Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52049 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41596 Aug 7, 2013
Not Yet Equal wrote:
<quoted text>
All individuals have the right to marry under the same restrictions, and restrictions on being currently married, age, informed consent, and incest, have been shown to be legitimate restrictions. Gender is not a legitimate restriction. Your personal "essence" is not the essence of the law. Ability to have sex is not a requirement. That is your personal prejudice.
I made no reference to age. I did specifically note that the number under your dumbing down of marriage is discriminatory.

You also know that the issue of children involved in incest has been removed by the homosexual redefinition of marriage. Moreover, procreation is not a requirement of marriage, right? Or did you want to make an exception for one class of people???

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41597 Aug 7, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet, ironically, you have claimed in your past posts that SS couples will NEVER be next of kin like heterosexual couples.
You flip-flopped, KiMerde, and you hoped nobody would notice.
But we did, Hunty, we did notice your flip-flop.
I made the point that couples get married to HAVE next of kin. I've never heard of someone getting married to be LEGAL next of kin.

I didn't flip-flop, you gay twirled.

Again.
Freedom

Belleville, IL

#41598 Aug 7, 2013
Who cares, it does not effect anyone else. Freedom of choice.
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41599 Aug 7, 2013
AGENDATTACK - The constant pounding the non-agendist takes from the agendabigots.
Anyone differing from their AGENDA OPINION is beaten down. The agendists are a cruel mean spirited group of haters.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#41601 Aug 7, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I made the point that couples get married to HAVE next of kin. I've never heard of someone getting married to be LEGAL next of kin.
I didn't flip-flop, you gay twirled.
Again.
Hunty, you flip-flip more than a beached bluegill.
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41602 Aug 7, 2013
Just another AGENDATTACK HA!!!
Sparkle_is_stripper wrote:
<quoted text>you do realize that no one reads your crap right.... just saying... they just see your login id and move on knowing its gonna be another stupid agenda something
next
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41604 Aug 7, 2013
I love you also Lilly.
Sparkle_is_stripper wrote:
<quoted text>told you all... its like playing a broken record....this looser actually thinks people read her stupid
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41606 Aug 7, 2013
AGENDABREAKER - when an agendist breaks someones heart.
Sparkle_is_stripper wrote:
<quoted text>I don't love you... sorry
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41608 Aug 8, 2013
AGENDAGLITTER - When Sparkle smacks down another Christian.
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41611 Aug 8, 2013
Looks like we are both are in need of attention.
Bring on some more....I'm enjoying it.
Sparkle_is_stripper wrote:
<quoted text>can anyone image living with this repetitive rambling biatch.... wow

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#41614 Aug 8, 2013
Big Bubba wrote:
Three gay men died, and were going to be cremated. Their lovers happened to be at the funeral home at the same time, and were discussing what they planned to do with the ashes.
The first man said, "My Ryan loved to fly, so I'm going up in a plane and scatter his ashes in the sky."
The second man said, "My Ross was a good fisherman, so I'm going to scatter his ashes in our favorite lake."
The third man said, "My Jack was such a good lover, I think I'm going to dump his ashes in a pot of chili, so he can tear my ass up just one more time."
Ain't that the Truth Babe!

1

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41616 Aug 9, 2013
The reunion of a man and woman in marriage reflects the very roots of earliest human existence, genderless life.

Go back in a ss couples' history, and what do you find? Immediately? A mother and father.

While at the same time marriage connects us to the past, birthing future humanity.

A ss couple? No past, and no future. A duplicate gendered half of marriage making the hilarious claim they are the same.
beers

United States

#41618 Aug 9, 2013
mahz wrote:
Keep spreading that hate in the name of Jesus.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/09/25/bru...
Yes, we disagree w/ you so therefore it must be hate. I'm sure you disagreed w/ your parents. Does that mean you hate them? No.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#41619 Aug 9, 2013
SURPRISE!!!! Another copy and paste from KiMerde.
KiMare wrote:
The reunion of a man and woman in marriage reflects the very roots of earliest human existence, genderless life.
Go back in a ss couples' history, and what do you find? Immediately? A mother and father.
While at the same time marriage connects us to the past, birthing future humanity.
A ss couple? No past, and no future. A duplicate gendered half of marriage making the hilarious claim they are the same.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41621 Aug 9, 2013
mahz wrote:
Keep spreading that hate in the name of Jesus.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/09/25/bru...
The article speaks of the powerful, positive effect Christianity has had.

That's spreading hate?

I think your distortion only exposes your hate, ignorance and bigotry.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41622 Aug 9, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
SURPRISE!!!! Another copy and paste from KiMerde.
<quoted text>
Another example of your impotence to mount a stiff rebuttal.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#41624 Aug 9, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Another example of your impotence to mount a stiff rebuttal.
Sweet Pea, I can get stiff and mount it all day long if needed, but you are not worth the effort.

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#41625 Aug 9, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I made no reference to age. I did specifically note that the number under your dumbing down of marriage is discriminatory.
You also know that the issue of children involved in incest has been removed by the homosexual redefinition of marriage. Moreover, procreation is not a requirement of marriage, right? Or did you want to make an exception for one class of people???
The incest prohibition remains in full force and effect. It was never based only on reproduction. Otherwise, one could become surgically sterile and claim the right to marry a child, sibling, or parent. The legally and scientifically well documented problems of abuse in incest, were always and remain one of the primary reasons incest is prohibited.

And again, number is a separate and independent restriction. Changing the number would require a new and different body of law, and impose a different social structure. 2=2. 100 does not equal 2. Polygamy is something very different.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41626 Aug 9, 2013
Not Yet Equal wrote:
<quoted text>
The incest prohibition remains in full force and effect. It was never based only on reproduction. Otherwise, one could become surgically sterile and claim the right to marry a child, sibling, or parent. The legally and scientifically well documented problems of abuse in incest, were always and remain one of the primary reasons incest is prohibited.
And again, number is a separate and independent restriction. Changing the number would require a new and different body of law, and impose a different social structure. 2=2. 100 does not equal 2. Polygamy is something very different.
I'm not talking about incest with a minor.

If there is no prevailing interest (remember under the dumbed down definition children are not considered), restricting the number is discriminatory. The laws already would have to be changed for SS couples to be falsely called married.

Religionthebigli e

“saved From jesus”

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#41627 Aug 9, 2013
Sparkle_is_stripper wrote:
<quoted text>ge sweetheart whats for lunch today?
Well my love its AGENDASANDWICHES.
Nice Husband says
What are we gonna do today CDC says husband?
Well lover we are gonna AGENDAGARDEN... the AGENDAGOSHOPPING
Very cool says husband
A day in the life of CDC and her tourettes
LMAO

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Cutler Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Who do you support for U.S. House in Illinois (... (Oct '10) 16 hr Vote Term Limits 193
Onie Baloney Boland 18 hr Haha 1
You tell me Jun 15 Who knows 3
Pfc Wyatt Ride Proceeds (Jun '14) Jun 15 Rebecca 37
Cowardless pheen jaime! Jun 14 Joke 2
Meth heads (Nov '17) Jun 14 Eeeewwwww 14
Homicide of Patricia Ann Davis (Nov '11) Jun 13 Marilyn S Martin 34

Cutler Jobs

Personal Finance

Cutler Mortgages