Goes to show how your "facts" are wrong. Leneghan and Guzzo are the ones who came to the table with a 5.6 mill number after the first failure, not Mark. Gerber did not submit a "flat" number, he submitted 6.6 mill in November, the amount needed to properly fund the fire department for the next 5 years. She said all along that 5.6 mill is the same as a renewal, which it is. So now the township will begin to explode with growth again (over 300 apartments behind LA Fitness, 2 new residential developements and a Target)and the fire department is being forced to operate the next 6 years on the same money it had in 2002. With all that growth, everyones tax bills would have dropped to $175 per $100k within a year or two anyway. So now the tax payers are at $0 savings and a severly damaged and understaffed FD.<quoted text>
He can't pass the buck on that. He blames Leneghan and his neighbors for the failure of the November levy and the flat levy that was passed in February. At what point does the township's FISCAL OFFICER take any of the blame? IT IS GERBER'S FAULT FOR NOT CAMPAIGNING IN HIS OWN NEIGHBORHOOD IN NOVEMBER AND SUBMITTING A FLAT LEVY IN FEBRUARY!!!
And while we're at it, why does he keep defending the November levy? IT WAS TOO EXPENSIVE. IT FAILED. IT IS OVER!
She is so delusional that she thought they could do this without letting any firefighters go. Had Sybert and Carducci not done her dirty work for her and let some go first of the year, there would of been even more let go this month before they could get their loan money.