Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
billy bob

Jefferson, GA

#16792 Jun 29, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
AND YOU are such a study in stability. ROTFL
You complain about people posting links to support their statments while YOU just rant and rave and offer nothing more than YOUR HATE FILLED OPINIONS. POT-KETTLE-BLACK
Why don't you stop calling people names for disagreeing with you and past a fact showing that they are really wrong for a mains stream news source for a change.
You can find a web site on the world wide web to support any statement, true on not, makes no difference. Have allies visited earth, sure they have. Who do you think built the pyramids of Egypt & Mexico?

http://www.universetoday.com/16017/apollo-ast...

Is Obama a Muslim, a lot of people think so, it's on the internet or they saw it on TV. They even claim that he admitted it on TV, did he really, of course not.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslimfa...

I am sure you are a nice person and don't beat your pets. But outlandish rants backed up by off the wall web sites built just for you just doesn't get it. You have NO creditability, none.
jeb stuart

Cordele, GA

#16793 Jun 29, 2013
bored monitor wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me "axe" u a question: When did you choose to be straight?
Ur response will probably be something like: I didn't I was born that way.
Let me axe u another question: When do gays choose to be gay?
Dammit man, looks like the "bored monitor" just stepped out of the closet. That's okay bm, I am not a homophobe.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#16794 Jun 29, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
First Law of Thermodynamics: They can’t win.
Second Law of Thermodynamics: They can’t break even.
Third Law of Thermodynamics: They can’t stop playing.
lol You nailed it, General.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#16795 Jun 29, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
How can you misjudge me so ?
My heart aches with disappointment.
Even worse, how can you believe my union friends would be so obtuse as to leave a body around to be found.
Thanks to the absence of regulations and inspections,'Ol Jimmy became part of 11,793 packages of "pressed chicken" manufactured in E. St. Louis,(along with 3 large field rats, a copy of the April, 1975 Playboy magazine, and the thumb of a 53 year old factory worker named "Hugh")
I'm told that the "Pressed Chicken" tasted especially like actual chicken that year.
Unfortunately, I was overseas loitering in bars and checking for "Adam's apples" on the ladies I encountered when Jimmy disappeared, or I would have been there to help him out.
Who knows, had I been there, maybe the pressed chicken would have been even tastier, and that batch would have made 11,926 packages.
lol Great reply. To be honest, I DIDN'T think you would leave a body that could be so EASILY found! Fortunately for me, I didn't start eating chicken until a few years ago. Whew! Just thinking.....if I had consumed some of the "Hoffa" chicken, would that have forced me into the membership of the Teamsters????
jeb stuart

Cordele, GA

#16796 Jun 29, 2013
bored monitor wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me "axe" u a question: When did you choose to be straight?
Ur response will probably be something like: I didn't I was born that way.
Let me axe u another question: When do gays choose to be gay?
I will say this about what "oh,my" said about gays being born that way, I have read about and seen(tv) many examples of homosexuality in the animal kingdom. And I am not talking about a young male dog trying to hump another one. What does it all mean? I have no clue. As far as gay marriage- it is a non-issue with me.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#16797 Jun 29, 2013
billy bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you stop calling people names for disagreeing with you and past a fact showing that they are really wrong for a mains stream news source for a change.
You can find a web site on the world wide web to support any statement, true on not, makes no difference. Have allies visited earth, sure they have. Who do you think built the pyramids of Egypt & Mexico?
http://www.universetoday.com/16017/apollo-ast...
Is Obama a Muslim, a lot of people think so, it's on the internet or they saw it on TV. They even claim that he admitted it on TV, did he really, of course not.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslimfa...
I am sure you are a nice person and don't beat your pets. But outlandish rants backed up by off the wall web sites built just for you just doesn't get it. You have NO creditability, none.
Your first sentence is the absolutel definition of your posts. The fact that you deny it just proves how insane you are. If you call CNN, Huffinton Post, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, etc. off the wall, then you are just trying to make YOURSELF feel better for being so out of touch with reality.
guest

United States

#16798 Jun 29, 2013
billy bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you stop calling people names for disagreeing with you and past a fact showing that they are really wrong for a mains stream news source for a change.
You can find a web site on the world wide web to support any statement, true on not, makes no difference. Have allies visited earth, sure they have. Who do you think built the pyramids of Egypt & Mexico?
http://www.universetoday.com/16017/apollo-ast...
Is Obama a Muslim, a lot of people think so, it's on the internet or they saw it on TV. They even claim that he admitted it on TV, did he really, of course not.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslimfa...
I am sure you are a nice person and don't beat your pets. But outlandish rants backed up by off the wall web sites built just for you just doesn't get it. You have NO creditability, none.
It doesn't take long to figure out the "green squared" ones does it? They think that their "green square" proves that they are a cut above but all it really proves is their propensity for group think. They are incapable of independent thought. They need a badge to help boost their self esteem and identify themselves to the like minded. They are part of the ever shrinking minority of a warped existence that can only see as far as their pinched belief system can bare. A pitiful lot to say the least, but very funny in their incessant whining about an ever changing world that they thought they had control of but have found it slipping ever further from their understanding.
Oh my

Young Harris, GA

#16799 Jun 29, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
This isn't about what dress lengths are appropriate in public or the unfortunate degradation of what is acceptable on television and in our movies. It is redefining the fundamental foundation upon which a society is built. This country was founded on principles and ideals that, while often not met by fallible people or even by the institutions that those same fallible people established, were something to strive towards. An attitude of "anything goes" is hardly the "potential" we should be celebrating.
Nope, never said anything goes, nice try though. What I did say is that homosexuality is coming from Nature and as such it falls under equal protrection. Don't agree, so what, you're fast becoming a minority.

"fundamental foundation upon which a society is built"
Oh really, says who, you. There's been, common law, livin' together, adhoc arrangements since the beginning of time. People decide for themselves what's best for themselves at any given time. There was a time when inter-racial marriage was forbidden, not any more, why, cause there's no damn reason to forbid it.

The attitude of the country has changed, change with it, or stay the same, it don't matter to me, time and demographics are against you.
Who

Hiawassee, GA

#16801 Jun 29, 2013
bored monitor wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me "axe" u a question: When did you choose to be straight?
Ur response will probably be something like: I didn't I was born that way.
Let me axe u another question: When do gays choose to be gay?
Let me axe u a ?.
When did you decide you are gay?
Let me axe u another ?.
If you are not gay, why do you huff up and show support for gays?
You very ever ever or seldom if never, post any opinions here, why now?

Don't be ashamed if you are gay, the supremes now say you can get married. You are free to come out of the closet.

But most important of all, I will not change my mind about gays.
You dont like what I say, just skip over it.




Who

Hiawassee, GA

#16802 Jun 29, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
That may be true but in this case it does: http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2013/03/27/1780...
"Two new polls confirm that a significant majority of Americans want the Supreme Court to overturn the Defense of Marriage Act so that same-sex couples can access the federal benefits associated with marriage.
Another case of a liar who misinterprets a poll result to further their agenda of being a gay person.

Here was the question that you specifically failed to include.
"As you may know, several states legally recognize marriages between gay or lesbian couples.
Regardless of how you feel about the laws in those states, do you think the federal government
should or should not
legally recognize the same sex marriages that have been performed in states that allow them?

The question is geared only to reflect the respondents feeling whether or not the federal government should recognize gay marriages in only those states that have legalized it whcih is not what you have implied.
You knee jerk libroids will tell any lie, twist any truth, and sell your children to try and make people believe your BS.

Here's the link of the poll. And I dont believe polls by CNN are trustworthy, mainly because their intent to confuse and misdirect.


Page 4 gives the breakdown.

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/03/2...


Who

Hiawassee, GA

#16803 Jun 29, 2013
Another point::

"A total of 1,021 adults were interviewed by telephone nationwide by live interviewers calling both landline and cell phones.

All respondents were asked questions concerning basic demographics, and the entire sample was weighted to reflect national Census
figures for gender, race, age, education, region of country, and telephone usage. Among the entire sample, 33% described themselves as Democrats, 25% described themselves as Republicans, and 43% described themselves as Independents or
members of another party.

Crosstabs on the following pages only include results for subgroups with enough unweighted cases to produce a sampling error
of +/-8.5 percentage points or less. Some subgroups represent too small a share of the national population to produce crosstabs
with an acceptable sampling error. Interviews were conducted among these subgroups, but results for groups with a sampling error larger than +/-8.5 percentage points are not displayed and instead are denoted with "N/A".


This poll is a JOKE, a waste of someone's money.
+/- 8.5% is a big difference. Change them around and the poll could show most people are against.
Who

Hiawassee, GA

#16804 Jun 29, 2013
Multiple polls link::

http://www.pollingreport.com/civil.htm

And many of the poll respondents probably dont even understand the questions and dont know who their elected reps are.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#16805 Jun 29, 2013
Who wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me axe u a ?.
When did you decide you are gay?
Let me axe u another ?.
If you are not gay, why do you huff up and show support for gays?
You very ever ever or seldom if never, post any opinions here, why now?
Don't be ashamed if you are gay, the supremes now say you can get married. You are free to come out of the closet.
But most important of all, I will not change my mind about gays.
You dont like what I say, just skip over it.
Didn't say I am or am not gay. Doesn't matter. Gays have little or no impact on me. What someone does in their own bedroom is none of my concern or urs.

U made the point that being gay is a choice, yet u can't say when u chose not to be gay.

u made a foolish post, u were called on it and u failed.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#16806 Jun 29, 2013
billy bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Just curious, in what way does gay marriage actually affect YOU?
Do you really think that all heterosexual married couples have the same idea of what marriage is, or is not?
You do realize that marriage is on the decline in this country and has been for a long time, you do know that, don't you??
Or are you just trying to force your views on others again? Its a free country, right? Or is it only a free country when it matches with what you think?
Now tell the truth, or just baffle me with more BS.
I am not claiming recognizing same sex marriage has any impact on me and even if it did, it would be irrelevant. The important impact is on society. In most civilized societies, marriage, for thousands of years, has been understood as the legal union of one man and one woman. It served to stabilize society and protect children. Now the US has decided to fundamentally redefine what constitutes marriage. Okay, where does it stop? Polygamists are already looking at this as their opening, and why shouldn't they. If marriage can be defined as both one man and one woman, and as two women and as two men - why not one man and two women?
What would be a valid argument against it, now that we have begun redefining marriage, what is the rationale to stop? And why not one woman and two men? Well, what about the children - which man is on the birth certificate? Would paternity tests be required at birth? Those are just two reasonable scenarios that could be argued for now.
Once marriage can be seen as fluid, doesn't it naturally follow that its significance must be diminished? We already have a huge segment of our population having children out of wedlock and we have seen the results - greater probability of growing up in poverty, greater chance of being abused, greater chance of not finishing high school, much less college, greater chance of ending up in jail.
Society has a vested interest in children being raised in a stable home, anything that further diminishes the odds of that, I consider a tragedy. In my opinion, the redefinition of marriage does that. That is my priority - the sanctity of marriage. What Jim and Bob do in the privacy of their home does not impact me, if they want some formal recognition of their relationship - fine, I understand that desire and can respect it - find some alternative term and have our legislatures recognize it - but don't call it marriage, because it isn't.
Don't expect you to agree and I've said my piece.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#16807 Jun 29, 2013
This is the final kiss of death for Rubio's so called Republican career. I don't remember, but wasn't Rubio a Tea Party favorite? I could be wrong. Doesn't matter now anyway does it?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#16808 Jun 29, 2013
If it were legal I would take bets that there will be no or very little border security when this immigration bill passes. I wonder if they have any bets on this in Vegas?

ww.wnd.com/2013/06/loopholes-mean-amnesty-bef...
OMTE

Rural Valley, PA

#16809 Jun 29, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not claiming recognizing same sex marriage has any impact on me and even if it did, it would be irrelevant. The important impact is on society. In most civilized societies, marriage, for thousands of years, has been understood as the legal union of one man and one woman. It served to stabilize society and protect children. Now the US has decided to fundamentally redefine what constitutes marriage. Okay, where does it stop? Polygamists are already looking at this as their opening, and why shouldn't they. If marriage can be defined as both one man and one woman, and as two women and as two men - why not one man and two women?
What would be a valid argument against it, now that we have begun redefining marriage, what is the rationale to stop? And why not one woman and two men? Well, what about the children - which man is on the birth certificate? Would paternity tests be required at birth? Those are just two reasonable scenarios that could be argued for now.
Once marriage can be seen as fluid, doesn't it naturally follow that its significance must be diminished? We already have a huge segment of our population having children out of wedlock and we have seen the results - greater probability of growing up in poverty, greater chance of being abused, greater chance of not finishing high school, much less college, greater chance of ending up in jail.
Society has a vested interest in children being raised in a stable home, anything that further diminishes the odds of that, I consider a tragedy. In my opinion, the redefinition of marriage does that. That is my priority - the sanctity of marriage. What Jim and Bob do in the privacy of their home does not impact me, if they want some formal recognition of their relationship - fine, I understand that desire and can respect it - find some alternative term and have our legislatures recognize it - but don't call it marriage, because it isn't.
Don't expect you to agree and I've said my piece.
Awesome post. A++++
Who

Hiawassee, GA

#16810 Jun 29, 2013
bored monitor wrote:
<quoted text>
U made the point that being gay is a choice, yet u can't say when u chose not to be gay.
u made a foolish post, u were called on it and u failed.
This is what I posted dimwit....
"Reason being, there is scientific proof to say one way or the other of what makes a person homosexual. There is much speculation with biased opinions to say it's by choice, or it's a natural inclination."
Now using your sorry reasoning, anyone could say that I said it was a natural inclination, like Oh my claims.
I didn't say either one, I said "much speculation, with biased opinions, to say it could be EITHER choice or natural.
The one with the screwed up foolish interpretation is you.
I have called it deviant behaviour; I will state here the "Census should have a section collecting information on gays as a population group."
Much could be learned about their deviant behaviour, why they do what they do, the impact on neighbors, the community's children, race relations, the impact on forlorn women who never marry because of a shortage of straight men, or the forlorn men who never marry because of a shortage of straight women.
The medical community could track any disease the gays spread, inoculate them, put them in quarantine to protect the general population.
Many good uses for a census section on gays.
Who

Hiawassee, GA

#16811 Jun 29, 2013
And it's bad enough we've got to deal with our own sexual deviants, now we got to deal with the illegal deviants also.

""Advocates focused their fury on several Democrats on the Judiciary Committee, which considered more than 300 amendments to the bill, after the senators warned the chairman, Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, that they would not vote for an amendment he wanted to introduce. The measure by Mr. Leahy, also a Democrat, would have allowed American citizens to seek permanent resident status — a document known as a green card — for a foreign same-sex partners."

Also,

"Federal Law Now Allows Immigration Benefits For Same-Sex Partners"

http://www.higbeeassociates.com/practices/imm...




danger zone

Sylacauga, AL

#16812 Jun 29, 2013
Bigdave1 wrote:
If it were legal I would take bets that there will be no or very little border security when this immigration bill passes. I wonder if they have any bets on this in Vegas?
ww.wnd.com/2013/06/loopholes-mean-amnesty-bef...
I was actually thinking the same, if Vegas is taking bets on Holder's fate. Also, odds on the immigration bill. Just curious.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Darien Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
cornerstone christian correspondence school dip... (Apr '10) Tue April johnson 210
What McIntosh/Darien does not want you to know (May '13) Jul 9 Nteri 26
Mcintosh/Darien CROOKED RACIST COPS (May '13) Jul 8 LELEDAWN 58
Part 12 Guy Heinze Jr. (May '10) Jul 6 Udhruc 1,202
Divorce Attorney Jun 28 Jail The Ho 2
Judge Jean Bolin (May '12) Jun 27 Meth-intosh Busted 12
Speed Trap along the I-95 corridor in Mcintosh ... (Nov '15) Jun 27 Mcintrash Finest 8

Darien Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Darien Mortgages