Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

crazy wrote:

i cant believe how many posts are on here

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
So the lack of marriage stops love? Are you serious?
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a CROSS CULTURAL constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
ss couples are a direct failure.
There, no religion, no hatred, just the facts confronting your denial and ignorance.
Smile.

pointmaker wrote:

Marriage is part of our culture? Whose? Yours or mine? Marriage didn't put us all on this earth! Sex did. Duh. Biology. And, now we are quite overcrowded with people who love to hate. And the haters here... tell me... with all the divorces happening today between straights... do we really do it better? Marriage is a contract recognized by God (or at least as you people speak of it) but there is freedom of religion here folks... and the way it goes is this... You cannot prevent someone from being united under a gov. contract. We are all equal under the constitution.... Why not under God? We were all made in his image and he taught to love you neighbor and not cast the first stone... but here you all come to defy your lord in defense of a marriage in the eyes of him or her. Judge not, lest you be judged. I could see if hetro peeps were like really really good at marriage and very few failed and good, positive thing always came from it how you guys could say.... NO, NO one else can do it! But, we suck at it... let people in love have their love. Would your God want you to promote or try to destroy honest love? Catholic church is going to come out of the closet about it and you guys are all gonna lose your marbles. Nothing though should be based off exclusiveness and hatred when it comes to religion. Think about it.

bad idea wrote:

<quoted text>
Join the blacks, they blame other people for their dissatisfaction in life as well. "Everyone just wants things to be fair." Well, reality check, life isn't fair. Also, think about it like this. How will civilization continue to exist with there becoming more and more gays? Last time I checked, a dude can't get another dude pregnant. Don't gay people, men in particular, have a drastically increased risk of aids? Yes they do. Isn't that expensive to treat? Yes it is. Don't most people with aids not have health care? Well, yes. Who pays for their treatments then? The taxpayer. Oh, well its seems to me the american taxpayer should be up in arms because in a round about way, this will only cost them more. It's also un-natural for a child to be reared by gay's. That is already putting them behind the 8 ball to start their life. Kids are cruel, so why would you want to subject a kid to anymore cruelty? The list goes on and on as to why this is a bad idea. Just my opinion.

GottaBeKiddingMe wrote:

<quoted text>
How will civilization continue? We already have 200 babys to every 100 deaths in this country. Homosexuals do NOT have an increase risk of AIDS. Do you also believe Marijuana kills brain cells too? Wake up! this isn't the 1950s anymore. Do a little research using google and some common sense. Nothing you said make sense at all.

Next Step wrote:

<quoted text>Can't wait for multi-sex marriages and multi-partner marriages , why stop now ! Let's run society to the point where normal is abnormal . Dear God

bobby wrote:

i think the further these discussions take place, the further nature's laws are implied as irrelevant.
key indication of a loose grip with reality 101.

The Cure 4 Divorce wrote:

<quoted text>
A marriage license should be good for one year; then it expires and must be renewed the same was as you renew a license plate on your car
.
If you fail to renew your marriage license before the yearly deadline; divorce will be automatic

The real fact king wrote:

please they wont be happy until were all QUEER

The real fact king wrote:

<quoted text>really what ever makes you sleep at night but queer is queer

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
An apple tree bearing fruit.
An apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
An walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
An walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!
Still, no logical response...
Smirk.

bobby wrote:

<quoted text>
your lack of grammar assaults all who reads.
i ponder why you chose to use the word an correctly before 'apple tree' but used 'an' before walnut twice .. then 'a' before apple tree the third time.