Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Georgia in 2010?

Posted in the Darien Forum

Comments (Page 349)

Showing posts 6,961 - 6,980 of39,413
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
OMTE

Adel, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7430
Apr 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

jeb stuart wrote:
<quoted text>I actually agree with part of your post(@ sorry parents),but how can you say that you love children and call a girl slutty simply because she makes a mistake.
If her mistake ends in the death of baby; then just calling her slut is me being nice.
jeb stuart

Jesup, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7431
Apr 21, 2013
 
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>If her mistake ends in the death of baby; then just calling her slut is me being nice.
that's some tough love you got there,shorty.
OMTE

Adel, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7432
Apr 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

jeb stuart wrote:
<quoted text>that's some tough love you got there,shorty.
It's tough world and hell is hot she better get ready.
jeb stuart

Jesup, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7433
Apr 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>It's tough world and hell is hot she better get ready.
there is one more irony/hypocrisy about this.right-wingers seem to want these babies,yet they don't want to see any gov't funds spent for their support.result-bunch of unwanted and unloved babies to support without any funding.except people like Angelina jolie and yourself.how many have you adopted so far.
jeb stuart

Jesup, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7434
Apr 21, 2013
 
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>It's tough world and hell is hot she better get ready.
you playin' God now,huh.careful there,shorty.
domino

Wedowee, AL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7435
Apr 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>It's tough world and hell is hot she better get ready.
Well there is some things for certain, I totally disagree with you on many points which i am sure you could care less about. We are in total agreement about God, abortions and pride when saying the Pledge of Allegiance.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7436
Apr 21, 2013
 
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>

"No where is there intent that the First Amendment requires that the public arena be "free from religion" - which is the tack so many of the Left try to take."
Now you've changed the argument, in the previous post you made reference to Freedom from Religion, which is not the same as making the public arena be "free from religion". Freedom from Religion is they very point that Jefferson is discussing in the quotes I supplied:
It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are 20 gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
-Thomas Jefferson
Religious institutions that use government power in support of themselves and force their views on persons of other faiths, or of no faith, undermine all our civil rights.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Danbury Baptists
Which is the very condition that exists when schools promote prayer, or when public property is turned over to religious displays during religious holidays. Providing Chaplins in the Military or Congress to meet to the needs of adults is not quite the same thing.
..........
I wasn't changing the argument at all as Jefferson never makes the argument for freedom from religion, his argument is always freedom OF religion, which necessitates that the "freedom FROM religion" that so many try to support with his "separation" quote is faulty at best, a deliberate twisting at worst. Our Founders absolutely saw a place for public worship, while never demanding that all bow in the same form of worship.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7437
Apr 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>So if your body is your own to do what with as you wish; then why are narcotics illegal? I love what the constitution stands for but it is an outdated document.
Why is is outdated? Just what would you replace it with? Just what people would you trust to write a new Constitution? Why would you even think that it is outdated. That is just pure liberal B.S.
I personally think our forefathers thought out the Constitution very well and just because it was done a long time ago doesn't mean that it and its principles are not correct. Man has made many changes to the laws in this country and many of them are not Constitutional. It is always some man that thinks he always knows what is best for us and what we should do. Follow the actual Constitution and all things are answered and answered fairly and with common sense. We don't need judicial activist for judges, we need judges that follow the Constitution. Then we are all protected and given the same equal rights under the law.
dont understand

Hiawassee, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7438
Apr 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
The whole point of the First Amendment was that no one religion would be considered the STATE religion - as the Church of England was the state religion of England and enjoyed privileges above other religions. The letter from Jefferson from which the "wall of separation" quotation is lifted is to a group of Baptist ministers who feared a state religion would be established in the United States. His point was to assure them that people would be free to worship as they please. No where is there intent that the First Amendment requires that the public arena be "free from religion" - which is the tack so many of the Left try to take. In "Notes on the State of Virginia" he asks "Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God?" As president he signed bills appropriating funds for chaplains in the military and in Congress. Freedom OF religion - absolutely. Freedom FROM religion - a complete twisting of intent.
I don't understand your gripe, we have freedom of religion. We have military chaplains paid for by the government. You can pray in school, at work anywhere you want. Your problem is you want it all to be about your God. The First Amendment to the country's Constitution states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." It guarantees the free exercise of religion while also preventing the government from establishing a state religion. The Supreme Court has also interpreted this as preventing the government from having any authority in religion.
Its freedom of religion, any religion not just yours. The religions practiced in the United States include Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. Baha'i Faith, Buddhism, Hinduism, Janism, Sikhism and the no religion beliefs of Agnostics, Atheists and Humanism. They all play by the same rules, can’t do it in government places, we don’t have a one religion government, thanks to the foresight of our forefathers. The founders of this country came to escape religious percussion. They were running from the one church one specific religious concepts of England. The According to a 2002 survey by the Pew forum, nearly 6 in 10 Americans said that religion plays an important role in their lives. It’s not just about the Christian religion, it’s all religions. When you are willing to allow all religious to celebrate their religious holidays and beliefs in public places you might have an argument. It would be a nightmare for employers and schools, but who cares.
In 1963, 90% of Americans claimed to be Christians; 2% professed no religious identity. In 2012, the percentage of Christians was closer to 70%; 13% claim no religious identity. Keep pushing intolerance of others and the numbers will continue to fall.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7439
Apr 21, 2013
 
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>

Religious institutions that use government power in support of themselves and force their views on persons of other faiths, or of no faith, undermine all our civil rights.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Danbury Baptists
And again, this was in regards to the establishment of a state religion as England had with the Church of England.
OMTE

Adel, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7440
Apr 21, 2013
 
Bigdave1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is is outdated? Just what would you replace it with? Just what people would you trust to write a new Constitution? Why would you even think that it is outdated. That is just pure liberal B.S.
I personally think our forefathers thought out the Constitution very well and just because it was done a long time ago doesn't mean that it and its principles are not correct. Man has made many changes to the laws in this country and many of them are not Constitutional. It is always some man that thinks he always knows what is best for us and what we should do. Follow the actual Constitution and all things are answered and answered fairly and with common sense. We don't need judicial activist for judges, we need judges that follow the Constitution. Then we are all protected and given the same equal rights under the law.
I would go into great detail on how I feel about this, but I have to go to work tmrw. GN.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7441
Apr 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
That would be from the 1954 revision of the Pledge of Alligence, just a tad later than the US Constitution which is the founding document of this country.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegi...
The Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1892 by Francis Bellamy (1855–1931), who was a Baptist minister, a Christian socialist,[3] and the cousin of socialist utopian novelist Edward Bellamy (1850–1898).
(American Exceptionalism)
Prior to February 1954, no endeavor to get the Pledge officially amended succeeded. The final successful push came from George MacPherson Docherty. Some American presidents honored Lincoln's birthday by attending services at the church Lincoln attended, New York Avenue Presbyterian Church by sitting in Lincoln's pew on the Sunday nearest February 12. On February 7, 1954, with President Eisenhower sitting in Lincoln's pew, the church's pastor, George MacPherson Docherty, delivered a sermon based on the Gettysburg Address titled "A New Birth of Freedom." He argued that the nation's might lay not in arms but its spirit and higher purpose. He noted that the Pledge's sentiments could be those of any nation, that "there was something missing in the pledge, and that which was missing was the characteristic and definitive factor in the American way of life." He cited Lincoln's words "under God" as defining words that set the United States apart from other nations.
President Eisenhower had been baptized a Presbyterian very recently, just a year before. He responded enthusiastically to Docherty in a conversation following the service. Eisenhower acted on his suggestion the next day and on February 8, 1954, Rep. Charles Oakman (R-Mich.), introduced a bill to that effect. Congress passed the necessary legislation and Eisenhower signed the bill into law on Flag Day, June 14, 1954.[17] Eisenhower stated "From this day forward, the millions of our school children will daily proclaim in every city and town, every village and rural school house, the dedication of our nation and our people to the Almighty.... In this way we are reaffirming the transcendence of religious faith in America's heritage and future; in this way we shall constantly strengthen those spiritual weapons which forever will be our country's most powerful resource, in peace or in war."[18]
The phrase "under God" was incorporated into the Pledge of Allegiance June 14, 1954, by a Joint Resolution of Congress amending §4 of the Flag Code enacted in 1942.
...One objection[22] states that a democratic republic built on freedom of dissent should not require its citizens to pledge allegiance to it, and that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects one's right to refrain from speaking or standing (also a form of speech).[21] Another objection lies in the fact that the people who are most likely to recite the Pledge every day, small children in schools, cannot really give their consent or even completely understand the Pledge they are taking.
SO? Why teach children the ABC's as they might learn to read. Why tell children not to play with fire? Why teach children right from wrong? Perhaps to help them not to become criminals when they get older? To actually fit into a society of free people? What is your point?
Farrell Landon

Washington, DC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7442
Apr 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

Yaaaaawn. You guys must watch the news snd just transcribe here? Bunch of mindless fu***ng sheep.
Oh my

Young Harris, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7443
Apr 22, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
I wasn't changing the argument at all as Jefferson never makes the argument for freedom from religion, his argument is always freedom OF religion, which necessitates that the "freedom FROM religion" that so many try to support with his "separation" quote is faulty at best, a deliberate twisting at worst. Our Founders absolutely saw a place for public worship, while never demanding that all bow in the same form of worship.
Sorry, but you can't separate one from the other, Freedon of Reilgion and Freedom from Religion are two sides of the same coin.

When the Supreme Court stopped the reading of daily devotionals over the PA System in my elementary school it did not prohibit public worship, Christians still had numerous churches to attend, but it did disentangle the state from promoting religion.

Perhaps you could explain how public worship is currently prohibited, because I see many doezens of churches within our small community, I see street corner preachers hawking their wares, I see people praying in public, I see the open display of religion on private property during religious holidays, I see religious opinions expressed in the local paper and on public message boards like this.

It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are 20 gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
-Thomas Jefferson

Religious institutions that use government power in support of themselves and force their views on persons of other faiths, or of no faith, undermine all our civil rights.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Danbury Baptists
Oh my

Young Harris, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7444
Apr 22, 2013
 

Judged:

2

Bigdave1 wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
SO? Why teach children the ABC's as they might learn to read. Why tell children not to play with fire? Why teach children right from wrong? Perhaps to help them not to become criminals when they get older? To actually fit into a society of free people? What is your point?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegi...
The Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1892 by Francis Bellamy (1855–1931), who was a Baptist minister, a Christian socialist, and the cousin of socialist utopian novelist Edward Bellamy (1850–1898).
..........
Well, Bigdave1, knowing that you are a staunch anti-communist I'm surprised that you would champion anything coming from the mind of a socialist, as many on this board have stated liberal, progressive, socialist, communist, it's all the same thing.

Beyond that little inconsistency, I've got to wonder how much educational value the Pledge of Alligence really has when compared to a class in Civics or American History. Course it has great value for those that put stock in the reciting of words, the wearing of lapel badges, and other public displays of patriotism and piety. As has been stated on these very pages, you can't be an American unless you're willing to take the Pledge, and pity all those unsaved souls who came before it's offical acceptance in 1942.
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7445
Apr 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

The Jobless Trap
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: April 21, 2013
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/22/opinion/kru... ;

...The key question is whether workers who have been unemployed for a long time eventually come to be seen as unemployable, tainted goods that nobody will buy. This could happen because their work skills atrophy, but a more likely reason is that potential employers assume that something must be wrong with people who can’t find a job, even if the real reason is simply the terrible economy. And there is, unfortunately, growing evidence that the tainting of the long-term unemployed is happening as we speak.

One piece of evidence comes from the relationship between job openings and unemployment. Normally these two numbers move inversely: the more job openings, the fewer Americans out of work. And this traditional relationship remains true if we look at short-term unemployment. But as William Dickens and Rand Ghayad of Northeastern University recently showed, the relationship has broken down for the long-term unemployed: a rising number of job openings doesn’t seem to do much to reduce their numbers. It’s as if employers don’t even bother looking at anyone who has been out of work for a long time.

To test this hypothesis, Mr. Ghayad then did an experiment, sending out résumés describing the qualifications and employment history of 4,800 fictitious workers. Who got called back? The answer was that workers who reported having been unemployed for six months or more got very few callbacks, even when all their other qualifications were better than those of workers who did attract employer interest.

...And let’s be clear: this is a policy decision. The main reason our economic recovery has been so weak is that, spooked by fear-mongering over debt, we’ve been doing exactly what basic macroeconomics says you shouldn’t do — cutting government spending in the face of a depressed economy.

It’s hard to overstate how self-destructive this policy is. Indeed, the shadow of long-term unemployment means that austerity policies are counterproductive even in purely fiscal terms. Workers, after all, are taxpayers too; if our debt obsession exiles millions of Americans from productive employment, it will cut into future revenues and raise future deficits.

Our exaggerated fear of debt is, in short, creating a slow-motion catastrophe. It’s ruining many lives, and at the same time making us poorer and weaker in every way. And the longer we persist in this folly, the greater the damage will be.
Scott

Jefferson, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7446
Apr 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegi...
The Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1892 by Francis Bellamy (1855–1931), who was a Baptist minister, a Christian socialist, and the cousin of socialist utopian novelist Edward Bellamy (1850–1898).
..........
Well, Bigdave1, knowing that you are a staunch anti-communist I'm surprised that you would champion anything coming from the mind of a socialist, as many on this board have stated liberal, progressive, socialist, communist, it's all the same thing.
Beyond that little inconsistency, I've got to wonder how much educational value the Pledge of Alligence really has when compared to a class in Civics or American History. Course it has great value for those that put stock in the reciting of words, the wearing of lapel badges, and other public displays of patriotism and piety. As has been stated on these very pages, you can't be an American unless you're willing to take the Pledge, and pity all those unsaved souls who came before it's offical acceptance in 1942.
Well, ok then. Let's just get rid of the Pledge. While we are at it, we can get rid of the American flag and the national anthem. We sure don't want to offend anyone. Maybe your "President" could write an Executive Order that would make it unlawful for anyone to show any kind or pride in his or her country.
prefer

Hiawassee, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7447
Apr 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Bigdave1 wrote:
<quoted text>
SO? Why teach children the ABC's as they might learn to read. Why tell children not to play with fire? Why teach children right from wrong? Perhaps to help them not to become criminals when they get older? To actually fit into a society of free people? What is your point?
ABC's so they can function and be productive in today’s society

Playing with fire to protect themselves and others in a caring society.

Right and wrong to protect themselves and others, and keep them out of jail in a civil society.

I think the point is schools should teach children needed skills so they can function in society and form their OWN opinions about such things as saying the Pledge of Allegiance and religious beliefs. A little different than the brain washing used by Hitler, many others in complete control of a people and most religions just to promote their agendas.
Bored

Nashville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7448
Apr 22, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

prefer wrote:
<quoted text>

I think the point is schools should teach children needed skills so they can function in society and form their OWN opinions about such things as saying the Pledge of Allegiance and religious beliefs. A little different than the brain washing used by Hitler, many others in complete control of a people and most religions just to promote their agendas.
The Agenda word is over used.
The only "agenda" most people have is to be able to provide for themselves and their families. All other "agendas" are courtesy of demigods, whether right or left.
Religion is not an "agenda", it is a life of of varying devotions.

Only left wing wackos think religion is an agenda.
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7449
Apr 22, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Bored wrote:
<quoted text>
The Agenda word is over used.
The only "agenda" most people have is to be able to provide for themselves and their families. All other "agendas" are courtesy of demigods, whether right or left.
Religion is not an "agenda", it is a life of of varying devotions.
Only left wing wackos think religion is an agenda.
Want to try again?

Definition of AGENDA
1
: a list or outline of things to be considered or done
2
: an underlying often ideological plan or program

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Commission
The Great Commission of Christianity is the instruction of the resurrected Jesus Christ to his disciples that they spread his teachings to all the nations of the world. It has become a tenet in Christian theology emphasizing ministry, missionary work, evangelism, and baptism.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 6,961 - 6,980 of39,413
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Darien Discussions

Search the Darien Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
cornerstone christian correspondence school dip... (Apr '10) 1 hr lacrassia 94
Part 12 Guy Heinze Jr. (May '10) 5 hr wusatdatrial 1,152
beverly hill billy speed trap court of Darien Ga. (Jun '09) Thu A passerby 132
Peggy Edenfield gets 60 years for Christopher B... (Sep '11) Apr 15 andrea perez 21
GA Who do you support for Governor in Georgia in 2... (Oct '10) Apr 13 youfool 1,983
Illegally Parked ? Apr 3 annon 1
This is what is possible for animals everywhere! Apr 3 bored 2
•••

Flood Warning for McIntosh County was issued at April 18 at 9:49PM EDT

•••
•••
•••
•••

Darien Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Darien People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••