Who do you support for Governor in Oh...
tommy

Ostrander, OH

#5782 Jun 28, 2012
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry. I was under the impression that you were insane. Thanks for clearing that up.
Norman thanks for the bj today. Remember the garage not the front door norman
Afternoon delight again tomorrow Reagan norm Deplume
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#5783 Jun 28, 2012
Kramers Attorney wrote:
<quoted text>As I said, wait until WE force you to buy something you don't want and/or can't afford.
I'm not too worried about it.
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#5784 Jun 28, 2012
free wrote:
Why would you make a dumb mass questioned statement like that, other than the fact that you can ? Do you think Black minorities lean "American White" ? Latino ? Asian ? European Caucasion ?
Do you think the Muslim Brotherhood will recruit "American Whites" ? Latinos ? Asians ? European Caucasions ? Or Black Americans ?........Don't look now Che, Middle East Muslims are breeding & increasing in numbers in the United States. How long do you think it will take befoire they take a shot at us ? Twin Towers I ? Or Twin Towers September 11 part II ?
In the meantime, Muslim Terrorists continuously cause chaos to draw militaries into battles & wars that deplete their resources and troops. Do you think the Crusades were fought on European soil, at the out set ? How long did it take for the Muslims to invade Europe ?
It's hilarious to see Middle East transplants in England speak with British accents...
<quoted text>
And the teabagger paranoia begins.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#5785 Jun 28, 2012
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't? Why don't you explain it to me then?
You didn't guess whose quote that was about the individual mandate.
Then I guess you were not reading between the lines. I'm assuming that it was Romney's quote which is why I made the statement about constitutions.

The US Constitution has a list of wonderful things our federal government is to provide for us. You know, things like roads, postal service and military protection. Anything outside of that is a guess. Some on your side have stated that if our spending today is not listed in the Constitution, it certainly doesn't say Congress can't spend on these things. On the other hand, if our founders wanted Congress to have unlimited spending, then why did they list their responsibilities in the first place? If our founders wanted Congress to have unlimited spending, then I'm sure it would have been written that way.

States on the other hand (back in the day) were designed to operate like individual countries, and only unite on federal issues such as protection, roads and so forth. Therefore, all states had their own Constitution, and states can do as they please be it starting a public retirement plan, healthcare plan, welfare, and so on. But that is not the responsibility of your federal government.

Why was our system of government designed this way? So that we wouldn't have what we have today, and that is a massive entitlement machine that is virtually unstoppable. Our federal government is a powerhouse that millions depend upon. That dependency empowers politicians, and this is something our founders never wanted. The larger the government, the smaller the citizen.
Reality Bites

AOL

#5786 Jun 28, 2012
What an exciting day for the least among us. Comrade Pelosi multi trillion dollar law will transform the Best Health Care system in the World to Govt Cheese Style Health Care.

Tax and Spend and Borrow.
Tax and Spend and Borrow.

Our pitiful American children and grand children won't stand a change.

Obama truly is the Less for More President. Way Way Way MORE for Way Way Way Less...

All Hail Obama......Pay Up Suckers.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#5787 Jun 28, 2012
Female wrote:
WHOOO!!! HOOO!!!! We have a wonderful President. He made History today...
He made history several times during his term. First President to ever devalue the country from a three star credit rating to a two star. He made records in the amount of debt in the shortest period of time. He has record number of food stamp recipients in our history. The first President to do absolutely nothing, and receive a Nobel Peace Prize before he even warmed up his seat in the oval office. Not sure, but I believe he also has the most rounds of golf as well.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#5788 Jun 28, 2012
Kennesaw71 wrote:
Since this is now a taxation issue now, do you all realize it won't take 60% to repeal it now?
.
Also, as a taxation issue, there are no filibusters allowed either.
.
What Roberts did was set this up so it's as easy as possible to repeal it now. It's up to the voters in November now.
Just think 401k is a tax issue.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#5789 Jun 28, 2012
Kennesaw71 wrote:
Since this is now a taxation issue now, do you all realize it won't take 60% to repeal it now?
.
Also, as a taxation issue, there are no filibusters allowed either.
.
What Roberts did was set this up so it's as easy as possible to repeal it now. It's up to the voters in November now.
Even if and when DumBama gets kicked out of office, it does not change the ruling that is a new precedent in this country. If I understand this correctly, what the SC said is that the federal government has the right to tax people into submission for whatever project or law they decided to create. In my opinion, this decision doubled the federal government power over citizenry in this country, and reduced our liberty by half.
rider

Ishpeming, MI

#5791 Jun 28, 2012
COINTELPRO - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of
covert, and often illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau
of ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO - 185k -
Operation Mockingbird - Spartacus Educational
One of the most important journalists under the control of Operation Mockingbird
was Joseph Alsop, whose articles appeared in over 300 different newspapers.

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKmocki ...- 212k -

Since: Mar 11

United States

#5793 Jun 28, 2012
The Democrats are going to have a hard time running into November claiming the American people need to vote for them to preserve Obamacare. It remains deeply unpopular with the American people. If they want to make a vote for them a vote for keeping a massive tax increase, let them have at it.

This decision totally removes a growing left-wing talking point that suddenly they must vote for Obama because of judges. The Supreme Court as a November issue for the left is gone. For the right? That sound you hear is the marching of libertarians into Camp Romney, with noses held, knowing that the libertarian and conservative coalitions must unite to defeat Obama and Obamacare.

Congressional Republicans need to shut down the individual mandate. Force the Democrats on the record about the mandate. Defund Obamacare. This now, by necessity, is a political fight and the GOP sure as hell should fight.

60% of Americans agree with them on the issue. And guess what? The Democrats have been saying for a while that individual pieces of Obamacare are quite popular. With John Roberts’ opinion, the repeal fight takes place on GOP turf, not Democrat turf. The all or nothing repeal has always been better ground for the GOP and now John Roberts has forced everyone onto that ground.

It seems very, very clear to me in reviewing John Roberts’ decision that he is playing a much longer game than us and can afford to with life tenure. He probably just handed Mitt Romney the White House.

Furthermore, go back to 2009. Olympia Snowe was the deciding vote to get Obamacare out of the Senate Committee. Had she voted no, we’d not be here now.
Seth Adams

AOL

#5794 Jun 28, 2012
Very smart move by Roberts. By deeming it a TAX all that we have to do is give Romney the majority of both Houses of Congress and the TAX can be legally Repealed. We don't have to had our health care choices over to some Orwellian Committee of All Powerful Elites after all.

We must get out the Vote to reverse this travesty.
Duke for Mayor

United States

#5796 Jun 28, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly what I said. Of course, I used a little brevity, but it still means the same thing. In other words, if Republicans gain leadership of all branches of government, and then decide to make gun ownership a law for all non-convicted adult felons in this country, or pay a gun tax, it's constitutional by this ruling. The same thing goes for installing solar panels, windmills, or perhaps a hybrid vehicle. Where does it stop? The federal government now has the authority to tax you into submission against your will on agendas promoted by the party at large.
Roberts addresses that specific issue on pages 39-44 of the opinion (not the page numbers on the viewer), using energy efficient windows as an example), and describing the limitations on the Government's taxing powers.

woof

Since: Mar 11

United States

#5797 Jun 28, 2012
Seth Adams wrote:
Very smart move by Roberts. By deeming it a TAX all that we have to do is give Romney the majority of both Houses of Congress and the TAX can be legally Repealed. We don't have to had our health care choices over to some Orwellian Committee of All Powerful Elites after all.
We must get out the Vote to reverse this travesty.
.
Also, as a tax issue, I understand filibusters are not allowed either. Roberts has left it up to the people. I think he probably played it smarter than anyone ever would've thought.
Female

Chillicothe, OH

#5798 Jun 28, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
He made history several times during his term. First President to ever devalue the country from a three star credit rating to a two star. He made records in the amount of debt in the shortest period of time. He has record number of food stamp recipients in our history. The first President to do absolutely nothing, and receive a Nobel Peace Prize before he even warmed up his seat in the oval office. Not sure, but I believe he also has the most rounds of golf as well.
.......... You forgot to thank Bush he paved the way and helped the most.
Seth Adams

AOL

#5799 Jun 28, 2012
Kennesaw71 wrote:
<quoted text>
.
Also, as a tax issue, I understand filibusters are not allowed either. Roberts has left it up to the people. I think he probably played it smarter than anyone ever would've thought.
Thanks.....agreed.
rider

Ishpeming, MI

#5802 Jun 29, 2012
The US department of Defense's original plans to research the Mind control phenomena was to determine psychological and chemical formulas providing the US with the "perfect" espionage agent. This quickly evolved into planning the "production" of the perfect soldier... government worker...slave.

However, German SS officer/occultist Himmler's research development scientists sent this search "for the "Manchurian Candidate" off in another direction ... PSYCHOLOGICAL GENETIC ENGINEERING.

It was determined that "absolute" mind control could be realized through specific tortures of the intended transgenerational Victim ...from the moment of birth!

Armed with this deadly research, a collection of "dedicated psychiatrists" from Germany, Italy, and the US, a new but ancient form of mind-control was reborn through Project Monarch.

Modern science had simply unraveled the occult cryptic so called "magikal" secrets of mind control...to spawn a new generation of "superior beings"...who could NEVER ASK WHAT THEIR COUNTRY COULD DO FOR THEM...BUT ONLY WHAT THEY COULD DO FOR THEIR COUNTRY.

precursor of the MKUltra program began in 1945 when the Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency was established and given direct responsibility for Operation Paperclip. Operation Paperclip was a program to recruit former Nazi scientists. Some of these scientists studied torture and brainwashing, and several had just been identified and prosecuted as war criminals during the Nuremberg Trials.[13][14]

Several secret U.S. government projects grew out of Operation Paperclip. These projects included Project CHATTER (established 1947), and Project BLUEBIRD (established 1950), which was renamed Project ARTICHOKE in 1951. Their purpose was to study mind control, interrogation, behavior modification and related topics.

[edit] MKUltraThe project's intentionally oblique CIA cryptonym is made up of the digraph MK, meaning that the project was sponsored by the agency's Technical Services Staff, followed by the word Ultra (which had previously been used to designate the most secret classification of World War II intelligence). Other related cryptonyms include Project MKNAOMI and Project MKDELTA.

Several known deaths have been associated with Project MKUltra, most notably that of Frank Olson. Olson, a United States Army biochemist and biological weapons researcher, was given LSD without his knowledge or consent in November, 1953, as part of a CIA experiment and died under suspicious circumstances a week later. International
Human experimentation in North Korea
Unethical human experimentation in the United States
Nazi human experimentation
Poison laboratory of the Soviet secret services
Unit 731
Operations
Category:Central Intelligence Agency operations
COINTELPRO
Operation Dormouse
Project MKCHICKWIT
Project MKOFTEN
Other topics
Kurt Blome
Sidney Gottlieb
Project MKUltra - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Project MKUltra, or MK-Ultra, was a covert human research program into
behavioural modification run by the CIA's Office of Scientific Intelligence. The
program ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKULTRA - 221k -
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#5803 Jun 29, 2012
remember the words of the chief justice, after the delivery of verdict on healthcare mandate.........

it is not the courts job to fight the citizens political battles.

do you hear what he is saying?

vote is how you fight.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#5805 Jun 29, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly what I said. Of course, I used a little brevity, but it still means the same thing. In other words, if Republicans gain leadership of all branches of government, and then decide to make gun ownership a law for all non-convicted adult felons in this country, or pay a gun tax, it's constitutional by this ruling. The same thing goes for installing solar panels, windmills, or perhaps a hybrid vehicle. Where does it stop? The federal government now has the authority to tax you into submission against your will on agendas promoted by the party at large.
You don't understand the difference between bad policy versus constitutionality. There are many things that might be realllllly bad policy but be perfectly constitutional. Why does the GOP always want the Supreme Court to "fix" the GOPs policy defeats?
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#5806 Jun 29, 2012
Kennesaw71 wrote:
The Democrats are going to have a hard time running into November claiming the American people need to vote for them to preserve Obamacare. It remains deeply unpopular with the American people. If they want to make a vote for them a vote for keeping a massive tax increase, let them have at it.
This decision totally removes a growing left-wing talking point that suddenly they must vote for Obama because of judges. The Supreme Court as a November issue for the left is gone. For the right? That sound you hear is the marching of libertarians into Camp Romney, with noses held, knowing that the libertarian and conservative coalitions must unite to defeat Obama and Obamacare.
Congressional Republicans need to shut down the individual mandate. Force the Democrats on the record about the mandate. Defund Obamacare. This now, by necessity, is a political fight and the GOP sure as hell should fight.
60% of Americans agree with them on the issue. And guess what? The Democrats have been saying for a while that individual pieces of Obamacare are quite popular. With John Roberts’ opinion, the repeal fight takes place on GOP turf, not Democrat turf. The all or nothing repeal has always been better ground for the GOP and now John Roberts has forced everyone onto that ground.
It seems very, very clear to me in reviewing John Roberts’ decision that he is playing a much longer game than us and can afford to with life tenure. He probably just handed Mitt Romney the White House.
Furthermore, go back to 2009. Olympia Snowe was the deciding vote to get Obamacare out of the Senate Committee. Had she voted no, we’d not be here now.
How do you explain that when you call it "Obamacare" people say they are against it, but when you ask the same people about the individual parts of the law, those same people say they support it?

You really should stop complaining about the individual mandate. That is a GOP baby designed to provide corporate welfare for insurance companies.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#5809 Jun 29, 2012
free wrote:
in a 2009 address to Congress, Oblame-a said if you make less than $250k your taxes will not go up one dime.......... No, your taxes will go up more than a QUARTER and up. Change you can believe in ! Or what ever change you hope is left in your pocket that you can believe in .
Stop making things up. That is a lie.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Cuba Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Katie bennington 22 hr Luvvv 1
Kelly Reynolds Aug 24 Andrew 5
Kyle Greene Aug 23 B**tch Please... 2
Just moved here, any suggestions on where to go... Aug 23 Brittany 2
Class of 99 girls Aug 22 Owen Brigsby 6
Who is James Kirk?? (Aug '12) Aug 22 KTandHmom 32
Jason Conner??? (May '12) Aug 22 Wilmingtonisajoke 8
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Cuba Mortgages