Are the Golden Arches really supposed...

Are the Golden Arches really supposed to be giant french fries?

There are 4 comments on the How Stuff Works story from May 9, 2009, titled Are the Golden Arches really supposed to be giant french fries?. In it, How Stuff Works reports that:

Atteberry, Jonathan. "Are the Golden Arches really supposed to be giant french fries?." 05 May 2009.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at How Stuff Works.

Since: Mar 07

Ontario, Canada

#1 May 9, 2009
What a stupid question. It's a friggin "M".

Lawrenceville, GA

#2 May 9, 2009
No, they are not. And Unknown27 is also wrong. The arches were just to be eye-catching on the original building. It was only later that they developed them into the M.

Since: Mar 07

Ontario, Canada

#3 May 10, 2009
True - the arches were originally eye-catching. I am saying that those arches were later developed into an "M" and that's what they're used for to this present day.

Berkeley, IL

#4 Oct 29, 2009
No they are inverted taco shells.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Des Plaines Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min VetnorsGate 1,785,799
Who do you support for U.S. House in Illinois (... (Oct '10) 2 hr dont tread on me 211
NOCITA rules (Apr '11) 7 hr Apple pie 27
Taylor St. gypsies claiming Melrose Parker iden... 7 hr Apple pie 24
Greg salvi (May '16) 7 hr Apple pie 35
Do you remember-North Avenue Roller Rink? (May '09) 7 hr Apple pie 94
Madonna Del Carmine, or Guadalupe (Dec '16) 7 hr Apple pie 17

Des Plaines Jobs

Personal Finance

Des Plaines Mortgages