; is proof that gay marriage has no adverse affect your marriage
Before any other issue can be put on the table, the basic question of whether a relationship qualifies as marriage must be answered.

Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Gay couples are a defective, desolate contradiction of the very basic goal of evolution.

Hence, the very term 'gay marriage' is an oxymoron. Literally 'unmarriage'.

That reality can't be legislated or legalized.

Sorry.

Smile.
Time

Broad Run, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37674
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
If you
..........
Then, and only then, can you equate same-sex unions with marriage.
Your "If - Thens" aren't based on logic, and your conclusions are not based in fact.

Why keep posting this, when you know it isn't truth-based?
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37675
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Before any other issue can be put on the table, the basic question of whether a relationship qualifies as marriage must be answered.
Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are a defective, desolate contradiction of the very basic goal of evolution.
Hence, the very term 'gay marriage' is an oxymoron. Literally 'unmarriage'.
That reality can't be legislated or legalized.
Sorry.
Smile.
It was two of you heteros that ate the forbidden fruit and received the curse of childbirth as your reward
.
++++++++++
Genesis 3:16> Unto the woman HE said, "I will greatly multiply thy sorowe and thy conception. In sorow thou shalt bring forth children: and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and hee shall rule ouer thee."
++++++++++
.
Gays are exempt from the curse of childbirth; but we do have biblical marriage instructions in this example from the Authorized King James Bible:
.
++++++++++
1 Samuel 18 :1> And it came to passe when hee made an ende of speaking vnto Saul, that the soule of Ionathan was knit with the soule of Dauid, and Ionathan loued him as his owne soule.
.
1 Samuel 18:3> Then Ionathan and Dauid made a couenant, because he loued him as his owne soule.
.
1 Samuel 18:4> And Ionathan stript himselfe of the robe that was vpon him, and gaue it to Dauid, and his garments, euen to his sword, and to his bow, and to his girdle.
.
1 Samuel 20:41> And assoone as the ladde was gone, Dauid arose out of a place toward the South, and fell on his face to the ground, and bowed himselfe three times: and they kissed one another, and wept one with another, vntill Dauid exceeded.
.
1 Samuel 20:42> And Ionathan said to Dauid, Goe in peace, forasmuch as wee haue sworne both of vs in the Name of the Lord, saying; The Lord be betweene me and thee, and betweene my seede and thy seede for euer. And hee arose, and departed: and Ionathan went into the citie.
.
2 Samuel 1:25> How are the mightie fallen in the midst of the battell! O Ionathan, thou wast slaine in thine high places.
.
2 Samuel 1:26> I am distressed for thee, my brother Ionathan, very pleasant hast thou beene vnto mee: thy loue to mee was wonderfull, passing the loue of women.
++++++++++
Time

Broad Run, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37676
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Before any other issue can be put on the table, the basic question of whether a relationship qualifies as marriage must be answered.

Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
.....
It has been answered by a multitude of other countries and a variety of states in this country.

The results are already in.

I know you think you are clever with your "definition", but it has no bearing on marriage at all, since no marriage is required in order to have sex, and marriage only places such constraints on sex as each couple and individual chooses.

What types and sorts of "mating behaviors" each couple might engage in are intentionally absent from marriage law, as long as all parties are able to legally consent.
Time

Broad Run, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37677
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
....
Gay couples are a defective, desolate contradiction of the very basic goal of evolution.
Hence, the very term 'gay marriage' is an oxymoron. Literally 'unmarriage'.
That reality can't be legislated or legalized.
Sorry.
Smile.
That's only your opinion, and one not based in logic or reality.

It may be YOUR "truth", but it doesn't apply to anyone else.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37680
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Time wrote:
<quoted text>
Your "If - Thens" aren't based on logic, and your conclusions are not based in fact.
Why keep posting this, when you know it isn't truth-based?
I'm sorry, your unspecific opinion does nothing to validate your claim. In fact it makes you look stupid.

Which begs the question, why does it annoy you then...

Why a specific one and see who has the facts and logic?

Smirk.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 32,321 - 32,340 of48,691
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Des Plaines Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Des Plaines People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Des Plaines News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Des Plaines
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••