Informed Opinion

Alva, FL

#7345 Apr 20, 2013
get it right wrote:
<quoted text>That is the biggest pile of crap I've heard in a while. Independent my big toe.
Must be you're afraid to admit that you live far out on the left fringe.
Yep, Eisenhower, Goldwater, Nixon, Buckley, Bush the 1st - all those crazy left wingers.

The Right Wingers have gone so Fascist that sometimes they make Osama bin Laden seem like a moderate.

Muslim Taliban or Christian Taliban - the difference is that the Saudi rich own the Muslim Taliban, and the American rich own the Christian Taliban.
OMTE

Moultrie, GA

#7346 Apr 20, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Please think about the silliness of that post.
Paul Ryan - raised on Social Security checks after his father died; attended college collecting Social Security checks and on government loans and grants; went to work for the government; then became a representative continuing on the government payroll. His major private sector employment was being a personal trainer for a few months to bored housewives.
Now Paul is hypocritically telling us all how he's against all that "socialism" like Social Security, Student Loans and grants, and he's an expert on business.
He says that Ayn Rand - another Social Security and Medicare dependent hypocrite - who was an avid Atheist - who wrote a book about economics every responsible economist makes jokes about - is the most important person in his ideological development.
Can anyone take him seriously.
As to making abortion illegal again - that what is called making it a "crime".
Crimes are punished by fines and imprisonment. That's the definition of a crime.
Unless you plan on buying my daughter a new houses if one chooses not to have a baby - when you criminalize abortion - you're gonna have to throw her or the doctor in jail to stop her. That's what happens when you make something illegal - you punish the person who engage in the conduct.
Or maybe, you could just take her into "protective custody" and tie her to a gurney and force her to have a baby. Now that's America - pregnant women imprisoned until they have their babies they don't want to have.
But don't worry - as usual - criminalizing abortion never has and never will effect folks like you and me, I'll just send her on vacation to a pleasant country not run by the Muslim or Christian Taliban and she'll have her abortion in a country not run by religious fanatics.
To believe in God and to not kill babies doesn't make you a religious fanatic. You think it's cool for these girls to have four and five abortions? To suck a baby out and break its neck?
Bored

United States

#7347 Apr 20, 2013
Scott wrote:
I know you have a deep hatred for "Right Wingers" but, how about at least, being intellectually honest for a change.
Ha-Ha
You used the word intellect in association with this poster. Ha-Ha.
A conundrum of word play.
Bored

United States

#7348 Apr 20, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
Parts of Obamacare are a tax, but how is the "individual mandate" a tax?
The way I read it, a mandate is mandatory. The supremes declared it a tax.
OMTE

Moultrie, GA

#7349 Apr 20, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
BRAINLESS TROLL
How rude. One would think you didn't like him.

“Marble Man”

Since: Jul 11

Dallas, GA

#7350 Apr 20, 2013
Bored wrote:
<quoted text>
The way I read it, a mandate is mandatory. The supremes declared it a tax.
It is an interesting point, aren't taxes collected by government?

“Marble Man”

Since: Jul 11

Dallas, GA

#7351 Apr 20, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>

That's because I believe in "limited government", maximum personal freedoms, keeping the government out if my kids' bedrooms, bodies, and insuring as much privacy in our lives as possible.
As long as those personal freedoms, and the consequences of them, aren't paid for from my packets.
Informed Opinion

Alva, FL

#7352 Apr 20, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>To believe in God and to not kill babies doesn't make you a religious fanatic. You think it's cool for these girls to have four and five abortions? To suck a baby out and break its neck?
Things to consider:

Constitution - that pesky irritating document -

No, it's not cool, it's stupid, despicable, disgusting, irresponsible, unreasonable, selfish, and indisciplined.

But the alternative is to create a Fascist state that intrudes into the most private aspects of our family lives.

If the government has the authority to force women to have babies against their will; it surely has the authority to do anything and everything else it decides to do.

Once you strip away the protections of the Constitution to allow the government to intrude into another's life - don't be surprised when you wish those protections still existed when the government agents show up at your door to "correct things".

Logical Analysis :

Also, why does the "right to life" disappear at birth ?

http://www.globalissues.org/print/article/715 :

Some 21,000 children die every day around the world.

That is equivalent to:

1 child dying every 4 seconds
14 children dying every minute
A 2011 Libya conflict-scale death toll every day
A 2010 Haiti earthquake occurring every 10 days
A 2004 Asian Tsunami occurring every 11 days
An Iraq-scale death toll every 19–46 days
Just under 7.6 million children dying every year
Some 92 million children dying between 2000 and 2010.

The killers are poverty, hunger, easily preventable diseases and illnesses, and other related causes.

So......

If we are truly concerned about babies and children - we need to immediately create a 10% surtax - raising all our taxes to pay for additional nutritional assistance, housing and healthcare - to keep these children alive.

Otherwise, it seems pretty silly to demand we shred the Constitution to force children to have babies - because babies have a "right to life" - but once they are born, that "right to life" somehow disappears - because we we won't pay the cost of keeping those children alive.

My Grandfather always said that if you want to know what people truly care about and believe in - watch where they spend their time and their money.

When the people so incensed that my daughter may someday elect to have an abortion,(because unborn children have a "right to life" that overcomes her right to control her life), spend their time and money assuring all children already here have a "right to life" - then we should take the alleged "right to life" seriously.

Till then, a "right to life" that ends upon birth is just a nonsensical sound bite.

Since: Jul 12

Villa Rica, GA

#7353 Apr 20, 2013
question wrote:
<quoted text>
You ever listen to Paul Ryan speak over the last 4 years, seems not. This is the problem, as long as you get guns and abortion control you don't know or care what else the big guns of the Repug party are planning. Never can understand why conservatives have a fit over the government controlling some types of guns and background checks on prospective gun owners but have no problem with government controlling some poor womans body!? Thats a question.
Besides making no sense why would you think I am a Republican? I am a conservative but I am not a republican. Your question to me is just too far out. Best read some, or most of my previous post then you will understand.
OMTE

Moultrie, GA

#7354 Apr 20, 2013
If your slu"ty a$$ daughter willing spreads those legs and creates a life then to preserve her future kills that life. She deserves to burn in hell and if you encourage this behavior your worst than she is. Way to go DAd. I hope you both burn in hell.

Since: Jul 12

Villa Rica, GA

#7355 Apr 20, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Things to consider:
Constitution - that pesky irritating document -
No, it's not cool, it's stupid, despicable, disgusting, irresponsible, unreasonable, selfish, and indisciplined.
But the alternative is to create a Fascist state that intrudes into the most private aspects of our family lives.
If the government has the authority to force women to have babies against their will; it surely has the authority to do anything and everything else it decides to do.
Once you strip away the protections of the Constitution to allow the government to intrude into another's life - don't be surprised when you wish those protections still existed when the government agents show up at your door to "correct things".
Logical Analysis :
Also, why does the "right to life" disappear at birth ?
http://www.globalissues.org/print/article/715 :
Some 21,000 children die every day around the world.
That is equivalent to:
1 child dying every 4 seconds
14 children dying every minute
A 2011 Libya conflict-scale death toll every day
A 2010 Haiti earthquake occurring every 10 days
A 2004 Asian Tsunami occurring every 11 days
An Iraq-scale death toll every 19–46 days
Just under 7.6 million children dying every year
Some 92 million children dying between 2000 and 2010.
The killers are poverty, hunger, easily preventable diseases and illnesses, and other related causes.
So......
If we are truly concerned about babies and children - we need to immediately create a 10% surtax - raising all our taxes to pay for additional nutritional assistance, housing and healthcare - to keep these children alive.
Otherwise, it seems pretty silly to demand we shred the Constitution to force children to have babies - because babies have a "right to life" - but once they are born, that "right to life" somehow disappears - because we we won't pay the cost of keeping those children alive.
My Grandfather always said that if you want to know what people truly care about and believe in - watch where they spend their time and their money.
When the people so incensed that my daughter may someday elect to have an abortion,(because unborn children have a "right to life" that overcomes her right to control her life), spend their time and money assuring all children already here have a "right to life" - then we should take the alleged "right to life" seriously.
Till then, a "right to life" that ends upon birth is just a nonsensical sound bite.
I usually won't reply to a Troll but you are beginning to irritate me with all your garbage.
Why throw abortion in the subject with gun control? That is what you liberals always do and it works. It changes the subject and the stupid republicans always fall for it. I personally think abortion is murder, but I am not God and I will not tell any woman what she has to do with her body anymore than I will listen to a woman tell me what to do with my body. It is a personal thing between a person and their higher power. It is not up to you or me to tell people what they can or can't do with their bodies. I also feel that if a woman wants to sell her body that she has that right as it is her body. She knows the consequences.
No one says a thing about a criminal breaking into a home and murdering a whole family, including their children because the family didn't have a gun or the proper amount of bullets to fight the criminals off. Get the point? If not just give up on yourself.

Since: Jul 12

Villa Rica, GA

#7356 Apr 20, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>Republicans do suck, but you're way out there in left field.
It is beginning to scare me as we are thinking too much alike. Maybe that is a good thing. I think we both have something called common sense, which by the way is not common anymore.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#7357 Apr 20, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no desire to tell a women what she can do with her uterus.
That's because I believe in "limited government", maximum personal freedoms, keeping the government out if my kids' bedrooms, bodies, and insuring as much privacy in our lives as possible.
Hey - that used to make me a great Conservative.
So was that a yes or no?

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#7358 Apr 20, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>To believe in God and to not kill babies doesn't make you a religious fanatic. You think it's cool for these girls to have four and five abortions? To suck a baby out and break its neck?
R u standing when u type?

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#7359 Apr 20, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Things to consider:
Constitution - that pesky irritating document -
No, it's not cool, it's stupid, despicable, disgusting, irresponsible, unreasonable, selfish, and indisciplined.
But the alternative is to create a Fascist state that intrudes into the most private aspects of our family lives.
If the government has the authority to force women to have babies against their will; it surely has the authority to do anything and everything else it decides to do.
Once you strip away the protections of the Constitution to allow the government to intrude into another's life - don't be surprised when you wish those protections still existed when the government agents show up at your door to "correct things".
Logical Analysis :
Also, why does the "right to life" disappear at birth ?
http://www.globalissues.org/print/article/715 :
Some 21,000 children die every day around the world.
That is equivalent to:
1 child dying every 4 seconds
14 children dying every minute
A 2011 Libya conflict-scale death toll every day
A 2010 Haiti earthquake occurring every 10 days
A 2004 Asian Tsunami occurring every 11 days
An Iraq-scale death toll every 19–46 days
Just under 7.6 million children dying every year
Some 92 million children dying between 2000 and 2010.
The killers are poverty, hunger, easily preventable diseases and illnesses, and other related causes.
So......
If we are truly concerned about babies and children - we need to immediately create a 10% surtax - raising all our taxes to pay for additional nutritional assistance, housing and healthcare - to keep these children alive.
Otherwise, it seems pretty silly to demand we shred the Constitution to force children to have babies - because babies have a "right to life" - but once they are born, that "right to life" somehow disappears - because we we won't pay the cost of keeping those children alive.
My Grandfather always said that if you want to know what people truly care about and believe in - watch where they spend their time and their money.
When the people so incensed that my daughter may someday elect to have an abortion,(because unborn children have a "right to life" that overcomes her right to control her life), spend their time and money assuring all children already here have a "right to life" - then we should take the alleged "right to life" seriously.
Till then, a "right to life" that ends upon birth is just a nonsensical sound bite.
ur daughter shouldn't get pregnant if she can't afford to take care of a child, even though it's the liberal way.
OMTE

Moultrie, GA

#7360 Apr 20, 2013
bored monitor wrote:
<quoted text>
R u standing when u type?
Shutup stupid moron. How old are you twelve?
Bored

Nashville, TN

#7361 Apr 20, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
It is an interesting point, aren't taxes collected by government?
Yes they are, I understand the taxes will be deducted from your paycheck, like ss and medicare. Also a tax penalty for not signing up.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Mandatory, taxes with held, penalty, and Obama may be planning on having you shot if you don't pay up.
Why do you think the gubment has ordered billions of rounds of ammo. Those boys don't play, give them guns and ammo and you have another ruby ridge.
Bored

Nashville, TN

#7362 Apr 20, 2013
bored monitor wrote:
<quoted text>
ur daughter shouldn't get pregnant if she can't afford to take care of a child, even though it's the liberal way.
Libtards want to populate the world, only way to get green space.
get it right

Cornelia, GA

#7363 Apr 20, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Things to consider:
Constitution - that pesky irritating document -
No, it's not cool, it's stupid, despicable, disgusting, irresponsible, unreasonable, selfish, and indisciplined.
But the alternative is to create a Fascist state that intrudes into the most private aspects of our family lives.
If the government has the authority to force women to have babies against their will; it surely has the authority to do anything and everything else it decides to do.
Once you strip away the protections of the Constitution to allow the government to intrude into another's life - don't be surprised when you wish those protections still existed when the government agents show up at your door to "correct things".
Logical Analysis :
Also, why does the "right to life" disappear at birth ?
http://www.globalissues.org/print/article/715 :
Some 21,000 children die every day around the world.
That is equivalent to:
1 child dying every 4 seconds
14 children dying every minute
A 2011 Libya conflict-scale death toll every day
A 2010 Haiti earthquake occurring every 10 days
A 2004 Asian Tsunami occurring every 11 days
An Iraq-scale death toll every 19–46 days
Just under 7.6 million children dying every year
Some 92 million children dying between 2000 and 2010.
The killers are poverty, hunger, easily preventable diseases and illnesses, and other related causes.
So......
If we are truly concerned about babies and children - we need to immediately create a 10% surtax - raising all our taxes to pay for additional nutritional assistance, housing and healthcare - to keep these children alive.
Otherwise, it seems pretty silly to demand we shred the Constitution to force children to have babies - because babies have a "right to life" - but once they are born, that "right to life" somehow disappears - because we we won't pay the cost of keeping those children alive.
My Grandfather always said that if you want to know what people truly care about and believe in - watch where they spend their time and their money.
When the people so incensed that my daughter may someday elect to have an abortion,(because unborn children have a "right to life" that overcomes her right to control her life), spend their time and money assuring all children already here have a "right to life" - then we should take the alleged "right to life" seriously.
Till then, a "right to life" that ends upon birth is just a nonsensical sound bite.
That is by far the most convoluted pile of BS you've posted.
What part of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness do you not understand? There are consequences for one's actions. Using abortion as birth control violates the life conceived. Since we are all given these rights by our creator then no mere human can remove these rights.
get it right

Cornelia, GA

#7364 Apr 20, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, Eisenhower, Goldwater, Nixon, Buckley, Bush the 1st - all those crazy left wingers.
The Right Wingers have gone so Fascist that sometimes they make Osama bin Laden seem like a moderate.
Muslim Taliban or Christian Taliban - the difference is that the Saudi rich own the Muslim Taliban, and the American rich own the Christian Taliban.
There is no comparing Christianity with islam, only broad contrasts.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Darien Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
might be moving to Brunswick Sat I used to live there 2
*Missing Person* Amber Whited (Jul '13) Oct 17 your wrong 8
Are you a Southern Democrat? Oct 16 voter 2
The Red Carpet (Jul '13) Oct 15 HGN 3
feds everywhere Oct 15 Political Traveler 2
Infowars.com banned from Facebook Oct 15 Political Traveler 2
Red Carpet Lounge Oct 15 HGN 1
Darien Dating
Find my Match

Darien Jobs

Darien People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Darien News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Darien

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]